First Nations vow to 'stop that bulldozer coming north,' as Ontario passes controversial mining law
On Wednesday afternoon, the province passed Bill 5, the so-called Protect Ontario by Unleashing Our Economy Act, which has sparked a firestorm of anger among First Nations.
The province has said the bill is needed to speed up large projects, particularly mines, in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war.
Jeers from dozens of First Nations members echoed in the legislature as the bill was passed into law. Ford did not show up for the final vote.
Earlier in the day, Ford wouldn't say if he would use the notwithstanding clause to save Bill 5 if it ends up being challenged and found unconstitutional in court. But he said that he would "cross that bridge" when he comes to it.
First Nations say the bill tramples their rights and ignores their concerns, and they have warned they may blockade roads, railways and mines in protest.
But Ford said Wednesday that wouldn't be "very wise."
Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government has given itself the power to suspend provincial and municipal laws for chosen projects in areas it deems to have economic importance. The move has sparked a firestorm of anger among First Nations.
"You can't break the law," Ford said. "Simple as that. ... They need to move on or they'll be dealt with appropriately."
When asked to clarify his comments, Ford said he doesn't direct the police and any enforcement would be up to the Ontario Provincial Police or local police services.
The legislation will create so-called "special economic zones," where the government could suspend laws in order to speed up projects such as mines.
Ford has cited the need to move more quickly on mining places such as the Ring of Fire in northern Ontario in order to strengthen the province's economy while it is under Trump's attack.
Civil liberty groups are livid at the prospect of effectively lawless zones, and unions have warned that labour laws would be under threat.
The measure is part of an omnibus bill that makes a slew of other changes, including stripping protections for endangered and threatened species. Environmental groups and the Toronto Zoo have warned this will lead to extinctions.
Farmers, who largely support the Progressive Conservative government, have also spoken out against the bill. The Ontario Federation of Agriculture said the broad powers "could override vital protections for farmland and agricultural systems."
Several First Nation leaders said Wednesday there was nothing the government could do to rectify the bill.
"I believe it is too late," said deputy Grand Chief Anna Betty Achneepineskum of Nishnawbe Aski Nation, which represents 49 First Nations, including those in the Ring of Fire.
"They have not acknowledged our request, our demands and our position to start over again so that we can be there as the rightful treaty people of Ontario."
NDP deputy leader Sol Mamakwa, who represents the northern Ontario riding of Kiiwetinoong that is home to many First Nations and the Ring of Fire, said that Ford is not listening to their concerns.
"This is not the wild, wild west," he said, surrounded by several people who flew in from various communities in his riding.
"We are the ones that live in these communities on these lands. He does not live in those lands. ... You cannot vote, legislatively bulldoze your way. These are the people that will stop that bulldozer coming north."
Ford's government fast-tracked the bill and limited third-reading debate, and while the opposition parties tried to stall the bill at the committee stage, it returned to the legislature Wednesday afternoon for the third reading and final vote.
In response to the growing backlash, Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford and Mining Minister Stephen Lecce said late last month that the province would amend Bill 5 to explicitly include duty to consult provisions throughout the legislation.
That amendment did not end up making it in the bill due to the tactics the Liberals used in committee.
Ford said it's unfortunate that opposition parties wanted to "drag this out," but his government will consult with First Nations over the coming months.
"When it comes to duty to consult, which is very important, and we are going to do it, if they have an equity partnership it moves like greased lightning," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
6 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
An American embraces the spirit of Canada
Article content 'The Hall of Gods,' exclaimed Mary Schaffer in 1929 as she boated across Alberta's Maligne Lake, with its turquoise waters and sculpted mountain peaks. The first European to behold his land of wonder, she was told by First Nations people there that the very small land mass at the lake's centre was to them 'Spirit Island'. Article content My wife and I arrived in Alberta on July 2 with two questions: Was Jasper National Park as beautiful as I remembered from a 1970s visit? And second, how has the Canadian spirit responded to threats of annexation from the United States? Article content Article content Article content We had heard at least one American tour company was skipping Jasper—citing logistical concerns, but perhaps also with doubts that the area had recovered from last year's wildfires. The park indeed lost some forest. Guides estimated that three to five per cent of parkland was affected. As Canadians undoubtedly know, we learned that the town of Jasper, however, suffered much more—nearly 30 per cent of its property was destroyed. Article content Article content Yet, the spirit of Alberta is one of resilience. Some residents are still in temporary shelters, but are awaiting permanent housing; some businesses haven't reopened; others feared a loss of tourists. But visitors from all over the world are hearing that Jasper remains a magical place, not a site to be avoided. Article content On June 29, three days before we embarked for Calgary, the American president once again told Time magazine that he intended to annex Canada as the 51st state. An American friend of ours wondered whether Canadians only tolerate American tourists for their money. Article content Article content We found the opposite. People in Alberta were eager to share one of the most beautiful places on Earth —wanting us to share in the spirit of adventure that the Canadian Rockies offer. Though we mostly avoided politics, I did say 'I'm sorry' to two Canadians, neither voiced anger at the sovereignty-attacking words by our president. Article content Canadians appear to like understatement. One example came from a historical marker by the Bow River. A sign recounted how a hiker fell into a ditch. He reportedly told his mates, 'It would be good to deal with this situation with haste.' Article content That gentle understatement felt quintessentially Canadian — echoing Britain's enduring 'stiff upper lip' influence. Another example: a wildlife guide telling us of a tourist trampled by an elk, commenting: 'We find a range of intelligences here.' Article content What amazed me most in terms of Canadian attitude was what we didn't see: there were no protest signs, no anti-American buttons or stickers. At least in the parts of Alberta we visited, political expression was invisible. Had the situation been reversed, fierce anti-Canadian protest messaging would be very prominent, and I would fear for the safety of Canadians visiting the States.
CBC
7 hours ago
- CBC
Jordan's Principle office in Brandon shuts down over federal funding cuts
Social Sharing A Jordan's Principle office serving urban children and families from Canupawakpa Dakota First Nation and Birdtail Sioux First Nation in Brandon, Man. has shut its doors, citing a major reduction in federal funding. Canupawakpa Chief Raymond Brown told CBC News the First Nation saw federal funding for Jordan's Principle cut by millions. "We couldn't afford to keep that office open," Brown said. The Dakota Urban Jordan's Principle office, located at 1209 Richmond Ave., opened in October 2024 and closed in the spring, forcing Canupawakpa to lay off five employees. Brown said the closure of the urban office marks a significant blow to the delivery of services under Jordan's Principle — an initiative to ensure First Nations youth can access essential health and social services without delay or disruption, with jurisdictional questions over which government should pay to be worked out later. In February, the federal government announced changes to Jordan's Principle that narrow the range of eligible requests. Indigenous Services Canada, which has been handling funding requests, says it's dealing with an enormous backlog of about 140,000, and in March announced operational and eligibility changes, amid concerns the funding was not being used as intended. CBC contacted Indigenous Services Canada for comment, but did not receive a statement by publication time. The federal government's funding cuts have left the Dakota Urban Jordan's Principle office unable to continue operations, despite growing demands, Brown said. He estimates around 100 families consistently visited the office. The closure means families and children will lose access to essential services like school lunches, teaching assistants and transportation, Brown said. The decision to close the office and lay off around five workers happened before her election in April, said Birdtail Sioux First Nation Chief Tréchelle Bunn. She said Jordan's Principle funding is still being processed and Birdtail is still receiving notices of how much the community will receive this year. While there's still a Jordan's Principle office in Birdtail Sioux First Nation, the funding cuts are making some supports and services inaccessible for urban members, she said. "It's really unfortunate and it's kind of out of our control at this point," Bunn said. New funding model needed, says chief Bunn said First Nation leaders, communities and families were not fairly consulted when it comes to Jordan's Principle funding changes. She said the government needs to be held accountable for this. "A buzzword, I think, that is often used is a 'nation to nation relationship,'" Bunn said. "For that to happen, there needs to actually be communication and consultation with the leaders and community members." The funding changes to Jordan's Principle are part of a long history of the federal government imposing their own ideas of what First Nation children need, cutting out First Nation leadership and families who know first-hand what's best, said Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs Grand Chief Kyra Wilson. "These conversations are not happening with our leadership, with our families," Wilson said. "These conversations are happening in government offices where they are not seeing the direct impacts of the lack of services and support ... that's also very frustrating." Canupawakpa still has an on-reserve Jordan's Principle office, Brown said, but it is considerably smaller with fewer services. He warned any medical help through the service will now need to come with doctors' approval. That will make life harder for families, he said. In Canupawakpa, they want their own funding service that's specific to the Dakota people, Brown said. Jordan's Principle had too many restrictions and they need something that works better for the community. "We can handle our own funding and our own finances how we want," Brown said. "This is our country."
Winnipeg Free Press
14 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Settlement dollars paying for broken promises, missed opportunities, devastated lives
This week, the federal government agreed to a $99-million settlement with Muscowpetung Saulteaux Nation, a First Nation approximately 60 kilometres northeast of Regina, for Canada's failure to provide agricultural support and materials as promised under Treaty 4. That seems like a lot of money, but it's really not. And, far more important, is the profit from the opportunity gained when justice is finally served. Under Treaty 4, signed in 1874, 35 First Nations across what is now northwestern Manitoba, almost all of southern Saskatchewan and southeastern Alberta were promised farming tools including plows, seeds and animals to rebuild their lives after losing their traditional territories — and, indeed, their livelihoods — due to urbanization and settlement. The federal government didn't keep its promises, resulting in massive poverty, starvation and death as communities struggled to build economies, feed themselves and stave off sickness due to weakened immune systems. Add in the fact First Nations had to endure laws such as the Indian Act, which forbade movement, provided substandard education and prevented economic growth, and you get — in many cases — the dire situations that exist now. Farming is the financial and cultural bedrock of life in Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta, and First Nations didn't even get a chance to participate. So, how much does it cost to compensate 151 years of suffering and lost opportunities? Much more than $99 million. Meanwhile, the other 34 First Nations in Treaty 4 are owed the same thing. This week, alongside the agreement with Muscowpetung Saulteaux Nation, the federal government also announced settlements with two other Treaty 4 communities: Big River First Nation ($208 million) and One Arrow First Nation ($124 million). The claims don't end at Treaty 4. Agricultural materials and opportunities were promised to virtually every First Nation from northwestern Ontario to B.C. to the Northwest Territories in what is often called the (11) 'numbered' treaties, negotiated between 1871 and 1921. Those promises weren't kept, either. In fact, more than 50 specific such 'cows and plows' claims against the federal government have now been negotiated with First Nations. The total so far is $6.9 billion. There are another 100 or so additional cases under negotiation and about 150 legitimate claims yet to come. In Manitoba, there are 24 in process, which leaves 39 more First Nations— including my home community of Peguis First Nation — with claims they can (and likely will) pursue. Most Manitoba claims are currently in the 'assessment' or 'negotiation' stage, according to information provided by the Government of Canada. Five Manitoba claims have been settled: Gambler First Nation, Pine Creek First Nation, Sapotaweyak Cree Nation, Tootinaowaziibeeng Treaty Reserve and Wuskwi Sipihk First Nation, each in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Don't get caught up in the numbers. It's about new opportunities. This is why many don't like the term 'cows and plows' when describing these agreements; treaty promises of agricultural materials and support wasn't about providing First Nations with one-time payments, but opportunities to grow their economies, thrive and live like anyone else. This is why some communities choose different paths when obtaining a settlement. In some cases, First Nations governments provide their members a 'per-capita' payment. Muscowpetung, for example, approved a $40,000 one-time payment for each member. Ironically, it's probably more a benefit passed on to Canadian businesses and citizens, as First Nations beneficiaries will spend their settlement dollars buying things for themselves and their families. Most First Nations governments have set up trust funds to pay for community infrastructure projects and programs — a long-missed opportunity to build the lives of residents, provide employment and facilitate the growth of educational and cultural paths. It's easy to get caught up in the money when it comes to settling legitimate claims First Nations have with the Canadian government over failed promises. What's harder to see are the opportunities that should have been, and the ones now possible when justice is finally served. Status report on specific claims Niigaan SinclairColumnist Niigaan Sinclair is Anishinaabe and is a columnist at the Winnipeg Free Press. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
