UK lifts sanctions on Syria, says country deserves chance to rebuild economy
The UK government has said it is lifting sanctions against a dozen Syrian entities, including government departments and media outlets, to help the country rebuild after President Bashar al-Assad was toppled in a lightning rebel offensive in December.
The UK had put the sanctions in place against those who supported Assad's repressive rule, helped violently suppress civilians and spread misinformation.
"The Syrian people deserve the opportunity to rebuild their country and economy and a stable Syria is in the UK's national interest," Hamish Falconer, minister for the Middle East, said in a statement.
Syria's new leaders have struggled to begin rebuilding the country's decimated economy and infrastructure after nearly 14 years of civil war.
The new authorities in Damascus have made a push for harsh sanctions imposed by western countries on Assad's government to be lifted, with limited success.
Syrians commemorate the seventh anniversary of a chemical attack in the town of Douma, 7 April, 2025
AP Photo
Financial sanctions and asset freezes were lifted on several government agencies, including the ministries of interior and defence, the UK Foreign Office said.
Sanctions were also dropped against the General Organization of Radio and TV, a state-run agency that allegedly spread propaganda for Assad and incited violence against civilians.
The Foreign Office said it also lifted sanctions against Al Watan, a newspaper, Cham Press TV, and Sama TV, for spreading misinformation.
Sanctions imposed against al-Assad and associates remain in place and legislation was amended to allow the former leader and others to be held accountable for atrocities committed against Syrians.
In March, the UK dropped sanctions against two dozen Syrian businesses, mostly banks and oil companies.
The Trump administration has yet to formally recognise the new Syrian government led by President Ahmad al-Sharaa, an Islamist former insurgent who led the offensive that ousted al-Assad.
Syria's interim President Ahmad al-Sharaa during a press conference in Ankara, 4 February, 2025
AP Photo
The militant group al-Sharaa led, Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), remains a US-designated terrorist organisation and the sanctions imposed on Damascus under al-Assad remain in place.
However, Washington has eased some restrictions.
In January, the US Treasury issued a general licence, lasting six months, that authorises certain transactions with the Syrian government, including some energy sales and incidental transactions.
The European Union, meanwhile, has begun to ease some energy and transport sanctions and banking restrictions against Syria, suspending measures targeting oil, gas and electricity as well as transport, including the aviation sector.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
French court to decide if al-Assad can be stripped of immunity
France's highest court will rule on Friday whether former Syrian President Bashar al- Assad can be stripped of head-of-state immunity, a decision that could clear the way for his trial in absentia over alleged chemical weapons attacks. If the ruling is made, it would set a legal precedent for prosecuting sitting or former leaders accused of atrocities. Al-Assad is facing a trial before France's Cour de Cassation in absentia over the use of chemical weapons in Ghouta in 2013 and Douma in 2018. The exiled former dictator of Syria, now living in Russia, has retained now lawyers for these charges and has denied he was behind the chemical attacks. A ruling against al-Assad would be a 'huge victory for the victims,' according to Mazen Darwish, president of the Syrian Centre for Media which collected evidence of war crimes. 'It's not only about Syrians, this will open the door for the victims from any country and this will be the first time that a domestic investigative judge has the right to issue an arrest warrant for a president during his rule.' Darwish said a favourable ruling could also allow his group to pursue other al-Assad regime figures, such as launching a money laundering case against former Syrian Central Bank governor and Minister of Economy Adib Mayalah. Mayalah's lawyers have argued he had immunity under international law. Al-Assad was previously relatively safe under international law. Heads of state could not be prosecuted for actions taken during their rule, a rule designed long ago to ease dialogue when leader needed to travel the world to meet, according to French lawyer Jeanne Sulzer. Sulzer said that kind of immunity is 'almost a taboo' regardless of the weight of the charges. 'You have to wait until the person is not sitting in office to be able to prosecute.' She had co-led the case against al-Assad for the 2013 chemical attack. For more than 50 years, Syria was ruled by Hafez al-Assad and then his son Bashar. During the Arab Spring, rebellion broke out against their tyrannical rule in 2011 across the country of 23 million. A brutal 13-year civil war broke out which killed more than half a million people, according to the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights. Millions more fled to Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Europe.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
French court to rule on Assad immunity in chemical attack case
Rights activists say that if the Court of Cassation confirms Assad does not enjoy immunity due to the severity of the accusations, it could set a major precedent in international law towards holding war criminals to account. But if the reasoning is that the warrant is valid because France did not consider Assad to be a legitimate ruler at the time of the alleged crimes, it would not have the same impact. French authorities issued the warrant against Assad in November 2023 over his alleged role in the chain of command for a sarin gas attack that killed more than 1,000 people, according to US intelligence, on August 4 and 5, 2013 in Adra and Douma outside Damascus. Assad is accused of complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity in the case, though Syrian authorities at the time denied involvement and blamed rebels. The French judiciary tackled the case under the principle of universal jurisdiction, whereby a court may prosecute individuals for serious crimes committed in other countries. An investigation -- based on testimonies of survivors and military defectors, as well as photos and video footage -- led to warrants for the arrest of Assad, his brother Maher who headed an elite army unit, and two generals. Public prosecutors approved three of the warrants, but issued an appeal against the one targeting Assad, arguing he should have immunity as a head of state. The Paris Court of Appeal in June last year however upheld it, and prosecutors again appealed. Assad's circumstances have since changed. He and his family fled to Russia, according to Russian authorities, after Islamist-led rebels toppled him in December last year. Assad immunity issue Agnes Callamard, a French human rights activist and the secretary general of Amnesty International, said the court's decision could "pave the way for a major precedent in international law" if it decided immunity should be lifted in certain cases. "A ruling lifting Bashar al-Assad's immunity would help strengthen the founding principles of international law in its fight against the impunity of war criminals," she wrote in the newspaper Liberation on Thursday. Callamard however noted that it was unlikely any arrest warrant would lead to Assad being detained as he was protected by Russia. The high court's prosecutor has recommended the arrest warrant be upheld, but on the grounds that France had not recognised Assad as the legitimate ruler of Syria since 2012. Mazen Darwish, a prominent Syrian lawyer who heads the Syrian Center for Media and Freedom of Expression, a civil party to the case, said the prosecutor's argument was "very clever". But it "undermines the moral foundation" according to which "immunity should not apply" in cases of war crimes and crimes against humanity, he said. The reasoning "also grants a single foreign government the power to decide who is or is not a legitimate head of state, which sets an extremely dangerous precedent", he said. French investigating magistrates in January issued a second arrest warrant against Assad for suspected complicity in war crimes for a bombing in the Syrian city of Deraa in 2017 that killed a French-Syrian civilian. Friday's hearing is scheduled to start at 1300 GMT.
