Climate Crisis 'Evil Twin' Is Coming for Marine Life
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Scientists have warned that the planet crossed the global boundary for ocean acidification around the year 2020, according to a new study.
Published in Global Change Biology, the study from Plymouth Marine Laboratory, NOAA and Oregon State University concludes that a key chemical threshold—set to prevent widespread harm to marine life—has already been exceeded.
The planetary boundary for ocean acidification is defined as a 20% decline from the pre-industrial aragonite saturation state, a measure of ocean water's ability to support calcifying organisms such as corals and shellfish.
March 3 2017, Great Barrier Reef, Cairns Australia. A diver swims over bleached staghorn coral, acropora, during the 2017 coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef. Picture was taken on Pixie Reef.
March 3 2017, Great Barrier Reef, Cairns Australia. A diver swims over bleached staghorn coral, acropora, during the 2017 coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef. Picture was taken on Pixie Reef.
Photo by Brett Monroe Garner / Getty Images
"The original boundary was characterized by two criteria: [First] that the polar regions do not reach undersaturation, and [second] that warm-water coral reefs do not fall below the marginal growth threshold," study author Helen Findlay told Newsweek in an email.
"We felt that neither of these things could be really assessed using a surface ocean global average figure without considering natural seasonal and regional variability, and so our study made the reassessment based also on regional changes."
Underestimating the Pace
Using updated models, the study found that the global average surface ocean had entered the boundary's uncertainty zone by 2020.
In deeper layers of the ocean, the findings are even more severe. At depths of 200 meters, 60% of the ocean had surpassed the acidification threshold.
Previous planetary boundary assessments, including those as recent as 2023, had judged ocean acidification to be nearing its critical limit but not yet beyond it.
The new analysis suggests that the original boundary may have underestimated the pace and reach of acidification.
It also reveals that the most affected regions include polar waters and the tropical zones that support the bulk of the world's coral reef systems.
'Now is the time'
"In our lifetimes (and by year 2100) we are committed to the ocean acidification that has already taken place," Findlay told Newsweek. "We cannot reverse that in the short term.
"Even if we were to stop emitting CO2 today, the ocean would remain at this level of ocean acidification for thousands of years."
However, Findlay noted that carbon dioxide removal and fewer emissions could speed the process up.
"Our models tell us that this is the decade for decisions," she told Newsweek. "For ocean acidification, the emissions pathways diverge around the year 2030, which means that now is the time to make the choice about how we minimize further damage."
How Ocean Acidification Happens
Ocean acidification occurs when carbon dioxide from the atmosphere dissolves into the ocean, changing the water's chemistry.
This process lowers the pH of seawater and reduces the amount of carbonate ions, which are essential building blocks for many marine creatures.
Animals like corals, oysters, clams and some types of plankton need carbonate to build their shells and skeletons. As acidification increases, it becomes harder for these organisms to grow and survive.
Findlay added that there has been misreporting that "all shellfish will die in the next 5-10 years".
"This is not the case," Findlay said. "Organisms are resilient when they are given the chance, but it is the rate of change that is important, and more likely that some local populations will survive and some may not."
Wide-Ranging Negative Effects
According to the researchers, habitat degradation has already become evident.
The study reports that suitable conditions for tropical coral reefs have shrunk by 43%, and for polar pteropods by up to 61%. Coastal regions vital for shellfish like oysters and mussels are also increasingly at risk.
Researchers propose redefining the ocean acidification boundary to a 10% decline from the pre-industrial saturation state to better protect marine biodiversity.
'Stick to the Paris Agreement targets'
When Newsweek asked about meaningful ways to combat acidification, Findlay explained, "Stop CO2 emissions! Stick to the Paris Agreement targets. Protect and restore ocean habitats and ecosystems. Minimize damage to the seafloor.
