Body fat, not BMI, ‘far more accurate' at predicting major health risks: study
Body mass index (BMI) may not be the most accurate predictor of death risk.
A new study from the University of Florida found that BMI — a measurement that is commonly used to determine whether a person's weight is in a healthy range for their height — is 'deeply flawed' in terms of predicting mortality.
Instead, one's level of body fat is 'far more accurate,' concluded the study, which was published this week in the Annals of Family Medicine.
To measure participants' body fat, the researchers used a method called bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), which uses a device to measure the resistance of body tissue to a small electrical current.
Over a 15-year period, those who had high body fat were found to be 78% more likely to die than those who had healthy body fat levels, researchers found.
They were also more than three times as likely to die of heart disease, the study noted.
BMI — which is calculated by dividing weight by height, squared — was described as 'entirely unreliable' in predicting the risk of death over a 15-year period from any cause.
The study included 4,252 people in the U.S. and pulled data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
BMI should not be relied upon as a 'vital sign' of health, according to senior author Frank Orlando, M.D., medical director of UF Health Family Medicine in Springhill.
6 A new study from the University of Florida found that instead of using body mass index (BMI), one's level of body fat is 'far more accurate' when examining death risk.
methaphum – stock.adobe.com
6 BMI, used to determine whether a person's weight is in a healthy range for their height, was described as 'entirely unreliable' in predicting the risk of death over a 15-year period.
Halfpoint – stock.adobe.com
'I'm a family physician, and on a regular basis, we're faced with patients who have diabetes, heart disease, obesity and other conditions that are related to obesity,' Orlando said in a press release for the study.
'One of the routine measures we take alongside traditional vital signs is BMI. We use BMI to screen for a person having an issue with their body composition, but it's not as accurate for everyone as vital signs are,' he added.
BMI has been the international standard for measuring obesity since the 1980s, according to many sources, though some experts have questioned its validity.
An individual is considered obese if their BMI is 30 or above, overweight if it is between 25 and 29.9, of 'normal' weight in the range of 18.5 to 24.9, or underweight if lower than 18.5.
While BMI is easy to calculate, one of its main limitations is that it cannot distinguish between muscle and fat mass, the researchers noted.
'For example, people who are bodybuilders can really elevate their body mass index,' Orlando said. 'But they're healthy even with a BMI indicating that they're obese.'
6 'People who are bodybuilders can really elevate their body mass index,' senior author Frank Orlando, M.D., said about the limitations of BMI. 'But they're healthy even with a BMI indicating that they're obese.'
Maksim Denisenko – stock.adobe.com
'BMI is just so ingrained in how we think about body fat,' Arch Mainous, PhD, Professor and Vice Chair of Research in the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine at the University of Florida, added. 'I think the study shows it's time to go to an alternative that is now proven to be far better at the job.'
Other methods, such as a DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) scan, may be even more accurate than BIA, but are much more expensive and not as accessible, the researchers noted.
'If you talk to obesity researchers, they're going to say you have to use the DEXA scan because it's the most accurate,' Mainous said in the release. 'And that's probably true. But it's never going to be viable in a doctor's office or family practice.'
6 'We use BMI to screen for a person having an issue with their body composition, but it's not as accurate for everyone as vital signs are,' Orlando said.
grinny – stock.adobe.com
Dr. Stephen Vogel — a family medicine physician with PlushCare, a virtual health platform with primary care, therapy and weight management options — echoed the limitations of BMI.
'It has been an easy measurement tool that helps us understand at-risk groups across various populations and demographics, but it doesn't provide accurate data from patient to patient,' the North Carolina-based doctor, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital.
'These findings don't challenge the assumptions about BMI — they strengthen the message that new standards, delivered in a consistent and low-cost way, would provide better nuance for the individual when it comes to their overall physical health.'
Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here!
Potential limitations
'The main strengths of this study are a better correlation to an individual's risk of morbidity and mortality — however, the limitations lie in the fact that we don't have enough data to determine the right cutoff for these numbers, or to identify the right tools that will be both accurate and precise across the population,' Vogel said.
The researchers also acknowledged that body fat percentage thresholds haven't yet been as standardized as BMI and waist circumference.
Also, the age range of the participants in the study was limited by the data source.
6 The researchers acknowledged that body fat percentage thresholds haven't yet been as standardized as BMI and waist circumference.
VadimGuzhva – stock.adobe.com
'Future studies should extend this comparison of body fat to BMI in older adults,' the researchers wrote.
The study was also limited by focusing only on mortality as an outcome, they noted, without taking into account any developing diseases — such as heart failure or cancer — that could deepen the understanding of body fat as a risk factor.
The goal, according to Vogel, is to have a cost-effective, consistent method that can be used across the population with reliable accuracy.
6 According to Dr. Stephen Vogel, 'benefits would come in the form of a more detailed list of information that helps providers and patients make informed decisions about the patient's health, which is ideal.'
Anatta_Tan – stock.adobe.com
'These data will drive better discussions in the doctor's office, as well as public health initiatives with the goal of improving the health of all.'
'Benefits would come in the form of a more detailed list of information that helps providers and patients make informed decisions about the patient's health, which is ideal,' Vogel noted.
'I'm hopeful there's enough buzz around these measures that steps will continue to be taken toward regular implementation.'
The researchers are hopeful that once standards are validated, measuring body fat percentage with bioelectrical impedance analysis could become standard of care.
They added, 'These data will drive better discussions in the doctor's office, as well as public health initiatives with the goal of improving the health of all.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
BMI is B-A-D, a new study suggests. Here's a better way to measure weight
When it comes to measuring weight, BMI is the acronym everyone loves to hate. Health professionals have long used body mass index as a quick screening tool to fast-track certain patients into a 'code red' management plan — people whose weight puts them in danger of future health problems. The issue is that BMI measures health risk by calculating height and weight. However, muscle and bone weigh more than fat, so BMI measurements can overestimate the danger for people with a muscular build or a larger frame. Conversely, BMI can underestimate health concerns in older adults and anyone who has lost muscle, according to the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston. Now, authors of a new study say a different approach to weight measurement may be a more accurate way to predict future health issues. Bioelectrical impedance analysis, or BIA, uses undetectable electric currents to measure not only the percentage of body fat but also lean muscle mass and water weight. The technology works like this: You stand on metal plates on the machine while holding your hands or thumbs on another metal attachment held away from the body. Once started, the machine sends a weak electrical current through the body. Body fat, muscle and bone all have different electrical conductivity, so the machine uses algorithms to determine lean muscle mass, body fat percentage and water weight. 'We found body-fat percentage to be a stronger predictor of 15-year mortality risk in adults between the ages of 20 and 49 than BMI,' said Arch Mainous III, lead author of the study published Tuesday in the journal Annals of Family Medicine. When it came to deaths from heart disease, people with high body fat as measured by BIA were 262% times more likely to die than people who had a healthy percentage of body fat, said Mainous, a professor and vice chair of research in community health and family medicine at the University of Florida School of Medicine. 'Now remember, using BMI did not flag any risk at all in this younger population, which isn't one we typically consider to be at high risk for heart disease,' said senior author Dr. Frank Orlando, a clinical associate professor of community health and family medicine at University of Florida Health. 'Think of the interventions we can do to keep them healthy when we know this early. I think it's a game-changer for how we should look at body composition,' Orlando said. BMI is measured by dividing your weight by the square of your height. (If you are mathematically challenged like I am, the National Institutes of Health has a free calculator.) In BMI world, a body mass between 18.5 and 24.9 is a healthy weight, between 25 and 29.9 is overweight, between 30 and 34.9 is obese, between 35 and 39.9 is class 2 obesity, and anything greater than 40 is 'severe' or class 3 obesity. People are considered underweight if their BMI is lower than 18.5. Using BMI to measure health risk works — on a population level. Countless studies have shown that a greater BMI really does correlate with developing chronic diseases of all kinds — cancer, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, kidney and liver disease, and more. Where BMI fails is at the patient level. Imagine a patient who is 'skinny fat' — thin on the outside but riddled with globs of fat wrapped around major organs on the inside. Your BMI would be fine even though your health was at risk. 