Louisiana lawmakers dissect personal injury laws as attorney-legislators protest
House lawmakers advanced six bills targeting personal injury lawsuits Tuesday in the opening salvo of the Louisiana Legislature's ongoing debate over high insurance rates.
'I guess we can say this is opening day, and here's your first pitch,' Rep. Jay Gallé, R-Mandeville, said to the House Civil Law Committee while presenting one of six so-called tort reform bills the committee considered Tuesday.
Out of the six bills, one of the most hotly contested would limit the ability for people to recover damages for injuries sustained in accidents for which they are mostly at fault. House Bill 431 sponsored by Rep. Emily Chenevert, R-Baton Rouge, cleared the committee in an 11-4 vote along party lines.
Her bill would change Louisiana's comparative fault statute, which assigns a percentage of blame to each party in an accident and allows for the recovery of damages in proportion with those percentages. The statute often arises in cases that involve multiple negligent acts by multiple people, some more to blame than others.
In theory, someone partly at fault for an accident can potentially recover some of the awarded damages. Chenevert's bill would change that to prohibit any amount of recovery by a party who's 51% or more at fault.
'You should not be able to collect if the accident is mostly your fault,' Chenevert said. 'I would say that's common sense. Should we reward negligence?'
But Rep. Chad Brown, D-Plaquemine, pointed out that the bill only modifies comparative fault on the plaintiff's side and not the defendant's. As a result, a defendant would still be protected by the liability proportions.
'There's a double standard here that the plaintiff is going to get zeroes if he's 51% at fault, and the defendant is only gonna pay 51% if he's 51% at fault,' said Brown, who is an attorney. '… The plaintiff is more imperiled than the defendant.'
Chenevert said 34 other states have a version of the law.
The committee similarly advanced House Bill 34, sponsored by Rep. Brian Glorioso, R-Slidell, in a 11-3 vote. His measure would change state law to allow any party to introduce evidence related to medical expenses.
Currently, the law prevents juries from seeing what accident victims actually pay for medical treatment and only allows them to see what a doctor billed. In many instances, however, medical providers don't actually receive the full amounts that they bill. At other times, Glorioso said, some lawyers work with doctors who inflate their medical billings just to get an increased payout.
Glorioso's bill would limit a claimant's recovery of medical expenses to 'reasonable' amounts, which would be left for a judge or jury to decide.
'Let's let the jury see all of the evidence,' he said. 'Let's not blindfold them and just let them see one side.'
Brown countered, saying defendants get to hide details from jurors, such as whether insurance coverage is available for injuries a victim claims. He said he supports leveling the playing field between plaintiffs and insurance companies.
The committee saw Republicans prevail in another vote on House Bill 443, sponsored by Rep. Chance Henry, R-Crowley. His bill would require plaintiffs to notify defendants of an intent to file a lawsuit within 10 days of retaining a lawyer.
Currently, plaintiffs' lawyers can gather evidence and prepare for a lawsuit for almost two full years before a defendant is even aware a suit is coming. Henry said his bill would give a defendant the same amount of time to prepare for a claim as a plaintiff..
Democrats on the committee said if plaintiffs will be required to provide such a notice, then defendants should at least be required to respond to that notice with similar information – such as contact information for the insurance company's lawyer and claims adjuster.
Rep. Ed Larvadain, D-Alexandria, said many of the insurance companies he deals with in his law practice won't return calls or even provide email addresses for anyone at the company.
Rep. Nick Muscarello, R-Hammond, questioned how the requirement would even be enforced and encouraged Henry to work with the concerned lawmakers on potential amendments before the bill is debated on the House floor. Henry said he would.
House Bill 434, sponsored by Rep. Jason DeWitt, R-Alexandria, advanced to the floor in an 11-2 vote but saw no debate. The proposal would limit bodily injury claims by plaintiffs who did not carry auto insurance at the time of the accident. It also would forbid uninsured plaintiffs' recovery on the first $100,000 worth of damages.
Other bills the committee advanced include House Bill 450, sponsored by Rep. Michael Melerine, R-Shreveport, and House Bill 291, sponsored by Gallé.
Melerine's bill would end the Housley presumption, a standard of evidence explained in a 1991 Louisiana Supreme Court ruling that applies to auto accidents, medical malpractice and other injury lawsuits. In a nutshell, the Housley presumption says courts should assume a plaintiff's injuries resulted from the accident in question if they were in good health beforehand.
Lawmakers have tried repeatedly to revoke Housley, but those attempts either failed or were vetoed in previous years. This year is expected to be different as Gov. Jeff Landry recently signaled support for the measure.
Gallé's bill would extend the filing deadline, called a 'prescriptive period,' for wrongful death lawsuits from one year to two, aligning Louisiana with the deadline found in most other states.
Proponents of the bill have argued that a shorter prescriptive period attracts more frivolous lawsuits by essentially forcing people to quickly file claims so as to not lose their litigation rights. The proposal also complements a similar measure lawmakers approved last year to extend the deadline for filing personal injury claims.
