
I was a late-night writer. Colbert's cancellation hurts American comedy – and sanity
Maybe now people will finally stop saying Trump is good for comedy.
In this latest Trump administration, I often joke that I'm just not cut out for being this furious all the time. I'm a comedy writer. I'm built for naming dogs Doctor Reginald Pancakes and writing sentences like 'Every woman's deodorant is called Delicate Whisper and every man's deodorant is called Beef Shazam!' I get that there's nothing more annoying than a comedian getting all serious, and yet here we are.
So first, let's address the obvious: was the cancellation for political reasons or, as the network claims, for 'purely financial' reasons. My answer? Yes. The problem is we keep treating those like they're separate things.
CBS isn't ending the show for 10 months. They could have made the announcement whenever they wanted. But they chose to tell Stephen Colbert, host of the highest-rated network late night show, just 48 hours after he called Paramount's payment to Trump a 'big fat bribe'. They chose to cancel the Peabody award-winning show in the midst of an attempt to sell Paramount to a company called Skydance, a merger that has to be approved by the Trump administration. They chose to tell Colbert they were canceling his show, one day after the CEO of Skydance met with the FCC and discussed 'CBS's editorial decision-making'.
Basically, if the decision wasn't political, then Paramount sure is happy to let it look political, and at that point there's no meaningful difference. Whether the network canceled the Late Show to appease Trump or not, they did it knowing he'd think so.
CBS wants it both ways. They want the viewers to believe they're an unbiased network and they want Trump to think they'll do anything he wants.
So that's what I think as a human being who lives in this world right now. But, as a comedy writer who wrote for late night TV for almost a decade? Well, I can't stop thinking about the jokes. This cancellation is really sad to me because I believe in the power of jokes.
True story: once a guy was mugging me and he started punching me in the face. I told a joke and he STOPPED PUNCHING ME. That is the power of jokes. (No, I will not tell you the joke. Because I'd say it and then you'd be all 'C'mon, it's not that funny' and then I'd have to be all: 'No, you had to be there. It's not as funny when you aren't punching me in the face.')
The thing about jokes is that they require a shared base of knowledge. A shared reality. If I tell a joke about a commercial and you've never seen that commercial, the joke isn't going to go over very well. Losing late night shows is one more step toward losing a shared reality, and that to me is terrifying.
There is a moment every New Yorker knows. It happens when you're on the subway and someone does something particularly insane: an 83-year-old white lady raps, or a man in a three-piece suit publicly clips his toenails. And then you catch the eye of someone across the train – they raise their eyebrows and you raise your eyebrows back. And then you feel a little better. Because someone else saw what you saw and they can confirm that it's something.
Late night hosts like Stephen Colbert do that on a larger scale. They're our way of saying: 'Hey, this is crazy, right? RIGHT?' In this world of algorithmic bubbles and blatant lies and deepfakes, late night television is a place you can gather at night and say: 'Yes, this happened and it is fucking weird.'
Here's another thing I like about jokes: the basis of jokes is truth. I've written books, speeches, game shows and news articles and I've never been fact-checked as hard as I was when writing late night television. Jokes just don't work if they're not based on something true.
And for our leaders? The ability to take a joke matters. If our corporate overlords and representatives in government can't handle being joked about on late night TV, we don't need new shows. We need new leaders. In this current system – with a Congress and a supreme court who want nothing more than to cater to Trump's every whim – we don't have a lot of options to hold our leaders accountable. In a free society, joking about our leaders isn't just helpful or fun, it's vital.
For me, this isn't just about Colbert. (I met him once. In 2014, the day Last Week Tonight with John Oliver was set to tape our first show, Colbert came to our office and went from room to room to congratulate each member of the staff and to wish us luck. It was a kind gesture that I'll long remember.)
It's not just about his staff – a couple hundred people who in my experience are thoughtful, hilarious, ridiculously competent people at the top of their game.
It's not even just about the humiliating weakness the television networks continue to display as the president sues them into silence.
It's about the jokes. We need the jokes. Because this country could really use a break from getting punched in the face.
