
Obesity drug prices are dropping, but getting a steady supply remains a challenge
The medications still amount to around $500 per month for those without insurance — out of reach for many patients. And even for people with insurance,
coverage
remains uneven.
'The medications should be available, the question is at what price and can people sustain that,' said Matt Maciejewski, a Duke University professor who studies obesity treatment coverage.
Doctors say the situation forces them to get creative in treating patients, but there's hope that prices may fall more in the future.
The drugs are still in high demand
Wegovy and Zepbound are part of a wave of obesity medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists that have soared in popularity.
Zepbound brought in $2.3 billion in U.S. sales during this year's first quarter, making it one of drugmaker Eli Lilly's best sellers.
Novo Nordisk says Wegovy has about 200,000 weekly prescriptions in the U.S., where it brought in nearly $1.9 billion in first-quarter sales.
Insurance coverage is increasing — for some
The benefits consultant Mercer says more businesses with 500 or more employees are adding coverage of the injected drugs for their workers and family members.
And Novo says 85% of its patients who have coverage in the U.S. pay $25 or less per month.
Plus some patients with diabetes can get coverage of the GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Mounjaro from Novo and Lilly that are approved to treat that condition.
But most state and federally funded
Medicaid programs
don't cover the drugs for obesity and neither does Medicare, the federal program mainly for people age 65 and older.
Even the plans that cover the drugs often pay only a portion of the bill, exposing patients to hundreds of dollars in monthly costs, said Dr. Beverly Tchang.
Drugmakers offer help with these out-of-pocket costs, but that assistance can be limited.
'Coverage is not the same as access,' said Tchang, a New York-based doctor who serves as a paid advisor to both Novo and Lilly.
But coverage remains inconsistent
Bill-payers like employers are nervous about drugs that might be used by a lot of people indefinitely.
Some big employers
have dropped coverage
of the drugs due to the expense. Pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, also are starting to pick one brand over the other as they negotiate deals with the drugmakers.
One of the nation's largest PBMs, run by CVS Health,
dropped Zepbound
from its national formulary, or list of covered drugs, on July 1 in favor of Wegovy.
That forced Tchang to figure out another treatment plan for several patients, many of whom took Zepbound because it made them less nauseous.
Dr. Courtney Younglove's office sends prospective patients a video link showing them how to check their insurer's website for coverage of the drugs before they visit.
'Then some of them just cancel their appointment because they don't have coverage,' the Overland Park, Kansas, doctor said.
Cheaper compounded drugs are still being sold
Compounding pharmacies and other entities were allowed to make off-brand, cheaper copies of Wegovy and Zepbound when there was a shortage of the drugs. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration determined
earlier this year
that the shortage had ended.
That should have ended the compounded versions, but there is an exception: Some compounding is permitted when a drug is personalized for the patient.
The health care company Hims & Hers Health offers compounded doses of semaglutide, the drug behind Wegovy, that adjust dose levels to help patients manage side effects. Hims says these plans start at $165 a month for 12 months, with customers paying in full upfront.
It's a contentious issue. Eli Lilly has sued pharmacies and telehealth companies trying to stop them from selling compounded versions of its products.
Novo recently ended a short-lived partnership with Hims to sell Wegovy because the telehealth company continued compounding. Novo says the compounded versions of its drug put patient safety at risk because ingredients are made by foreign suppliers not monitored by US regulators.
Hims says it checks all ingredients to make sure they meet U.S. quality and safety standards. It also uses a third-party lab to verify that a drug's strength is accurately labeled.
Prices have dropped
Both drugmakers are selling
most of their doses
for around $500 a month to people without insurance, a few hundred dollars less than some initial prices.
Even so, that expense would eat up about 14% of the average annual per person income in the U.S., which is around $43,000.
There are some factors that may suppress prices over time. Both companies are developing pill versions of their treatments. Those could hit the market in the next year or so, which might drive down prices for the older, injectable doses.
Younglove said some of her patients save as much as 15% by getting their doses shipped from a pharmacy in Canada. They used to get them from an Israeli pharmacy until the Canadians dropped their prices.
She says competition like this, plus the introduction of pill versions, will pressure U.S. prices.
'I think price wars are going to drive it down,' she said. 'I think we are in the early stages. I have hope.'