'Those people are more likely to have nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, more likely to have elevated glucose, more likely to have elevated blood pressure, and more likely to have inflammation in general,' Mainous said. All of these health issues can be treated, stopped and in some cases even reversed if caught early enough, he added. While doctors are aware of the issues with BMI, many prefer it 'because it is cheap and easily put into practice,' Mainous said. 'They'd like to use a more direct measurement such as a DEXA scan, but those cost too much and are not widely available, so everyone falls back to the indirect measure of BMI.' DEXA stands for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and is the gold standard for body mass analysis. Such machines can cost between $45,000 and $80,000, so patients typically travel to a hospital or specialty center to get the scan, Orlando said. The cost to the patient can easily be $400 to $500 per scan, he said. 'However, we found the newer versions of bioelectrical impedance are pretty accurate, giving some valid and reliable results,' Orlando said. One note — at-home based bioelectrical impedance products are not nearly as accurate, said Dr. Andrew Freeman, director of cardiovascular prevention and wellness at National Jewish Health in Denver. 'They can be affected a lot by how much body fluid you have, how hydrated you are,' said Freeman, who was not involved with the new research. 'At-home measurements will only give a ballpark — the clinic-based machines are more precise.' The new study analyzed data on 4,252 men and women who participated in the 1999 to 2004 federal survey called NHANES, or the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a yearly checkup of the nation's health. Technicians measured each person's body composition, including height, weight and waist circumference. In addition, all participants underwent a clinic-based bioelectrical impedance analysis, which measures the body's resistance to electrical currents. Researchers then compared that data with the National Death Index through 2019 to see how many people died. After adjusting for age, race and poverty status, the study found a BMI that labeled someone as obese was not associated with a statistically significant higher risk of death from any cause, when compared with those in healthy BMI range. People with high body fat as measured by bioimpedance analysis, however, were 78% more likely to die from any cause, Mainous said. Measuring waist circumference was also helpful, but not as accurate as body mass. Add that to the 262% higher chance of dying from heart disease found by the study, and it's a no-brainer for doctors to use bioelectrical impedance analysis on patients, Orlando said. 'Let's face it, the magnitude of risk this study shows is enormous,' Freeman said. 'It's scary to think that we may have been using a surrogate — BMI — that may not have been all that accurate over the years.' The study shows how better weight measurements could easily become personalized medicine, Freeman added. 'Imagine you came into your doctor's office,' he said. 'They provided your body fat percentage and an individualized risk assessment. They talked to you about exercise and other lifestyle changes and referred you to a nutritionist. 'They gave you an opportunity to make these changes, and then if needed, helped you out with medication. If the medical profession did this and were able to save many more lives, that would be amazing.' Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
WSU study finds possible link between childhood obesity and mothers' smoking pre-pregnancy
A study led by Washington State University (WSU) has identified possible links between childhood obesity and whether a mother smoked before pregnancy. The study found body mass index (BMI) patterns that could predict obesity, with findings published in Jama Network Open. The research analyzed the BMI trajectories of over 9,400 children, finding that while most children follow a typical BMI development path, 11% showed atypical patterns linked to factors before pregnancy. 'The most distinct finding is that we can identify children on a path to obesity as early as age 3.5 years,' said Chang Liu, an assistant professor of psychology at WSU and the corresponding author of the new paper. The study used data from the Environmental Influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) program, covering from January 1997 to June 2024. Children in the atypical BMI group were more likely to have mothers who smoked during pregnancy or had high pre-pregnancy BMI, according to a release from WSU. The study said these children did not experience the typical BMI decline after their first year and began rapid weight gain by age 3.5, reaching an average BMI above the 99th percentile by age 9. The study highlights the potential for early intervention, suggesting that identifying at-risk children by age 3.5 could help prevent obesity and its associated health risks. The findings underscore the importance of early identification and intervention in preventing childhood obesity, with prenatal factors playing a significant role in determining BMI trajectories.
