Queen Camilla makes history as she's handed yet another prestigious title
Queen Camilla has become the first member of the royal family and first woman to be appointed Vice Admiral of the United Kingdom. The honour was given to the Queen during a ceremony at Devonport naval base in Plymouth today, where, as the sponsor of HMS Astute, she joined a ceremony to mark the end of the submarine's first commission.
Gen Sir Gwyn Jenkins, First Sea Lord and Chief of Naval Staff, said Camilla's new historic title would "further enhance Her Majesty's relationship with the service" and reflected the "high regard" she commands with sailors and other Naval officers.
Arriving at the naval base, Queen Camilla inspected a Guard of Honour consisting of submariners before the ship's company performed a traditional "Cheer Ship" salute, as the Queen descended onto the submarine's deck.
As Lady Sponsor of the HMS Astute submarine, the Queen has maintained close ties with the vessel, and the Navy at large, since naming it in 2007. Since taking on the role of Lady Sponsor, she has been considered a key member of the submarine's ship's company and has stayed closely connected with the 135-strong crew.
Camilla's support has come in the form of annual writings to the crew onboard the vessel, as well as the delivery of care packages that include English breakfast tea and shortbread, which were "really well received on board" according to naval sources.
The office and esteemed title of Vice Admiral of the United Kingdom dates back to the mid-16th century, after it was created by Henry VIII in 1513. The most recent holder of the title was Admiral Lord Boyce, the former First Sea Lord and Chief of the Defence Staff, who died in 2022 aged 79.
Rear Admiral Andy Perks, head of the submarine service, presented Camilla with the honour, which included the formal presentation of a burgee, or pennant, to recognise the Queen's ongoing support for the Royal Navy.
Commander Christopher Bate, HMS Astute's Commanding Officer, expressed the crew's pride in the Queen's sponsorship, as he said: "Her Majesty The Queen has supported us from the very beginning. She has consistently shown a deep commitment to all aspects of our work."
He added: "It is a proud and memorable moment to welcome Her Majesty to HMS Astute and for her to meet our families as we mark the end of our first commission."
While at the naval base, Queen Camilla was given a very unusual gift: a roll of cling film. The Queen was presented with the roll of cling film on a wooden stand after the ceremony, which was engraved with the words: "First of class, second to none."
The gift marks an inside joke between the submariners as cling film apparently kept the vessel going when they used it to wrap the engines more than two years ago. Camilla found the strange gift very amusing, exclaiming: 'The famous clingfilm!' The submariners engraved the gift with a special message: 'Clingfilm, keeping Nuclear Submarines at Sea'.
General Sir Gwyn Jenkins met with Queen Camilla earlier today at another event, and expressed his joy over bestowing Camilla with the honour.
He said: "We're super proud of Her Majesty's role with HMS Astute, as are the crew, it really matters a lot to us as a Navy and to them as a crew that it's the Queen's submarine."
The Queen then joked to him about not wanting to serve on a submarine, with the head of the Royal Navy saying: "I think we would all recognise that being a submariner is a very special skill set, you have to be really committed to the role and what you do for the country. It can be phenomenally rewarding, it's an amazing sense of teamwork onboard, but it's not for everyone."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
10 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Eggs will be 'perfectly fluffy' when 1 ingredient is added before cooking — not milk
Making scrambled eggs is simple, but there are a few common mistakes that can ruin the dish - one expert shared the 'most important' ingredient for the perfect eggs Scrambled eggs, a timeless classic that never loses its charm, whether it's nestled on avocado toast or starring in a full English. They're effortlessly light and fluffy, and whipping them up is a doddle. Yet, even with such a simple dish, there's room for slip-ups, like the dreaded watery scramble that can dampen any breakfast. While many tout milk as the antidote to this soggy scenario, a top tip from a culinary whizz suggests otherwise. This game-changing advice comes courtesy of Delish's kitchen gurus on TikTok, where they've unveiled the secret to achieving "perfectly fluffy" scrambled eggs that could grace any posh brunch menu. The twist? Skip the milk when you're beating your eggs, despite popular belief. Instead, they advocate for a dash of water, reports the Express. It might raise eyebrows, but there's method to the madness. The expert explained: "The dairy proteins cook at a different rate to the egg proteins, and this can result in watery eggs." Here's how to rustle up the creamiest scrambled eggs in your own kitchen. Creamy scrambled eggs Ingredients 4 eggs Pinch of salt 1 tbsp water Butter or oil for the pan Method Crack your eggs into a mixing bowl. Sprinkle in some salt and whisk. Next, pour in a bit of water and give it another good mix, then let the mixture sit for 10 minutes before cooking. Get your non-stick pan heated to a medium-high temperature - this is important for fluffy curds. Pop in a splash of oil or a knob of butter to give your eggs that extra luxurious, creamy finish. Let the eggs cook for a few minutes, then grab your spatula and gently nudge them about the pan once they begin to set. But here's the golden rule - and it's absolutely crucial - whip those eggs off the heat while they're still "slightly wet". The expert revealed: "They're going to keep on cooking even after they hit the plate." Displaying her perfectly velvety scrambled eggs on toast, she concluded: "Follow these rules and your eggs will come out just like this every time."
Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Families hit with 'unspoken' £1,076 charge per child this summer
Families could be facing a worrying time as schools close for six weeks over the summer Families forking out for childcare over the six-week summer holiday now face an average bill of £1,076 per child – a 4% increase on last year, according to a report. Councils have reported a lack of holiday childcare places – particularly for children with special educational needs and disabilities (Send), as per research by the Coram Family and Childcare charity. The study suggests that UK families pay on average £1,076 for six weeks at a holiday childcare club for a school-age child, which is £677 more than they would shell out for six weeks in an after-school club during term time. The research, based on surveys of local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales between April and June, indicates the average cost of a holiday childcare club has risen by 4% in a year to £179 per week. Wales has the steepest weekly price at £210, followed by England at £178 and Scotland at £168. There is significant variation in holiday club prices across England, ranging from £196 per week in the South East to £162 per week in the North West. The report also discovered that the average cost of a childminder during the holidays is £234 per week in the UK. Inner London has the highest childminder price at £306 per week, compared to the South West where the childminder cost is £191 per week. Across England, a mere 9% of local authorities reported having sufficient holiday childcare provision for at least three quarters of children with Send in their localities. This percentage plummets to 0% across three English regions – the East Midlands, the East of England and Inner London, according to the findings. The charity has urged the Government to increase funding, training and support for holiday childcare providers to cater for Send children's requirements. Additionally, the holiday activities and food (HAF) programme – which provides local authorities with funding to deliver holiday childcare, activities and meals for children entitled to free school meals – must continue beyond March 2026 to guarantee disadvantaged youngsters have access to childcare throughout school breaks, the organisation stressed. The funded childcare expansion – launched under the Conservative administration – commenced its rollout across England last April for working parents with two year olds. Working parents of children aged nine months and above can now access 15 hours of funded childcare weekly during term periods, ahead of the complete implementation of 30 hours per week for all qualifying families this September. The study noted: "It is encouraging to see increasing recognition that childcare is essential for facilitating parental workplace participation, with the continued expansion of funded childcare in early years, support to develop wraparound childcare before and after school, and the introduction of free breakfast clubs. "There is no longer an assumption that parents and employers are able to fit their work around the school day, or an expectation that they will do so. "However, outside of school term time, the situation is very different. Holiday childcare remains the unspoken outlier of childcare policy and the gap that parents must bridge every school holiday." Lydia Hodges, head of Coram Family and Childcare, said: "The need for childcare doesn't finish at the end of term. Holiday childcare not only helps parents to work but gives children the chance to have fun, make friends and stay active during the school breaks. "Yet all too often it is missing from childcare conversations. Whilst the increase in government-funded early education has reduced childcare costs for working parents of under-fives in England, prices for holiday childcare are going up for school-age children. "This risks encouraging parents to work while their children are young, only to find it is not sustainable once their child starts school. Availability of holiday childcare is an ongoing issue and without a clear picture of how much holiday childcare there is in each area, we cannot be sure that children – particularly those with special educational needs and disabilities – are not missing out." Arooj Shah, chairwoman of the Local Government Association's (LGA) children and young people board, said: "While councils recognise the importance of ensuring there is sufficient provision available for children with Send, it can be difficult to ensure the right provision is available, particularly given the challenging situation that many providers face at the moment. "Councils work closely with providers to improve access to holiday childcare provision for children with Send but without investment and recruitment of quality staff this will be difficult to deliver." A Government spokesperson said: "We recognise the school holidays can be a pressurised time for parents, which is why this government is putting pounds back in parents' pockets both during the holidays and in term time. "We are expanding free school meals to all children whose households are on universal credit, introducing free breakfast clubs in primary schools, and rolling out 30 government funded hours of early education from September – saving families money and helping them balance work with family life. "We are also continuing to fund free holiday clubs through the Holiday Activities and Food programme which provides six weeks of activities and meals for any child from a low-income family who needs it."
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Where did ‘husband' come from?
'Am I housebound?' asked my husband as I was discussing with him the complicated history of the name for his role in life. 'No, darling,' I said. 'You're the one in the house who just is or lives there.' Only later did I tell him that the word bond, behind the -band of husband, sank in worth with the years, following the same path as boor, churl and peasant. Whereas I as a housewife enjoy a comparatively transparent label, any husband's title is obscure. It is simply a house-bond, but the first element of husband, hus-, no longer seems like house, and the -bond element is often mistaken for a form of bond, a separate word to do with binding. The bond in husband derives from words in Norse languages with related meanings 'to live, dwell, to cultivate, to build'. Old English had a connected word, buan, 'to dwell', and these all came from the ancient Indo-European word that gave us be, as well as the Latin fui and the Greek stem phu- (hence physics). The history of the English word be finds cousins in Persian, Russian and Irish. Anyway, before the Norman Conquest, bonda in English meant a freeman, like a ceorl (churl), below a noble thane but above a servile worker. After the Normans came, the churl sank from freeman to a tenant bound to a lord, and bonde in Middle English became equivalent to a villein or serf, and then to a slave. It was at this stage that the word became confused with bond as in bondage. In husband, the fossilised -band was insulated from these developments in meaning. Husbandry meant at first management of a household, an obsolete sense, of which we retain only husbanding of resources. Husbandry was the task of a husbandman, cultivating the soil. The husband as master of the house came to mean the correlative of a housewife, to whom he'd be married. Strangely some men in the Middle Ages, such as Richard Husewif (1192), had the word as a surname; perhaps it was taken as a role independent of sex. My husband certainly couldn't be mistaken for one.