"Prevent the addition of nutrients and pollution in the coastal regions that can cause local acidification and therefore add to the overall global problem. Fund and support local communities to protect their local environment in a way that has sustainable benefits to them."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
'Inflammatory' Diet During Pregnancy Linked to Child Diabetes Risk
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Pregnant women who consume a diet high in inflammation-promoting foods may be increasing their child's risk of developing type 1 diabetes, a study found. The findings, published in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, suggest that an expectant mother's diet could have long-term implications for her child's immune health. Researchers discovered that for every one-unit increase in a dietary inflammation score—called the EDII (Empirical Dietary Inflammatory Index)—the child's risk of developing type 1 diabetes rose by 16 percent. Hungry pregnant woman choosing from pizza, salad and eating pasta, having desire for junk food, sitting in kitchen. Hungry pregnant woman choosing from pizza, salad and eating pasta, having desire for junk food, sitting in kitchen. Prostock-Studio This risk appeared to be independent of factors like the child's sex or birth weight, but it was influenced by other maternal behaviors, including gluten intake and smoking during pregnancy. The study is among the first large-scale investigations to link a pro-inflammatory maternal diet to type 1 diabetes in offspring, offering new insight into how prenatal nutrition may shape the immune system before birth. Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease in which the body's immune system attacks insulin-producing cells in the pancreas. The condition typically appears in childhood or adolescence and requires lifelong insulin therapy. While genetics play a role, the consistent rise in type 1 diabetes diagnoses—about three to four percent per year in developed nations—points to significant environmental influences. Researchers have long suspected that factors during early development, including in utero, may be critical to disease risk. In this new study, scientists analyzed data from over 67,000 mother-child pairs from the Danish National Birth Cohort, tracking pregnancies from 1996 to 2002 and following children for an average of 17 years. They used detailed food frequency questionnaires completed at around 25 weeks of pregnancy to assign each mother an EDII score based on the inflammatory potential of her diet. Higher scores were linked to greater consumption of red and processed meats, sugary drinks, refined grains, fried foods and trans fats which have been deemed harmful to health. Diets with more anti-inflammatory foods—such as leafy greens, garlic, tomatoes, whole grains, fruits, coffee and tea—were associated with lower scores. Out of the 67,701 children tracked, 281 developed type 1 diabetes, with the average age of diagnosis being 10. Notably, the study found that three maternal factors during mid-pregnancy—an inflammatory diet, higher gluten intake and smoking—were all independently associated with a greater risk of type 1 diabetes in children. A 10-gram increase in daily gluten consumption was linked to a striking 36 percent rise in risk. "Mid-pregnancy may be a critical period during which the fetus is particularly susceptible to maternal lifestyle influences," the authors wrote, suggesting this stage as a window of opportunity for prevention. The study's lead researchers warn that while the study is observational and cannot prove causality, the patterns are compelling. "A low-grade inflammatory state... is increasingly acknowledged as a critical early-life factor influencing offspring health," they explained, emphasizing that the immune system begins developing well before birth. This research adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that dietary choices during pregnancy can have profound and lasting effects. "It underscores the importance of anti-inflammatory, nutrient-rich foods during pregnancy," said the study's authors, calling for further research and potentially updated dietary guidance for expectant mothers. Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about diabetes? Let us know via health@ Reference Noorzae, R., Bjerregaard, A. A., Halldorsson, T. I., Granström, C., Brantsæter, A. L., Borge, T., Caspersen, I. H., Svensson, J., Stene, L. C. M., Antvorskov, J. C., Giovannucci, E. L., Christiansen, M., Pociot, F., & Olsen, S. F. (2025). Association between a pro-inflammatory dietary pattern during pregnancy and type 1 diabetes risk in offspring: Prospective cohort study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
Newsweek
9 hours ago
- Newsweek
Parkinson's Breakthrough Could Help Prevent Brain Cell Loss
