Some Gen Z Workers Are Quitting Jobs Over 'Sunday Scaries'
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The "Sunday scaries" have been known to affect employees across the board, but Gen Z appears to have a special sensitivity to the anxiety that can hit right before a new work week.
In a new report from Resume.io, roughly one in five Gen Z workers said they actually quit their job over the "Sunday scaries."
"This generation is the first to prioritize mental health over wealth," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek in part.
Why It Matters
The younger generation, which includes workers up to the age of 28, has quickly earned a bad reputation among employers.
A recent report from Intelligent.com revealed that one in six businesses said they were hesitant to hire recent college graduates over concerns about how prepared they are for the work, as well as their communication skills and professionalism.
And a whopping six in 10 employers had already fired college graduates who were hired in 2024 in September of last year.
Woman lying in a hammock and working with a notebook on January 12, 2010 in Varkala near Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Woman lying in a hammock and working with a notebook on January 12, 2010 in Varkala near Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
EyesWideOpen/Getty Images
What To Know
The "Sunday scaries" are having damaging effects on the newest crop of employees.
Today, the "Sunday scaries" generally refer to the anxiety and dread that can occur right before the work week begins, usually on Sunday evening. The term first originated on Urban Dictionary in 2009 and has now been a common reference for many workers dealing with high levels of stress and burnout.
In the Resume.io survey of 1,000 Americans, 20.2 percent of Gen Z workers said they had quit a job over the Sunday scaries. And 45.9 percent have considered doing so.
Across the larger worker population, one in seven employees said they experienced Sunday anxiety every week, and 11.7 percent have quit a job over it.
"This generation is the first to prioritize mental health over wealth," Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek. "They've watched their parents sacrifice for 'job security,' only to face layoffs, recession, and stress-related illness. Gen Z isn't job hopping because they're flaky. They're hunting for alignment. Purpose. Boundaries. If they can't find it? They leave."
Gen Z was also more likely to report that their job negatively impacts their mental health, with 71.6 percent indicating their job has at least a somewhat negative effect on their well-being. Meanwhile, only 44.6 percent of millennials, 37.8 percent of Gen X, and just 27.3 percent of Boomers said the same.
The top contributors to the Sunday scaries included workload and deadlines (33.1 percent), burnout and exhaustion (23.6 percent) and unrealistic expectations (15.7 percent).
Generally, entry-level jobs were the most vulnerable to Sunday anxiety, with 19.6 percent of those workers saying that they feel it every Sunday.
"The pressure and workload that is placed upon many in professional positions is increasing and it feels like many young people are being asked to do the work of two or three employees," Matthew Solit, the executive clinical director at LifeStance Health, told Newsweek.
"The workplace culture in America does not always favor rest and time away from work, instead favor checking emails while out of office and working long hours. Simply put, the burnout factor is higher, and the youngest generations are seeing it and struggling more to cope."
What People Are Saying
Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek: "For Gen Z, 'Sunday Scaries' has become a flashing red siren. Warning of burnout, toxic work cultures, and lives out of balance. They're not lazy. They're just not willing to sell their soul for a paycheck that can't cover rent and therapy."
Matthew Solit, the executive clinical director at LifeStance Health, told Newsweek: "The 'Sunday Scaries' is a very real phenomenon and at times can be debilitating for anyone in any generation. Gen Z is particularly impacted by it given how fresh this group is in the workforce and the fact that the oldest of this generation is currently 28. For Gen Z and even many millennials, the idea of what life and success in the workforce would look like did not live up to the vision that was projected on them by other generations. Many in this age group find themselves in high-stress and low-return positions that they did not envision."
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The anxiety and profound lack of connection with their current employer brings on the Sunday scaries. Many are feeling overworked and possibly overlooked as the cost of everything increases. I bet there is a significant correlation between job satisfaction and compensation, which many GenZ may feel left behind."
What Happens Next
Gen Z's reaction to Sunday scaries likely reflects a larger shift in the workforce, where employees are gaining more power, Ryan said.
"Older generations asked, 'How can I fit into this job?' Gen Z flips the script by asking 'How does this job fit into my life?' And yes, that makes some employers uncomfortable," Ryan said.
"Employers clinging to outdated 9 to 5s and performative wellness perks will hemorrhage true talent. But companies who adapt aka flexible hours, culture, mental health benefits, loyalty will be paid back to them. To me, this is just the pendulum of power swinging back to the workers, not the employers."