Jill Twiss has won multiple Emmys and Peabody awards as a senior writer on HBO's Last Week Tonight with John Oliver and a staff writer on The Amber Ruffin Show

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mirror
MIKEY SMITH: 8 unhinged Donald Trump moments as he scrambles to distract from Epstein scandal
Donald Trump is still scrambling to get people to talk about literally anything else - but Barack Obama is having absolutely none of it Donald Trump continued his scramble to get people to talk about literally anything but his former friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. He's not even hiding it. He flat out ordered Republicans to do the pivot from one subject to another in a televised speech last night. Meanwhile, Obama hit back at Trump's threat to jail him over a bunch of made up nonsense. Trump had some real trouble with what I believe Americans call "math". And if you weren't sure whether America is creeping slowly towards being an old school dictatorship, Republicans are in the process of naming an Opera House after the great leader's wife. Here's everything that's happened in Trump World in the last 24 hours that you need to know about. 1. Trump teaches Republicans to pivot from Epstein to 'Obama did it' At a reception for Republican members of congress, Trump went on a long detour, during which he coached those present, if asked about the Epstein files, to pivot to "Obama did it" "Remember this, Obama cheated on the election," Trump said. There is no evidence to support this claim. "You should mention that every time they give you a question that's not appropriate, just say 'by the way, Obama cheated on the election.' You'll watch the camera turn off almost instantly." 2. He claimed his poll numbers are up 5 points since the Epstein letter. They're obviously not Trump claimed at the reception: "They're the best numbers I've ever had. And with this made up hoax that they're talking about, my numbers have gone up for and five points." This is, of course, untrue. According to the most recent polling - by YouGov for the Economist - Trump's numbers are somewhere south of the gutter. He's at 55% disapprove, 40% approve, 4% not sure. His net approval is -15% - down 1.2 points since last week. For a while the only President who had worse numbers at this point in his presidency was himself eight years ago. According to the Economist poll, the has breached this threshold. 3. Pam Bondi did her own little Watergate-style purge A group of US judges last night voted to replace Trump's pick for New Jersey's top federal prosecutor - who just happens to be one of his former personal lawyers. Alina Habba defended Trump in a series of legal cases, but has no experience as a prosecutor in criminal law. Nevertheless she was given the job on an interim basis, and officially nominated for the position. So when judges rejected her as prosecutor - a rare move - at the end of her 120 post, it was expected her deputy, career prosecutor Desiree Leigh Grace, would take over. That made Bondi mad, so she fired the deputy, giving no reason for the decision. "This Department of Justice does not tolerate rogue judges - especially when they threaten the President's core Article II powers," Bondi said on Twitter after the move. Bondi, it's said, plans to reinstall Habba in the post, but it's unclear how. 4. Can we just return to how the President is casually accusing his predecessor of treason and threatening to jail him? Because that seems like kind of a big deal, and it's not really being treated as one. If any previous President had done this it would be a huge scandal. Like, grounds for impeachment huge. Even the line where he accuses Obama of trying to instigate a coup, when Trump himself tried to instigate a coup four years ago, feels like a throwaway detail. 5. Obama has had enough of this nonsense "Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response," the former President said in a statement. "But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. "Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes. "These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio." As we've written previously, Trump, Gabbard and the people who go out to bat for them on TV either don't know the difference between "Russia hacked the vote tallies" and "Russia ran a propaganda campaign, some of which included hacking and leaking people's emails" - or they're lying. Bottom line is, Obama's right - the documents don't say what they say they say. 6. And yet, Gabbard keeps declassifying meaningless documents Last night Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard added another meaningless document to her crazy wall of conspiracy theories. This time the red wool leads the reader to a 44-page report prepared by Republican members of the House Intelligence Committee - without input from their Democrat counterparts - from 2020. The previously secret document spends a long time quibbling about whether the Intelligence community's view that Vladimir Putin had a "clear preference" for Donald Trump winning the election was based on good intelligence. The Republicans, shockingly, decided was not. It's notable though that the document itself doesn't say Putin didn't want Trump to win - only that in their view the source of that claim from back in 2016 was sketchy. It also doesn't say Putin didn't try to influence the result by attacking Hillary Clinton's campaign - just that in their view the motivation was to sow discontent, rather than influence the outcome. It's really incredible how many previously classified files a government can release while it's trying not to release other ones, isn't it? Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. 7. For a businessman, Trump has a hard time with percentages Discussing his plan to reduce drug prices, Trump said he was going to cut them by "numbers that are not even thought to be achievable." "This is somebody nobody else can do. I can get the drug prices down… 1000% 600% 500% 1500%. Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable." Given all of those reductions would result in drug companies giving money to patients to use their drugs, no Donald, they're not even thought to be achievable. Stay in school, kids. 8. They might be renaming an opera house after Melania Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee have voted to adopt an amendment that would re-name the second largest auditorium in the Kennedy Center after Melania Trump. It isn't currently named after anyone.


