logo
UN envoy warns of worsening Red Sea tension after Houthi attacks off Yemen's coast

UN envoy warns of worsening Red Sea tension after Houthi attacks off Yemen's coast

The National2 days ago
The UN's Yemen envoy has expressed serious concern over the situation in the Red Sea, and warned of potential environmental damage after two Houthi attacks on commercial vessels.
The incidents mark the first such attacks since Washington announced a truce with the Iran-backed rebel group in May. The Houthis, who control much of northern Yemen, have previously attacked shipping lanes, but the latest strikes raise fears of renewed instability in the strategic waterway.
Hans Grundberg, the special envoy for Yemen, told the Security Council on Wednesday that freedom of navigation in the Red Sea must be protected, and civilian infrastructure must never become a target in conflict.
This week's attacks on shipping, both of which were claimed by the Houthis, were the first for seven months, Mr Grundberg said.
'Above all, Yemen must not be drawn deeper into regional crises that threaten to unravel the already extremely fragile situation in the country. The stakes for Yemen are simply too high,' he added.
The first attack sank the Magic Seas cargo ship, although its crew was rescued by a UAE team.
The second attack began on Monday against the MV Eternity C, a Liberian-flagged bulk carrier, and left at least three crew members dead. The Houthis claimed responsibility for it on Wednesday.
The EU naval mission in the Red Sea said the attacked ship's crew consisted of 22 sailors – 21 Filipinos and one Russian – along with a three-member security team. Five Filipinos and one Indian were rescued, the mission stated.
The nationalities of the three people killed during the hours-long assault remain unknown.
From November 2023 through December 2024, the Houthis launched missile and drone attacks on more than 100 commercial vessels in the Red Sea. The Iran-backed group claimed the strikes were in solidarity with Palestinians during the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.
The Iran-backed rebels halted their attacks during a temporary ceasefire but later faced an intense US-led air strike campaign under President Donald Trump.
US acting ambassador to the UN, Dorothy Shea, accused Iran of enabling the Houthis to 'attack Israel, threaten and blackmail our partners in the Gulf, and to play a role in Iran's terror networks across the wider Middle East region'.
Ms Shea called on the 15-member Security Council to not tolerate Iran's violations.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lebanon faces existential threat unless it addresses Hezbollah weapons, US envoy says
Lebanon faces existential threat unless it addresses Hezbollah weapons, US envoy says

The National

time6 hours ago

  • The National

Lebanon faces existential threat unless it addresses Hezbollah weapons, US envoy says

Lebanon risks being taken over by regional powers unless Beirut acts to address Hezbollah's weapons stockpiles, the US ambassador to Turkey warned on Friday. Tom Barrack, who also serves as the US envoy to Syria, told The National that Lebanon needs to resolve the issue or else it could face an existential threat. 'You have Israel on one side, you have Iran on the other, and now you have Syria manifesting itself so quickly that if Lebanon doesn't move, it's going to be Bilad Al Sham again,' he said, using the historical name for the Syria region. 'Syrians say Lebanon is our beach resort. So we need to move. And I know how frustrated the Lebanese people are. It frustrates me.' Mr Barrack said the US, Saudi Arabia and Qatar are ready to help if Lebanon takes the lead. Last month, Mr Barrack presented Lebanese officials with a proposal to disarm Hezbollah and implement economic reforms to help lift the country out of its six-year financial crisis, one of the worst in modern history. The US proposal ties reconstruction aid and a halt to Israeli army operations to Hezbollah's full disarmament across the country. Since a US-brokered ceasefire began in November, the Iran-backed group has withdrawn most of its troops from the Israeli border. Israel insists it must be disarmed nationwide. In response to the proposal, Lebanese authorities submitted a seven-page document calling for a full Israeli withdrawal from disputed territory, including Shebaa Farms, and reaffirming state control over all weapons while pledging to dismantle Hezbollah's arms in south Lebanon. The document stopped short of agreeing to disarm Hezbollah nationwide. 'I thought it was responsive, very responsive,' Mr Barrack said, while acknowledging that issues remain. 'There are issues that we have to arm wrestle with each other over to come to a final conclusion. Remember, we have an agreement … it was a great agreement. The problem is, nobody followed it." He stressed the urgency for Lebanon to act. When asked if Hezbollah agreeing to lay down its arms and become a purely political party would prompt President Donald Trump's administration to remove the group from its foreign terrorist list, as it did with Hayat Tahrir Al Sham (HTS) in Syria, Mr Barrack declined to elaborate. 'I'm not running from the answer, but I can't answer it,' he told a group journalists in New York earlier on Friday. Asked why President Joseph Aoun has not publicly committed to a disarmament timetable, Mr Barrack said: 'He doesn't want to start a civil war.' The Lebanese armed forces are widely viewed as the 'best, neutral, reliable mediator' in the current crisis but face severe funding shortages due to Lebanon's economic collapse, Mr Barrack said. He noted that despite the Lebanese army's credibility, it operates 'on a shoestring budget', forcing UN peacekeepers in Lebanon (Unifil) to fill the gap with 10,000 troops. 'God bless the United Nations and the Unifil troops, but they don't really have command and control over harsh things,' Mr Barrack said. Mr Barrack acknowledged that any attempt to fully disarm Hezbollah could be volatile and risk sparking a civil war. He suggested a possible path could involve Hezbollah agreeing to voluntarily disarm its heavy weapons, including rockets and drones, handing them over to monitored depots under a 'mechanism' involving the US, France, Israel and the Lebanese army. Mr Barrack said the Lebanese army lacks the resources and manpower to take on such a mission. 'We don't have the soldiers on the ground for LAF to be able to do that yet, because they don't have the money. They're using equipment that's 60 years old,' he said. As a result, Hezbollah argues it cannot rely on the Lebanese army for protection, he added. 'Hezbollah is looking at it saying, 'We can't rely on LAF. We have to rely on ourselves because Israel is bombing us every day, and they're still occupying our land,'' he said, referring to disputed border areas known as the 'five points". Mr Barrack said addressing these security concerns, while preventing escalation into conflict, would require international support to strengthen Lebanon's army and a mechanism to manage heavy weapons, with buy-in from all sides. He said the US has approached its Gulf partners to seek funding for the Lebanese armed forces but has faced resistance. 'The US is going to our valued Gulf partners and saying, 'We want money to go to LAF,'' he said. 'Why do the Gulf partners not want to do that? Because they've given so much money to Lebanon in the past that's gone to the corrupt leaders. So they're saying, 'Yeah, we're done.'' He noted that Gulf states are reluctant to invest further without assurances that funds will bypass Lebanon's entrenched political elite and corruption. 'This is the big dilemma,' Mr Barrack said, adding that without sustained support for the Lebanese army, it will remain under-resourced, complicating any efforts to stabilise the country and reduce Hezbollah's hold. 'We need to help bolster LAF,' Mr Barrack said. 'We can do it hand-in-hand with the Gulf countries, hand-in-hand with Unifil, as we redefine what their role is on a continued basis.'

UN two-state solution conference rescheduled for end of July
UN two-state solution conference rescheduled for end of July

The National

time8 hours ago

  • The National

UN two-state solution conference rescheduled for end of July

A UN conference hosted by France and Saudi Arabia to advance a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians has been rescheduled for July 28-29, diplomats said on Friday. The meeting was postponed last month after Israel launched a military attack on Iran, beginning a nearly two-week conflict that ended after the US carried out its own attacks on Iranian nuclear infrastructure and President Donald Trump declared a general ceasefire. The conference follows a UN General Assembly resolution passed in September that endorsed an International Court of Justice advisory opinion declaring Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories illegal. The meeting aims to translate international consensus into concrete steps towards a lasting resolution to the decades-old conflict. French officials said previously that President Emmanuel Macron would attend and that he was leaning towards formally recognising a Palestinian state. It is unclear if he will be in attendance at the rescheduled conference, or if Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman would be there. The rescheduled conference comes as a ceasefire in the Israel-Gaza war appears to be within reach. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who was visiting Washington this week, said in an interview that he hoped to reach a hostage release deal within a few days, and Hamas has acknowledged that talks were progressing. Mr Trump has said talks were going "very well". Israel has repeatedly denounced the conference, saying it rewards Hamas for the October 7 attack that started the Gaza war, and has pressed France not to recognise a Palestinian state.

