logo
We live in time: Daylight Savings and the 'Time Lords' of Congress

We live in time: Daylight Savings and the 'Time Lords' of Congress

Yahoo08-03-2025
We live in time.
We can both make time. Even double time. And we can also lose time.
But it's Congress and Presidents who control time.
Politicians have the power to dictate time. Down to the hour and the minute of what time it is. That's why we spring forward this weekend. And when you lose your hour of sleep, you know who to blame.
No. Not DOGE.
But Congress, of course.
Read On The Fox News App
This dates back more than two centuries.
Trump Calls To 'Eliminate' Daylight Saving Time: 'Very Costly To Our Nation'
Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to "fix the Standard of Weights and Measures."
That's listed right next to Congressional authority over bankruptcies and punishment for counterfeiters.
After all, we lose an hour this weekend like a thief in the night.
Congress formally established Daylight Saving Time with the Uniform Time Act of 1966. It also established time zones in the 1880s to help the railroads coordinate. Before that, time hinged on whatever locals said it was. That led to 144 distinct local times in the U.S. The Twin Cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul even went by different clocks, despite only being separated by the Mississippi River.
So, lawmakers are kind of like "Time Lords" from Doctor Who. But while they have not waged the Last Great Time War, for some lawmakers, time has expired for the biannual time change.
"I haven't had anybody come to me and say, 'This is something that benefits our society.' Why do we have it around anymore? Let's get rid of the antiquated stuff that hold us back from advancement," said Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga.
Censure Resolutions: When To Double Down, And When To Turn The Page
Florida lawmakers push especially hard to codify the time change in law. After all, Florida is the Sunshine State. Much of the state's economy is based on what you can do outdoors. Sunbathe. Golf. Walk on the beach. Go to amusement parks.
"In tourism, it's huge," said Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla. "Instead of getting dark at 5:39, it gets dark at 6:30. It makes a big difference. A lot of times the weather's nice (people) like to be outside eating."
Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., pushed time change legislation when he served as governor of the Sunshine State. He's authored a bill which he believes will give all states more sunshine – by effectively freezing time.
"It will lock the clock. So stop going back and forth between Daylight Savings Time and Standard Time," said Scott.
Former Sen. and now Secretary of State Marco Rubio, R-Fla., authored a bill to mandate Daylight Saving Time year-round several years ago. To everyone's surprise, the Senate approved the bill by unanimous consent in 2022. But the bill then died in the House.
Congress approved the Standard Time Act to create the first version of Daylight Saving time in 1918 during World War I. Proponents of the legislation argued that there was "wasted light" at the beginning of the day. Shifting the clocks would reward Americans with "extra" hours of daylight in the evening.
Reporter's Noteboook: Sorting It Out
"I used to think my state legislature had the foolishiest ideas in the world," said Rep. Robert Thomas, D-Ky., of the measure at the time. "But it never tried to change the sun in its orbit."
Farmers and residents of the west opposed the plan.
President Woodrow Wilson wanted to keep the time change. But Congress voted to repeal it. Wilson then vetoed the bill.
What comes next is one of the most fascinating aspects of time legislation, Congress and the presidency. There have only been 112 successful overrides of a presidential veto in American history. One of them is on a piece of time legislation. Congress overrode Wilson's veto and gave back the hour it picked up during World War I.
Presidents have tinkered with changing the time via executive order to maximize daylight during times of crisis.
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt shifted the clocks during World War II. President Richard Nixon did the same during the OPEC oil shocks of the 1970s.
The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Senate Trying To Advance Trump's Agenda
It was thought that President Trump may wade into the time waters. He's berated the seasonal time changes for years now, dating back to his first term in office. Mr. Trump posted about the time switch on Truth Social as recently as mid-December.
"The Republican Party will use its best efforts to eliminate Daylight Saving Time, which has a small but strong constituency, but shouldn't! Daylight Saving Time is inconvenient, and very costly to our Nation," wrote the president.
But President Trump wasn't inclined to turn back time when pressed about it by colleague Peter Doocy on Thursday.
"It's a 50/50 issue. And if something is a 50/50 issue, it's hard to get excited about it. I assume people would like to have more light later. But some people want to have more light earlier because they don't want to take their kids to school in the dark," said Mr. Trump.
The problem is that most people abhor changing the clocks. But they worry about it getting dark way too early in the winter. Or the sun "rising" at absurd times in the summer.
It depends on where you live.
House Minority Leader Jeffries Describes Trump's Address To Congress As 'Most Divisive' In American History
The country may harbor deep political divisions. But at least one lawmaker believes it's time Americans rally around something.
"I'd love for us to not have to switch our clocks if that's something that actually probably can unite Americans right now," said Sen. Andy Kim, D-N.J.
But at least once senior lawmaker hasn't given the time of day to clock shifting efforts.
"You have thoughts on daylight savings?" asked colleague Ryan Schmelz of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.
Jeffries chuckled.
"There's a lot going on in the United States of America. I haven't been able to give a thought to daylight savings," replied Jeffries.
Shakespeare wrote that "let every man be master of his time." But that's hard to do when Congress decides the time. Of course, the Bard also declared that "what is past is prologue."
And that means that despite the legislative efforts, everyone will probably have to change the clocks again in October when we fall back.Original article source: We live in time: Daylight Savings and the 'Time Lords' of Congress
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in US sodas, Trump says
Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in US sodas, Trump says

