Military bases or vital waterway: Iran weighs response to US strikes
An advisor to Iran's supreme leader issued a warning on Sunday, saying any US base in the region that takes part in attacks is a "legitimate target".
Disrupting traffic through the narrow Strait of Hormuz, a vital route for oil and gas, would send energy prices soaring in a global inflationary shock.
Closing the waterway would be "extremely dangerous", Kaja Kallas, the European Union's top diplomat, said on Monday.
AFP looks at the two scenarios and their possible implications.
- Strait of Hormuz -
The narrow, U-shaped seaway snaking between Iran and the Arabian Peninsula is the gateway for Gulf energy shipments to global markets, carrying one-fifth of the world's oil and liquefied natural gas exports.
Closing the 50-kilometre (30-mile) wide channel could spike oil to $120 a barrel, according to Deutsche Bank research, raising prices of transport, food and utilities around the world.
"It's in the best interest of all Middle Eastern countries to keep the Strait of Hormuz open and prevent any supply disruption," Rystad Energy senior analyst Lu Ming Pang wrote last week.
Currently, traders do not appear too concerned. Brent crude was trading at $76 on Monday, marginally changed from Friday's close.
"Looking at the oil price this morning, it is clear that the oil market doesn't assign a very high probability of (a closure) happening," said Bjarne Schieldrop, chief commodities analyst at SEB bank.
The big question is whether Iran is prepared to detonate this economic hand-grenade. Despite threats in the past, including in 2011 as oil sanctions loomed, it has not pulled the pin.
According to a senior European official, the Iranians do not have the means to block the strait "long-term", but they could hamper shipping.
But "it would be a form of suicide to do that," the official said.
"The effect on Israel would be close to zero, the effect on themselves immense, as well as on the United States, Europe and China."
Iranian forces have nearly 200 fast patrol boats that can fire anti-ship missiles or torpedoes, plus mine-laying vessels, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
But the US Fifth Fleet, a major naval force, is stationed across the Gulf in Bahrain, and Iran remains under daily fire from Israeli warplanes and drones.
Iran's own energy exports, in spite of sanctions, remain an important source of income for the world's ninth-biggest oil-producing country.
- US bases -
With United States military bases spread around the Gulf countries to Iran's west, there is no shortage of potential targets.
Kuwait, in a legacy of the 1990 Gulf war, houses about 13,500 US forces, while the biggest US base in the region is Al Udeid in Qatar.
The US Fifth Fleet, covering the Gulf, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean, is based in Bahrain, and about 3,500 US personnel are stationed at Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates.
In Iraq, US troops are deployed in various installations, including the Al-Asad and Arbil air bases, as part of an anti-jihadist coalition.
Iran-backed Iraqi armed factions have threatened Washington's interests should it join Israel's campaign, having targeted them in previous years.
Increased US involvement in the Iran-Israel war risks attacks "on US interests, US bases and such across the region", said Renad Mansour, senior research fellow at Chatham House.
"The US attack on Iran has now meant that this war is between Israel, the United States and Iran, which means that across the region, Iran may seek to target the US," he added.
However, this option is also fraught for Iran as it risks isolating itself from the powerful Gulf monarchies that enjoy good relations with Washington.
"Tehran is unlikely to strike Gulf Arab states," said Andreas Krieg, a senior lecturer at King's College London.
"Even as it sees the UAE and Saudi Arabia as quiet enablers of the US-Israeli axis, Iran understands that any attack on their soil would likely unify them against it and open the door for greater American military presence.
"Instead, Iran may issue veiled warnings to these states, use regional proxies to pressure them, or engage in cyber or intelligence disruptions targeting their interests -- maintaining plausible deniability while raising the cost of involvement."
th-rh/ami/jsa
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Say 'I Do' in Venice Wedding Marred by Billionaire-Bashing Protests
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez are officially married. The Amazon billionaire and former TV anchor tied the knot Friday in a lavish celebration in Venice, Italy. More from The Hollywood Reporter Matty Healy Gives Mixed Message on Politics as The 1975 Kick Off Glastonbury Headline Sets Trump "Terminating" U.S.-Canada Trade Talks Over Streaming Tax Germany Arrests Syrian National Over 2024 Terrorist Plot At Taylor Swift Show The three-day, $10 million extravaganza reportedly took over the whole island of San Giorgio Maggiore, opposite Venice's historic St. Mark's Square, with a guest list that boasted Oprah, Bill Gates, Kim Kardashian, Kris Jenner, Karlie Kloss, Ivanka Trump, Orlando Bloom, Jewel, Leonardo DiCaprio, Barry Diller and Diane von Furstenberg. The couple hosted A-list attendees in heavily booked hotels across the city, including at the Aman, where George and Amal Clooney tied the knot in 2014; Gritti Palace; The St. Regis; Hotel Danieli; and Belmond Cipriani. Vogue boss Anna Wintour reportedly helped Sánchez select her dress for the ceremony, and word spread that Elton John was asked to perform. It's hard to expect any less from Bezos, one of the world's richest men (valued at $233 billion), whose wedding planners have commandeered many of the city's resources. But a portion of Venice natives were not so welcoming. Blocked streets and boat reroutes prompted a group of them to make their feelings known. Banners reading, 'If you can rent Venice for your wedding, you can pay more tax,' and, 'No Space for Bezos' — referencing the American businessman's cosmic aspirations with his space-travel firm Blue Origin — were displayed in Venice ahead of the nuptials. Meanwhile, other protesters threatened to fill the canals with inflatables, dinghies and boats to obstruct Bezos' water taxis. Graffiti and stickers plastered on walls remarked: 'Veniceland: A playground fit for an oligarch.' Greenpeace Italy and U.K.-based group Everyone Hates Elon, which The Hollywood Reporter recently spoke to about their billionaire-bashing efforts, joined in by unveiling the aforementioned tax-angled message on a 400-square-meter banner in the middle of St. Mark's Square on Monday. It was swiftly removed by police. According to a 2021 ProPublica report based on IRS data, in 2007 and again in 2011, Bezos managed to pay nothing in federal income tax, and his tax rate from 2014 to 2018 was estimated to be just 0.98 percent. Chief among the concerns are Venice's already-overcrowded streets, worsened by the constant influx of tourists, and climate change contributing to a sinking city. 