New York Post
15 hours ago
- New York Post
Body fat, not BMI, ‘far more accurate' at predicting major health risks: study
Body mass index (BMI) may not be the most accurate predictor of death risk. A new study from the University of Florida found that BMI — a measurement that is commonly used to determine whether a person's weight is in a healthy range for their height — is 'deeply flawed' in terms of predicting mortality. Instead, one's level of body fat is 'far more accurate,' concluded the study, which was published this week in the Annals of Family Medicine. To measure participants' body fat, the researchers used a method called bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), which uses a device to measure the resistance of body tissue to a small electrical current. Over a 15-year period, those who had high body fat were found to be 78% more likely to die than those who had healthy body fat levels, researchers found. They were also more than three times as likely to die of heart disease, the study noted. BMI — which is calculated by dividing weight by height, squared — was described as 'entirely unreliable' in predicting the risk of death over a 15-year period from any cause. The study included 4,252 people in the U.S. and pulled data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. BMI should not be relied upon as a 'vital sign' of health, according to senior author Frank Orlando, M.D., medical director of UF Health Family Medicine in Springhill. 6 A new study from the University of Florida found that instead of using body mass index (BMI), one's level of body fat is 'far more accurate' when examining death risk. methaphum – 6 BMI, used to determine whether a person's weight is in a healthy range for their height, was described as 'entirely unreliable' in predicting the risk of death over a 15-year period. Halfpoint – 'I'm a family physician, and on a regular basis, we're faced with patients who have diabetes, heart disease, obesity and other conditions that are related to obesity,' Orlando said in a press release for the study. 'One of the routine measures we take alongside traditional vital signs is BMI. We use BMI to screen for a person having an issue with their body composition, but it's not as accurate for everyone as vital signs are,' he added. BMI has been the international standard for measuring obesity since the 1980s, according to many sources, though some experts have questioned its validity. An individual is considered obese if their BMI is 30 or above, overweight if it is between 25 and 29.9, of 'normal' weight in the range of 18.5 to 24.9, or underweight if lower than 18.5. While BMI is easy to calculate, one of its main limitations is that it cannot distinguish between muscle and fat mass, the researchers noted. 'For example, people who are bodybuilders can really elevate their body mass index,' Orlando said. 'But they're healthy even with a BMI indicating that they're obese.' 6 'People who are bodybuilders can really elevate their body mass index,' senior author Frank Orlando, M.D., said about the limitations of BMI. 'But they're healthy even with a BMI indicating that they're obese.' Maksim Denisenko – 'BMI is just so ingrained in how we think about body fat,' Arch Mainous, PhD, Professor and Vice Chair of Research in the Department of Community Health and Family Medicine at the University of Florida, added. 'I think the study shows it's time to go to an alternative that is now proven to be far better at the job.' Other methods, such as a DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) scan, may be even more accurate than BIA, but are much more expensive and not as accessible, the researchers noted. 'If you talk to obesity researchers, they're going to say you have to use the DEXA scan because it's the most accurate,' Mainous said in the release. 'And that's probably true. But it's never going to be viable in a doctor's office or family practice.' 6 'We use BMI to screen for a person having an issue with their body composition, but it's not as accurate for everyone as vital signs are,' Orlando said. grinny – Dr. Stephen Vogel — a family medicine physician with PlushCare, a virtual health platform with primary care, therapy and weight management options — echoed the limitations of BMI. 'It has been an easy measurement tool that helps us understand at-risk groups across various populations and demographics, but it doesn't provide accurate data from patient to patient,' the North Carolina-based doctor, who was not involved in the study, told Fox News Digital. 'These findings don't challenge the assumptions about BMI — they strengthen the message that new standards, delivered in a consistent and low-cost way, would provide better nuance for the individual when it comes to their overall physical health.' Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! Potential limitations 'The main strengths of this study are a better correlation to an individual's risk of morbidity and mortality — however, the limitations lie in the fact that we don't have enough data to determine the right cutoff for these numbers, or to identify the right tools that will be both accurate and precise across the population,' Vogel said. The researchers also acknowledged that body fat percentage thresholds haven't yet been as standardized as BMI and waist circumference. Also, the age range of the participants in the study was limited by the data source. 6 The researchers acknowledged that body fat percentage thresholds haven't yet been as standardized as BMI and waist circumference. VadimGuzhva – 'Future studies should extend this comparison of body fat to BMI in older adults,' the researchers wrote. The study was also limited by focusing only on mortality as an outcome, they noted, without taking into account any developing diseases — such as heart failure or cancer — that could deepen the understanding of body fat as a risk factor. The goal, according to Vogel, is to have a cost-effective, consistent method that can be used across the population with reliable accuracy. 6 According to Dr. Stephen Vogel, 'benefits would come in the form of a more detailed list of information that helps providers and patients make informed decisions about the patient's health, which is ideal.' Anatta_Tan – 'These data will drive better discussions in the doctor's office, as well as public health initiatives with the goal of improving the health of all.' 'Benefits would come in the form of a more detailed list of information that helps providers and patients make informed decisions about the patient's health, which is ideal,' Vogel noted. 'I'm hopeful there's enough buzz around these measures that steps will continue to be taken toward regular implementation.' The researchers are hopeful that once standards are validated, measuring body fat percentage with bioelectrical impedance analysis could become standard of care. They added, 'These data will drive better discussions in the doctor's office, as well as public health initiatives with the goal of improving the health of all.'
