
Air India 171 plane crash: The likely next steps in black box analysis
The black boxes, which are actually bright orange in colour, are critical in aircraft accident investigations as they provide data on numerous parameters and aircraft systems, helping the investigators identify the most likely causes of an accident. According to the government, the analysis of the data from the Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR) is underway and will help reconstruct the sequence of events leading to the accident and identify contributing factors.
Unlike older aircraft models that had separate cockpit voice recorder (CVR) and flight data recorder (FDR), modern jets like the Boeing 787 aircraft have two combined black box sets, each with the joint functions of CVR and FDR, and a few other capabilities. The combined unit is called EAFR, and regulations require two units to be located in the aircraft—one at the front and one at the aft, or rear section—for redundancy, in case of unit is significantly damaged or is never recovered. The first EAFR were recovered on June 13 from a building rooftop at the crash site in Ahmedabad, while the second was recovered on June 16 from the aircraft debris.
The purpose of the FDR is to record flight data on numerous parameters of aircraft operations, while the CVR records the flight crew's voices, as well as other sounds inside the cockpit. Communications with air traffic control, automated radio weather briefings, and conversation between the pilots and ground or cabin crew are also recorded.
Apart from a few visual cues that suggest lack of thrust and insufficient lift beyond a point, there aren't any tell-tale signs of what might have gone wrong with the Air India aircraft. In such instances, the black boxes become all the more crucial for the investigation. The data is expected to give insights into pilot action, functioning of aircraft systems and components, and identification of any system malfunction or failure, among others.
The FDR records many different operating conditions of the flight. By regulation, newly manufactured aircraft must monitor at least 88 key parameters like time, altitude, airspeed, heading, and aircraft attitude. The EAFRs installed on the Boeing 787 aircraft have the capability of recording around 2,000 parameters and in-flight characteristics that can aid in the investigation. According to experts, the modern black boxes can generate highly specific and minute data on scores of parameters, allowing investigators to go deeper into the analysis of the probable causes of the accident. Current regulations mandate that FDR should have data for at least 25 hours.
With the data retrieved from the FDR, investigators should be able to generate a computer animated video reconstruction of the flight. The investigators can then visualise the aircraft's attitude, instrument readings, power settings, and other characteristics of the flight. This animation enables the investigating team to visualise the last moments of the flight before the accident, along with exhaustive flight data.
Coming to the CVR, in addition to the pilots' conversation with each other and the ATC, investigators would be highly interested in sounds pertaining to engine noise, any warnings that may have been sounded in the cockpit, sounds related to landing gear, among other clicks and pops. Regulations require CVR to store at least two hours of data.
Notably, at least one of the EAFRs on Boeing 787 aircraft are equipped with its own independent emergency battery, which keeps it running for around 10 minutes in the case of the plane suffering a total electrical failure. Given that the ill-fated aircraft was not airborne for even a minute before crashing, the emergency battery is expected to have helped record all flight data, if the plane indeed suffered total electrical failure.
'Both the Flight Data Recorder and the Cockpit Voice Recorder have proven to be valuable tools in the accident investigation process. They (FDR and CVR) can provide information that may be difficult or impossible to obtain by other means. When used in conjunction with other information gained in the investigation, the recorders are playing an ever-increasing role in determining the Probable Cause of an aircraft accident,' the US National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) says on its website. The NTSB is among external organisations assisting India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) in the probe.
Just the availability of extensive flight data does not mean that the investigation will be swift. And that is because that data needs to be carefully analysed, interpreted, and made sense of before zeroing in—as accurately as possible—on the most probable causes of the accident.
Once the data is successfully retrieved, the interpretation process begins, which itself could be time consuming due to various factors, including multi-agency involvement, requirement of deep analysis of the FDR and CVR data, and likelihood of simultaneous system failures in a short span of time, among others. It could take anywhere between a few days to a few weeks to effectively analyse the black box data.
Aircraft are highly sophisticated and complex machines and air crash investigations, too, are extremely complex. Often, aircraft accidents are caused by multiple things going wrong almost simultaneously, or one thing leading to the other in quick succession. Data interpretation in crashes involving modern jetliners, in turn, can also be significantly complicated. Investigators need to be extremely meticulous in analyzing the data in order to identify the series of events that led to the catastrophic crash, and pinpoint the exact causes behind those events .