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
In The AI Revolution, Medical Schools Are Falling Behind U.S. Colleges
Instead of learning to use the tools that will define tomorrow's care, med school students still ... More memorize biochemistry pathways and obscure facts they'll never use in clinical practice. getty At Duke University, every matriculating student now has access to a custom AI assistant. At Cal State, more than 460,000 students across 23 campuses are equipped with a 24/7 ChatGPT toolkit upon enrollment. These aren't pilot programs. They're part of a full-scale transformation in the way higher education is preparing students for their future careers. Meanwhile, most U.S. medical schools remain stuck in the last century. Instead of learning to use the tools that will define tomorrow's care, students still memorize biochemistry pathways and are tested on obscure facts they'll never use in clinical practice. Following the release of OpenAI's ChatGPT in 2022, college deans and department chairs responded with caution. They worried about plagiarism, declining writing skills and an overreliance on artificial intelligence. Since, most have since shifted from risk avoidance to opportunity. Today, universities are integrating generative AI into tutoring, test prep, research, advising and more. Many now expect faculty to teach AI fluency across each of their disciplines. Medical education hasn't kept pace. A recent Educause study found that only 14% of medical schools have developed a formal GenAI curriculum compared with 60% of undergraduate programs. Most medical school leaders continue to view large language models as administrative tools rather than clinical ones. That's a mistake. By the time today's students become physicians, they'll carry in their pockets a tool more powerful and important to clinical practice than the stethoscope ever was. In seconds, GenAI can surface every relevant medical study, guideline and precedent. And soon, it will allow patients to accurately evaluate symptoms and understand treatment options before they ever set foot in a clinic. Used wisely, generative AI will help prevent the 400,000 deaths each year from diagnostic errors, the 250,000 from preventable medical mistakes and the 500,000 from poorly controlled chronic diseases. Despite GenAI's potential to transform healthcare, most medical schools still train students for the medicine of the past. They prioritize memorization over critical thinking and practical application. They reward students for recalling facts rather than for effectively accessing and applying knowledge with tools like ChatGPT or Claude. Historically, physicians were judged by how well they told patients what to do. In the future, success will be measured by medical outcomes. Specifically, how well clinicians and AI-empowered patients work together to prevent disease, manage symptoms and save lives. The outdated approach to medical education persists beyond university classrooms. Internship and residency programs still prioritize applicants for their memorization-based test scores. Attending physicians routinely quiz trainees on arcane facts instead of engaging in practical problem-solving. This practice, known as 'pimping,' is a relic of 20th-century training. Few industries outside of medicine would tolerate it. How To Modernize Medical Training Generative AI is advancing at breakneck speed, with capabilities doubling roughly every year. In five years, medical students will enter clinical practice with GenAI tools 32 times more powerful than today's models — yet few will have received formal training on how to use them effectively. Modernizing medical education must begin with faculty. Most students entering medical school in 2025 will already be comfortable using generative AI, having leaned on it during college and while preparing for the MCAT exam. But most professors will be playing catch-up. To close this gap, medical schools should implement a faculty education program before the new academic year. Instructors unfamiliar with GenAI would learn how to write effective prompts, evaluate the reliability of answers and ask clarifying questions to refine outputs. Once all faculty have a foundational understanding of the new applications, the real work begins. They need to create a curriculum for the coming semester. Here are two examples of what that might look like for third-year students on a clinical rotation: Exercise 1: Differential diagnosis with GenAI as a co-physician In a small-group session, students would receive a clinical vignette: A 43-year-old woman presents with fatigue, joint pain and a facial rash that worsens with sun exposure. Students would begin by first drafting their own differential diagnosis. Then, they would prompt a generative AI tool to generate its own list of potential diagnoses. Next, participants would engage the AI in a back-and-forth dialogue, questioning its reasoning, testing assumptions and challenging conclusions. To reinforce clinical reasoning in collaboration with GenAI, each student would also submit written responses to these questions: Is lupus or dermatomyositis the more likely diagnosis, and why? What additional data would help rule out Lyme disease? Cite three high-quality studies that support your diagnostic ranking. The goal of this type of exercise isn't to identify a 'right' answer but to strengthen analytical thinking, expose cognitive biases and teach