Two words were missing from Starmer's speech: terrorism works
But there are two vital words missing from the note: terrorism works. Peaceful negotiations, as tried in Oslo, Camp David and the Annapolis process, have flattered only to deceive. None of them have led to the UK shifting its position on recognition. It has taken, instead, the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. It has taken the impact of 1,200 dead Jews.
But it won't just be other terrorist groups which realise that if you want to get the British Government to shift policy, it's time to scale up the scope of your terror. In the context of 'a peace process towards a two-state solution', as the Cabinet note puts it, the Prime Minister has come up with the worst possible way to recognise a Palestinian state, which makes the ceasefire he claims is his priority less rather than more likely than it is now.
By announcing that if a ceasefire is agreed then the UK won't go ahead with recognition, Starmer has managed to find a new way to encourage Hamas not to agree to a ceasefire or to release the hostages. The onus in his conditions is placed entirely on Israel ('…the UK will recognise the state of Palestine in September…unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, reaches a ceasefire, makes clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution'). Leave aside the moral outrage of placing the onus entirely on our supposed ally, the victim of an act of barbarity unprecedented in recent history, and focus instead on the practical meaning.
Unless the UK Government is calling for Israel simply to surrender to Hamas – which, even for this government, seems unlikely – then it takes both participants to agree to a ceasefire. Israel cannot agree to terms which do not include the release of the hostages, and Sir Keir's conditions do not include that as a pre-requisite, leaving Hamas free to continue holding them (the PM called on Hamas to release the hostages, as he has done many times before, but as a lawyer he will be well aware that that demand was not one of the conditions – nor could it be, since the conditions are placed entirely on Israel).
But even if Israel made clear it was ready to agree a deal – as it has already done repeatedly – that would still not be enough to satisfy Starmer's conditions if Hamas rejected a ceasefire, as it has already done repeatedly. Without a ceasefire, UK recognition goes ahead in September. The ball is in Hamas' hands.
In other words, Sir Keir Starmer's announcement makes a ceasefire less likely than it was before he spoke yesterday, because it incentivises Hamas to carry on fighting to secure UK recognition of a Palestinian state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Fighters attack Syrian forces as ceasefire breaks down
Armed fighters attacked Syria's internal security forces in the city of Sweida on Sunday, killing one person and breaking a fragile ceasefire. The renewed violence follows deadly clashes between Druze and Sunni Bedouins in July that drew the intervention of Syrian government forces and tribal fighters who came to support the Bedouins. Israel also entered the fray, carrying out strikes on Syrian troops in support of the Druze, an Arabic-speaking ethno-religious minority with communities in Israel. A ceasefire put an end to the week of bloodshed – which killed 1,400 people, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights – but the situation remained tense, flaring into violence again on Sunday. Syria's state-run Ekhbariya TV reported that one member of the Syrian government forces was killed by the armed gang. Unconfirmed reports also suggested Druze militants had conquered an area west of Sweida from regime forces. Meanwhile, Israeli troops questioned 'several suspects' overnight who are thought to be involved in weapons trafficking in the Hader area in southern Syria. The Israel Defence Force (IDF) said troops entered four locations simultaneously and located 'numerous weapons that the suspects had been trafficking'. Israel entered the conflict last month when Druze civilians were attacked by regime forces, launching airstrikes on government military positions as well as the defence ministry headquarter in Damascus. Hundreds of Israeli Druze crossed the border from Israeli-controlled Golan Heights into Syria to defend their family members from the attacks by regime forces and Bedouin tribes. Geir Pedersen, the UN special envoy for Syria, told ambassadors in the Security Council last week that 'Syrians are reeling after appalling violence in Sweida – violence that should not have happened and which also saw unacceptable foreign intervention'. Edem Wosornu, director of operations at the UN office for the coordination of humanitarian affairs, said the city of Sweida was 'teetering on the edge of collapse'. 'The recent violence in Sweida has displaced an estimated 175,000 people... a third of the population in the governorate, where two thirds of people were already in need of assistance,' she said last week. Ahmed Al-Sharaa, Syria's new president, has struggled to unite the country after toppling Bashar al-Assad in December last year. Several rounds of sectarian violence have erupted since, with his regime forces accused of committing atrocities against the Alawite and Druze minorities. The IDF took control last year of a buffer zone established in 1974 between Israel and Syria. Israel said it wouldn't allow a 'jihadi' presence on its border after the fall of the Assad regime, while promising to protect the Druze minority in southern Syria. The Syrian government has lashed out at Israel for attacking its territory and grabbing new territory, while some Druze in Syria and Lebanon have accused Israel of stoking sectarian divisions to seize more land.