Sukalp Sharma is a Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and writes on a host of subjects and sectors, notably energy and aviation. He has over 13 years of experience in journalism with a body of work spanning areas like politics, development, equity markets, corporates, trade, and economic policy. He considers himself an above-average photographer, which goes well with his love for travel. ... Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Not Sci-Fi, But Smart: India's Hospital Revolution Is Rooted in Reality, Say Experts
New Delhi: The term smart hospital often conjures up sci-fi imagery—robotic nurses, AI diagnoses, and error-free systems. But in India's complex healthcare landscape, the reality is far more layered. As the country steadily embraces digital transformation, the idea of the smart hospital is gaining prominence. Yet beyond buzzwords and sleek technology, what truly defines a smart hospital in the Indian context? At ETHealthworld's inaugural edition FutureMedX Summit, industry leaders took a hard look at what it really takes to build intelligent, tech-enabled hospitals in India—not as envisioned in glossy demos, but as implemented in overburdened ICUs, rural clinics, and tier-two cities. Smart hospitals , it turns out, are not about science fiction—they're about solving real problems in real time. In a compelling panel discussion titled 'The Rise of Smart Hospitals: Creating a Digital Health Ecosystem,' experts examined the evolving definition of smart care, patient-centric applications, and the practical challenges of implementing digital health solutions that are intelligent, compassionate, and scalable. The panel featured Viji Varghese , Hospital Director at Manipal Hospital Delhi; Rajiv Sikka , Group CIO of Medanta Hospitals; Dr. Narin Sehgal , Finance Secretary of CAHO and Secretary of AHPI, Delhi State, as well as Medical Director of Sehgal Neo Hospital; Kunal Aggarwal, Founder and Managing Director of Easy Solution Infosystems Pvt. Ltd; and Miraj Shah , Manager at eClinicalWorks India. The panelists discussed how connected ICUs, conversational AI, modular tech adoption, and patient-centric workflows are being practically implemented across different healthcare settings. They emphasized that India's smart hospital journey isn't about leaping into the future—it's about building it step by step, with empathy, interoperability, and measurable impact. Opening the conversation, Varghese noted that a smart hospital is not merely a collection of technologies. Instead, it is about how technology is used to ensure access to information for both providers and patients, so that better decisions can be made and better health outcomes achieved. Rather than being dazzled by devices and dashboards, she stressed the purposeful use of technology—enabling clinicians to deliver more accurate care and empowering patients to participate meaningfully in their own health journeys. Sikka emphasized that technology is essential for maintaining consistency across a growing network of hospitals. His definition of a smart hospital revolves around delivering predictable, standardized, and sustainable experiences for all stakeholders—patients, doctors, nurses, and support staff. Sixteen years ago, Medanta was a single hospital. Today, with six locations, he said it became clear that the patient and doctor experience could not scale without technology. For them, technology has become the great equalizer. He introduced Medanta's 'Triple A' principle—any device, anywhere, anytime—as the foundation of its connected care model. ICU doctors, for instance, no longer need to call junior residents for updates. They can view live bedside monitor readings, ventilator stats, and infusion pump data from handheld devices, allowing real-time decision-making. Sikka also offered an aspirational but achievable vision of reimagining the patient journey—from parking to post-discharge. He asked why patients should wait for hours in the admission lobby, when they could complete pre-admission formalities like KYC and insurance at home. A hospital, he said, should function like a hotel—walk in, check in, and begin care. Once a patient is admitted, the hospital system sends real-time notifications to the designated doctor, nursing unit, housekeeping, F&B, and other departments. With clearly defined turnaround times for vital checks and doctor rounds, the entire process becomes seamless and system-driven. On the post-discharge front, Medanta has developed procedure-specific follow-up pathways. Whether it's a stent placement or orthopedic surgery, patients receive milestone-based reminders and coordinated care through CRM systems, ensuring continuity and reducing readmission risks. Dr. Narin Sehgal brought a deeply human touch to the discussion. While acknowledging the power of technology, he reminded the audience that the real hero of the hospital is the patient. Everything must revolve around them, he said, and technology must never make patients feel threatened. He recalled how patients often express fear and vulnerability before entering the operation theatre, which underlines the need for empathy, communication, and trust—elements that must be built into the design of a smart hospital. Technology is evolving so rapidly, he noted, that even clinicians struggle to keep up. Smartness isn't just about automation, it's about assurance. For him, smart hospitals begin with safety, simplicity, and purpose. He also emphasized the importance of modular, ROI-friendly solutions that are accessible even to smaller hospitals. Kunal Aggarwal echoed the sentiment that technology should never replace people but should instead enable them—whether they're clinicians, back-office staff, or patients. From clinical decision support systems to multilingual videos that ease pre-operative anxiety, he highlighted the need for tech that functions as a supportive partner. Miraj Shah added that the best digital solutions are those that remain invisible yet impactful. Care delivery, he stressed, must always remain front and center. Sikka reinforced these views with examples of transformative technologies already in use at Medanta. ICU monitors, ventilators, and infusion pumps generate over 20,000 data points per patient per day, enabling comprehensive, real-time monitoring. In imaging, AI tools screen chest X-rays for tuberculosis and lung nodules as part of India's largest CSR-led TB-free program. In outpatient departments, conversational AI transcribes doctor-patient interactions into structured prescriptions in real time, saving clinician time and reducing waitlists. Looking ahead, Sikka predicted that the future of healthcare