Nirav Modi's brother Nehal arrested in US on India's extradition request
Nehal Modi, 46, was taken into custody on Friday, US authorities informed Indian officials, according to a report by news agency PTI. His next court appearance is scheduled for July 17, where he is expected to seek bail, a move that US prosecutors will oppose, PTI reported.
The extradition request pertains to two charges: one count of money laundering under Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, and one count of criminal conspiracy under Sections 120-B (criminal conspiracy) and 201 (causing disappearance of evidence) of the Indian Penal Code.
The case stems from the massive ₹13,000 crore fraud at Punjab National Bank, one of the biggest in India's banking history. The fraud was allegedly orchestrated by Nirav Modi, Nehal Modi, and their uncle Mehul Choksi.
Born and raised in Antwerp, Belgium, Nehal Modi is fluent in English, Gujarati, and Hindi. According to officials cited by PTI, he is wanted in India for laundering proceeds of crime on behalf of Nirav Modi, who is currently lodged in a London prison and fighting extradition to India.
Authorities said Nehal Modi helped conceal and transfer large sums of illicit funds through a network of shell companies and offshore transactions. He has been named in a charge sheet filed by the ED and has been accused of destroying evidence and 'knowingly and intentionally' facilitating Nirav Modi's illegal activities, PTI reported.
The ED also alleged that following the exposure of the PNB fraud, Nehal and Nirav's top aide Mihir R Bhansali 'took 50 kg gold and substantial cash from Dubai' and instructed dummy directors not to reveal his name to authorities, officials told PTI.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
34 minutes ago
- Hans India
Govt says there's no directive to block Reuters X handle in India
The Government of India has clarified that it has not issued any order to withhold the X account of the international news agency Reuters in the country. "There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem," an official spokesperson said in a statement. This clarification comes after Reuters' X account was found to be withheld in India, prompting concerns over press freedom and censorship. Users attempting to access the handle were shown a notice stating that the account had been withheld "in response to a legal demand". Reuters confirmed the development earlier, saying it was seeking more information on why its handle was blocked in India. According to officials familiar with the matter, the only request for blocking Reuters' X account was issued on May 7, during Operation Sindoor launched against Pakistan following the massacre of 26 Indian tourists in Pahalgam in an Islamabad-sponsored terrorist attack. This was a part of a national security exercise. However, although several hundred accounts were blocked due to national security reasons, no action was implemented to block the Reuters handle on X despite the government order, the official said. It appears that X, owned by Elon Musk, may have mistakenly enforced the outdated order. "The issue is not relevant anymore. The government has reached out to X, asking them to explain the blocking and to lift the embargo," a senior official said. Reuters has not issued any public statement on the issue. Despite the block on Reuters' main and Reuters World handles, several affiliated accounts, including Reuters Tech News, Reuters Fact Check, Reuters Asia, and Reuters China, remain accessible within India.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
BJP asks Karnataka CM to apologise for linking COVID vaccines with heart attacks as expert panel rejects claim
Synopsis Karnataka BJP demands an apology from Chief Minister Siddaramaiah for linking cardiac arrests in Hassan to COVID-19 vaccination. An expert panel found no evidence supporting the claim, attributing the rise in cardiac deaths to multifactorial risks. Union Minister Pralhad Joshi and BJP spokesperson Dr CN Ashwath Narayan criticized Siddaramaiah's remarks as baseless and aimed at discrediting Indian-made vaccines.
NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
Centre Responds After News Agency Reuters' X Account Withheld In India
New Delhi: There has been no requirement from the Indian government to withhold Reuters' X handle, the Centre has said, denying any role in the international news agency's social media account going blank in the country. The Reuters' main handle is currently inaccessible to users in India, with a notice displayed on the platform showing that the action was taken "in response to a legal demand." A government spokesperson clarified this morning it did not ask for the account to be withheld and that it is continuously working with X to resolve the problem. "There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold Reuters, and we are continuously working with X to resolve the problem," said the spokesperson. Reports suggest the action could be due to an old request that was acted on too late, and that the handle is likely to be restored soon. The government had requested blocking hundreds of social media accounts, including that of Reuters, during 'Operation Sindoor', but Reuters' handle was not blocked that time while others faced the action, reported news agency PTI. Quoting an official source, it said the government had issued the order on May 7. It now appears that it has been acted on now, the report said, calling it a "mistake on their part". The government has also asked the platform to explain its action and lift the censorship since the issue is no longer relevant. Two official accounts, including the main and world handles, of Reuters are currently withheld in India while other handles of the news organisation, including Reuters Tech News, Reuters Fact Check, and Reuters Asia, are accessible. The UK-based agency is yet to issue a statement. According to X, accounts or specific posts are withheld in events of legal demands like a court order or local laws.
