
Air India crash families in UK have ‘received the wrong bodies', say lawyers
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Taking note of an earlier report on the issue by Daily Mail, the Indian govt has clarified that the victims were identified as per 'established protocols and technical requirements' and that they 'are continuing to work with the UK authorities on addressing any concerns related to this issue,' MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said on Wednesday. 'All mortal remains were handled with utmost professionalism and with due regard for the dignity of the deceased,' he added.
'Sadly, the stories of mistakes with mixed remains have been repeatedly recounted to us by families we represent,' Sarah Stewart, aviation partner at Stewarts, a law firm, told TOI. 'Our clients feel that they were let down, with allegedly apparent mistakes by the forensic teams in India and insufficient support by British consular services, the foreign office and the British crisis response teams for the families of those British citizens killed in the accident.
'
Demetrius Danas, a specialist aviation law lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, which is also advising some families affected by the
, told TOI some families have reported receiving remains not belonging to their loved ones. He said this raises 'serious questions around the recovery and repatriation process' and 'just adds to the hurt and pain they continue to face'.
James Healy-Pratt, aviation partner at Keystone Law in the UK, which is representing around 20 families of victims, told TOI they 'expect PM Starmer to raise these serious issues with PM Modi this week in London.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The families deserve urgent answers and assurances about the whereabouts of their loved ones.'
The identification of mortal remains and DNA matching was carried out by the Ahmedabad civil hospital.
A UK govt spokesperson said: 'Formal identification of bodies is a matter for the Indian authorities.' However, allrepatriated remains are being independently investigated in line with UK processes, by the Inner West London Senior Coroner, based in Westminster in the UK.
The coroner opened and adjourned her inquest into 12 deaths on July 9. Disaster victim identification experts from the UK have been deployed to Ahmedabad to support the UK's consular response and 'to understand in-country processes for victim identification, mortuary operations and support services', the UK govt said.
Relatives of one victim had to abandon their funeral plans after being informed that their coffin contained the body of an unknown passenger rather than their family member, the Daily Mail reported.
In another case, the 'commingled' remnants of more than one person killed in the crash were mistakenly placed in the same casket. They had to be separated before the funeral could go ahead, the Mail reported.
The BBC spoke to a third person, Miten Patel, who said the coroner told him that 'other remains' were found in his mother Shobhana's casket. Both his mother and father, Ashok, were killed in the crash. "There has to be a level of responsibility that you're sending the right bodies to the UK,' he said.
The bungled repatriation was uncovered when Inner West London senior coroner Prof Fiona Wilcox sought to verify repatriated Britons' identities by matching their DNA with samples provided by the families.
Around 12 bodies have been repatriated to the UK so far.
James Healy-Pratt of Keystone Law told the Mail: 'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back. But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this. I think these families deserve an explanation. One family now has no one to bury because it was the wrong person in their casket. And if isn't their relative, the question is, who is it in that coffin?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
PM Modi, Amit Shah meet President amid Parliament logjam, Veep election announcement
Prime Minister Narendra Modi met President Droupadi Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan on Sunday. While the official agenda of the meeting has not been disclosed, the high-level engagement is seen as politically after PM Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah also called on President Murmu at Rashtrapati Bhavan on August 3. The unexpected nature of Shah's meeting has sparked speculation and stirred political activity in the meetings come at a time when the process for electing the next Vice President has formally begun. The Election Commission announced the schedule for the Vice President election on August 1, with voting to be held on September 9. Meanwhile, tensions continue in Parliament over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process of the Election Commission in Bihar. Opposition parties are demanding a debate on the issue, but the government's reluctance has led to disruptions in the House to the geopolitical backdrop, the meetings follow US President Donald Trump's recent announcement of a 25% tariff on Indian goods, along with proposed penalties over India's continued defense and energy engagements with Modi had previously met President Droupadi Murmu at the Rashtrapati Bhavan on July 16, before the start of the monsoon session of the precise reasons behind Sunday's meetings remain undisclosed, the timing has raised eyebrows across political and diplomatic circles.- EndsMust Watch


United News of India
30 minutes ago
- United News of India
BJP criticises NCP-SCP over Jitendra Awhad's controversial remarks on Sanatan Dharma
New Delhi, Aug 3 (UNI) The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) today criticised Nationalist Congress Party–Sharadchandra Pawar (NCP-SCP) leader Jitendra Awhad over his remarks describing Sanatan Dharma as having 'destroyed India.' Such comments attack the very fabric of Indian civilisation, BJP spokesperson Sambit Patra said at a press conference here, and questioned whether such a position reflected the official stance of the NCP-SCP. Patra commented, 'We are a tolerant society, and that is precisely why we are expressing our protest through a press conference. Had such a statement been made about Islam and Muslims, the response would not have been as restrained.' Patra also directed pointed questions at NCP-SCP chief Sharad Pawar and party MP Supriya Sule, asking whether Awhad's controversial remarks represented the party's official ideology or were merely his personal views. 'He has spoken against the core values of India. I would like to ask Sharad Pawar and his daughter, Supriya Sule, if they endorse this statement,' he said. Patra further observed, 'nowhere else in the world do we see a situation where the majority population is openly accused and then simultaneously labelled as intolerant.' Awhad had sparked a controversy after stating that Sanatan Dharma had 'ruined India' and terming its ideology as 'perverted.' His remarks came in the aftermath of a special NIA court acquitting all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case — a development that has reignited political discourse surrounding the notion of 'saffron terror.' It may be mentioned that, at a public interaction, Awhad had asserted that Sanatan Dharma had historically marginalised key figures of social reform. 'There was never any religion called Sanatan Dharma. We are followers of Hindu Dharma. This so-called Sanatan Dharma denied Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj his coronation and defamed Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj. Its followers attempted to assassinate Jyotirao Phule and humiliated Savitribai Phule,' he said. The BJP leader also referred to Dr. BR Ambedkar's criticism of the Manusmriti and the caste-based oppression allegedly embedded in Sanatan Dharma. 'It was this same tradition that denied Ambedkar the right to education and even access to water. It was Babasaheb who rose against Sanatan Dharma, burned the Manusmriti, and rejected its oppressive traditions,' Awhad said. The BJP has called for a clarification from the NCP-SCP leadership, maintaining that such remarks are inflammatory and disregard the sentiments of the Hindu majority. UNI AJ AKT SSP


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Prajwal Revanna case: Netizens laud judiciary after swift verdict
The swift conviction and sentencing of Prajwal Revanna in a high-profile sexual assault case has drawn rare praise for the judiciary on social media. The former MP has been convicted within 14 months from the date of filing of the complaint in May last year. Many X users, some of whom had initially expressed apprehension, showed surprise and relief at the speed and firmness of the court's action, calling it a much-needed boost to public faith in the legal system. They were responding to news posts by TOI, first on Prajwal's conviction and then on the sentencing. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru "Finally a good news come from our court system," (sic) wrote user Arunsharma30, echoing the sentiment of many others. Another user, Pavithra Shankar, added, "Good news... hope the judicial system is restored." Following the pronouncement of life imprisonment, Tushar Chandra posted, "How did India turn so lucky with the judiciary?" Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !