Lawmakers press forward with controversial bill that may have big impact on grocery store shelves: 'We have our work cut out for us'
The Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act would require high-revenue businesses to reduce plastic use by 30% within 12 years. After that, at least 75% of all packaging, including paper and cardboard, must be recycled.
The bill was initially intended to reach an Assembly vote in June 2024, but legislators ran out of time to push it through, reported lohud. Since then, "the special interests have really ramped up their opposition," said Judith Enck, the president of Beyond Plastic. "So, we have our work cut out for us this year."
As of 2024, 67% of New Yorkers supported the bill, according to Siena College research. Supporters hope that the bill will cut down on litter from single-use plastics that wind up in streets, parks, and waterways. It could also mean fewer toxic chemicals from plastics contaminating soil and water supplies.
Other states have advocated for similar waste-reducing legislation. A proposed law in New Jersey would prevent restaurants from providing single-use condiments and utensils with meals unless a customer asks for them. California lawmakers introduced a bill to ban disposable vapes.
But New York's plastic reduction bill has been met with some criticism, with 22% of residents opposing it. The primary concern is that it could be costly to businesses and, therefore, increase consumer costs, reported the Business Council of New York State Inc. Some also worry that the bill could impact the availability of everyday items.
Opposers have voiced support for alternatives.
The Business Council of New York State Inc. has publicly backed the Affordable Waste Reduction Act, which proposes a state-managed recycling program funded by companies using plastic materials. The goal is to make compliance simpler for businesses and reduce the massive investment that PRIAA would require.
"This approach strengthens New York's recycling infrastructure, keeps costs down for consumers, and supports a more sustainable future," said senator Monica R. Martinez, the bill's sponsor.
Regardless of the route New York decides to take, the state is on a good path toward reducing plastic and waste.
Should plastic grocery bags be banned nationwide?
Absolutely
No way
Let each state decide
I'm not sure
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
"It's past time the producers responsible for our excessive plastic waste take responsibility for its disposal," said senator Pete Harckham (@SenatorHarckhham) on X.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Megabill hits health care for immigrants, including legal ones, hard
Chapman added that Florida GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis' support for Trump's crackdown has already discouraged patients from seeking care at the community health centers, even though they typically do not ask about immigration status. 'If my status was not clearly defined, I would be concerned about signing anything,' he added. Vern Buchanan (R-Fla.), vice chair of the Ways and Means Committee, told POLITICO the megabill 'ensures that federal health care dollars are prioritized for American citizens.' Buchanan led a letter with 11 members of the Florida Republican House delegation supporting the megabill. Under fiscal pressure, blue states, including Minnesota and Illinois, have moved to roll back health care access for undocumented immigrants, who are not eligible for any federally subsidized health care programs. Last week, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, approved a state budget that will scale back free health care for undocumented immigrants. One of the hardest-hit states from the megabill restrictions on immigrants will be New York, which is one of three states that have enacted a basic health program allowed under the Affordable Care Act known as the Essential Plan. The Essential Plan offers low-cost health insurance for New Yorkers earning up to 250 percent above the federal poverty line and is funded by federal dollars that would otherwise be used for ACA tax credits. The GOP megabill will strip coverage for half a million immigrants covered by the plan and shift the cost to New York. The state must pick up the tab because of a 2001 state court decision that requires it to cover immigrants who are ineligible for Medicaid due to their immigration status. The state's hospital lobby, the Greater New York Hospital Association, believes the provisions as a whole will cost New York $3 billion annually and leave 225,000 immigrant New Yorkers uninsured. 'The downstream impacts are not just on immigrants,' said Elisabeth Wynn, executive vice president at the New York hospital group. 'We don't close services for a particular insurance category, those get closed for all.' Earlier this month, five Republican House members from New York wrote a letter to Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) urging a two- to three-year delay to the immigrant restrictions, warning an 'abrupt elimination…will have drastically disruptive consequences for New York's healthcare system.' The bill will exclude lawfully present immigrants earning below the federal poverty level from the Obamacare marketplace starting next year. Marketplace restrictions for lawfully present immigrants earning above the poverty level will start in 2027.
New York Post
14 hours ago
- New York Post
Douglas Murray: Will NYC fall for the selfie-entitled Zohran Mamdani?
