$8 million PFAS water project moves forward in Morganfield
According to the Environmental Protection Agency, PFAS are long lasting chemicals that break down slowly over time and can be found all across the country in fish, soil, air and water.
'They're part of our everyday life,' said David Tapp, the water treatment plant supervisor in Morganfield. 'They're in our car seats– anything you can buy that is stain resistant, water resistant or nonstick labels is generally coated in more of these chemicals. And they have a strong chemical bond. And they last forever in the environment.'
Tapp says the levels of PFAS in the city are still considered 'safe,' but the city is ready to prevent it from reaching dangerous levels.
'You have a laundry list of everything from kidney cancer to birth defects to high cholesterol that it causes when it's ingested,' said Tapp. 'It's stuff that's been around for a while and we didn't realize how dangerous it was.'
The project in motion involves constructing a new building — located right next to the plant that will have 'Granular-Activated Carbon' filters. We're told these filters will help remove the chemicals from the water.
'When you look at it under a microscope, it looks like lava rocks we use in a gas room.,' said Tapp. 'And you have these big metal tanks that's full of sand-looking stuff. It's real porous. And you pump water through it and the contaminants get stuck inside the pores. It's just a secondary filtering process.'
Although the cost of the project is high, Tapp says the city is committed to putting residents first.
'We've secured funding for $7 million of that and we've applied for more grant funding through a couple different agencies to try to make up the difference to lessen the load on our customers and residents,' said Tapp.
The building that will house the GAC filters is set to be completed in July 2027.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
23 minutes ago
- Medscape
Before the Ink Is Dry: Residents and Their First Contracts
Tung Giep, MD, was ready to hire the doctor sitting across from him. Giep's Texas-based private practice needed another neonatologist. The young doctor in front of him was qualified and clearly in need of a change. Just a year out of training, the physician was working double the days on call he'd signed on for and with no overtime pay. 'How much notice do you have to give your employer?' Giep asked. The interviewee admitted he had no clue, and Giep knew that was a bad sign. The interviewee called later that week to say his contract required a 6-month notice. Giep told him that he was sorry to hear it; he couldn't wait that long. 'Young doctors have no clue about what's out there, especially in the contract arena,' Giep told Medscape Medical News . After years of training, debt, and low wages, new doctors are rightfully eager to sign on to their first jobs. But, unbeknownst to them, hospital contracts can be littered with unfavorable terms — noncompetes, vague assignments, lack of overtime or insurance — that cause major problems down the road. There are ways for new doctors to protect themselves and their future plans. But they can't go it alone. Experts agree: Legal help is nonnegotiable. About Medscape Data Medscape continually surveys physicians and other medical professionals about key practice challenges and current issues, creating high-impact analyses. For example, the Medscape Physician Compensation Report 2025 found that Doctors reported seeing an average of 78 patients per week for primary care physicians and 71 for specialists. About 61% of physicians feel underpaid. Nearly two thirds of doctors qualified for an incentive bonus program with the average amount of $48,000 in 2024. Bigger Than Benefits 'The overwhelming majority of physicians are employed now, which is different than what it was pre-COVID,' said Elizabeth Snelson, Esq., attorney and president of the Legal Counsel for the Medical Staff, PLLC. A 2024 analysis funded by the Physicians Advocacy Institute found that more than 77% of doctors are now employed by hospitals, health systems, or corporate entities. After decades of training, the transition to employee can be abrupt for doctors who are accustomed to the protective academic system, said Snelson, who also authored the American Medical Association's Physicians' Guide to Hospital Employment Contracts . Hospitals are very different. 'They are coming at it, in my experience, very trusting and very eager,' Snelson said of new doctors. Residents and fellows are overworked and underpaid for so long, 'they're often dazzled by the zeros in the offer…they've never had cash flow like this,' she said. Worse, the money and benefits are not unimportant. Doctors have debt to repay and years of training to make up for. But there's more to consider, Snelson said. The same contracts that make it easy to start — with salaries and bonuses — can make it extremely hard to live or leave when you please. Subtle nuances can have big implications. No mention of tail insurance likely means the doctor is responsible for paying the huge premium whenever they decide to leave. 'At least 7 days per month on call' means the employer can ask you to juggle 21 days. And if you're a specialist, like a neonatologist, but your contract uses the word pediatrician, the employer could assign you to rounds as a pediatric hospitalist. And that's just a small taste. Here are a few of the common contract hurdles new doctors run into: No compensation for additional call time. Assigned to work outside their subspecialty or outside the hospital location they were hired to work at. Long termination notices requiring 6- or even 18-month advance notice. Payback clauses that require the doctor to repay signing and moving bonuses if they choose to leave the position within the first few years. The absence of tail insurance, meaning the doctor will be on the hook for tens of thousands of dollars for coverage if they decide to leave. Broad noncompete clauses that prevent doctors from working within a radius of any of their locations — not just the primary hospital. No protections if the hospital hires the doctor but privileges are delayed. 