World Boxing apologises for naming Imane Khelif in gender testing rule change
When the governing body released its new policy, it named Khelif, who won Olympic gold at the Paris 2024 Games amid a gender row. World Boxing said the Algerian will not be allowed to compete in its female categories without first undergoing a sex test.
However, the governing body has now told the BBC that its president, Boris van der Vorst, has sent a written apology to the Algerian Boxing Federation. In his letter, Van der Vorst said 'the athlete's privacy should have been protected', per the BBC.
Khelif, 26, won gold in the women's welterweight category at last summer's Olympics, while Taiwan's Lin Yu-ting became featherweight champion. Each boxer's success was overshadowed over the course of the Olympics, due to their respective disqualifications from the 2023 World Championship.
The International Boxing Association (IBA), which oversaw that competition, alleged that both fighters had failed gender eligibility tests, leading to their disqualifications. The IBA previously oversaw Olympic boxing, too, but was removed ahead of the 2020 Games due to concerns about the organisation's finances and links to Russia, and due to fears of corruption.
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) said boxers could compete in the women's categories in Paris if their passports said they were female. Khelif was born and raised as a woman and has never identified as transgender or intersex.
She was due to return to action in the Netherlands between 5 and 10 June, but on Friday, World Boxing announced the introduction of mandatory sex testing 'to ensure the safety of all participants and deliver a competitive level playing field for men and women'.
A statement added: 'In light of plans to introduce this policy and the particular circumstances surrounding some boxers that competed at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games, World Boxing has written to the Algerian Boxing Federation to inform it that Imane Khelif will not be allowed to participate in the female category at the Eindhoven Box Cup or any World Boxing event until Imane Khelif undergoes sex testing.
'This decision reflects concerns over the safety and wellbeing of all boxers, including Imane Khelif, and aims to protect the mental and physical health of all participants in light of some of the reactions that have been expressed in relation to the boxer's potential participation at the Eindhoven Box Cup.'
World Boxing also said '[in] the event the athlete's sex certification is challenged by the athlete's federation or by World Boxing, [the athlete will be] ineligible to compete until the dispute is resolved'.
The IOC granted World Boxing provisional recognition as the sport's international governing body in February. The Algerian Boxing Federation joined World Boxing in September.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
D'Tigress Make It Five: Nigeria's Golden Generation Continues Its Reign
In a tournament that tested grit, teamwork, and championship resolve, D'Tigress once again stood tall. Nigeria's women's basketball team claimed their fifth consecutive FIBA Women's AfroBasket title, defeating Mali in the final and solidifying their dominance in African basketball. This victory was not just another gold medal; it was a powerful statement. It served as a reminder that while many teams aspire to create a legacy, D'Tigress are living it, winning title after title while facing the pressure to sustain their greatness. For Head Coach Rena Wakama, this was her second consecutive AfroBasket title, each one a significant milestone in its own right. Just a year ago, Wakama and D'Tigress made history in Olympic basketball by becoming the first African team—male or female—to reach the quarter-finals. Now, they have proven once again that they are the best team on the continent, going undefeated in continental play since 2015. This triumph celebrates Nigerian excellence. It was about more than just lifting another trophy; it was about holding their ground while the rest of the continent came at them with increasing determination, intelligence, and preparation. D'Tigress navigated each stage: group, knockout, and finals, with discipline, intensity, and an unwavering resolve. Every game was a testament to the deep connection within this team. From veterans who understand what it takes to win, to newer players carving out their places in the team's dynasty, the blend of talent and selflessness was evident. Standout performers like Amy Okonkwo, who was awarded MVP of the tournament, Promise Amukamara, Ezinne Kalu, and Murjanatu Musa displayed a perfect mix of speed and composure, turning defensive pressure into fast breaks and open shots. Throughout the tournament, Nigeria attacked in waves. Whether shooting from beyond the arc or driving to the rim, they dictated the tempo and forced their opponents into mistakes. Their suffocating defense led to numerous turnovers and transition points. When shots weren't falling, it was their hustle and rebounding that kept them ahead. Even when the momentum shifted against them, as it did in the semifinal, they remained composed, regrouped, and responded like champions. The semifinal against Senegal, a long-standing rival in African basketball, lived up to its billing as a clash of giants. Senegal challenged Nigeria fiercely, but in the end, D'Tigress pulled away with clarity and composure in the crucial moments. When the final buzzer sounded the following day after clinching their fifth straight AfroBasket title, players embraced, with some crying, some celebrating, and others simply holding up five fingers, one for each championship they've now won in a