logo
EU-US trade deal leaves future of pharma tariffs uncertain

EU-US trade deal leaves future of pharma tariffs uncertain

Euronews4 days ago
The current status of tariffs on pharmaceuticals between the EU and the US remains uncertain, despite the announcement on Sunday of a new transatlantic trade agreement.
The situation is particularly sensitive given the mutual dependency in the sector: the US imports large volumes of critical pharmaceuticals from the EU, while EU-based pharmaceutical companies—especially in Ireland and Denmark—rely heavily on access to the American market.
Although the new trade agreement will officially enter into force on 1 August, pharmaceuticals will not be subject to a 15% tariff which will be slapped on most goods imported from the European Union to the United States.
This does not mean that there won't be tariffs at all on pharmaceuticals, as the US is still conducting an investigation into imported pharmaceuticals to assess whether they threaten US national security.
For this reason, pharmaceuticals were technically excluded from yesterday's formal agreement, several EU sources confirm, as the US could not commit to any decision on tariff changes, which will only come after the conclusion of that process.
However, if tariffs are introduced following the investigation, the EU expects the US—under President Trump—to honour the informal understanding reached during negotiations.
This includes a cap of 15% on tariffs, which the EU considers "all-inclusive", meaning it should apply even to products still under investigation, such as pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.
'I believe that this commitment will be honoured and respected in this case as well,' said EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič during a press briefing following the deal.
So, what happens after 1 August?
In the short term, nothing will change.
Despite earlier reports suggesting the US would impose a 15% tariff on pharmaceuticals too in line with most EU goods, that is not expected to happen immediately.
'There will be no tariffs on pharmaceuticals this Friday,' clarified a senior EU official who participated in the negotiations with President Trump in Scotland.
Most pharmaceutical products traded between the EU and the US currently benefit from a 0% tariff rate under the Most-Favoured Nation (MFN) framework. This is consistent with prior US-EU trade arrangements and World Trade Organization (WTO) commitments.
As a result, EU pharmaceutical exports have faced no tariff barriers when entering the US market—a condition that remained unchanged even after Trump's so-called "Liberation Day", when he announced imposing blanket tariffs on goods.
Uncertain outcome of the US investigation
But tariffs on pharmaceuticals are expected to come at one point.
The key uncertainty revolves around the ongoing Section 232 investigation being conducted by the Trump administration.
This probe, authorised under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, is intended to assess whether imports of pharmaceuticals (and other products as well such as semiconductors) threaten US national security.
The investigation's conclusions could lead to unilateral actions by the US, including higher tariffs or import restrictions, independent of the broader trade deal struck yesterday.
'[During the talks] President Trump wanted to make clear that they still have full freedom to conclude the 232 investigations and to choose any policy measures as a result,' said another EU negotiator.
While EU officials cannot predict the outcome of the US investigation, they believe it is nearing completion.
'These are two investigations—pharmaceuticals and semiconductors—that are pretty close to conclusion,' an official noted.
If the US does impose tariffs following the investigation, the EU expects these to be capped at 15% for both sectors, in line with the political understanding reached during the trade talks.
EU's bet on pharma tariffs
The EU's strategy is clear: even though Trump could not legally commit yesterday to tariffs on pharmaceuticals while the investigation is ongoing, the EU insisted on a 15% ceiling across all sectors, with no exclusions for pharmaceuticals.
A senior EU official added that this understanding is backed by a broader political commitment, including planned investments by pharmaceutical companies in the US and pressure from the industry on both sides of the Atlantic to collaborate more closely.
'There is a clear understanding that investments, supply chain integration, and joint R&D efforts should all fall under the special 15% regime,' the official explained.
Still, the EU acknowledges that this is not yet a legally binding commitment.
'Is this a legal commitment? No, not at this stage. That would have to come through an executive order once the US concludes its investigation,' the source continued.
For now, both pharmaceutical and semiconductor products remain at zero-duty 0rates. No changes will occur on 1 August, but that could change once the US finalises its Section 232 investigation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump gambles with reindustrializing the US
Trump gambles with reindustrializing the US

LeMonde

time21 minutes ago

  • LeMonde

Trump gambles with reindustrializing the US

Attracting foreign investment to reindustrialize the US has been the main objective of Donald Trump's tariff policy. "Remember the army of millions and millions of human beings screwing in little screws to make iPhones? That kind of thing is going to come to America," promised US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick on April 6, just days after Trump announced so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on April 2. The agreement unveiled on Sunday, July 27, with the European Union includes an additional $600 billion in investments to be made in the US. A few days earlier, Japan committed to invest $550 billion in the US as part of its agreement signed with Washington. These commitments, however, remain vague – both in terms of the time frame and the sectors involved. In recent weeks, several major European groups have announced plans to build factories in the US, raising concerns over reduced activities in Europe and even an increase in offshoring to the US. On July 24, Bernard Arnault, the founder and CEO of the luxury group LVMH, announced that Louis Vuitton would open a fourth manufacturing site across the Atlantic. "For our American customers, buying a Louis Vuitton product 'made in USA' poses (…) no problem at all," Arnault argued in the French newspaper Le Figaro on July 24.

