logo
Missouri Supreme Court reinstates abortion restrictions, imposing ‘de-facto' ban

Missouri Supreme Court reinstates abortion restrictions, imposing ‘de-facto' ban

Yahoo27-05-2025
The Missouri Supreme Court building in Jefferson City (Annelise Hanshaw/Missouri Independent).
The Missouri Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered a judge in Kansas City to lift an injunction that had blocked restrictions on abortion, a ruling that upends access to the procedure six months after voters enshrined reproductive rights into the state Constitution.
The two-page order imposes a 'de facto abortion ban' in the state, according to the leaders of the state's two Planned Parenthood affiliates.
Over the course of two rulings — one in December and one in February — Jackson County Judge Jerri Zhang pointed to the voter-approved constitutional amendment in issuing a temporary injunction blocking abortion restrictions enacted over numerous years by state lawmakers.
Most notably, Zhang struck down licensing requirement for abortion clinics, arguing the regulations were 'unnecessary' and 'discriminatory' because they do not treat services provided in abortion facilities the same as other types of similarly situated health care, including miscarriage care.
The injunction allowed abortions in the state to resume while the case made its way to a January 2026 trial.
Missouri clinics will 'immediately' offer abortion across the state after judge's ruling
On Tuesday, the state Supreme Court determined Zhang applied the wrong standard in rulings, ordering her to vacate her earlier orders and re-evaluate the case using the standards the court laid out. That leaves the door open for Zhang to potentially implement another injunction.
Tom Bastian, spokesman for the Missouri ACLU, painted Tuesday's ruling as only a temporary setback. His organization believes its arguments for halting restrictions met the standard set by the Supreme Court and expects Zhang will grant another injunction 'blocking the ban and restrictions, once again allowing Missourians access to abortion care.'
Despite the potential ambiguity, Republicans celebrated the Supreme Court ruling.
'Today's decision from the Missouri Supreme Court is a win for women and children and sends a clear message – abortion providers must comply with state law regarding basic safety and sanitation requirements,' Attorney General Andrew Bailey said in an emailed statement.
Emily Wales, president and CEO of Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains. and Margot Riphagen, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Great Rivers, released a statement decrying the ruling as putting Missouri 'back under a de facto abortion ban and is devastating for Missourians and the providers they trust with their personal health care decisions.'
A decade ago, more than 5,000 abortions were performed in Missouri, according to the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services. By 2020, when abortions were still legal, that number fell to 167, a drop that abortion providers attributed to the state's growing list of regulations.
Missouri's trigger law banning all abortions with limited exceptions for medical emergencies went into effect the same day the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June 2022.
Last November, Missourians narrowly approved Amendment 3, which states, in part, that 'the right to reproductive freedom shall not be denied, interfered with, delayed, or otherwise restricted unless the government demonstrates that such action is justifiable by a compelling governmental interest achieved by the least restrictive means.'
Earlier this month, the GOP supermajority placed a new constitutional amendment on the 2026 ballot that would reinstate the abortion ban with limited exceptions for medical emergencies, rape and incest.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Largest Texas Newspaper Rebukes Greg Abbott Over Redistricting 'Power Grab'
Largest Texas Newspaper Rebukes Greg Abbott Over Redistricting 'Power Grab'