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new treatment for one type of Parkinson's disease may be on the horizon after researchers discovered a "brake" that can halt cell death. The study, led by researchers from Stanford University, California, involved a form of the neurodegenerative disorder that is caused by a single genetic mutation. This mutation causes an excess of a protein that interferes with the brain's ability to protect itself. Inhibiting this protein, the team found, can halt the damage and even allow dying neurons to recover. "These findings suggest that it might be possible to improve, not just stabilize, the condition of patients with Parkinson's disease," said paper author and Stanford biochemist professor Suzanne Pfeffer in a statement. Key, however, will be "if patients can be identified early enough," she added. While Parkinson's most recognizable symptom might be resting tremors, the earliest signs of the disease typically manifest some 15 years earlier. These first signs, Pfeffer said, include constipation, a loss of smell and REM sleep behavior disorder, a condition in which people act out their dreams while sleeping. Artist's impression of neurons in the brain. Artist's impression of neurons in the brain. FlashMovie/iStock / Getty Images Plus In the U.S, it is estimated that some 1.1 million people are living with Parkinson's disease—a figure only expected to rise in the near future, according to the Parkinson's Foundation. As Pfeffer and colleagues explain, around a quarter of all cases are caused by genetic mutations, with one of the most common being one that increases the activity of an enzyme called leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2). Too much LRRK2 in the brain changes the structure of cells by causing them to lose their "antenna" (technically the primary cilia) that allows them to send and receive chemical messages. In a healthy brain, communications are relayed back and forth between dopamine neurons in two regions of the brain known as the striatum and the substantia nigra. When dopamine neurons are stressed, they release a protein-based signal in the striatum called sonic hedgehog (after the video game character)—this causes neurons and support cells to produce so-called neuroprotective factors that shield other cells from dying. When LRRK2 activity crosses a certain threshold, the loss of the primary cilia in the cells of the striatum prevents them from receiving the sonic hedgehog signal; as a result, the neuroprotective factors are not produced. "Many kinds of processes necessary for cells to survive are regulated through cilia sending and receiving signals," explained Pfeffer. "The cells in the striatum that secrete neuroprotective factors in response to hedgehog signals also need hedgehog to survive. "We think that when cells have lost their cilia, they are also on the pathway to death because they need cilia to receive signals that keep them alive." A diagram shows how neurons (blue) rooted in the substantia nigra provide dopamine (dark green dots) to striatal neurons (red). A diagram shows how neurons (blue) rooted in the substantia nigra provide dopamine (dark green dots) to striatal neurons (red). Emily Moskal / Stanford Medicine It is possible to combat an excess of LRRK2 using a so-called "MLi-2 LRRK2 kinase inhibitor," a molecule that attaches to the enzyme and reduces its activity. In their study, Pfeffer and colleagues set out to test whether this inhibitor could also reverse the effects of too much LRRK2, as well as whether it was even possible for fully mature neurons and supportive glia to regrow lost cilia and regain their communication ability. At first, the results were not promising. The team gave the inhibitor for two weeks to mice that had the LRRK2 mutation (and show symptoms consistent with early Parkinson's disease)—to no effect. However, the researchers were inspired by recent studies into sleep-wake cycles, which found that the primary cilia on the mature cells involved grew and shrank every 12 hours. "The findings that other non-dividing cells grow cilia made us realize that it was theoretically possible for the inhibitor to work," said Pfeffer. Inspired by this, the team decided to try giving the mice the inhibitor for a longer time—with the results at three months being "astounding," the biochemist added. The longer treatment saw the percentage of striatal neurons and glia with primary cilia in the mice with the mutation increase to the same level as regular, healthy mice. This had the effect of restoring communication between the dopamine neurons and the striatum, leading to the normal secretion of neuroprotective factors. The researchers also found that the level of hedgehog signaling from the dopamine neurons decreased—suggesting that they were under less stress. Moreover, the density of dopamine nerve endings in the mice's striatum was found to double, suggesting that neurons which had been in the process of dying had recovered. LRRK2 inhibition decreased stress in dopamine neurons in mice models of Parkinson's (top right vs. bottom right—with healthy mice on the left for comparison.) LRRK2 inhibition decreased stress in dopamine neurons in mice models of Parkinson's (top right vs. bottom right—with healthy mice on the left for comparison.) Ebsy Jaimon & Suzanne Pfeffer With their initial study complete, the researchers say that their next step would be to determine whether other forms of Parkinson's that are not associated with the LRRK2 mutation could also benefit from the new treatment. This is possible, Pfeffer explains, because the mutation is not the only way to end up with an overactive LRRK2 enzyme. In fact, she added, the inhibitor treatment might even help with other neurodegenerative diseases. "We are so excited about these findings. They suggest this approach has great promise to help patients in terms of restoring neuronal activity in this brain circuit, said Pfeffer. She concluded: "There are multiple LRRK2 inhibitor clinical trials underway—and our hope is that these findings in mice will hold true for patients in the future." Do you have a tip on a health story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about Parkinson's disease? Let us know via health@ Reference Jaimon, E., Lin, Y.-E., Tonelli, F., Antico, O., Alessi, D. R., & Pfeffer, S. R. (2025). Restoration of striatal neuroprotective pathways by kinase inhibitor treatment of Parkinson's disease–linked LRRK2-mutant mice. Science Signaling, 18(793).
