Taoiseach and Tánaiste welcome EU decision to review trade agreements with Israel
The Taoiseach and Tánaiste have welcomed the EU's decision to review its trade arrangements with Israel.
The EU has said it is reviewing its association agreement with Israel, which governs its political and economic relationship.
Advertisement
Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign policy chief, said a majority of members favoured looking again at the 25-year-old agreement.
The agreement forms the basis of trade ties between the EU and Israel.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin said in a statement that Ireland will work to ensure the review is taken forward as quickly as possible, and that Israel 'cannot act with impunity against all international humanitarian laws and norms'.
Tánaiste Simon Harris said that the situation in the enclave has become immeasurably worse since Ireland first called for this review alongside Spain in February 2024.
Advertisement
"The decision to review the EU-Israel Association Agreement to examine compliance with human rights announced today by High Representative Kaja Kallas is one I strongly welcome.
Together with Spain, Ireland first called for this step to be taken in February 2024," the Taoiseach said.
"
Since then, many thousands of Palestinians have been killed and maimed in a brutal military operation, the brunt of which has been borne by an innocent civilian population.
"Thousands more are at the brink of starvation, with the UN warning that 14,000 babies could die in the next 48 hours if aid doesn't reach them.
"Israel must know that the world is watching and that we will not stand by
," Mr Martin said.
He added that "Ireland will work to ensure that the review is taken forward as quickly as possible, and that its conclusions are acted upon.
"
We must stop this war. We need an immediate ceasefire, the release of all hostages and unimpeded access for humanitarian aid."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
A rise in defence spending will kick-start the industrial future
The decision at the Nato summit this week to increase defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 is a seismic shift for all of us and will have massive implications for the budgets of every government department over the next decade. When we consider in the high levels of debt and tax, this raises fundamental questions for government in allocating resources at a time when the growth of tax receipts is constrained by the paucity of economic growth. Right across western Europe the challenge caused by the financial crisis of 2008 led to a step change in the long-term trajectory of financial growth. Put simply we have come up short. The challenge for us is how we strengthen the economy in the midst of the challenges we face? A failure to move the needle on this will result in living standards continuing to be squeezed and the impossibility of funding the growth of defence spending, resulting in painful cuts elsewhere. • Ageing and sick population will lead to £16bn annual tax rise Events have conspired to leverage massive costs on to the public purse: Covid, the cost of living crisis, largely as a knock-on effect of the Ukrainian conflict, have led to levels of fiscal debt typically only seen at times of war. Time of war is an apt phrase as politicians and wider society have a growing realisation that times have changed. Global instability and the threat of war is very real. Though in these islands we have excellence in many aspects of our armed forces, to a large extent our military capability has been hollowed out. The need to enhance defence capability and at pace is stark. There is now a race to invest and if we take last year's defence spending of £53.9 billion as our base, we are going to have to find by 2035 an extra £60 billion plus a year to invest in defence. Where is this to come from? Starmer's government are for now, silent on the source of the majority of this funding. Difficult choices are going to have to be made. • SNP ban on 'munitions' funds puts Scottish shipbuilding on the line Short of a sustained increase in economic growth there is going to be a squeeze elsewhere on spending. Austerity will be a price to be paid as a consequence of having to invest in our national security. Investment in defence, though, can be a lever and transformative in itself in generating economic growth. With the increase in defence spending requiring £60 billion-plus, it is beyond doubt that we need to make sure that Scotland gets its fair share, and I know the Scottish government will be standing up for Scotland's interest in making it happen. There is a long history of the SNP doing just that. From Nicola Sturgeon making the case for shipbuilding jobs at Govan and numerous MPs making the case for defence spending in Scotland, most notably Angus Robertson and Stewart MacDonald, who championed the industry and in particular defended Scotland's historic regiments — a campaign led by Annabelle Ewing. It is therefore of no surprise — and consistent with the long-term position of the SNP — to read John Swinney being quoted in The Times this week that he had no objections if a company came to Scotland to set up a munitions factory, while making the point that the Russian threat is very real. We speak of our support for Ukraine. We speak of their right to defend their sovereignty. There is a need to replenish munitions