input will be voice—and perhaps, eventually, neural signals. Varghese noted that smart hospitals represent more of a cultural shift than a technological one. Earlier, she said, healthcare was top-down. Now, technology is empowering patients to become active participants in their care. This shift in mindset must extend to both clinicians and administrators. However, she cautioned that despite India's progress in digital health, challenges such as infrastructure costs, skill gaps, and a lack of tailored health information systems (HIS) for smaller hospitals remain significant hurdles. Shah emphasized the importance of partnerships and interoperability, stating that smart hospitals cannot function in silos. They must connect with primary care, startups, public health networks, and national digital platforms like the Ayushman Bharat Digital Mission (ABDM). Aggarwal pointed to scalable innovations such as Aravind Eye Care's tele-ophthalmology model, while Sehgal stressed the need for open APIs and modular systems to avoid vendor lock-ins and enable inclusive growth. Sikka shared that Medanta's AI-powered command centers are already optimizing discharge workflows, medication logistics, and interdepartmental referrals in real time. As for digital twins, he explained that while patient-centric models are still a distant goal due to the lack of long-term electronic medical record data, operational digital twins are already being piloted to manage peak-hour radiology traffic and predictive equipment maintenance. So, what will truly drive India's smart hospital journey? The panelists agreed: smart hospitals are not built on technology stacks alone—they are built on trust, interoperability, informed patients, and collaborative partnerships. India may not yet have universal EMRs or patient digital twins, but with open minds, open APIs, and a people-first approach, the future of Indian healthcare is undeniably smarter.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Vivo X Fold 5 with Zeiss camera, 6000mAh battery to launch in India soon
China's Vivo has announced that its next-generation book-style foldable smartphone, the Vivo X Fold 5, will be launching in India soon. Though the company has not released the launch schedule, it has revealed key specifications of the smartphone including AI-powered features and battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 5 was launched in the company's home country last month, featuring Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor. The Indian variant of the smartphone is expected to be along the same line. Vivo X Fold 5: What to expect Vivo has confirmed that the X Fold 5 in India will pack a 6,000mAh battery and support 80W wired charging, similar to the Chinese counterpart. Vivo will also continue with its collaboration with the German optics brand Zeiss, offering a triple camera set-up at the rear with a 50MP telephoto camera. For durability, the Vivo X Fold 5 is said to come with IPX8/IPX9 rating for water resistance, and IP5X rating for dust resistance. Vivo also said that the smartphone has been tested for 6,00,000 'reliable foldings' to ensure the durability of the hinge mechanism. Coming to the design, the X Fold 5 will have a sleek profile measuring 9.2mm when folded and 4.3mm when unfolded. As for the AI-powered features, Vivo X Fold 5 will offer AI Image Studio within the Gallery app for smart image editing tools. It will also offer several productivity features such as AI Smart Office for summarising meetings using AI. The smartphone will also feature a customisable side-mounted button for accessing controls such as sound profiles, torch, camera and even launching individual apps. Vivo X Fold 5 launched in China with the following specifications:


Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US founder calls out Indian techie for ‘scamming' multiple startups: ‘I fired this guy in 1 week'
Suhail Doshi, co-founder and former CEO of Mixpanel, has accused an Indian man of working at multiple startups simultaneously under false pretences. In a post on X, San Francisco-based Doshi identified Soham Parekh as a 'scammer' who has allegedly duped several companies. He warned other founders to steer clear of him. Suhail Doshi, founder of Playground AI, accused a former employee of moonlighting at 3 to 4 startups (YouTube/@initializedcapital) Doshi, who is also the founder of Playground AI, claimed that Parekh was briefly employed at his company. He said Parekh was fired within a week and warned against moonlighting – but the warning seems to have fallen on deaf ears as the Indian man continued to work with multiple startups. 'PSA: there's a guy named Soham Parekh (in India) who works at 3-4 startups at the same time. He's been preying on YC companies and more. Beware,' the US-based entrepreneur posted on X this afternoon. 'I fired this guy in his first week and told him to stop lying / scamming people. He hasn't stopped a year later. No more excuses,' he added. Doshi shared the ex-employee's CV on X. According to the CV, Soham Parekh has worked at companies like Dynamo AI, Union AI, Synthesia and Alan AI in various technical roles. He holds a bachelor's degree from the University of Mumbai and a master's degree from Georgia Institute of Technology, as per the CV. However, while sharing the CV publicly, Doshi warned that it is 'Probably 90% fake and most links are gone.' The Playground founder further claimed that he tried to talk sense into Parekh but failed. 'I want to also say that I tried to talk sense into this guy, explain the impact, and give him a chance to turn a new leaf because sometimes that's what a person needs. But it clearly didn't work,' he wrote. Doshi also said he corroborated this account with more than six companies before shaming Parekh publicly. Post divides opinion on social media The accusatory post divided opinion on social media, although many supported Doshi and some confirmed his accusations. Nicolai Ouporov, co-founder and CEO of Fleet AI, agreed with Doshi. 'He has been doing this for years and works at more than 4 startups at any given time,' Ouporov posted. Justin Harvey, co-founder of AIVideo, said: 'I was THIS close to hiring him. The craziest part is he actually crushed the interview.' Another startup founder named Adish Jain wrote: 'Can confirm. This guy wasted our time for a month. did great in interviews. but he's a liar.' Some people, however, questioned why Doshi felt it is wrong to moonlight at different companies at the same time. 'Gets nothing done. Made up constant lies. Corroborated by 6+ other companies. The tweet will surface 10+ more - you'll see,' the founder of Playground replied.