students how to use GenAI to broaden diagnostic reasoning (not limit it). By the end of the exercise, students should be more confident using AI tools to support — but not replace — their own clinical judgment. Exercise 2: Managing chronic disease with GenAI support In this scenario, students imagine seeing a 45-year-old man during a routine checkup. The patient has no prior medical problems but, on physical exam, his blood pressure measures 140/100. Students begin by walking through the clinical reasoning process: What questions would they ask during the patient history? Which physical findings would be most concerning? What laboratory tests would they order? What initial treatment and follow-up plan would they recommend? Then, students enter the same case into a generative AI tool and evaluate its recommendations. Where do the AI's suggestions align with their own? Where do they differ (and why)? Finally, students are tasked with designing a patient-centered care plan that incorporates medical therapy, lifestyle changes and as many GenAI-powered applications as possible. These might include analyzing data from at-home blood pressure monitors, customizing educational guidance or enabling patients to actively manage their chronic diseases between visits. Training Physicians To Lead, Not Follow Colleges understand that preparing students for tomorrow's careers means teaching them how to apply generative AI in their chosen fields. Medicine must do the same. Soon, physicians will carry in their pocket the entirety of medical knowledge, instantly accessible and continuously updated. They'll consult AI agents trained on the latest research and clinical guidelines. And their patients, empowered by GenAI, will arrive not with random Google results, but with a working understanding of their symptoms, potential diagnoses and evidence-based treatment options. If medical schools don't prepare students to lead clinical application of these tools, for-profit companies and private equity firms will focus solely on ways to lower costs, even when these approaches compromise medical care. As medical school deans prepare to welcome the class of 2029, they must ask themselves: Are we training students to practice yesterday's medicine or to lead tomorrow's?

an hour ago
Obesity drug prices are dropping, but getting a steady supply remains a challenge
Prices are falling for the popular obesity treatments Wegovy and Zepbound, but steady access to the drugs remains challenging. The medications still amount to around $500 per month for those without insurance — out of reach for many patients. And even for people with insurance, coverage remains uneven. 'The medications should be available, the question is at what price and can people sustain that,' said Matt Maciejewski, a Duke University professor who studies obesity treatment coverage. Doctors say the situation forces them to get creative in treating patients, but there's hope that prices may fall more in the future. Wegovy and Zepbound are part of a wave of obesity medications known as GLP-1 receptor agonists that have soared in popularity. Zepbound brought in $2.3 billion in U.S. sales during this year's first quarter, making it one of drugmaker Eli Lilly's best sellers. Novo Nordisk says Wegovy has about 200,000 weekly prescriptions in the U.S., where it brought in nearly $1.9 billion in first-quarter sales. The benefits consultant Mercer says more businesses with 500 or more employees are adding coverage of the injected drugs for their workers and family members. And Novo says 85% of its patients who have coverage in the U.S. pay $25 or less per month. Plus some patients with diabetes can get coverage of the GLP-1 drugs Ozempic and Mounjaro from Novo and Lilly that are approved to treat that condition. But most state and federally funded Medicaid programs don't cover the drugs for obesity and neither does Medicare, the federal program mainly for people age 65 and older. Even the plans that cover the drugs often pay only a portion of the bill, exposing patients to hundreds of dollars in monthly costs, said Dr. Beverly Tchang. Drugmakers offer help with these out-of-pocket costs, but that assistance can be limited. 'Coverage is not the same as access,' said Tchang, a New York-based doctor who serves as a paid advisor to both Novo and Lilly. Bill-payers like employers are nervous about drugs that might be used by a lot of people indefinitely. Some big employers have dropped coverage of the drugs due to the expense. Pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, also are starting to pick one brand over the other as they negotiate deals with the drugmakers. One of the nation's largest PBMs, run by CVS Health, dropped Zepbound from its national formulary, or list of covered drugs, on July 1 in favor of Wegovy. That forced Tchang to figure out another treatment plan for several patients, many of whom took Zepbound because it made them less nauseous. Dr. Courtney Younglove's office sends prospective patients a video link showing them how to check their insurer's website for coverage of the drugs before they visit. 