'A contract is like a prenuptial agreement; you want to make sure everything is thought of,' according to Giep, author of the new book, 'The Business of Medicine: The Definitive Guide to Help New Physicians Start Their Career on the Right Path and Avoid Costly Mistakes.' Which is why, all experts agree, you need a specialized attorney to review your contract. Everything Is Negotiable I don't blame doctors for missing the problematic details in their contract, said Dennis Hursh, a healthcare employment attorney who specializes in physician contracts. 'It's legalese, and they just don't see it,' he said. In fact, most new hires are told their contract is standard and that it can't be changed. So, they likely skim over it and agree, trusting the system just as they did in training. Except not being able to change the contract is false. 'The recruiter isn't lying; they can't change it,' Hursh said. But someone can. In his experience negotiating over 4000 contracts, he's seen less than 12 cases where the employers refused changes. The contract you're offered 'may be the one everyone is given, that's true,' Hursh said, 'but it's not the one everyone signs.' The reality is that most new physicians don't know their contract was negotiable until they're on the job. They find out their colleagues signed different deals: fewer call hours or better provisions, Hursh said. That's why 'I see a lot of second contracts,' he told Medscape Medical News . Price of Freedom It's not enough to have a family lawyer or attorney friend look over your contract, Giep said. 'You wouldn't see a dermatologist for an ob/gyn issue,' he argued. Doctors need an attorney experienced in healthcare employment, specifically. And contrary to popular sentiment, that's not selfish, greedy, or combative. Doctors may worry that hiring a lawyer seems distrusting, 'as if that employer doesn't have a bank of lawyers behind them,' Snelson said. An attorney wrote the contract you're considering. Hiring one of your own is basic professionalism; it shows you're taking the opportunity seriously, Hursh added. But it won't be free. Prices vary widely, but experts said you can expect to pay at least $1000 for a contract review. It's pricey amid an already expensive transition. But, consider it the price of protection, Snelson said. It's just a small piece of the big salary you're signing on for, and it can make a huge difference in your future quality of life. Even if you don't make huge changes, a healthcare attorney can help you understand what you're signing on for, she said. If you're hoping to leave a position in 2 years because of your spouse's job, your attorney can help you decipher what it will take to quit. Is the notice 120 days or 18 months? Will you owe back bonuses or be on the hook for expensive tail insurance? If you're in the city you hope to stay in, you want help understanding and minimizing the noncompete. What are your limitations if you leave? Are you prevented from working near your primary hospital, or does the noncompete include any building affiliated with the hospital? That could be tens or hundreds of miles. 'It should be based on where the physician did most of their services,' Hursh said. And some specialties, like anesthesiology, radiology, pathology, or emergency medicine, pose no risk of stealing patients. They shouldn't have noncompete clauses in their contracts at all, he added. And even if your first job is at a dream institution, you need legal help protecting your day-to-day. The contract should be specific about the work you're doing — neonatology not pediatrics, for example — and where you're doing it. There should be a clear compensation structure for any additional hours. The employer benefits when the contract uses vague language, Giep said. 'The healthcare attorney you hire will help you tighten it up.' And if you get the sense at any time that a future employer doesn't want your lawyer involved, 'that's a red flag,' Snelson said. Ask yourself, if 'they want a lawyer but don't want me to have one — Do I want to work here?'
Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Detroit mayoral primary hints at Democratic mood ahead of 2026 midterms
As Detroit attempts to recover a semblance of its past glory, Mary Sheffield, a Black woman and president of the city council, advanced to the November general election for mayor, the Associated Press reported late Tuesday, as votes for the mayoral primary were being counted. Solomon Kinloch, a pastor, bested Saunteel Jenkins, former city council president, for the second spot.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stanford University lays off over 360 employees, citing Trump policies
By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Stanford University said on Tuesday it has laid off over 360 employees, citing budget constraints that it attributed to the federal funding policies of U.S. President Donald Trump. The Trump administration has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian protests against U.S. ally Israel's war in Gaza, climate initiatives, transgender policies and diversity, equity and inclusion programs. "Stanford is in the process of making budget reductions," a university spokesperson said in emailed statement in response to media reports on the layoffs. "Last week, many schools and units made staff workforce reductions. In total, 363 layoffs occurred." The Californian university said in June it had made a $140 million reduction in the general funds budget for the upcoming year due to "a challenging fiscal environment shaped in large part by federal policy changes affecting higher education." Last week, the Trump administration froze more than $330 million in funding for the University of California, Los Angeles, after alleging the university failed to prevent a hostile environment for Jewish and Israeli students since campus protests erupted after the start of Israel's war in Gaza. The Los Angeles Times reported on Tuesday that UCLA leaders were preparing to negotiate with the Trump administration over the freeze. The government has recently settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both institutions accepted certain demands made by the government. Talks to settle with Harvard University remain ongoing. Rights advocates have raised concerns about academic freedom and free speech over the government's actions. The Trump administration alleges universities allowed antisemitism during pro-Palestinian campus protests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's military assault in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism.