row. That image was powerful: a generation of athletes reminding the world that greatness is not an accident. It is built piece by piece through sacrifice, belief, and consistency. This fifth title carries symbolic weight, arriving at a moment when Nigerian women in sports are excelling across various fields. The Super Falcons remain continental champions in football, while D'Tigress maintains the same status in basketball. Two powerhouse teams in different sports united in excellence. For Wakama, this achievement is part of a larger mission. From the beginning of her tenure, she has been outspoken about the need to change narratives surrounding women's sports in Nigeria. During a post-Olympic interview last year with she made her intentions clear: the goal isn't just to win; it's to inspire, create visibility, and spark belief. "I just wanted to bring attention to women's basketball, to show that we are skilled as well. With the support and love behind us, we too can potentially reach the top of the industry and excel." Her efforts are paying off. The momentum is growing, reflected in increasing titles, visibility, fan engagement, and media coverage. The days of dismissing women's basketball in Nigeria are fading. The next generation now sees a pathway forward. They witness a winning team led by a Nigerian coach, overcoming challenges and lifting trophies with pride. That matters. As the tournament concluded, discussions naturally shifted to what's next. The 2026 FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup qualifiers are on the horizon, bringing questions about team depth, rotation, and development. But for now, D'Tigress can relish this moment, they've earned it. Winning five in a row is no small accomplishment; it signifies a dynasty and a legacy. While headlines capture the final score and the fifth title, the real story lies in the journey: how a team full of players from around the world comes together under one flag, time and again, to showcase what Nigerian basketball is capable of achieving. D'Tigress are not just the champions of Africa; they are the gold standard.
News24
27 minutes ago
- News24
Why do African elites seek medical treatment abroad?
Choosing where to seek medical help is a deeply private decision. But the numerous occasions African leaders have sought treatment abroad have thrown the spotlight on local healthcare investment. To a large extent, leaders are responsible for the development of proper health care for the citizens of their countries. The deaths of former leaders Muhammadu Buhari of Nigeria and Edgar Lungu of Zambia in foreign medical facilities have not calmed accusations that African leaders neglect public health systems in their own countries. 'The state of healthcare in Nigeria is deeply concerning. The biggest problem is infrastructure. There are no drugs and functional medical equipment,' Jamila Atiku, a researcher on public health in Nigeria, told DW. Low investment in public health Reasons for medical tourism include a lack of specialised treatment available locally, poorly equipped hospitals and security fears for politicians. READ | Nigeria's former president Buhari dies at 82 Another factor, according to Zimbabwean health rights advocate Chamunorwa Mashoko, is an over-reliance on foreign aid. 'Among African countries, over 32 out of 54 countries are not allocating significant budgets to health. This is motivated by overdependency on donor aid,' he told DW. 'Africa is failing to realise that foreign funding in health is just for diplomacy. Those assisting us with all that aid really has nothing to do with our health challenges,' Mashoko added. African countries receive more than $60 billion (€52 billion) in health funding, representing just a fraction of the total health financing needed for the continent. Under the 2001 Abuja Declaration, African Union (AU) member states committed to end the continent's health financing crisis by pledging to allocate 15% of their annual national budgets to healthcare. But over two decades later, only three countries, Rwanda, Botswana, and Cape Verde, have consistently met or exceeded the target. The World Health Organisation (WHO) reports that over 30 AU member states allocate less than 10% of their budget to healthcare, with some allocating as little as 5% to 7%. 'Nigeria has been fluctuating between 4%-6% of the annual budget,' said Atiku, adding that politicians are only concerned about other infrastructure development projects like roads. 'Doctors and healthcare professionals are always going on strike because they are underpaid.' Inadequate public financing of health has resulted in poorly run, underperforming health systems across many African countries. 'Over-reliance on external funding is highly unsustainable and inconsistent with achieving Universal Health Coverage,' said Itai Rusike, of the Zimbabwe-based Community Working Group on Health. 'The Abuja target of 15% allocation to health has remained an elusive target. It is now outdated given the population increase, huge disease burden and the levels of neglect of infrastructure and health worker retention,' Rusike added. Which medical services are sought abroad A chronic lack of specialised treatment and facilities is driving many African patients to seek medical treatment abroad. The sectors affected include oncology, cardiology, neurology, orthopaedics, organ transplants, fertility, and paediatrics for the management of rare genetic disorders. Over 300 000 Africans travel to India annually for medical services, spending more than $2 billion each year. India is said to be generating more than $6 billion each year from medical tourism. Projections show the Asian country could get $13 billion in medical tourism by 2026 under the 'Heal in India' initiative. Phill Magakoe/Gallo Images According to the African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, Nigerians are estimated to spend $1 billion annually on medical tourism. Sixty percent of that amount is spent on oncology, orthopaedics, nephrology, and cardiology. Additionally, the figure represents almost 20% of the annual public health expenditure that covers the salaries of health workers. An estimated 5 000 Nigerians fly out of the country monthly for medical treatment, many traveling to India. What needs to be done Some African health authorities argue they are doing their best to improve healthcare for their countries. 