Tian Chua gives ‘Turun Anwar' rally a miss
PETALING JAYA : Former PKR vice-president Tian Chua will not be attending the anti-Anwar Ibrahim rally at Dataran Merdeka, despite his name being included in the programme.
According to the programme shared by an opposition leader, the former Batu MP was scheduled to arrive at 3.15pm.
Tian Chua told FMT the organisers invited him to attend the rally on Thursday or Friday.
'But I told them I couldn't attend because I won't be in town. Maybe, by that time, they may have already printed the programme,' he said.
He also said he told the organisers he respected their right to assemble.
Tian Chua, a staunch supporter of Anwar Ibrahim after Anwar was sacked as deputy prime minister in 1998, was sacked from the party in 2023.
The decision came after he contested the Batu parliamentary seat as an independent candidate in the 15th general election.
According to the programme for the rally, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and PN chairman Muhyiddin Yassin will be present at the event, aimed at calling for Anwar's resignation as the prime minister.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Asean foreign ministers urge immediate ceasefire in Thailand-Cambodia clash
KUALA LUMPUR: Asean foreign ministers have urged both Thailand and Cambodia to pursue a ceasefire and return to the negotiating table amid escalating tensions along their shared border. In a statement issued yesterday, the ministers urged both sides to exercise maximum restraint and refrain from taking any actions that may undermine a ceasefire. The ministers voiced grave concern over the escalating conflict, which has led to mounting casualties on both sides, damage to public property, and the large-scale displacement of communities along the border. The bloc said that disputes must be settled by peaceful means, based on the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, as well as the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia (TAC) and the Asean Charter. "We remain supportive of the efforts of the Asean Chair in facilitating both sides to resume dialogue and end the fighting," the statement concluded. Yesterday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said he will meet the leaders of Cambodia and Thailand in Putrajaya today to discuss a ceasefire over their ongoing conflict. He said the talks will be held at his official residence in the Seri Perdana Complex at 3pm. Both the Prime Ministers of Thailand and Cambodia have previously agreed in principal to mediation and personally contacted Anwar to express their appreciation for Malaysia's initiative. However, violence continues along the border. The Southeast Asian neighbours have been locked in their bloodiest conflict in years over this dispute, with at least 34 people confirmed dead and more than 200,000 displaced.
The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
Police investigate four reports from Dataran Merdeka rally
KUALA LUMPUR: Police have confirmed receiving four reports linked to the rally held at Dataran Merdeka on Saturday. One case involves an effigy resembling Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim being caned near the National Mosque, while the other three pertain to drone usage. Acting Kuala Lumpur police chief Datuk Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad stated that the effigy incident is being investigated under multiple laws, including the Sedition Act 1948, the Penal Code, and the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. 'The case has been referred to the Classified Crime Investigation Unit in Bukit Aman,' he said during a press conference. The remaining reports concerning drone operations have been forwarded to the Civil Aviation Authority of Malaysia (CAAM). Mohamed Usuf noted that while the rally proceeded peacefully and with proper approval, authorities will still scrutinise any misconduct by participants. - Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
40 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
LFL rubbishes ex-chief judge's claim of pressure over constitutional ruling
LFL's N Surendran said judicial deliberation shouldn't be mistaken for interference. PETALING JAYA : Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) has rubbished claims of judicial interference after a former chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak said that a top judge pressured him to rule in favour of a litigant in a constitutional case against the federal government. Abdul Rahman Sebli, who retired last Thursday, claimed in his farewell speech that a 'very senior member of the judiciary' had emailed him, criticising his interpretation of the constitutional issue at hand. Rahman said judicial independence was not only about interference by the executive, but also about a judge's own peers in the discharge of judicial functions. In a statement today, LFL adviser N Surendran said such accusations were 'plainly wrong' and defied logic, particularly as the senior judge in question was part of the seven-member Federal Court panel hearing the case. 'How can a judge 'interfere' in a case which she herself was involved in deciding? Such a suggestion defies logic,' he said, without citing names. Surendran said unless someone outside the bench, such as from the executive, tried to influence the decision, it did not qualify as interference. He also argued that there was nothing 'sinister' about judges on multi-judge panels discussing cases and circulating draft judgments to persuade colleagues. 'In other words, there can be nothing wrong with any judge suggesting to his fellow judge in the same panel that his interpretation of the law is incorrect, and to try to change his position on it. 'This is part of the usual process of judicial decision-making, not just in Malaysia, but also of Supreme Courts in other common-law countries such as the UK or the US,' he said. Surendran also said it was 'strange' that a now former Federal Court judge was making a complaint that he was affected by 'peer pressure', adding that Federal Court judges enjoy security of tenure and constitutional protection. While acknowledging that judicial interference was a serious concern, Surendran warned against diluting its meaning. 'Judicial interference is a very serious matter. But it must not be confused with entirely appropriate and necessary internal processes of judicial deliberation,' he said.