HR consultant Bryan Driscoll echoed this sentiment.
"Quitting over the Sunday scaries isn't retreat - it's acknowledgement," Driscoll told Newsweek. "And it's a red flag for employers. It reflects a workforce that's no longer willing to tolerate toxic cultures, vague expectations, or the erosion of work-life balance. Gen Z is demanding better and if companies don't adapt, they'll keep losing talent."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
How much does it really cost to own a car in the US?
Driving is probably the most consistent way Americans get from point A to point B across the country. And while it's well known that buying a car is a significant investment, most of us don't typically factor in the day-to-day or annual costs associated with keeping our cars running and operational. Not to mention the cost of insurance for your vehicle, and for those who live in larger cities, the cost to park your car each and every day. Adding this all together, the average American pays roughly $12,828 a year to own a car, roughly $1,069 per month, says a new study from Way. The initial number probably seems eye-popping for sure, but when you break down the various payments on your vehicle, it slowly starts to add up. The first and largest is the depreciation of your car. While this isn't physically money that you're spending, it's money that you're losing every time you use your car. As with age and usage, the price of your car will continue to drop until the day you finally sell it or trade it in. On average, the value of your car drops about $4,600 a year, according to Way. Next is gas and insurance, which can vary depending on your location, but typically Americans spend about $2,200 on gas every year and $1,700 on car insurance. After that, there's the maintenance of your car that you end up doing every year. These include oil changes, tire rotations, brake pad replacements, new air filters, new windshield wipers and anything else that potentially goes wrong with your car in a given year. The prices on this can obviously vary drastically depending on what is going on with your car, but on average, a typical U.S. citizen will spend roughly $1,500 on car maintenance every year. Going a little more unnoticed is the various financing charges and taxes and fees that you end up paying each year on your car and probably don't even realize it. Combined, the two can add up to about $1,600 a year. Finally, there are parking costs, which probably only apply to people who live in larger cities. But on average, the typical American spends around $1,000 on parking. This can vary drastically obviously for someone who lives in the suburbs versus someone who lives in a major city in California or New York. Separately, all these payments may not seem too crazy, but when combined, it's a bit more than the normal person may expect to pay on a car year after year.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
DOGE AI Tool to Target 100K Federal Rules for Elimination: Report
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is reportedly using a newly developed artificial intelligence (AI) tool to accelerate the rollback of federal regulations, with a stated goal of eliminating 50 percent of all federal rules by the first anniversary of President Donald Trump's second inauguration, according to a Saturday report from The Washington Post. Internal documents reviewed by the newspaper, along with interviews with four government officials familiar with the project, reveal an ambitious timeline and a wide-ranging use of the tool across various agencies. Newsweek has reached out to the White House for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters DOGE was created by Trump through an executive order to improve efficiency and reduce waste in the federal government. It was led by billionaire Elon Musk who departed the administration in May. The reported plan represents one of the most aggressive attempts by the Trump administration to overhaul the federal regulatory system. By automating the deregulation process, the administration aims to reduce government spending and compliance burdens significantly. However, the use of AI to interpret complex legal language and determine regulatory necessity raises legal and practical concerns, particularly regarding accuracy, oversight, and the future role of civil servants in shaping public policy, according to the Post. What to Know The "DOGE AI Deregulation Decision Tool," developed by engineers brought into government under Elon Musk's DOGE initiative, is programmed to scan about 200,000 existing federal rules and flag those that are either outdated or not legally required. According to a PowerPoint presentation dated July 1 that was obtained by the newspaper, the tool estimates that approximately 100,000 of those rules could be eliminated, primarily through automation with minimal human input. The projection claims this could save trillions in compliance costs and spark increased external investment. At the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), AI has already reviewed over 1,000 regulatory sections in under two weeks. Similarly, it was responsible for "100% of deregulations" at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), according to the PowerPoint presentation. The Post, however, reported it was not able to confirm the use of AI at the agency independently. When asked about the use of AI for deregulation, White House spokesman Harrison Fields emphasized to the newspaper that "all options are being explored" to meet the president's deregulation goals. He clarified that no single plan has been finalized, and the effort is still in early, creative stages with