'There is room for improvement to fund the health sector. We are targeting to ensure by 2027 at least 17 000 primary healthcare facilities are functional in Nigeria,' Nigeria's Minister of State for Health and Social Welfare, Iziaq Adekunle Salako, told DW. 'There is not a health system in the world that is 100%. We believe we are headed in the right direction in implementing solutions.' Health experts say African governments need to build modern health facilities to offer services currently being outsourced abroad. 'Looking up to politicians will not work. Communities need to come together and pull resources to create health care systems that work for them,' health rights advocate Chamunorwa Mashoko told DW. In 2016, the continental lender Afreximbank launched a support facility to build specialised health facilities across Africa to reduce outbound medical tourism. The initial target would focus on establishing a centre of excellence for cancer patients. Tanzania, Nigeria, Kenya and Ghana were identified as suitable to host the facilities.
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
3 African nations have agreed to take deportees from the US. What we know about the secretive deals
CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — Rwanda has become the third African nation to enter into a deal with the Trump administration to accept migrants deported by the United States. The Rwandan government said Tuesday it has agreed to accept up to 250 deportees from the U.S. for resettlement but didn't immediately give any more details, including when they would arrive or what Rwanda got, if anything, out of the deal. The U.S. has already deported eight men it said were dangerous criminals who were in the U.S. illegally to South Sudan and another five to Eswatini. Here's what we know, and still don't know, about U.S. President Donald Trump's expanding third-country deportation program in Africa and the largely secretive deals the U.S. is striking. The U.S. State Department and the Department of Homeland Security haven't responded to requests seeking more details on the deals in Africa. South Sudan The U.S. sent eight men from South Sudan, Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar and Vietnam to South Sudan in East Africa in early July after their deportations were held up by a legal challenge. That led to them being kept for weeks in a converted shipping container at an American military base in nearby Djibouti. U.S. officials said the men had been convicted of violent crimes in the U.S. When it took custody of them a month ago, the South Sudan government said it would ensure their 'safety and wellbeing' but has declined to give other details, including where the men are being held and what their fate might be. South Sudan has been wracked by conflict since it gained independence from Sudan in 2011 and is teetering on the edge of civil war again. Eswatini Two weeks after the South Sudan deportations, the U.S. announced that it had sent another five men — citizens of Vietnam, Jamaica, Cuba, Yemen and Laos — to the small kingdom of Eswatini in southern Africa. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said they were also violent criminals whose home countries had refused to take them back. Eswatini's government said the men would be held in solitary confinement until their repatriation, and later said that might take up to a year. A human rights lawyer in Eswatini has taken authorities to court alleging the men are being denied legal representation while being held in a maximum-security prison, and questioning the legality of detaining them indefinitely when they have served their criminal sentences in the U.S. U.S. authorities didn't name the men or say if they had been deported straight from prison or detained in another way. Eswatini, which borders South Africa, is one of the world's last absolute monarchies. King Mswati III has ruled since he turned 18 in 1986. Authorities under him are accused of violently subduing pro-democracy movements in a country where political parties are effectively banned. Rwanda Rwanda's deal with the U.S. comes after a contentious migrant agreement it reached with the U.K. in 2022 collapsed and was ruled unlawful by Britain's Supreme Court. That deal was meant to see people seeking asylum in the U.K. sent to Rwanda, where they would stay if their asylum applications were approved. The failed deal ultimately cost the U.K. nearly a billion dollars in public money, including around $300 million that it gave to Rwanda and didn't get back. Rwanda said that the deportees it will take from the U.S. will be resettled there and given work training, healthcare and help with accommodation. Analysts say that African nations might be seeking a range of benefits from the Trump administration in return for taking deportees, including more favorable tariff rates, aid and other financial assistance, and even the easing of sanctions against some of their officials.___ AP news on the Trump administration:
