UFC 317: How to watch Las Vegas title fights, start time, lineup, odds, more
The UFC is back in Las Vegas this week for International Fight Week with two titles at the top of the lineup in Las Vegas.
Here's how to watch UFC 317 with the vacant lightweight and flyweight belts on the line at the top of the card.
Broadcast and streaming info
UFC 317 has a main card that starts at 10 p.m. ET on pay-per-view via ESPN+. The preliminary card airs on ESPN and streams on ESPN+ at 8 p.m. ET, and early prelims stream on ESPN+ at 6:30 p.m. ET.
Longtime UFC correspondent Heidi Androl will conduct pre and post-fight interviews backstage with some of the athletes on the UFC 317 card, as well as report additional real-time updates for the event.
Dan Hellie will host the official UFC 317 weigh-in show on Friday at 11:50 a.m. ET/9:50 a.m. PT. He'll be joined by UFC Hall of Famers Daniel Cormier and Michael Bisping, as well as Laura Sanko.
Retired light heavyweight contender Anthony Smith, former UFC title challenger Chael Sonnen and Teddy Atlas will serve as desk analysts on the UFC 317 post-fight show and throughout the card, when necessary. Brett Okamoto will serve as desk host with Jon Anik joining the desk post-fight.
Jon Anik will serve as the leading man on the mic from cageside at UFC 317. He will command play-by-play alongside color commentators, former two-division UFC champion Daniel Cormier and Joe Rogan. Din Thomas will also contribute to the broadcast as a coach-analyst.
(Mike Bohn–MMA Junkie)
Main event: Ilia Topuria
Main event: Charles Oliveira
Co-main event: Alexandre Pantoja
Co-main event: Kai Kara-France
UFC debut: Jackson McVey
UFC debut: Alvin Hines
UFC 317 lineup
MAIN CARD (Pay-per-view, 10 p.m. ET)
PRELIMINARY CARD (ESPN/ESPN+/Disney+, 8 p.m. ET)
PRELIMINARY CARD (ESPN+/Disney+, 6:30 p.m. ET)
UFC 317 main card betting odds
UFC 317 prelim betting odds
UFC 317 early prelim betting odds
UFC 317 preview videos
UFC 317 full fight videos
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
ESPN makes boring selection for Ohio State's \
ESPN came out with a fun article this week, naming a "sleeper" player for every team in their expected Top 25. For the Buckeyes, they pick Carnell Tate. Honestly, Tate was the obvious pick. In a team with such high expectations and so few returning players, there were no other real choices. Basically everyone else returning to the Buckeyes is a veritable star already, and even the under-the-radar defenders returning are more high-profile than Tate. Then again, Tate is pretty high-profile himself. Sure, he was stuck behind Emeka Egbuka on the depth chart this past year, making him the third option in an elite receiver room, but most college football fans know who he is (especially after the Cotton Bowl). Which is why, in a way, ESPN chickened out a bit by going with Tate. As ESPN describes it, "With Egbuka gone to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Tate is set to play an ever bigger role for the Buckeyes as a junior." Which is obviously true. At the same time, the Buckeyes receiver room is so stacked that Tate––while certainly a talented playmaker––probably isn't much of a sleeper. A much better pick might have Eddrick Houston or Kayden McDonald on the defensive line. The Buckeyes need to replace a lot of NFL talent in that area, and someone will need to really step up if Ohio State wants to be championship-caliber again. Or if ESPN really wanted a sleeper of an offensive player for the Buckeyes, they could have gone with Brandon Inniss. Inniss should be an impact player for the Buckeyes this year (kind of like Tate last year), and far fewer people know who he is. Honestly, given the fact that Carnell Tate was the main photo ESPN used for their article, it almost feels like they put him up there because he is recognized already. Which he deserves--after all, he is one of the best returning receivers in college football. But it doesn't make him much of a "sleeper," does it?