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Coca-Cola agrees to use cane sugar in US sodas, Trump says

Coca-Cola has agreed to use real cane sugar for its soda beverages sold in the U.S., President Donald Trump announced Wednesday afternoon, July 16. "I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "I'd like to thank all of those in authority at Coca-Cola. This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!" Coca-Cola uses high fructose corn syrup to sweeten its U.S. products while cane sugar is used in other countries, Reuters reported. The switch comes as the president continues to support Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s efforts to move away from certain food ingredients, like artificial dyes. Through the Make America Healthy Again initiative, the Trump Administration aims to stop food industry from contributing to chronic health problems that Americans face from obesity to heart disease. In-N-Out: No, the chain didn't switch to '100% beef tallow,' contrary to White House claim USA TODAY has reached out to Coca-Cola for confirmation on the president's announcement. Contributing: Reuters This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Coca-Cola to use cane sugar for sodas in the US, Trump says

People Genuinely Cannot Believe The Trump Administration Ordered The Burning Of Enough Food To Feed 1.5 Million Kids For A Week
People Genuinely Cannot Believe The Trump Administration Ordered The Burning Of Enough Food To Feed 1.5 Million Kids For A Week

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

People Genuinely Cannot Believe The Trump Administration Ordered The Burning Of Enough Food To Feed 1.5 Million Kids For A Week

Remember when billionaire Elon Musk boasted about DOGE's cuts to the federal government in what he said was an attempt to rid the government of wasteful spending? Related: Well, one of those cuts dismantled foreign-aid programs, the Atlantic reports, and now, the Trump administration has ordered the burning of about 500 metric tons of soon-to-expire food meant to feed families and children in Afghanistan and Pakistan. To scale, that is enough food to feed about 1.5 million children for an entire week. However, instead of being distributed in the US or abroad, it's set to be burned. (And guess who's footing the bill?) This level of waste drew major backlash from US citizens. One person reacted, "Raise your hand if you're an American and would prefer this food be sent to the children currently being starved in Palestine." Related: Many couldn't fathom the idea of burning food when there are children who need it. "They're so 'pro life' until it comes to taking care of actual living breathing children," someone wrote. "Kids are starving & dying in Gaza & he's incinerating food," another agreed. This was a common response throughout the internet: Related: "Maga and trump are evil," people said. "The cruelty of this administration is unbelieveable," said another. Taxpayers also expressed displeasure with their money being symbolically burned with the food. "He's incinerating food that's already been paid for with our $$." Related: "so our tax dollars..... he's just lighting on fire? I HATE IT HERE." Netizens could not seem to find justification. "it's already been purchased," someone said. "he's not just burning food, he's burning money and staving people." And finally, alarms were raised about homelessness in the US as well. "If our taxes paid for it.... Why not give it to our homeless? What the hell?!?!? Such a waste!!!" What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Gaetz responds to McCarthy's quip at Hill Nation Summit: ‘Get help'
Gaetz responds to McCarthy's quip at Hill Nation Summit: ‘Get help'

The Hill

time16 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Gaetz responds to McCarthy's quip at Hill Nation Summit: ‘Get help'

Former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) told Kevin McCarthy to 'get help' Wednesday after the former House Speaker from California said that his life is better after leaving Congress because Gaetz isn't in it. 'This is so sad, Kevin,' Gaetz wrote on the social platform X along with a video of McCarthy's remarks at the Hill Nation Summit. 'Get help. Move on.' 'You don't have to always be thinking about me,' he added. McCarthy, who has been in a prolonged feud with Gaetz, said at the summit that his postcongressional life was 'fabulous.' 'We don't have Matt Gaetz anymore,' he said, drawing laughs from the crowd. Gaetz retired from Congress after President Trump nominated him last fall to become the nation's Attorney General, but Gaetz's nomination was pulled after failing to gain traction for confirmation in the Senate. McCarthy, meanwhile, retired from the House after he was ousted from his leadership post in 2023. Gaetz was a vocal proponent of the removal effort.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store