ongoing consultation within the White House. DOGE plans to complete agency-specific deregulation lists by September 1 and finish nationwide rollout by January 20, 2026—labeled in internal documents as "Relaunch America." Agencies are currently receiving training on how to integrate the AI tool into their regulatory review process. The presentation claims the tool could save 93 percent of the labor typically required to gut federal rules, reducing what would usually take 3.6 million work hours to just 36. Despite these goals, some federal employees expressed concern about accuracy. One HUD employee told the Post that the AI misinterpreted statutes and flagged legal language as non-compliant when it was accurate. HUD confirmed to the newspaper that while the agency is exploring AI to streamline efficiency, the system is not intended to replace expert judgment. The push to eliminate regulations is not new for Trump. In January, he issued an executive order mandating the repeal of 10 rules for every new one added. Departments like Transportation and Labor have already reported dozens of regulatory cuts. However, experts question whether such repeals will withstand scrutiny under the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs the legal process for rescinding rules. Previous attempts to bypass procedural safeguards—such as Trump's reversal of showerhead regulations—have faced legal scrutiny. DOGE's lawyers have reportedly vetted the tool, but concerns remain about whether its recommendations will be upheld in court or trusted by the private sector. While DOGE initially tried to play a leading role in the deregulation campaign, internal resistance from federal employees has slowed momentum. Agencies questioned DOGE's subject matter expertise and hesitated to outsource rulemaking authority to a third-party system. Moreover, the administration's efforts to downsize the federal workforce have hampered its ability to implement the deregulation strategy. An American flag waves at the U.S. Capitol Building on June 10 in Washington, D.C. An American flag waves at the U.S. Capitol Building on June 10 in Washington, People Are Saying Nicholas Bagley, a law professor at the University of Michigan, told The Washington Post about Trump's unilateral efforts to cut regulations: "There's been some flashy sideshow efforts to avoid the legal strictures, but in general, they don't stick." White House spokesman Harrison Fields wrote in an email obtained by The Washington Post: "The DOGE experts creating these plans are the best and brightest in the business and are embarking on a never-before-attempted transformation of government systems and operations to enhance efficiency and effectiveness." What Happens Next? Over the next several months, agencies will use the DOGE AI tool to select rules for repeal, respond to public comments, and finalize deregulation plans. Whether the courts, the public, and the agencies themselves accept that transformation remains uncertain.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Elon Musk is threatening to put third-party candidates on the ballot. Democrats are giddy.
'My first reaction was, it seems pretty confined in substance,' Mayo said. 'And because of that, I think it pulls some of the following that he has that has sort of found its way into the Republican Party base.' Musk did not respond to a request for comment sent via email. Voters regularly overstate how likely they are to vote or join a third party. But recent polling suggests Americans are at least theoretically open to it. While nearly half of voters say they would consider joining a third party, only 17 percent are interested in joining a Musk-led option, according to polling from Quinnipiac University from earlier this month. But that party could pull disproportionately from the GOP, per the survey, which found that nearly three times as many Republicans as Democrats would consider joining Musk's proposed third party. Barrett Marson, a Republican political strategist in Arizona, cautioned that a libertarian-minded candidate backed by Musk could attract support from either direction, putting Democrats in battleground districts at risk too. 'If anyone can be a spoiler or at least put up a candidate who has a chance to in either direction, it's Elon Musk, because he has the drive and financial wherewithal to match it,' Marson said. Still, Musk's ability to successfully field third-party bids will be highly dependent on the particular districts he targets and the candidates he puts on the ballot, said Charlie Gerow, a Pennsylvania-based GOP operative. 'Elon Musk's money is enough to sway a significant number of elections,' Gerow said. 'But you have to look at the individual candidates and the message they run on. There's a lot of factors that will play into whether or not he's successful. I think at this stage it's hard to predict the outcome when we don't really know what he's going to do.' Even if Musk fails to get candidates on the ballot, his bad blood with Trump will be sorely felt by Republicans, who benefited massively from his largesse in 2024. Ultimately, Democrats are still confident the effort would more than likely play out to their benefit should it come to fruition, said Georgia Democratic Party Chair Charlie Bailey, who is gearing up for one of the most competitive Senate races next year. 'I think if something has Elon Musk's branding on it, that you're not going to attract Democrats, and you're not going to attract many independents,' Bailey said. 'I think if it's got Elon Musk branding, you're likely to attract the vast majority of right-wing Republicans, so I don't think those voters are probably that gettable for us anyway.'