Newsweek
12 hours ago
- Newsweek
Common Belief About Left-Handed People Debunked by Psychologists
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. For decades, popular wisdom has held that left-handed people have a natural edge when it comes to creativity. But, according to new research from Cornell University, the link between left-handedness and artistic talent may be little more than myth. "The data do not support any advantage in creative thinking for lefties," psychologist professor Daniel Casasanto said in a statement. "In fact, there is some evidence that righties are more creative in some laboratory tests, and strong evidence that righties are overrepresented in professions that require the greatest creativity." In their study, Casasanto and colleagues examined more than a century's worth of scientific studies, aiming to resolve a long-standing question: Are left-handed individuals inherently more creative than their right-handed peers? However, the team found little fact to support the stereotype. From left: Left-handed American singer and guitarist Jimi Hendix in 1970; and left-handed British musician Paul McCartney playing on stage during The Beatles', last tour in 1966. From left: Left-handed American singer and guitarist Jimi Hendix in 1970; and left-handed British musician Paul McCartney playing on stage during The Beatles', last tour in 1966. Getty Images The widespread belief that left-handers—who make up roughly 10 percent of the population—are more imaginative or artistically gifted has persisted in part due to the brain's structure. Creative thinking, especially divergent thinking—the ability to generate multiple solutions to a problem—is more associated with the brain's right hemisphere, which also controls the left side of the body. In one prior study, for example, participants performed better on divergent thinking tests after squeezing a ball with their left hand, potentially stimulating creativity-supportive brain regions. That gave rise to the idea that left-handers might effectively conduct that experiment every time they use their dominant hand. But it seems the reality is more complex. In their study, Casasanto and colleagues analyzed nearly 1,000 papers published since 1900 that focused on handedness and creativity. Only 17 studies, covering about 50 effect sizes, met the criteria for inclusion due to consistent data reporting and inclusion of both left- and right-handed participants. The results of these studies indicated that handedness made little difference in performance across the most common lab tests of divergent thinking. In some cases, right-handed individuals showed a slight advantage. The researchers also re-examined occupational data from nearly 12,000 Americans across more than 770 professions, categorizing each role based on levels of required creativity. While artists and musicians did show a higher proportion of left-handers, other highly creative fields such as architecture did not. "Left-handers are overrepresented among artists and musicians," the study found, "but not among architects, physicists or other professions commonly perceived as creative." In fact, when ranked by creativity demands, professions such as physics and mathematics—comparable in creativity to fine arts because all fields were measured for originality and inductive reasoning—showed left-handers to be underrepresented. Casasanto said that the myth likely endures due to what he called "left-handed exceptionalism"—the idea that since left-handedness is rare, and how creative genius is rare, one might explain the other. Dr. Mosun, a consultant psychiatrist at Cassiobury Court and a Member of the Royal College of Psychiatrists (MRCPsych), told Newsweek that the myth has taken hold partly because of famous left-handed individuals in the arts like Paul McCartney and Jimi Hendrix. "There has been this almost romantic notion that left-handed people are naturally more artistic or creative," Mosun explained. "Historically, left handedness was seen as rare and associated with difference, which society sometimes interprets as special talent or even genius." But according to Mosun, the persistence of the stereotype reflects a broader tendency to simplify the origins of talent. "In reality, what this new research shows is that left-handed people aren't inherently more creative, but that doesn't take away from their individuality," she added. "It simply reminds us that creativity is influenced by so many factors—environment, education, culture, and also personality—rather than our dominant hand. "Stereotypes like these often emerge because we look for patterns to explain the exceptional, but the truth is always more nuanced." Do you have a tip on a science story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have a question about handedness? Let us know via science@ Reference Morgan, O., Zhao, S., & Casasanto, D. (2025). Handedness and creativity: Facts and fictions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