Sky News
27 minutes ago
- Sky News
Gaza latest: Hamas ready to deliver aid to hostages after footage of emaciated Israeli captive sparks outcry
IDF reviewing claim Palestinian killed in shelling of aid group's HQ Israel's military says it's reviewing a claim by the Palestine Red Crescent Society (PRCS) that an Israeli attack on its headquarters in Khan Younis killed one of its staff and wounded three others. The humanitarian and aid group said Israeli forces shelled its facility three times at around 1am local time (11pm UK time). Video footage and images released by the organisation showed gaping holes in the building's walls and floors, and rooms strewn with debris. In a statement, the PRCS said: "We are heartbroken to share that our colleague Omar Isleem was killed early this morning. "Our headquarters' location is well known to the occupying forces and clearly marked with the protective red emblem. "This was not a mistake. "We renew our call for accountability and for the protection of all humanitarian and medical personnel." Asked about the shelling, the IDF said it "is reviewing the claim that a building belonging to the Palestinian Red Crescent Society (PRCS) was damaged, and that uninvolved individuals in the Khan Younis area were harmed as a result of an IDF strike". "The incident remains under examination," it added.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Senior judges reveal regret at handing out ‘unfair' indefinite jail terms and call for scandal to be ‘put right'
Senior judges who imposed 'unfair' indefinite jail terms, which have left scores of inmates locked up for minor offences languishing in prison for decades, have revealed their regret for their part in the 'injustice'. Former High Court judge Sir John Saunders said he would apologise to offenders he handed imprisonment for public protection (IPP) jail terms, which were scrapped in 2012, but not retrospectively, leaving thousands already jailed incarcerated with no release date. Now the very judges who dished out the punishment have joined calls for the government to take urgent action to help more than 2,500 prisoners still trapped under the abolished jail term, which has been branded 'psychological torture' by the UN. Victims of the scandal, whose tragic cases have been highlighted by The Independent, include Leroy Douglas, who has served almost 20 years for stealing a mobile phone; Thomas White, 42, who set himself alight in his cell and has served 13 years for stealing a phone; and Abdullahi Suleman, 41, who is still inside 19 years after he was jailed for a laptop robbery. Sir John, 76, who served as recorder of Birmingham before he was appointed to the High Court, told The Independent that if he met an IPP prisoner he had jailed who was years over tariff, he would apologise. 'I should say I'm really sorry this has happened, it's extremely unfair,' he said. 'I didn't want to be party to unfairness. I would feel very bad about it, I would apologise to them.' He said that when the sentence was introduced in 2005 by New Labour in a bid to be tough on crime, it appeared there was a 'certain degree of sense' to plans to ensure offenders completed rehabilitation courses before they were approved for release by the Parole Board. But judges had no idea those prisoners would find themselves trapped in prison indefinitely, often without access to the courses they needed to be released. He added: 'I think the essence of the job of a judge is to be fair. And we really do all try to do that. So when we conduct criminal trials, we attempt to be fair. In passing sentences, we attempt to be fair. 'If we have been party to something which has been accepted by everybody as unfair and we have been part of it… it's a bit of an affront to the job.' He and Simon Tonking, the former recorder of Stafford, have lobbied prisons minister Lord James Timpson to help those still trapped under the jail term. Both have backed a package of proposals put forward by an expert panel convened by the Howard League for Penal Reform, calling for IPP prisoners to be given a release date within a two-year window at their next parole hearing. Mr Tonking recalled imposing an IPP sentence with a minimum tariff of just six months for a relatively minor offence after a man was caught following a woman in an alley. 'Now I wonder what happened to him,' he told The Independent. 'He was in his late twenties. For all I know, he may still be there [in prison]. 'And when I look back at that case, I think I should have tried harder not to impose it.' Although he was doing his best to administer the laws in place at the time, he is now determined to be part of the solution. 'I don't feel guilty, but I do feel, having been part of that, I should be doing all I can to put what has turned out to be an injustice right,' he added. 'And I am driven in part by the fact that I was part of the administration of justice at a time when these sentences were being passed. 'I have been a part of the system that is wrong. I feel that I ought to be part of the system to put it right.' Successive governments have resisted calls to resentence IPP prisoners, claiming they cannot risk letting prisoners out until they have passed the Parole Board's release test. However, at least 94 inmates have taken their own lives in custody after losing hope of being freed, according to campaigners, with many struggling as their mental health deteriorates in prison. Mr Tonking urged the Labour government to use its majority to finally end the injustice by taking up the Howard League's proposals, adding: 'Virtually everybody who has had any professional dealings with IPP knows that it's unjust and now is the time to act.' The proposed reforms also include providing a package of mental health support for released IPP prisoners and tightening up the criteria for recalling them. Currently, many find themselves hauled back to prison indefinitely for minor breaches of strict licence conditions, despite committing no further offences. Paul Glenn, who last year retired from his role as the most senior judge in Stoke-on-Trent, also backed the charity's proposals. He told The Independent: 'Nobody envisaged that 10 years after they should have been released, they would still be in custody. The injustice there is pretty obvious. 'It's undoubtedly right that we should be sentencing people for what they have done, rather than what they might do in the future.' Prisons minister Lord Timpson said: 'It is absolutely right that the IPP sentence was abolished. 'As the IPP annual report shows, we have significantly improved support for these offenders, with greater access to rehabilitation and mental health support. 'There is more work to do as we reduce the number of IPP offenders in custody, but we will only do so in a way that protects the public.'