Brazilians burn Trump effigies as tariffs spark anger
Brazilians burn Trump effigies as tariffs spark anger

France 24

time22 minutes ago

  • France 24

Brazilians burn Trump effigies as tariffs spark anger

Anti-Trump protests were held in Brasilia, Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, a sign of souring ties between two of the Americas' largest economies. The demonstrations were modestly attended, but reflected broad anger at Trump's decision to put a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian exports and to sanction a top judge. The mercurial US president has openly admitted he is punishing Brazil for prosecuting his political ally, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right Brazilian firebrand is currently on trial for plotting a coup after failing to win reelection in 2022. Bolsonaro supporters stormed Brazil's congress in January 2023, ransacking the chambers and attacking police, in scenes reminiscent of Trump supporters' attack on the US Capitol two years before. A Brazilian general has given evidence that the alleged plotters also wanted to assassinate leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and several other public officials. Trump has called the trial a "witch hunt" and his Treasury Department has sanctioned Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes in response. Trump also signed an executive order slapping 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian imports, citing Bolsonaro's "politically motivated persecution." The tariff is due to enter into force on August 6. Moraes, in a rare public address, said Friday he pledged to "continue working" despite a US travel ban and assets freeze. "This Court, the Office of the Attorney General, and the Federal Police will not bow to these threats," he said during a court session. And he vowed the court would remain "absolutely uncompromising in defending national sovereignty and its commitment to democracy." Moraes has repeatedly taken aim at the Brazilian far-right and its figurehead Bolsonaro, as well as tech titan Elon Musk, over online disinformation. He is also the presiding judge in the coup trial of Bolsonaro, who risks a 40-year prison sentence. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has accused Moraes of "serious human rights abuses, including arbitrary detention involving flagrant denials of fair trial guarantees and infringing on the freedom of expression." Moraes recently ordered Bolsonaro to wear an electronic ankle bracelet pending the conclusion of his trial, and barred him from leaving his home at night or using social media pending an investigation into potential obstruction of justice.

US Fed governor to resign early at critical time for central bank
US Fed governor to resign early at critical time for central bank

France 24

timean hour ago

  • France 24

US Fed governor to resign early at critical time for central bank

Kugler, who was nominated by former president Joe Biden in 2023, did not give a reason for stepping down from the Fed's board. Her term was due to end in January 2026, but her departure -- effective August 8 -- gives Trump the chance to appoint someone new to the Fed sooner than anticipated, shaping its leadership. Trump said he was "very happy" about the upcoming vacancy, after Kugler submitted her letter of resignation to him. The personnel shift comes as the Fed faces intensifying pressure under Trump, who has repeatedly criticized the central bank's chief Jerome Powell for not lowering interest rates sooner. Trump has also suggested that what he says is an overly costly renovation of the Fed's headquarters could be a reason to oust Powell, before backing off the threat. Powell's term as Fed chair ends in May 2026. Kugler did not attend the Fed's two-day policy meeting this week due to a personal matter, and did not vote on its decision. In a mid-July speech, she made the case for holding rates at the current level for some time, citing inflationary pressures and relatively low unemployment levels. "It has been an honor of a lifetime to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System," Kugler wrote in her resignation letter. Fed policymakers have approached further rate cuts with caution -- since their last reduction in December -- as they assess the impact of Trump's wide-ranging and fluctuating tariffs on inflation. They expect to have a better gauge of the duties' effects after data from the summer months, given that tariffs take time to filter through the economy. But Trump has urged for interest rate reductions, and for the benchmark lending rate to be lowered by as much as three percentage points. Early Friday, Trump touted the fact that two Fed governors voted against the central bank's Wednesday decision to keep rates unchanged again. He said on social media: "STRONG DISSENTS ON FED BOARD. IT WILL ONLY GET STRONGER!" He also called Powell a "stubborn moron" and said the Fed's board should "assume control" if Powell continued to support holding rates steady. Kugler is expected to return to Georgetown University as a professor this year, the Fed said Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store