What do you do if something doesn't work? Why, surely you should double down even harder on the things that make it not work. Right? That seems to be the attitude of voters who decided that Zohran Mamdani was the candidate for them in the New York City mayoral race. There are plenty of excuses that can be made for how New York ever had this woeful candidate put before us. A self-professed 'democratic socialist.' You could point to the failure of the Democratic Party to put up viable and talented candidates. You might wonder at how Andrew Cuomo honestly thought that there was a way back for him in city politics. And you might blame the vanity of a man who even now seems unwilling to drop out of the race. Or you might wonder why the Democratic Party has decided to make the same mistake on the city level that it has made on the national level in putting forward tested but failed candidates instead of successful and talented ones. An American tale But in the end we have to face the fact that the present front-runner for mayor is the most woefully inadequate candidate possible. Promising the most woefully impossible agenda. On Mamdani's qualifications the facts speak for themselves. Mamdani may be presenting himself as the representative of struggling New Yorkers, but he himself is anything but. Privately schooled at the Bank Street school, he went on to study at Bowdoin College in Maine. From there he loafed around for a bit, trying to make it as a rapper before deciding to become a political activist. Truly a story of American struggle. He had the cushion of his parents, of course. Because while Mamdani would like to present himself as the voice of the voiceless, he is in fact the perfect megaphone for a type of entitled coastal elite. His father is a professor at Columbia University — of course. And it seems that his father's interest in colonialism, post-colonialism and decolonization has formed his son's political worldview. The political base that Mamdani junior has decided to appeal to is exactly the sort of person who thinks 'decolonization' is one of the big issues of our time. A couple of centuries after it had even the slightest impact on the lives of people in this country. But if you have been educated by people like Mamdani Sr. then you might well think that decolonization is the great issue of our time. Because there are empires and colonies everywhere these days, aren't there? Ugly racial politics Yet that is just the mood music. The real crux of Mamdani's campaign comes down to just two things. The first is the playing of overtly racial politics, bringing the most divisive approach to the forefront of his campaign. This comes not just in Mamdani's promise to tax white New Yorkers, or to pretend that it is white New Yorkers who somehow have the power these days (doubtless because they're all still running those darn colonies). It is also there in his appeal to communities based on his own ethnic and religious background. Not just the Muslim card, but the Ugandan immigrant card, the Asian card. He used this not just to appeal to New Yorkers from South and East Asia but to young, white, college-educated New Yorkers who like to fetishize and glamorize anyone who they think of as 'other.' It doesn't matter how little Mamdani has achieved in his life to date, or how impossible his promises like rent control are. Mamdani need only release a video of himself eating without a knife and fork for these grads to coo with appreciation. You might put this down to the TikTokization of our politics, where a relatively fresh-faced candidate can make a sound bite seem long-winded. This is politics for a post-sound bite generation, where someone's 'vibe' matters more than their actual platform. Still we can glimpse where Mamdani might still unravel. In recent days we had confirmation that Mamdani lacks basic accounting skills. His promise that as mayor he will use $140 million to fund socialist grocery stores is something he claimed was already accounted for. It turns out that the money he thought was available for his free-food scheme is private spending which he mistook for government spending. Still, who cares what is private and what is government when you're promising a socialist utopia? Anti-white tax scheme As for his claim that white people need to be taxed more, again this is pure 'decolonization' bunkum. All recent studies show other racial groups exceeding the earnings of white Americans in this country. In fact the two groups which nationwide exceed the earnings of white Americans are Asian Americans and, er, Indian Americans. I wouldn't put it past Mamdani to attack these groups as well in due course. After all, the only sectarian politicking which Mamdani is keener on than antisemitism is his anti-Indian sentiment. Mamdani is one of those sectarian politicians who is never happier than when accusing Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi of being a 'war criminal.' Modi is one of the international leaders who Mamdani has said he would like to ban from coming to New York. But it isn't his grandstanding on the world stage that is his biggest drawback. Rather it is his incompetence and wishful thinking on the home front. After all, this city has been run by left-wing politicians for a long time. If you think the city is unequal, unfair and just begging for more left-wing policies, then why have these policies to date provided such terrible results? A sensible voter might conclude that it is because left-wing policies don't work. A naïve voter might be persuaded that it's because they haven't been tried enough, and conclude that what New York needs to thrive is for the rich to be chased out and everyone else to be given free stuff. There are 5 million voters in this city. The only way that Mamdani can win is if the only people who come out to vote are the minority of New Yorkers who are as delusional as he is.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Governor signs budget in early morning to secure Medicaid funds