France 24
4 hours ago
- France 24
Once a leading force, battered Tunisian party awaits elusive comeback
But observers say that Ennahdha, the Islamist-inspired movement still considered by some Tunisians as the country's main opposition party, could still bounce back after a devastating government crackdown. On July 25, 2021, Saied stunned the country when he suspended parliament and dissolved the government, a move critics denounced as a "coup" a decade after the Arab Spring revolt ushered in a democratic transition in the North African country. Many of Saied's critics have been prosecuted and jailed, including Ennahdha leader Rached Ghannouchi, 84, a former parliament speaker who was sentenced earlier this month to 14 years in prison for plotting against the state. Ghannouchi, who was arrested in 2023, has racked up several prison terms, including a 22-year sentence handed in February on the same charge. The crackdown over the past four years has seen around 150 Ennahdha figures imprisoned, prosecuted or living in exile, according to a party official. "Some believe the movement is dead, but that is not the case," said political scientist Slaheddine Jourchi. Ennahdha has been "weakened to the point of clinical death" but remained the most prominent party in Tunisia's "fragmented and fragile" opposition, Jourchi added. 'Once we're free again' Riadh Chaibi, a party official and adviser to Ghannouchi, said that even after "shrinking" its political platform, Ennahdah was still a relevant opposition outlet. "Despite repression, prosecutions and imprisonment" since 2021, "Ennahdha remains the country's largest political movement," Chaibi said. He said the current government has been "weaponising state institutions to eliminate political opponents", but "once we're free again, like we were in 2011, Ennahdha will regain its strength". Since 2011, when Ghannouchi returned from exile to lead the party, Ennahdha for years had a key role in Tunisian politics, holding the premiership and other senior roles. But by 2019, the year Saied was elected president, the party's popularity had already begun waning, winning only a third of the 1.5 million votes it had in 2011. Experts ascribed this trend to the party's failure to improve living standards and address pressing socio-economic issues. Ennahdha has also been accused of jihadist links, which it has repeatedly denied. Saied, who religiously avoids mentioning either Ennahdha or Ghannouchi by name, has often referred to the party's years in power as "the black decade" and accused it of committing "crimes against the country". Crowds of Tunisians, increasingly disillusioned as a political deadlock trumped Ennahdha's promise of change, poured into the streets in celebration when Saied forced the party out of the halls of power in 2021. Analyst Jourchi said Ennahdha's rise to power was a "poorly prepared adventure", and the party had "made many mistakes along the way". Left-wing politician Mongi Rahoui said it was "only natural that Ennahdha leaders and their governing partners be prosecuted for crimes they used their political position to commit". Today, the party's activities have been reduced mostly to issuing statements online, often reacting to prison sentences handed down to critics of Saied. 'Silence everything' But Ennahdha has weathered repression before, harshly suppressed under Tunisia's autocratic presidents Habib Bourguiba and Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. Party leaders were jailed or forced into exile, and Ghannouchi was sentenced to life in prison under Bourguiba but then freed -- and later exiled -- under Ben Ali. Tunisian historian Abdellatif Hannachi said that the party "seems to be bending with the wind, waiting for changes that would allow it to return". It has been in "clear decline", he added, but "that does not mean it's disappearing." Ennahdha's downfall was not an isolated case. Other opposition forces have also been crushed, and dozens of political, media and business figures are currently behind bars. "This regime no longer distinguishes between Islamist and secular, progressive and conservative," rights advocate Kamel Jendoubi, a former minister, recently said in a Facebook post. Saied's government "wants to silence everything that thinks, that criticises, or resists", Jendoubi argued. The opposition, however, remains fractured, failing for example to come together in rallies planned for the anniversary this month of Saied's power grab. © 2025 AFP