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Where are line judges at Wimbledon? Why Grand Slam event moved to electronic system
Of the four Grand Slams that take place each year on the tennis calendar, perhaps the most traditional one is Wimbledon at the All England Lawn Tennis & Croquet Club — it is the oldest of the four, after all. However, the 138th edition of The Championships at Wimbledon has broken away from at least one of its longstanding traditions. If you keep a keen eye on the action at Wimbledon as the tennis ball goes past a player and out of bounds on the grass court surface, you'll notice there are no longer line judges standing near the lines. Here's why the 2025 Wimbledon Championship doesn't have line judges on the courts: Why does Wimbledon not have line judges? A new change to the 2025 Wimbledon Championships was the removal of a line judge and the introduction of an electronic line-calling system. There is still a chair umpire used in the Grand Slam event. 'The decision to introduce live electronic line calling at The Championships was made following a significant period of consideration and consultation,' said Sally Bolton, chief executive of the All England Club, in an October statement. 'Having reviewed the results of the testing undertaken at The Championships this year, we consider the technology to be sufficiently robust and the time is right to take this important step in seeking maximum accuracy in our officiating. For the players, it will offer them the same conditions they have played under at a number of other events on tour. 'We take our responsibility to balance tradition and innovation at Wimbledon very seriously. Line umpires have played a central role in our officiating set-up at The Championships for many decades and we recognize their valuable contribution and thank them for their commitment and service.' As noted by The Associated Press, Wimbledon's decision to go away from a human line judge for this electronic line-calling system isn't a first for Wimbledon and the All England Lawn Tennis & Croquet Club to use technology. The tournament has used line-calling technology to call whether serves are in or out. Here's what it looks like on the baselines at a Wimbledon this season without line judges: Do any Grand Slams in tennis have line judges? Following Wimbledon's move to electronic line calling, the only Grand Slam event on the tennis schedule that still uses a human line judge is the French Open. "I think we are right to keep our referees and line judges at Roland Garros," French Tennis Federation president Gilles Moretton told ESPN. "For Roland Garros, we want to keep our linesmen as long as the players agree with that." As noted by ESPN, the first Grand Slam that started using an electronic line calling system was the Australian Open in 2021. The U.S. Open then followed a year later.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Jamahall Hill explains viral reaction to 'little crazy' scoring in Khalil Rountree loss
A lot was said about Jamahal Hill's reaction to the scoring of his loss to Khalil Rountree. Last month, in the main event of UFC on ABC 8 in Azerbaijan, Hill lost a unanimous decision to Rountree that read 49-46, 50-45 and 50-45, on the judges' scorecards. Many watching thought it was a clear, one-sided decision and were surprised to see Hill shocked by the cards. Hill, who recently addressed his defeat in a video on his YouTube channel, clarified what happened post-fight. He didn't think he beat Rountree but thought the fight was closer than what the scores read. "To me, at the moment, I thought I won the first round and the fifth round," Hill explained. "I've watched the fight back, and I still feel I won the first and the fifth round. I just think it was a pretty boring fight, and to score it that one-sided was a little crazy. I know people want to see me lose as bad as possible, but if you think that was on par with the type of dominations we've seen for five rounds, for example, I'll use my own experience, the Glover fight. If that was a five-round domination, then the Glover fight should've been 40-50. ... But ultimately, don't leave it in the judges' hands. You have to come out, implement yourself, and you don't have to worry about things like that." Hill's reaction to the scoring wasn't the only thing that was talked about following his bout. He also appeared to have confronted Rountree immediately after the bell, but it wasn't clear what was said. Hill was upset at the way Rountree fought him, but looking back, he now knows that fell on him. "The fight was more boring than I would've liked," Hill said. "I expected him to engage and come after me, so we could get after it and put more of a fight, of a show together, but it is what it is. The onus is on me to go in there and make fighters fight the fight that I want them to fight, and that didn't happen in this one." Hill, a former UFC light heavyweight champion, is now on a three-fight losing skid. His last victory came in January 2023 when he defeated veteran Glover Teixeira to win the vacant title. Hill opened up about his career rut on that same video, attributing the three defeats to his Achilles tear and lack of discipline.
