'Piya' drink is safe, contains no illegal substances - Ehati founders respond to viral claims
15 Jul 2025 12:34pm
Diana Tahir and Rahim Shukor said that the drink is merely a blend of pure cocoa, honey and natural spices specially formulated to help calm the mind. Photo: Facebook/Diana Tahir
PUTRAJAYA – Home motivation company Ehati International Sdn Bhd (eHati) has denied that the drink 'Piya' given to programme participants contains any illegal substances.
In a statement on Tuesday, eHati co-founders Diana Tahir and Rahim Shukor clarified that the drink is simply a blend of pure cocoa, honey and natural spices specially formulated to help calm the mind.
"This drink does not contain any illegal substances or psychedelic mushrooms as alleged," they said.
It was reported that claims had gone viral on social media stating that participants were given an unknown drink that allegedly caused noticeable mood changes in a short period.
The allegations triggered a wave of responses, including speculation that the drink might contain illegal substances such as so-called magic mushrooms.
More Like This
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Zuckerberg squaring off against Meta investors
MARK Zuckerberg is expected to appear as a star witness in an unusual US$8 billion trial that kicks off this week at which the Meta chief executive officer is accused of operating Facebook as an illegal enterprise that allowed users' data to be harvested without their consent. > Shareholders of Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, sued Zuckerberg and other current and former company leaders, saying they continually violated a 2012 agreement between Facebook and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to protect users' data. The case dates back to 2018, after it emerged that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump's successful campaign for United States president in 2016. Shareholders want Zuckerberg and the other defendants to reimburse the company for more than US$8 billion in fines and other costs paid by Meta after the Cambridge Analytica scandal came to light, including a record US$5 billion fine imposed on Facebook by the FTC in 2019 for violating the 2012 agreement. Defendants in the case include former chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, as well as former board members Peter Thiel, the Palantir Technologies co-founder, and Reed Hastings, the co-founder of Netflix. Zuckerberg and the other defendants, who declined to comment, have dismissed the allegations in court filings as "extreme claims". Meta, which is not a defendant, also declined to comment. The non-jury trial in Wilmington, Delaware, is scheduled to last eight days. It will mostly focus on decade-old events and board meetings to determine how Facebook leaders implemented the 2012 agreement. While the trial will cover long-ago policies, it comes as privacy concerns continue to dog Meta, which is under scrutiny for its training of artificial intelligence (AI) models. The company says it has invested billions of dollars since 2019 in its programme to safeguard users' privacy. Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers, said the case would fill in details about what the board knew — and when — regarding the data of users, who now total more than three billion daily across Meta's platforms. "There's an argument we can't avoid Facebook and Instagram in our lives," he said. "Can we trust Mark Zuckerberg?" Two years ago, the defendants sought to dismiss the case before trial, which the judge declined. "This is a case involving alleged wrongdoing on a truly colossal scale," said Travis Laster, the judge handling the case at the time. The trial in the Court of Chancery will be overseen by Kathaleen McCormick. Now the plaintiffs, individual investors and union pension funds, including California's State Teachers' Retirement System, must prove what is often described as the most difficult claim in corporate law — showing that directors utterly failed in their duty of oversight. Legal experts said it appeared to be the first trial on such a claim. Zuckerberg and Sandberg are alleged to have knowingly caused the company to violate the law. While Delaware law protects directors and officers for bad business decisions, it does not protect them from illegal ones, even if they are profitable. Defendants said in court filings that plaintiffs could not deliver the evidence. The shareholders in pre-trial court papers said they could prove that after the 2012 agreement, Facebook continued deceptive privacy practices, at the direction of Zuckerberg. The defendants said the evidence would show that the company built a team to oversee privacy and hired an outside compliance firm and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica's "studied deceit". In addition to the central privacy claims, plaintiffs also allege that when Zuckerberg could see that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was about to break and send company stock lower, he was motivated to offload his stock and reaped at least US$1 billion in profit. Defendants said evidence would show he used a stock-trading plan that could protect against insider-trading allegations. They also said the motivation was to benefit his charitable pursuits.
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Two university students killed in crash with private ambulance at traffic light
KUANTAN: Two Universiti Islam Pahang Sultan Ahmad Shah (Unipsas) undergraduates were killed after the motorcycle they were riding collided with a private ambulance at the Jalan Gambang traffic light near a secondary school here today. Muhammad Zuhair Rifqi Abdul Jalil, 22, who was riding the motorcycle, died on the spot in the 11am accident. His 21-year-old pillion rider, Muhammad Firdaus Mohammad Zamri, died while receiving treatment at Tengku Ampuan Afzan Hospital's (HTAA) red zone. Acting Kuantan police chief Superintendent Mohd Adli Mat Daud said preliminary investigations showed the collision involved a motorcycle and an ambulance transporting a patient from HTAA. "The ambulance, with its siren activated, was attempting to turn right at the traffic light junction when the motorcycle crashed into it. "The rider died at the scene, while the pillion passenger was rushed to HTAA, where he later succumbed to his injuries in the hospital's red zone. "The 49-year-old ambulance driver and his 43-year-old assistant sustained injuries and are currently receiving treatment at HTAA," he said in a statement today. Adli said the case is being investigated for causing death by reckless or dangerous driving, and urged any witnesses to come forward to assist in the investigation. Meanwhile, Unipsas, in a Facebook post, expressed sadness over the deaths of its two students in the tragic accident. "Zuhair Rifqi was a Quran and Sunnah studies diploma student while Firdaus was pursuing his degree in Syariah with Judicial Administration."
Borneo Post
8 hours ago
- Borneo Post
Scratch and lose: Mukah man poorer by over RM20,000 in bid to claim ‘prize' worth nearly RM1 mln
Muhamad Rizal says the victim had initially purchased two 'scratch and win' cards from a website promoted during the livestream. – AI photo MUKAH (July 15): A 43-year-old man here lost RM22,856 after falling victim to a 'scratch and win' scam conducted during a Facebook livestream believed to have been conducted from abroad. Mukah police chief DSP Muhamad Rizal Alias said the victim had initially purchased two 'scratch and win' cards from a website promoted during the livestream. 'After scratching the cards, the man was told he had won a prize worth RM956,520. However, he was instructed to pay a 20 per cent tax in order to claim the prize,' he said in a statement today. The victim went on to make four transfers totalling RM22,856 to three different bank accounts, purportedly for the tax and further card purchases. However, he became suspicious when more questionable payment requests were made, and eventually realised he had been scammed after he was no longer able to access the Facebook page. Muhammad Rizal said the case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating, and urged the public to remain vigilant when engaging in financial transactions online, especially with unfamiliar parties. 'We advise the public not to be easily swayed by lucrative offers, particularly those that require upfront payments to claim rewards. If in doubt, seek advice or lodge a report immediately,' he added. Mukah scam scratch and win