The committee quickly advanced both bills without objection.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
a minute ago
- Axios
Huizenga skips Michigan Senate race
Rep. Bill Huizenga won't run in the Michigan Senate race, he said in a statement on Wednesday. Why it matters: Huizenga's decision to pass on the Senate opens up a clearer path for former Rep. Mike Rogers, the National Republican Senatorial Committee's preferred candidate. Huizenga hasn't given a clear indication that he has decided to run for reelection to the House. "I look forward to announcing my future plans later this year," he said in a statement. Huizenga raised $747,000 in the second quarter, leaving him with $1.4 million in cash on hand. Zoom in: The White House has been putting pressure on House Republicans in swing districts to forgo senate or gubernatorial campaigns to help President Trump retain the House majority. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) became the latest House Republican to officially take a pass on a statewide bid when he announced his plans to run House on Wednesday morning. "I've decided the right thing to do for me, my family and my district is to run for re-election," Lawler said said on "Fox & Friends" after telling the New York Times that he wouldn't be running for governor. Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) decided to run for House reelection and forgo a governor's bid after pressure from the White House.

Los Angeles Times
a minute ago
- Los Angeles Times
Texas lawmakers begin review of catastrophic floods that killed at least 136
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas lawmakers on Wednesday began reviewing the Fourth of July floods that killed at least 136 people, a disaster that put local officials under scrutiny over why residents along the Guadalupe River did not receive more warnings. The catastrophic floods in the Texas Hill Country and a partisan redrawing of U.S. House maps, aimed at giving Republicans more winnable seats in the 2026 elections, are two major issues in a 30-day special session that is already off to a combative start. Democrats want to address flood relief and new flood warning systems before taking votes on new congressional maps sought by President Trump. They have not ruled out a walkout in a bid to derail the redistricting, which they have slammed as a partisan power grab. State and county emergency response officials are scheduled to testify, but no officials from Kerr County, the area most hard-hit by the floods, are expected to appear. Committee chair Sen. Charles Perry, a Republican, said local officials were not asked to come to the capitol to avoid pulling them away from their work. 'Our select committee will not armchair quarterback or attempt to assign blame,' Perry said. The head of Texas emergency management department, Nim Kidd, confirmed Wednesday that the number of deaths was 136, up from 135. Two people remain missing, a man and a girl from Camp Mystic, according to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. At one point, county officials said more than 170 people were unaccounted for, but ultimately found that most were safe. Twenty-seven campers and counselors, most of them children, were killed at the all-girls Christian summer camp in Kerr County, which does not have a warning system along the river after several missed opportunities by state and local agencies to finance one. Lawmakers have filed bills to improve early warning systems and emergency communications and to provide relief funding. Legislators are scheduled to visit Kerrville on July 31 to hear from residents. Democrats have left open the possibility of filibusters or walking out in the coming weeks to block the proposed congressional map redraw. On Monday, most of the party's members in the House signed a letter to the speaker stating that they would not engage in any work before addressing flood relief. But Democrats have few paths to resistance as the minority party in both chambers. Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton has threatened to arrest those who attempt to walk out on top of the $500 a day fines lawmakers face for breaking a quorum. Lathan writes for the Associated Press.


Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
House Dems prepare to force more Epstein votes
Democrats are hoping to jam Republicans with Jeffrey Epstein-related amendments ahead of a Thursday Appropriations subpanel markup, according to two senior Democratic aides granted anonymity. The Epstein issue had already scuttled the House floor schedule for the remainder of the week, leading Speaker Mike Johnson to send the House home early for their five-week summer recess. Democrats have attempted to force the issue in the Rules Committee and on the House floor, dividing Republicans who have faced a backlash from the MAGA base. Now, according to the aides, Democrats will do the same at the subcommittee markup at 10 a.m. Thursday. The aides were granted anonymity because they were not authorized to divulge plans. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole of Oklahoma said Wednesday morning that the panel will proceed with the subcommittee meeting as planned. 'There are no changes to our schedule,' he said, despite the House floor schedule being scrapped a day earlier. 'I will, however, convey any changes to you as soon as possible. ... Honestly, I want to see how things go today.' Forging ahead with committee debate would put Republicans on record on controversial amendments, including on ordering the release of information about the Epstein case. Then if House Republican leaders want to pass the bill on the floor in the coming months, it would resurface the drama they are trying to hush. Getting the House out of town early was intended, in part, to starve the Epstein narrative of oxygen on Capitol Hill, and Republicans may not want a fresh fight on the issue Thursday. Cole had articulated for months his goal to get all 12 House spending bills on the floor ahead of the August recess. But he acknowledged this week that delays by the massive GOP tax and domestic policy bill put that goal out of reach. Canceling a full committee markup would put his committee further behind that goal. Jennifer Scholtes contributed to this report.