logo
Trump's F-47 Could Become Sitting Ducks for China

Trump's F-47 Could Become Sitting Ducks for China

Newsweek05-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
U.S. aircraft, including the in-development F-47 stealth fighter, could be threatened by advanced Chinese weapons at U.S. bases in the Indo-Pacific, experts warn as Washington turns its gaze toward the region and possible Chinese designs on Taiwan.
F-47s at U.S. Air Force (USAF) bases in the Indo-Pacific will have to contend with China's mid- and long-range missiles, said John Hemmings, the deputy director for geopolitics at the Council on Geostrategy in the U.K.
"Combine that with what some have seen as under-investment in active base defenses, and we see that USAF—like all services and allies—will have critical issues keeping their aircraft safe," Hemmings told Newsweek.
There is a "growing cruise and ballistic missile threat" to USAF bases in the Pacific, prompting the U.S. military to take a long look at its air defenses around these facilities, the RAND think tank said in an analysis commissioned by the U.S. Pacific Air Forces and published on Tuesday.
President Donald Trump beside an image of an F-47 sixth-generation fighter jet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 21.
President Donald Trump beside an image of an F-47 sixth-generation fighter jet in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 21.
Pool via AP
China is able to attack "all U.S. bases in the Indo-Pacific region," and defenses around these bases have not kept up with the threats they could face, according to the think tank.
The USAF has looked at ways to make air bases in the region more protected, but "improvements to date have been limited, though the threat has advanced substantially," the analysis said. More money has been spent on "active defenses," such as missile systems, but "spending on passive defenses has significantly lagged behind," it continued. Passive defenses can include camouflage and decoys.
The U.S. under President Donald Trump has made its intention to turn away from Europe toward the Indo-Pacific clear, sparking a flurry of commitments among European allies to raise defense spending and rely less on American personnel and U.S.-supplied kit.
"The U.S. is prioritizing deterring war with China in the Pacific," U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told European allies in Brussels in February, adding, "Together, we can establish a division of labor that maximizes our comparative advantages in Europe and Pacific respectively."
Hegseth said on Saturday that Beijing was "preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific" and was gearing up for the "real deal" of an invasion push on Taiwan.
Imagery captured by the ESA's Sentinel-2 satellites on May 30 shows Kadena Air Base on Okinawa Island in southwestern Japan.
Imagery captured by the ESA's Sentinel-2 satellites on May 30 shows Kadena Air Base on Okinawa Island in southwestern Japan.
Copernicus
Beijing considers Taiwan a breakaway part of mainland China that it intends to one day reunite under central control. But Taipei, which has established a democratic government, has long asserted its independence from Beijing and aligned itself with Western allies.
"The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent," Hegseth said during a speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense forum in Singapore. China's Foreign Ministry denounced the speech as "filled with provocations and intended to sow division."
"China deplores and firmly opposes them and has protested strongly to the U.S.," Beijing added.
Imagery captured by the ESA's Sentinel-2 satellites on May 29 shows Andersen Air Force Base on the U.S. territory of Guam.
Imagery captured by the ESA's Sentinel-2 satellites on May 29 shows Andersen Air Force Base on the U.S. territory of Guam.
Copernicus
Trump announced in March that Boeing would be the main contractor for a new Air Force sixth-generation stealth jet, currently known as the F-47. "Nothing in the world comes even close to it," Trump said at the time.
The U.S. Navy's parallel program to get a sixth-generation jet in the air is known as F/A-XX. The Pentagon hopes to prioritize the F-47 development over the F/A-XX, believing going after two programs at once could slow both down, Bloomberg reported on Wednesday.
China is developing its own sixth-generation fighter, the J-36. Footage emerged late last year appearing to show a new Chinese stealth fighter flying over the southwestern Chinese city of Chengdu.
The future F-47, when deployed in the Indo-Pacific, will need fixed bases that would "be under mortal threat" from China's long-range weapons, Tom Shugart, an adjunct senior fellow with the Center for a New American Security think tank, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday.
Militaries across the world will have to rethink how they protect their air bases and expensive aircraft after Ukraine pulled off an elaborate, coordinated drone attack on several Russian air bases on Sunday, analysts say.
Ukraine said it hit 41 of Russia's aircraft, including at least one of its scarce A-50 airborne early warning and control aircraft and several long-range, nuclear-capable bombers.
One Ukrainian official said 13 aircraft had been destroyed, which could not be independently verified. Satellite imagery from the Siberian air base of Belaya and Olenya, an Arctic base in Murmansk—just two of the targeted bases—showed several destroyed Tu-95 and Tu-22 bombers.
Airfields and aircraft "will need to have their passive and active defenses upgraded to deal with this UAV [uncrewed aerial vehicle] threat," said Frederik Mertens, a strategic analyst with the Dutch think tank TNO.
"If there ever was a clear call for action, this is it," he told Newsweek. "The genie is out of the bottle."
Hemmings added, "We are in a new era of asset vulnerability."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Brace Yourself': Stephen Colbert Spots Trump Moment That Quickly 'Went Off The Rails'
'Brace Yourself': Stephen Colbert Spots Trump Moment That Quickly 'Went Off The Rails'