'Bezos' wedding is a symbol of extreme wealth, privilege and a lot of things that are going wrong currently in the world,' said Greenpeace campaigner Clara Thompson, who added that the wedding took place in 'one of the world's most climate-vulnerable cities.' Among Amazon's biggest critics are climate activists who denounce the company's carbon emissions, packaging waste and reported destruction of unsold goods. The pop-up protests seemed to have worked: The BBC reported on Tuesday that a local official confirmed that the wedding celebrations, set to take place at the Scuola Grande della Misericordia, would take place instead at the Arsenale, farther from the city center. Still, the now-married couple reportedly quietly donated to Venetian charities in April and sourced 80 percent of their wedding provisions from local vendors. On Monday, Luca Zaia, president of the surrounding Veneto region, announced a 1 million euro ($1.16 million) donation by Bezos and Sánchez to the Corila Consortium, an international scientific research group doing work on the Venice lagoon, according to CNN. 'The generous donation by Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez represents an act of great sensitivity and foresight,' Zaia said. 'Venice is not only a symbolic city of Veneto and Italy, it is a heritage of humanity that demands attention, respect and care.' Conservative Mayor Luigi Brugnaro, who has run Venice for 10 years, condemned the protests. 'Whoever loves Venice will always be welcome,' he said, while other city officials promised 'the celebrations, attended by 250 guests, will blend into the daily rhythm of the city.' Bezos' wedding planners from the London-based Lanza & Baucina events company said in a statement to Page Six that they had been actively working to avoid negative effects on the city. 'We have always acknowledged the wider debate and critical issues surrounding the city's future, and from the outset, our client has been honored to support the city and its all-important lagoon through non-profit organizations and associated projects,' the company said. Best of The Hollywood Reporter Seeing Double? 25 Pairs of Celebrities Who Look Nearly Identical From 'Lady in the Lake' to 'It Ends With Us': 29 New and Upcoming Book Adaptations in 2024 Meet the Superstars Who Glam Up Hollywood's A-List
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Institutional investors control 75% of Pan African Resources PLC (LON:PAF) and were rewarded last week after stock increased 4.3%
Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Pan African Resources' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions 53% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders Recent sales by insiders Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in Pan African Resources PLC (LON:PAF) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 75% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained UK£40m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 86%. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pan African Resources. See our latest analysis for Pan African Resources Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pan African Resources. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pan African Resources' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pan African Resources. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Allan Gray Proprietary Ltd. with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 10%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Pan African Resources PLC. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own UK£5.0m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pan African Resources. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Pan African Resources (of which 1 is a bit unpleasant!) you should know about. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $384.84 · 0.2% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia becomes first nation to recognize Taliban government of Afghanistan since 2021 takeover
Russia has become the first nation to recognize the Taliban government of Afghanistan since it took power in 2021, announcing on Thursday it has accepted an ambassador from the Islamist group. 'We believe that the act of official recognition of the government of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan will give impetus to the development of productive bilateral cooperation between our countries in various fields,' the Russian foreign ministry said in a statement. 'We see significant prospects for cooperation in the trade and economic area with an emphasis on projects in the fields of energy, transport, agriculture, and infrastructure,' the statement continues. 'We will continue to assist Kabul in strengthening regional security and combating the threats of terrorism and drug-related crime.' The statement by the Russian ministry was accompanied by a photo of the new Afghan ambassador to Russia, Gul Hassan Hassan, handing his credentials to Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko. In a post on X, alongside pictures of Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi meeting with Russian Ambassador to Kabul Dmitry Zhirnov, the Taliban's foreign ministry hailed the decision as positive and important. Russia's recognition is historically significant. The former Soviet Union fought a 9-year war in Afghanistan that ended with Moscow withdrawing its troops in 1989 following their defeat by the Afghan mujahideen, some of whom later founded the modern Taliban. In the aftermath of the 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan, Russia was one of a few nations to maintain a diplomatic presence in the country. Russia removed its designation of the Taliban as a terrorist group in April 2025. While the Taliban has exchanged ambassadors with China and the United Arab Emirates, and has a long-standing political office in Qatar, those countries do not recognize it as the government of Afghanistan. The lack of recognition has not prevented Afghanistan's new rulers from doing business with the outside world. In 2023, a Chinese oil company signed an oil extraction deal with the Taliban. Moreover, the Taliban has angled for the recognition of another former adversary: the United States. Efforts have reportedly ramped up since US President Donald Trump began his second term earlier this year. March 2025 saw the release of two Americans from Afghanistan, along with the US removing millions of dollars of bounties from three Taliban officials. People familiar with American conversations with the Islamist group told CNN in April that the Taliban has proposed numerous steps toward US recognition, including the creation of an embassy-like office within the US to handle Afghan issues. 'You need to be forthcoming and take a risk,' US officials told the Taliban during a March meeting to secure an American prisoner's release, according to the person familiar with the proceedings. 'Do this, it will likely open up the door for a better relationship.' It wasn't the first time the US had diplomatically engaged with the Taliban. In the last year of his first term, Trump reached an agreement with the group for a full US withdrawal by 2021. The deal achieved a chaotic fulfillment as the Taliban swept to power during former US President Joe Biden's first summer in the White House.