EU waits on Donald Trump letter as markets digest latest tariff salvo
EU waits on Donald Trump letter as markets digest latest tariff salvo

Gulf Today

time9 hours ago

  • Gulf Today

EU waits on Donald Trump letter as markets digest latest tariff salvo

The European Union braced on Friday for a possible letter from US President Donald Trump, outlining planned duties on his largest trade and investment partner after a broadening of his tariff war in recent days. The EU initially hoped to strike a comprehensive trade agreement, including zero-for-zero tariffs on industrial goods, but months of difficult talks have led to the realization it will probably have to settle for an interim agreement and hope something better can still be negotiated. The 27-country bloc is under conflicting pressures as powerhouse Germany urged a quick deal to safeguard its industry, while other EU members, such as France, have said EU negotiators should not cave into a one-sided deal on US terms. After keeping much of the world guessing his intentions, Trump has outlined new tariffs for a number of countries, including allies Japan and South Korea, along with a 50% tariff on copper, and a hike to 35% on Canadian goods. His cascade of tariff orders since returning to the White House has begun generating tens of billions of dollars a month in new revenue for the US government, and data due later on Friday is expected to show collections since inauguration day in January through June have shot past $100 billion - equal to or greater than the largest annual take ever from customs duties. "We remain locked and loaded to sign an agreement with the US. Let's see what happens when our friends in Washington wake up a few hours from now," EU spokesperson Olof Gill told a briefing. A source with knowledge of the US-EU negotiations said an agreement was close, but that it was hard to predict if the EU might still get a letter announcing more tariffs or when any agreement might be finalised. An EU diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the EU was strong when it acted together. "It is important that the pain or gain is distributed equally. We cannot have just one country or sector that takes the win." European shares dipped on Friday as investors awaited word on tariffs for the EU, while US stocks dipped in response to the upsized tariff rate Trump announced for Canada late on Thursday. Gold prices, meanwhile, rose for a third straight session on higher demand for the safe-haven asset. Investors appear increasingly inured to Trump's tariff announcements after having near-panic reactions to the earliest announcements in late winter and early spring. Still, the jacked-up rates Trump unveiled out of the blue this week on Brazil and then Canada are emblematic of his unpredictable approach to rolling out the levies. The 35% tariff on Canada is an increase from the current 25% rate he had assigned and is a blow to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, who was seeking to agree a trade pact with Washington. According to Trump, the new rate will take effect on August 1 and could go up further if Canada retaliates. "Throughout the current trade negotiations with the United States, the Canadian government has steadfastly defended our workers and businesses. We will continue to do so as we work towards the revised deadline of August 1," Carney said on X. The EU has drawn up countermeasures against Trump's tariffs, but has not imposed them. An initial 21 billion euros ($24.5 billion) of levies on US imports due in April was suspended before taking effect. Another package, on some 72 billion euros of US imports, could also be applied. "Basically, if a political decision is made to extend the suspension, then we'll extend the suspension," Gill said. "If we need to unsuspend it, we can do that, you know, at the drop of a hat," he added. Elsewhere US Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Kuala Lumpur on Friday, as the two powers vied to push their agendas in Asia. Both sides described the meeting as constructive. China this week warned the United States against reinstating hefty levies on its goods next month and Beijing has also threatened to retaliate against nations that strike deals with the United States to cut China out of supply chains. Trump has periodically railed against the EU, saying in February that it was "formed to screw the United States" and asking why Europe exports so many cars but buys so few from the US in return. His biggest grievance is the US merchandise trade deficit with the EU, which in 2024 amounted to $235 billion, according to US Census Bureau data. The EU has repeatedly pointed to the US surplus in services that in part redresses the balance. The potential escalation between the EU and the US is a big deal for financial markets, said Joseph Capurso, head of international economics at the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. "If you get something similar to (the U.S.-China trade war in April), that's going to be very destabilizing." Agencies

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store