Yahoo

time4 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Brace Yourself': Stephen Colbert Spots Trump Moment That Quickly 'Went Off The Rails'

'Late Show' host Stephen Colbert on Wednesday said President Donald Trump's event a day earlier 'went off the rails pretty darn quick.' Trump was supposed to discuss new investments in AI and energy, but then derailed himself with a long, strange ramble about his uncle, John Trump, who was a professor at MIT. The president boasted that his uncle was 'one of the great professors, 51 years, whatever, longest-serving professor in the history of MIT, three degrees in nuclear, chemical, and math.' 'Brace yourself,' Colbert warned his audience after playing the clip. 'None of that was true.' Trump's uncle was not the longest-serving professor at MIT. He had one degree, not three, and it was in electrical engineering not 'nuclear, chemical, and math.' Trump also said his uncle taught Ted Kaczynski, the 'Unabomber' terrorist who killed people via mail bombs. The president told a whole story about asking his uncle what kind of student Kaczynski was. His uncle, Trump claimed, told him that the future Unabomber was 'seriously good' and would correct the other students' work. 'None of that is true either,' Colbert said. Kaczynski went to Harvard, not MIT. 'Even more insane,' Colbert said, Trump's uncle died more than a decade before Kaczynski was ID'ed and arrested. 'So why on Earth would Trump have asked his uncle about him?' Colbert wondered, then broke out his impression of the president to envision how it might have happened. 'Hey, Uncle John, Uncle Professor Dr. John Trump, professor, sir, uncle. You know that random guy who isn't famous at all and lives in the woods and machines his own screws?' Colbert asked in his Trump voice. 'What was it like when you didn't teach him?' See more in his Wednesday night monologue:

China's premier urges tighter price oversight as deflation pressures squeeze economy
China's premier urges tighter price oversight as deflation pressures squeeze economy

CNBC

time6 minutes ago

  • CNBC

China's premier urges tighter price oversight as deflation pressures squeeze economy

Chinese Premier Li Qiang has called for tighter pricing regulation in the electric car sector during a high-level meeting Wednesday, as Beijing sought to rein in the cut-throat price wars that are fueling deflationary pressures in the economy. In singling out the country's electric-vehicle sector, Li urged strengthened cost oversight and price monitoring. He also called on major automakers to make timely payments to suppliers while practicing greater self-discipline in setting prices. Automakers should improve their competitiveness through technological innovation and quality upgrades, rather than excessive price cuts, Li said. The long-simmering concerns about oversupply and bruising price wars have come to the fore of Chinese policymakers in recent weeks, taking aim at what was described as "involution" — the fierce but often destructive competition — particularly in sectors saddled with surplus capacity, such as EVs, solar panels and steel bars. In a sign that the intensifying price wars have taken a toll on businesses, China's industrial profits plunged 9.1% in May. Its factory-gate producer prices also slipped by 2.8% in the first six months of the year from a year ago, official data showed. Even though profits for Chinese carmakers dropped 11.9% year over year in May, car sales in the country rose 11.7% during the same period, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, with over half of them being new energy vehicles. The auto industry association in May called to halt the "vicious competition," which it said has bitten into businesses' profitability and threatened the security of the supply chain. Sluggish consumer demand has also strained profit margins for businesses. Li also called for renewed efforts to boost domestic consumption, remove "unreasonable restrictions that thwart household spending" and optimize policies for a consumer goods trade-in program. The National Statistics Bureau's deputy head Sheng Laiyun said at a press briefing Tuesday that there has been progress made in the solar panel, cement and automobile industries in regulating prices without government intervention. Even as China shifts its policy messaging to tackle the price wars, economists pointed out that Beijing needs to balance the task of curbing excess supply without stalling growth or putting jobs at risk, especially as an intense trade war with the U.S. has cast doubts over external demand for its goods. Economists at Nomura Bank suggested that attempts to address the surplus capacity would involve substantial production cuts for manufacturers that have been selling products at a loss. However, curbs on investment flowing into the industrial sectors and production outputs would likely generate an additional drag on the economy. "Production cut inevitably comes at the cost of growth and jobs," said Neo Wang, lead China economist and strategist at Evercore ISI, suggesting Beijing is unlikely to meaningfully cut back capacity. "Ensuring growth and saving jobs are of higher priority to Beijing than correcting disinflation or deflation," Wang added, stressing that "the voices so far sound like a slogan for a short-lived campaign at best, rather than a prelude to any reform," Wang added. China reported Tuesday that its economic growth beat expectations, expanding 5.2% in the second quarter, putting the country on track to meet its official full-year growth target of 5%. While some companies across various industries have reportedly planned to cut output, it may not translate into a broader supply drawback, said Tianchen Xu, senior economist at Economist Intelligence Unit. "There are always people who want to expand their market share with low price. Even if a price alliance is formed, firms can still betray the alliance and undercut competitors," Xu said.

