US planes, cars, drinks on EU list for potential tariffs
The package is the second put forward by the European Commission, which oversees trade policy for the 27-nation European Union. It is designed to respond to U.S. tariffs on cars and car parts and a baseline tariff, currently at 10%.
U.S. President Donald Trump, however, is now threatening a baseline tariff on imports from the EU of 30% from August 1, a level European officials say is unacceptable and would end normal trade between two of the world's largest markets.
The list, sent to EU member states and seen by Reuters on Tuesday, covers U.S. goods imports worth 72 billion euros ($84.1 billion). It also includes electrical and precision equipment as well as agriculture and food products - a range of fruits and vegetables, along with wine, beer and spirits - worth a total of 6.35 billion euros.
A first package on 21 billion euros of U.S. goods was approved in April but then immediately suspended to allow room for negotiations. That suspension has been extended to August 6.
EU officials said on Monday that they were still seeking to strike a deal to avoid Trump's heavy tariff blow, but EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said member states had agreed the bloc would need to take countermeasures if talks with the U.S. fail.
The Commission initially put forward the second package in May for a public consultation. The proposal then related to 95 billion euros of U.S. goods. It has since been whittled down, though most of the main items have remained.
There is no specific date for EU members to approve the package.
($1 = 0.8562 euros)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
23 minutes ago
- Reuters
Hims & Hers hit with investor lawsuits after Novo ends Wegovy partnership
July 15 (Reuters) - Telehealth company Hims & Hers (HIMS.N), opens new tab is facing a growing number of U.S. investor lawsuits after Novo Nordisk's ( opens new tab decision last month to end a short-lived partnership to sell its Wegovy weight-loss drug through the platform sent shares plunging. A group of shareholders sued Hims on Monday in federal court in San Francisco, accusing its board and senior executives of making false and misleading statements about its financial condition and operations. The case was filed as a so-called derivative lawsuit on behalf of the company. The lawsuit follows two securities class actions filed by Hims investors in the same court last month, seeking damages over the drop in stock price after Novo in late June ended what the companies had initially described as a long-term collaboration designed to make obesity care and treatment more affordable and accessible. Hims, Novo and the lawyers who filed Monday's lawsuit did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Danish drugmaker Novo is not a defendant in the lawsuits. Founded in 2017, San Francisco-based Hims provides health and wellness products focused on weight loss, sexual and mental health and hair loss. Novo on June 23 said it was ending their partnership that began in late April, citing Hims' alleged improper marketing and sales of Wegovy copies. Novo accused Hims of 'deceptive promotion and selling of illegitimate, knockoff versions of Wegovy that put patient safety at risk.' Hims CEO Andrew Dudum responded, opens new tab in a post on X that day that accused Novo management of misleading the public and making anticompetitive demands 'that infringe on the independent decision making of providers and limit patient choice.' Hims shares fell $22.24, or over 34%, after Novo's announcement, declining from $64.22 per share on June 20 to close at $41.98 per share on June 23. The stock closed on Monday at $52.03 a share. The tight supply of Wegovy in the United States had allowed Hims and others to sell cheaper, compounded versions of the drug, known chemically as semaglutide. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration in February removed Wegovy from the agency's shortage list. Hims said the decision meant it could not guarantee continued sales of compounded semaglutide. The case is Steve Jones v. Andrew Dudum, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:25-cv-05866-AGT. For plaintiff: Shane Rowley of Rowley Law PLLC, and Francis "Casey" Flynn Jr. of Law Office of Francis J. Flynn Jr For defendants: No appearances yet Read more: Novo, Hims & Hers engage in war of words after Wegovy deal falls apart US judge upholds FDA's removal of Ozempic, Wegovy from drug shortage list Novo Nordisk to sell Wegovy through telehealth firms to cash-paying US customers
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
The View host tears into Republican infighting over Epstein files
The View host Ana Navarro tore into Republicans' responses to the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files during Tuesday's (15 July) program. It comes as a growing number of the president's supporters have complained after he encouraged people to move on from the Epstein files. For years, right-wing influencers circulated theories online about the government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his death in federal prison, perpetuating claims that a ring of high-profile, powerful individuals helped cover up the convicted pedophile's actions and ensure he never stood trial. But last week's Justice Department and FBI memo shut down many of those theories, including the existence of a 'client list,' and disappointed many Trump supporters who refused to believe the absence of bombshell revelations. "It turns out that when you spend years building a five-alarm fire, you can't put it out by pissing on it," Ms Navarro said.
Telegraph
27 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Pete Hegseth bans Pentagon officials from ‘evil globalism' conference
Pete Hegseth has banned Pentagon officials from speaking at a security conference because it promotes 'evil globalism'. Senior figures in the US defence department were set to speak at the Aspen Security Forum in Colorado this week, following a tradition under both Democrat and Republican administrations. However, Mr Hegseth, the US defence secretary, has blocked his department from taking part in the four-day event, which is hosted by the Aspen Institute think tank. Kingsley Wilson, a Pentagon spokeswoman, told Just the News that Mr Hegseth's office believes it 'promotes the evil of globalism, disdain for our great country, and hatred for the president of the United States'. The department 'has no interest in legitimising an organisation that has invited former officials who have been the architects of chaos abroad and failure at home', she continued. 'They are antithetical to the America First values of this administration.' Figures still scheduled to appear John Phelan, the Navy secretary, Emil Michael, the defence undersecretary for research and engineering, and Doug Beck, director of the department's defence innovation unit, were among several senior Pentagon officials due to speak this week, according to Politico. Ms Wilson did not clarify her comments and the Pentagon declined to provide further details. However, attendees tend to come from a more traditional foreign policy perspective than Mr Trump's 'America First' wing of the Republican Party, which has a strong isolationist streak and is deeply critical of former administrations. Those expected to speak at the conference this week include Condoleezza Rice, George W Bush's secretary of state, David Petraeus, Barack Obama's former CIA director, and Mark Esper, defence secretary in Donald Trump's first administration. Diplomatic figures from the current administration are still scheduled to appear, including Tom Barrack, the US ambassador for Turkey, and Adam Boehler, the presidential envoy for hostages. Sean Parnell, the Pentagon's chief spokesman said: 'Senior department of defence officials will no longer be participating at the Aspen Security Forum because their values do not align with the values of the DOD [department of defence]. 'The department will remain strong in its focus to increase the lethality of our warfighters, revitalise the warrior ethos, and project peace through strength on the world stage. 'It is clear the ASF [Aspen Security Forum] is not in alignment with these goals.' The conference hosts said in a statement that it had 'welcomed senior officials – Republican and Democrat, civilian and military – as well as senior foreign officials and experts, who bring experience and diverse perspectives on matters of national security' for more than a decade. 'We will miss the participation of the Pentagon, but our invitations remain open,' they added. 'The Aspen Security Forum remains committed to providing a platform for informed, non-partisan debate about the most important security challenges facing the world.'