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers signed a new two-year budget in the early morning hours Thursday in a race against Congress to ensure the state gets a federal Medicaid match that it would lose under President Trump's tax and spending cuts package. In an extraordinarily rapid succession of events, Evers and Republican lawmakers unveiled a compromise budget deal on Tuesday, the Senate passed it Wednesday night and hours later just before 1 a.m. on Thursday the Assembly passed it. Evers signed it in his conference room minutes later. Democrats who voted against the $111 billion spending bill said it didn't go far enough in meeting their priorities of increasing funding for schools, child care and expanding Medicaid. But Evers, who hasn't decided on whether he will seek a third term, hailed the compromise as the best deal that could be reached. 'I believe most Wisconsinites would say that compromise is a good thing because that is how government is supposed to work,' Evers said. Wisconsin's budget would affect nearly every person in the battleground state. Income taxes would be cut for working people and retirees by $1.4 billion, sales taxes would be eliminated on residential electric bills and it would cost more to get a driver's license, buy license plates and title a vehicle. Unprecedented speed There was urgency to pass the budget because of one part that increases an assessment on hospitals to help fund the state's Medicaid program and hospital provider payments. Medicaid cuts up for final approval this week in Congress cap how much states can get from the federal government through those fees. The budget would increase Wisconsin's assessment rate from 1.8% to the federal maximum of 6% to access federal matching funds. But if the federal bill is enacted first, Wisconsin could not raise the fee, putting $1.5 billion in funding for rural hospitals at risk. In the rush to get done, Republicans took the highly unusual move of bringing the budget up for votes on the same day. In at least the past 50 years, the budget has never passed both houses on the same day. 'We need to get this thing done today so we have the opportunity to access federal funding,' Republican Assembly Speaker Robin Vos said at the start of debate just before 8 p.m. Wednesday. Governors typically take several days to review and sign the budget after it's passed but Evers took just minutes. Bipartisan compromise In a concession to the Democratic governor, Republicans also agreed to spend more money on special education services in K-12 schools, subsidize child care costs and give the Universities of Wisconsin its biggest increase in nearly two decades. The plan would also likely result in higher property taxes in many school districts due to no increase in general aid to pay for operations. The budget called for closing a troubled aging prison in Green Bay by 2029, but Evers used his partial veto to strike that provision. He left in $15 million in money to support the closure, but objected to setting a date without a clear plan for how to get it done. Republicans need Democratic votes The Senate passed the budget 19-14, with five Democrats joining with 14 Republicans to approve it. Four Republicans joined 10 Democrats in voting no. The Assembly passed it 59-39 with six Democrats in support. One Republican voted against it. Democratic senators were brought into budget negotiations in the final days to secure enough votes to pass it. 'It's a bipartisan deal,' Senate Minority Leader Dianne Hesselbein said before the vote. 'I think everybody left the table wishing it was different, but this is something everyone has agreed on.' Democrats said newly drawn legislative maps, which helped them pick up seats in November and narrow the Republican majorities, led to greater compromise this year. 'That gave us leverage, that gave us an opportunity to have a conversation,' Democratic Sen. Mark Spreitzer said. Still, Spreitzer said the budget 'fell far short of what was needed on our priorities.' He and other Democrats said it didn't go enough to help fund child care, K-12 schools and higher education, in particular. Evers vetoes prison closure deadline The governor noted in his veto message that the state has 'painful experience' with trying to close prisons without a fleshed-out plan, pointing out that the state's youth prison remains open even though lawmakers passed a bill to close the facility in 2017. 'Green Bay Correctional Institution should close — on that much, the Legislature and I agree,' Evers wrote. 'It is simply not responsible or tenable to require doing so by a deadline absent a plan to actually accomplish that goal by the timeline set.' Jim Rafter, president of the village of Allouez, the suburb where the prison is located, issued a statement Friday saying the veto shows how broken state government has become. 'The time for studying has come and gone,' he said. 'The Village of Allouez and our community demand action and the certainty they deserve about when this facility will be closed.' Governor kills grant as payback for ending stewardship Evers used his partial veto powers to wipe out provisions in the budget that would have handed the town of Norway in southeastern Wisconsin's Racine County an annual $100,000 grant to control water runoff from State Highway 36. The governor said in his veto message he eliminated the grant because Republicans refused to extend the Warren Knowles-Gaylord Nelson Stewardship Program. That program provides funding for the state and outside groups to buy land for conservation and recreation. Republicans have complained for years that the program is too expensive and removes too much land from property tax rolls, hurting local municipalities. Funding is set to expire next year. Evers proposed allocating $1 billion to extend the program for another decade, but Republicans eliminated the provision. Evers accused legislators in his veto message of abandoning their responsibility to continue the program while using the runoff grant to help 'the politically connected few.' He did not elaborate. The town of Norway lies within state Rep. Chuck Wichgers and Sen. Julian Bradley's districts. Both are Republicans; Bradley sits on the Legislature's powerful budget-writing committee. Wichgers didn't immediately return a voicemail. No one from Bradley's office responded to an email seeking comment. Rep. Tony Kurtz and Sen. Pat Testin, both Republicans, introduced a bill last month that would extend the stewardship program through mid-2030, but the measure has yet to get a hearing. ___ Associated Press writer Todd Richmond contributed to this report.