in support of the defence of Ukraine. In doing this, though, there are red lines and that means munitions supplied in the needs of strategic defence interests and never in situations such as Gaza where civilians are targeted. Indeed, the SNP website makes the point that 'defence manufacturing infrastructure in Scotland is fundamental to our national engineering and manufacturing sector'. Today in Scotland we have excellence in aerospace, defence, security and space. The challenge is leveraging in investment and accelerating economic growth that is critical to our financial security as a consequence of the need to invest in our national security. ADS, the umbrella body for the industry, points out that the sector today employs 33,500 workers and delivers a value added of £3.2 billion, with an output per worker of £95,000. These figures make it self-evident that there is an economic prize in attracting defence investment into Scotland. We all want high growth, high wage, high productivity Scotland. A society that drives investment in skills and innovation. Think for a minute of our industrial past and leading-edge electrical engineering businesses such as Ferranti, (now Leonardo). Scotland is at the forefront of innovation in both defence and in civil applications. We need to re-engineer to capture that pioneering spirit, not just for defence capabilities but to use that opportunity as a lever through defence diversification to create a broader and deeper industrial and advanced manufacturing base. John Swinney is right to demonstrate that Scotland is open for investment. An increase in defence spending is coming. We should seize the opportunities out of this to kick-start investment in advanced manufacturing through, among other things, utilising our world-class academic base to develop the technologies and businesses for the future. Investment in defence, will kick-start the delivery of an industrial future for Scotland. Ian Blackford was the SNP leader in the House of Commons from 2017 to 2022, and an MP for Ross, Skye and Lochaber from 2015 to 2024.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Controversial government minister enjoyed £1,500 4-star hotel stay in Venice paid for by taxpayers
ATTORNEY General Lord Richard Hermer enjoyed a £1,500 taxpayer-funded stay at a luxury four-star hotel, stats show. He and staff racked up the four-figure bill while at an event where he gave a speech promoting stronger EU links. 2 2 The controversial lawyer, appointed last year by PM Sir Keir Starmer, stayed at the Hotel Papadopoli in Venice — which has been described as an 'emblem of elegance and legacy'. Papers released by the Attorney General's Office show £1,523 was paid on December 7. Costs are said to include two aides. A spokesman said: 'The Attorney General's Office remains committed to ensuring the most cost-effective way of travel, delivering best value for money for the taxpayer.' Lord Hermer has been involved in a number of controversies during Sir Keir's first year in office. He has compared those calling to exit the European Court of Human Rights to Nazis. And The Sun reported yesterday he called claims the UK has a two-tier justice system 'disgusting'. Unveiling Lord Hermer's Legal Fee Scandal
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Starmer's REAL opposition is mutinous MPs who have strangled every meaningful change… he must know it's all over for him
FIFTY years since the release of Jaws, and almost exactly one year after that Labour landslide, the opposition smell blood in the water. And nothing can stop them from coming for Keir 'Sharkbait' Starmer now. 10 Sharkbait is desperately paddling for the beach because, in his heart, he must know it is all over for him. The opposition has seen to it. The opposition? No, not Farage 's Reform UK or Badenoch 's Conservative Party. The REAL opposition to Starmer 's fragile reign are all those Labour backbenchers who are beyond Keir's control, or the will of his Whips, and have forced him into yet another humiliating U-turn. On Tuesday, this Labour Government was planning to pass its landmark , trimming a modest £5 billion from the £66 billion that health-related will cost the British taxpayer by the end of the decade. On Tuesday, this Labour Government was planning to pass its landmark welfare bill, trimming a modest £5billion from the £66billion that health-related benefits will cost the British taxpayer by the end of the decade. And they could not do it. More than 120 Labour MPs banded together to kill Sir Keir's modest plans to restrict benefits. By succeeding, they leave Starmer in office but hardly in power. In the coming days we will hear much talk about Starmer's weakness. He will be called a dead man walking. A lame duck quacking. A dead parrot of a PM. But do we really believe that ANY Labour Prime Minister would be able to persuade Labour's backbenchers that the billions blown on benefits has become unsustainable? The truth is that Labour are uncomfortable in Government. Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs Labour have no stomach for taming public spending. They never will. Keir Starmer should be driving through the changes that he promised. But he exists in a universe of U-turns. Starmer has already had to repent for taking the winter fuel payment away from pensioners. The Government is now looking at scrapping the two-child benefit cap — even though Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson warns, 'It would cost a lot of money.' Because Labour MPs don't like it. The real problem is not Sharkbait Starmer. The problem is a Labour Party who were in their comfort zone when they were in opposition. The Labour backbenchers don't WANT to balance the books. They want to be virtuous. And that is fine when you are in opposition. Whelk stall The performative politics work well when you are free to jeer and virtue-signal from the sidelines. But this Friday will be exactly one year since Labour's General Election victory. And every meaningful change that Starmer has attempted has been strangled at birth by his mutinous MPs. Sharkbait's welfare reforms will fail – or be so watered down that they are rendered meaningless. Instead, your taxes will rise. We will hear lots of blah-blah-blah about those with 'the broadest shoulders' paying more but this is a total lie. The rich can't get out of the UK fast enough. The increased tax burden will fall on the ordinary working man and woman. And Labour's allergy to taming public spending does NOT prove that they are fonts of human kindness. It just shows that they are totally unsuited to running a whelk stall, let alone our country. 10 SERVE A LOVE MATCH 10 WIMBLEDON starts tomorrow and the thoughts of all true tennis fans turn inevitably to romance. Carlos Alcaraz, world number two, and British number one Emma Raducanu will both be in Wimbledon singles action and will play mixed doubles together at the US Open a little later in the summer. And rumours abound that Emma and Carlos, inset, may have a relationship that extends beyond the court, where love means nothing, to the world beyond, where love is all. It has been a while since tennis had a great love story. The big four – Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal, Novak Djokovic, Andy Murray – all married sweethearts from their teenage years. The UK's Katie Boulter and Australia's Alex de Minaur are engaged and an adorable couple – but lacking the star power of Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf in the Nineties, or Chris Evert and Jimmy Connors in the Seventies. Alcaraz and Raducanu, both 22, would be on that level. Their union would transcend tennis, exerting the fascination of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, or Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez. But what would we call them? Raducaraz? Alcacanu? Raducarlos? If their relationship blossoms – and old romantics will feel that Emma and Carlos are made for each other – then let's hope they have a happier ending than Brangelina and Bennifer. Cool? You're Kiddin' 10 FROM the young members of The Who dozing under our nation's flag in the Sixties, to Noel Gallagher 's red, white and blue Epiphone guitar, Union Jacks and gilded youth are never really out of style. But most experts agree that the apex of Britpop was when Vanity Fair magazine put Liam Gallagher and Patsy Kensit on the cover in 1997, when even their pillows and the duvet were made from the Union flag. With Oasis about to go back on the road, Tatler magazine has declared – Cool Britannia is Back! That Vanity Fair cover was so iconic that you get Tatler's reference at first sight. Tatler's cover models are Molly Moorish-Gallagher, daughter of Liam Gallagher, and Sonny Ashcroft, son of Richard Ashcroft of the Verve, who is a support act for Oasis. Lovely youngsters, for sure. But they – let's face it – would never be on the cover of a magazine if it wasn't for the fact they are somebody's son and somebody's daughter. And the rampant nepotism on show is the big difference between then and now. Back during the heady days of Britpop, nobody gave a toss who your parents were. Zelensky survives assassination plot 10 UKRAINE President Volodymyr Zelensky has been in the news for so long we take this hero for granted. When Russia invaded Ukraine, Biden was in the White House and Boris was in 10 Downing Street. Now come reports that Zelensky survived a plot on his life by Russia's FSB spy service. Ukraine's own spooks say the would-be assassin was a retired military officer recruited 'decades earlier'. Russia's murderous threat to Zelensky will be there for the rest of his life. We should be in no doubt – he is what a hero looks like. Denis gets Bond bout THE director of the next James Bond film will be Denis Villeneuve. And we already know the French-Canadian will do a grand job at reinventing 007 because he gloriously rebooted Ridley Scott's Blade Runner with his own Blade Runner 2049. If Villeneuve can do it with an icon like Blade Runner, then he can do it with a brand like Bond. Villeneuve is the best thing to happen to 007 since Daniel Craig pulled on those baby-blue budgie smugglers for Casino Royale in 2006. Long story short, Daisy made the cut I KNOW I watched American action-comedy The Dukes Of Hazzard because I have vague memories of a brace of amiable young rednecks, an orange hot-rod and a fat man in a white suit – Boss Hogg? – who was some kind of authority figure. But what I can never forget about The Dukes Of Hazzard – what is seared into my memory and engraved on my soul – is Catherine Bach as Daisy Duke, who was revered for her cut-off denim shorts. Catherine Bach's Daisy was one of a kind, and now the shorts she wore so well have officially entered the English English Dictionary. They entered our hearts half a lifetime ago.