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Largest Texas Newspaper Rebukes Greg Abbott Over Redistricting 'Power Grab'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Houston Chronicle, Texas' largest newspaper, is criticizing Governor Greg Abbott in an opinion piece for what it calls his "Republican power grab" regarding his state legislature's push to vote and approve GOP-backed redistricting maps that could have drastic effects on and in the aftermath of the 2026 midterm election. Newsweek has reached out to Abbott's office via email for comment on Monday. Why It Matters Abbott had called a special session to address the flooding that killed 135 people last month in Texas Hill Country and the redistricting plan. Tensions have escalated between the governor, Republicans and Texas Democrats as 51 Democratic lawmakers in the Legislature fled the state to Illinois on Sunday to prevent Republicans from moving forward with a vote due to lacking a quorum. Two-thirds of members within the 150-member chamber must be present to pass legislation. In a letter, Abbott referred to the fleeing members as "derelict Democrats" and threatened to remove them from the Legislature altogether if they didn't return by 3 p.m. Monday, August 4. "Real Texans do not run from a fight. But that's exactly what most of the Texas House Democrats just than doing their job and voting on urgent legislation affecting the lives of all Texans, they have fled Texas to deprive the House of the quorum necessary to meet and conduct business," he wrote in part. Republicans have a slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and a slightly larger one in the U.S. Senate. Democrats hope to take back the House in next year's midterms, which traditionally have seen the party that is not in power in the White House gain a number of seats. During President Donald Trump's first term, Democrats picked up 41 seats in the midterms. Trump, meanwhile, has backed Abbott's move to redraw the state map. What To Know The Chronicle's editorial board published an op-ed piece on Monday, comparing Abbott's efforts during the recent deadly Texas floods to his political efforts to swiftly redraw and enact new districts across the Lone Star State. "The governor has followed his orders from Washington and put a Republican power grab before communities devastated by Central Texas floods," the editorial reads. "With a stroke of his pen, Abbott could have moved hundreds of millions of dollars by executive fiat. He could have called a session with the sole objective of addressing the still-unfolding crisis in the Hill Country." The editorial board continued: "But the lives of Texans come second to the desires of President Trump and his loyalists. When Trump utters the words 'very simple redrawing,' Abbott asks, how many seats do you want? And we end up with a Congressional map that puts Democrats on the endangered species list." Democrats have argued that if Republicans succeed in redrawing districts in Texas, Trump will push other states to do the same. The editorial also notes that both political parties, be it Republicans in Texas or Democrats in Illinois, have engaged in gerrymandering while in power to boost future prospects. The difference now, according to the Chronicle, is that Texas' bluest cities are being carved up and would hypothetically lead to a Republican majority on par with the nation's reddest state, Wyoming. Texas Democrats would safely hold about 21 percent of the state's congressional districts even though 46 percent of voters in last year's presidential election voted for Democratic nominee then-Vice President Kamala Harris. Abbott is also chastised for his threats of removal, with the editorial calling such an outcome "an attack on democracy itself." "None of this was necessary," the editorial concludes. "Abbott could've just made the special session all about flooding. Heck, lawmakers probably could've gotten a recovery package passed with plenty of time left over to sift through Lieutenant. Governor Dan Patrick's buffet of red-meat priorities. Instead, the well-being of Texans has once again come second to flagrant backroom partisan power-plays." George Strait, Greg Abbott, and Tom Cusick speak onstage for George Strait and Vaqueros del Mar's "Strait To The Heart": A benefit for Hill Country Flood Victims at Estancia at Thunder Valley on July 27... George Strait, Greg Abbott, and Tom Cusick speak onstage for George Strait and Vaqueros del Mar's "Strait To The Heart": A benefit for Hill Country Flood Victims at Estancia at Thunder Valley on July 27 in Boerne, Texas. More What People Are Saying Sergio Sanchez, a former Republican chairman and longtime radio host in Texas, told Newsweek: "This Texas GOP strategy is based on political reality. Almost the entire southern Texas border has shifted red. Red represents the traditional values, work ethic, economic opportunities, immigration controls and police protections no longer espoused by modern Democrats." He added: "The Democrats are again showing they have no values and solutions for Texas and the nation. Their cowardly response is laughable and sad. Democrats are clueless and lost." Former Democratic Texas Representative Colin Allred, also a past U.S. Senate candidate against Senator Ted Cruz, in a statement on Sunday: "This fight isn't just about maps—it's about power. When Republicans silence Black and Latino voters, they're not just rigging elections. They're rigging who gets health care, clean water, and a fair shot. "Let's be clear: they don't just want to rig the vote. They want to use that power to rig the economy — to keep helping the wealthy and well-connected while working families get left behind. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on X on Sunday: "I support the immediate arrest of these rogue lawmakers who've fled their duties. These radical Democrats are spitting in the face of every Texan they swore to represent. This is cowardice and dereliction of duty, and they should face the full force of the law without apology." Texas state Representative Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader, said during a press conference in Chicago: "We will do whatever it takes. What that looks like, we don't know." What Happens Next? Republican State House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would still meet as planned at 3 p.m. on Monday. "If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table...." he wrote on X. The lack of a quorum would also delay votes on flood relief and new warning systems in the wake of last month's catastrophic floods in Texas.

August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations
August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations

Boston Globe

time20 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations

Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year. It's not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extra early this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual. Advertisement On Monday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries sent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss 'the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a 'painful, unnecessary shutdown.' 'Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,' said the letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP. Advertisement 'It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter,' Thune said on Saturday. '... I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government.' Different approaches from the House and Senate So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line. Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won't be more efforts in the coming weeks to claw back or cancel funding already approved by Congress. 'If Republicans want to make a deal, then let's make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won't take back that deal a few weeks later,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, 'that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base.' Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance to Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned. 'The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend,' Fleischmann said. 'Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)' Advertisement Republican angry about pace of nominations Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Thune said last week that during the same point in Joe Biden's presidency, 49 of his 121 civilians nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days. 'I think they're desperately in need of change,' Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. 'I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.' Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending. At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Advertisement

Watch live: Texas Democrats who fled to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort speak out
Watch live: Texas Democrats who fled to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort speak out

Chicago Tribune

time20 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Watch live: Texas Democrats who fled to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort speak out

Seeking to avoid a vote on redrawing five congressional districts, Texas Democrats fled their home state for bluer pastures. Dozens of Democratic members of the Texas House of Representatives arrived in Chicago on Sunday while others flew to Albany and Boston. A supportive Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker met the Texas Democrats after they landed Sunday evening at O'Hare International Airport. At a late-night news conference, Pritzker praised the Texans for displaying 'a righteous act of courage' as he called Trump a 'cult leader' and 'would-be dictator.' The Illinois governor also criticized Texas Republicans for using a special legislative session in Austin, aimed at providing relief for last month's flood victims in the state's Hill Country, to please Trump and use it 'as political cover to push through a racially gerrymandered congressional map.' Texas House Democrats flee to Chicago to deny GOP's congressional redistricting effort'Let's be clear, this is not just rigging the system in Texas. It's about rigging the system against the rights of all Americans for years to come,' Pritzker said at the news conference, held at the west suburban Carol Stream headquarters of the DuPage County Democratic Party. Pritzker vowed to do 'everything we can to protect' the visiting Texas Democrats from threats of arrest by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton because 'they're doing the right thing.' Members of Texas' Democratic congressional delegation who arrived in Chicago on Sunday are scheduled during a Monday evening press conference. The event is scheduled to begin at 6 p.m. CDT. The event will be livestreamed here.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store