New Statesman
a minute ago
- New Statesman
The Mouses of Parliament
Photo byMPs and peers have packed their buckets and spades so actual rodents can enjoy a free run of the Mouses of Parliament over the summer. The infestation is worsening in a crumbling palace previously awarded a low two (out of five) catering hygiene rating by Westminster City Council after droppings were found in nearly two dozen places. Only this month the nature minister Mary Creagh's grilling on sustainability by the Environmental Audit Committee in room eight was interrupted by a mouse scampering across the floor. 'Oh my God,' squealed a startled Creagh, 'it must have been a species recovery right here in the room.' The upside was the uninvited visitor at least made her hearing memorable, unlike the Prime Minister's at the Liaison Committee the same day. One cabinet minister purred that Keir Starmer was human Trazodone, which was mission accomplished after a tumultuous first year. Gurgling down the plughole of Steve Reed's water refresher went Feargal Sharkey's prospects of a peerage after the campaigner and former Undertones frontman called for the Environment Secretary's resignation over the 'water industry shambles'. Sharkey was widely floated for ermine, having hosed down the dirty Tories in dozens of target seats in an arduous tour during the election campaign. A snout said a No 10 hitherto fretting about whether Sharkey might go rogue in the Lords had a definitive answer. It's All Over Now, as Sharkey once sang. Donald Trump is often best charmed on the golf course. Japan's Shinzo Abe even gifted him a gold-plated club. But who in the British cabinet could enjoy a round with the president? Not Starmer, who became the first PM to turn down membership of a Chequers-linked golf club. The leading contender ahead of Trump's flying visit to his Turnberry course was the Attorney General, Richard Hermer, who volunteered earlier this year. Could his swing convince Trump that human rights lawyers aren't all bad? Perhaps, if he lets the president win. Having lost out in the Conservative leadership contest to Kemi Badenoch after dim-witted supporters inadvertently rigged the ballot against him, James 'not very' Cleverly returned to the front bench to be the – seriously – 'thinking Tories'' answer to Robert 'generic' Jenrick. Urbane Cleverly will, whispered an admirer, go full video and challenge his more reactionary colleague's domination of the bandwidth. Classic divide and rule from Badenoch. Handbags at dawn in Nigel Farage's big press conference on crime. Laila Cunningham, a London councillor who last month joined Reform from the Tories, kicked off proceedings, before the Runcorn by-election victor, Sarah Pochin, the party's sole female MP, got up to thank her. Pochin noted that thanks to Cunningham's defection 'Reform UK now has two formidable women who speak with bravery and conviction about what needs to be done to bring back law and order to our streets'. But wait! Was she forgetting the existence of former Conservative minister Andrea Jenkyns, now Reform's Greater Lincolnshire mayor and until Pochin's triumph the party's most high-profile woman? Or does Pochin not think Jenkyns is 'formidable' enough on the subject of law and order? Jenkyns was not in attendance, but she has previously been spotted rolling her eyes when Pochin speaks at events. Is the upstart party big enough for both? MPs left for the recess still speculating on what was behind Rachel Reeves' PMQs tears. The latest theory doing the rounds is that shortly before the Chancellor entered the chamber she received a very shouty phone call from burly peer Tom Watson, Labour's rambunctious former deputy leader. Watson is locked in a fiery spat with a member of Reeves' team and, the story goes, called her to vent. Was it Watson's venomous words that reduced Reeves to tears? The official line remains a benefits-bashed Chancellor cracked after a dressing down from the Speaker. No cuddly politics in a Green Party with as many MPs (four) as Reform, yet a fraction of the public attention and prospects. MP Carla Denyer's focus on her Bristol Central constituency is blamed by some for the Greens' failure to take the West of England mayoralty in May. Labour's Helen Godwin pipped Reform squillionaire Brexit bad boy Arron Banks, with the eco brigade back in third. Denyer subsequently stood down as the Greens' co-leader. Voting to elect a fresh top team opens in August. In a fevered internal contest the stark choice is between Denyer's fellow chief, MP Adrian Ramsay, on a ticket with a third MP, Ellie Chowns, and the insurgent Zack Polanski pitching himself as the Greens' populist answer to Farage's turquoise reactionaryism. The Greens are at a crossroads. Predicting which way they'll turn would be a mug's game. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Over in the Lords a new name was heard in the undeclared contest to lead Tory peers: Thérèse Coffey. Briefly deputy PM during the Liz Truss interregnum, Coffey swapped parliamentary houses after voters in Suffolk Coastal issued marching orders and preferred Labour army reservist Jenny Riddell-Carpenter. Sociable Coffey, whispered a snout, is trying to mobilise the Tory turnip Taliban. Snout Line: Got a story? Write to tips@ [See also: Kemi Badenoch isn't working] Related


Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
MAGA turns its fury on a new Trump aide being blamed for 'helping' Obama
President Donald Trump 's MAGA supporters have a new target for their fury: his CIA director John Ratcliffe. And it's all because of Barack Obama. Ratcliffe, who served as the director of the Office of National Intelligence (ODNI) in Trump's first administration, is one of the president's most loyal supporters. But now MAGA supporters are asking why he didn't originally declassify the documents tied to the investigation of Russia's role in the 2016 election that were released last week. Criticism arose after Tulsi Gabbard, Trump's current intel chief, released a report that accused Obama of being behind a 'treasonous conspiracy' to allege Russia interfered in the 2020 election on Trump's behalf. Now MAGA supporters are furious that this did not come to light earlier. 'Wait! The current CIA director John Ratcliffe had the position of ODNI in the first Trump administration. Why didn't he declassify the documents proving the Russian collusion corruption by the Obama cabal that Tulsi Gabbard has now made public?,' Trump loyalist Roger Stone wrote on X. The CIA did not immediately respond to Daily Mail's request for comment. But in Trump's first term, Ratcliffe did release some documents tied to the Russia investigation, including a CIA memo that revealed Hillary Clinton had approved a plan to publicly tie Trump to the country's hack of the Democratic National Committee. At that time, Trump was running against Joe Biden for a second term in the White House - a contest he would ultimately lose. His campaign seized upon Ratcliffe's move as new evidence that Clinton was in a scheme to discredit Trump, who refers to the matter as the 'Russia hoax.' Additionally, in this Trump term, Ratcliffe and Gabbard have declassified information to allege Obama administration officials manipulated intelligence and conspired to undermine the legitimacy of Trump's win in 2016. And, earlier this month Ratcliffe released an internal CIA review of its Russia investigation, which found the agency failed in some cases to follow standard procedures. Ratcliffe, a longtime Trump loyalist, argued the review showed that Democratic appointees who led the agency at the time 'manipulated intelligence and silenced career professionals — all to get Trump.' Gabbard added fuel to the fire on Friday when she released a 114-page document that she says shows the Obama administration was aware that there was no threat of Russia 'directly' manipulating the vote in 2016. 'Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people,' Gabbard said in a statement. She called for an investigation into and potential criminal prosecution of anyone who took part – which may include Obama and James Comey, the former FBI director. Obama fired back at the 'bizarre allegations' coming from Trump. His office dismissed the claims as another example of the constant 'nonsense and misinformation' that emanates out of the White House. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' his post-presidency office said in a statement. The documents revealed insider discussions among top Obama officials about Russia 's much-debated role in the 2016 U.S. elections. Trump latched on to them and issued an extraordinary call to investigate the former president – accusing his predecessor of 'treason.' 'After what they did to me, whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people,' Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday. President Trump accused his Democratic rivals of organizing a failed 'coup' in 2016, when Trump defeated Hillary Clinton and captured the White House. 'They tried to rig the election and they got caught and there should be really severe consequences,' he said. Trump has long argued that the FBI counterintelligence probe that began during the 2016 election was the start of a 'coup' to prevent him from taking office. But a bipartisan Senate investigation in 2020 found that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. One of the leaders of that probe was Marco Rubio, who was a senator on the intelligence committee at the time and now serves as Trump's secretary of state.