'Then some of them just cancel their appointment because they don't have coverage,' the Overland Park, Kansas, doctor said. Compounding pharmacies and other entities were allowed to make off-brand, cheaper copies of Wegovy and Zepbound when there was a shortage of the drugs. But the U.S. Food and Drug Administration determined earlier this year that the shortage had ended. That should have ended the compounded versions, but there is an exception: Some compounding is permitted when a drug is personalized for the patient. The health care company Hims & Hers Health offers compounded doses of semaglutide, the drug behind Wegovy, that adjust dose levels to help patients manage side effects. Hims says these plans start at $165 a month for 12 months, with customers paying in full upfront. It's a contentious issue. Eli Lilly has sued pharmacies and telehealth companies trying to stop them from selling compounded versions of its products. Novo recently ended a short-lived partnership with Hims to sell Wegovy because the telehealth company continued compounding. Novo says the compounded versions of its drug put patient safety at risk because ingredients are made by foreign suppliers not monitored by US regulators. Hims says it checks all ingredients to make sure they meet U.S. quality and safety standards. It also uses a third-party lab to verify that a drug's strength is accurately labeled. Both drugmakers are selling most of their doses for around $500 a month to people without insurance, a few hundred dollars less than some initial prices. Even so, that expense would eat up about 14% of the average annual per person income in the U.S., which is around $43,000. There are some factors that may suppress prices over time. Both companies are developing pill versions of their treatments. Those could hit the market in the next year or so, which might drive down prices for the older, injectable doses. Younglove said some of her patients save as much as 15% by getting their doses shipped from a pharmacy in Canada. They used to get them from an Israeli pharmacy until the Canadians dropped their prices. She says competition like this, plus the introduction of pill versions, will pressure U.S. prices. 'I think price wars are going to drive it down,' she said. 'I think we are in the early stages. I have hope.'


Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Insurance cutbacks on costly GLP-1 coverage are good for small businesses
So it was welcome news in April when Advertisement 'We've been hearing from employers, with increased alarm, about the cost of these medicines,' Blue Cross spokesperson Amy McHugh told the Globe. 'They need some relief.' Advertisement Small, fully insured employers in Massachusetts already operate at a severe disadvantage on premium costs for a variety of regulatory and marketplace reasons, compared to their larger competitors. As president and CEO of the Retailers Association of Massachusetts, representing about 4,000 mostly smaller employers, I know of many small businesses that have faced double-digit premium increases year to year. It is now not unusual for a small employer in the Commonwealth to have annual premiums of $40,000 for each employee with a family plan. The primary tools employers have to lower those premiums are to go to high-deductible and high-copay plans, shifting more costs to employees. The disproportionate cost of health insurance for small employers is rapidly making them less competitive for workforce recruitment and retention, and salary growth is being held back because of increases in employee benefit costs. Meanwhile, drug manufacturers continue to seek revenue growth through high reimbursement rates and increases in the use of their products. When they can increase both their prices and sales volume, they see massive bottom-line growth. And they wield considerable political power to get provider-friendly public policy. If it weren't for that political power, government regulation could cap name-brand drug reimbursements at reasonable levels. But absent regulation, we need consumer choice — and engaged insurers — working for the premium payers, not the drug companies. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Point32Health are now doing the right thing for premium payers: They are giving large employers the option of paying more to retain coverage of GLP-1 drugs for weight loss. But all employers can now restrict coverage of these drugs to their original purpose of combating diabetes. In so doing, insurers representing struggling small businesses and their workforces are effectively telling the drug companies that they may seek a rapidly growing customer base or charge unjustifiably high prices, but they can't have both. Advertisement Consumers will still have the choice to pay for these drugs out of pocket or to move to an insurer or plan that covers the drugs — but that will mean higher monthly premiums. If consumers don't want the drugs, they shouldn't be forced to pay higher premiums for others who are using them. The drug manufacturers have choices, too. They could simply lower their prices to the levels they charge in other countries. That would be the best possible outcome. As the two largest health insurers in the state, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and Point32Health are right to exert this kind of pressure on drug companies. We need more of this from other insurers as part of broader efforts to bring down unaffordable health care costs in the Commonwealth. Ultimately, to make health care more affordable, consumers paying insurance premiums must become more important than drug manufacturers. For that, Massachusetts needs both lower prices and more empowerment of consumers to choose the insurance coverage they need and can afford.