Trump administration pulls $4B in federal funding for California's bullet train project

time11 minutes ago

Trump administration pulls $4B in federal funding for California's bullet train project

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- The Trump administration revoked federal funding for California's high-speed rail project on Wednesday, intensifying uncertainty about how the state will make good on its long-delayed promise of building a bullet train to shuttle riders between San Francisco and Los Angeles. The U.S. Transportation Department announced it was pulling back $4 billion in funding for the project, weeks after signaling it would do so. Overall, a little less than a quarter of the project's funding has come from the federal government. The rest has come from the state, mainly through a voter-approved bond and money from its cap-and-trade program. President Donald Trump and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy both have slammed the project as a 'train to nowhere." 'The Railroad we were promised still does not exist, and never will," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "This project was Severely Overpriced, Overregulated, and NEVER DELIVERED.' The loss marks the latest blow to California by the Trump administration, which has blocked a first-in-the-nation rule to phase out the sale of new gas-powered cars, launched investigations into university admission policies and threatened to pull funding over transgender girls being allowed to compete in girls sports. It also comes as rail project leaders are seeking private investment to help pay for its estimated price tag of more than $100 billion. Voters first approved the project in 2008 and it was supposed to be operating this decade. But cost estimates have consistently grown and its timeline pushed back. State officials are now focused on building a 119-mile (192-kilometer) stretch connecting the Central Valley cities of Bakersfield and Merced that is set to be operating by 2033. The California High Speed Rail Authority is slated to release a report this summer to state lawmakers with an updated funding plan and timeline for the project. Authority officials wrote in a letter earlier this month that the Trump administration made up its mind about revoking funding before thoroughly reviewing the project. They noted that more than 50 structures have already been built, including underpasses, viaducts and bridges to separate the rail line from roadways for safety. 'Canceling these grants without cause isn't just wrong — it's illegal,' authority CEO Ian Choudri said in a statement Wednesday. 'These are legally binding agreements, and the Authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025." The authority has asked potential private investors to express their interest by the end of the month. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom said the state will keep 'all options on the table' to fight the revocation of federal funds. 'Trump wants to hand China the future and abandon the Central Valley. We won't let him," he said in a statement. The state has 'no viable plan' to complete even the Central Valley segment, said Drew Feeley, acting administrator of the transportation department's Federal Railroad Administration, in a report released last month. He called the project a 'story of broken promises' and a waste of taxpayer dollars. California Democrats also have criticized project spending. Democratic Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan said at a budget hearing earlier this year that her constituents 'overwhelmingly believe' high-speed rail spending 'has been irresponsible.' Newsom plans to extend the state's cap-and-trade program, a key funding source for the project which is set to expire at the end of 2030, through 2045. The program sets a declining limit on the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions large emitters can release. Those polluters can buy allowances from the state needed to pollute, and about 45% of that money goes into what's known as the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, according to the Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee, a group of experts that reviews the program. The fund helps pay for climate and transportation projects, including high-speed rail. The bullet train project receives 25% of the money from the fund, which ends up being a little less or a little more than $1 billion annually, depending on the year. Newsom in May proposed guaranteeing $1 billion a year for the project from the fund, but lawmakers have not agreed to that.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store