logo
How has Ryanair changed its cabin baggage rule and will other airlines do it too?

How has Ryanair changed its cabin baggage rule and will other airlines do it too?

Irish Examiner13 hours ago
For all but the most seasoned travellers the metal bag sizers used by budget airlines have become an instrument of fear due to the heavy financial penalty incurred if hand baggage is too big to fit.
But as the summer holiday season gets under way there is some good news for those who struggle to travel light: Ryanair has announced it is increasing the size of the small 'personal' bag you can take in the cabin for free by 20%.
This sounds unusually generous of Ryanair – is it?
Yes. But it comes as airlines fall into line behind a new EU guaranteed bag size of 40cm by 30cm by 15cm. The current dimensions of the Ryanair free carry-on limit are 40cm by 25cm by 20cm. It is increasing them to 40cm by 30cm by 20cm.
Ryanair trumpets this is 'bigger than the EU standard'. It says the change 'will be implemented over the coming weeks, as our airport bag sizers are adjusted'.
The size change represents a 20% increase in volume and means Ryanair will be accepting free bags one-third bigger than the new EU minimum.
But that is the only aspect of Ryanair's baggage policy that is changing. If you get it wrong and a gate check reveals the bag is oversized you will pay a fee of £60. A larger cabin bag can be added to a flight booking for £6 to £36 depending on the route but, again, if it is deemed too large at the airport it will cost £75 to stow.
Will other airlines change their luggage rules, too?
Some won't have do anything. Rival budget airline easyJet, for example, already allows a more generous free underseat bag. Wizz Air's current free bag policy is the same as the one that Ryanair is moving to.
The airline association Airlines for Europe (A4E) says its 28 members have started applying the bag dimensions which were agreed by EU transport ministers last month.
'This will bring more clarity to passengers across Europe,' says its managing director, Ourania Georgoutsakou. 'From city-hoppers to family travellers, everyone will benefit from the same clear rule across our members' networks.' Standardising cabin-bag rules has been on the Brussels agenda for years with the decision to settle on a size enabling frequent travellers to buy one piece of luggage that will be accepted by multiple airlines.
All A4E airlines will be following the bag rule by the end of the 2025 summer season, it says, adding that 'carriers will continue to permit larger personal items at their discretion'.
Aren't hand baggage fees being abolished anyway?
Not yet, but they could be. European consumer groups are calling on EU lawmakers to investigate budget airlines for 'exploiting consumers' by charging for hand luggage.
In May, BEUC, an umbrella group for 44 consumer organisations, called for Brussels to investigate seven airlines, including Ryanair, easyJet and Wizz Air for this. BEUC director general Agustín Reyna said the airlines were 'ignoring the EU top court who ruled that charging [for] reasonably sized hand baggage is illegal'.
The organisation was referring to a EU court of justice ruling in 2014 that said the 'carriage of hand baggage cannot be made subject to a price supplement, provided that it meets reasonable requirements in terms of its weight and dimensions'.
In the meantime, Spain has become a battleground for the issue. Last year, its consumer affairs ministry fined five carriers, including Ryanair, a total of €179m (£150m) for charging passengers for hand luggage and seat reservations. Now low-cost carrier Wizz Air is being investigated, too.
Will charges be banned?
Ryanair's chief executive, Michael O'Leary, says no. He is dismissive of the Spanish effort, recently telling the Guardian the country has a 'mad minister who's decided that as General Franco passed some law 30 years before Spain joined the EU, passengers are free to bring as much baggage as they want.' A Spanish court has now temporarily suspended the fines on three of the airlines (including Ryanair) while the matter is under judicial review, after a legal challenge.
To complicate matters further, last month the transport committee of the European parliament voted to give passengers the right to an extra piece of free hand luggage weighing up to 7kg.
Under the new rule, travellers could bring one cabin bag measuring up to 100cm (based on the sum of the dimensions) on board their flight, as well a personal bag, at no additional cost. (MEPs also want children under 12 years old to be seated next to their accompanying passenger free of charge.) The proposed law requires approval from 55% of EU member states, but if adopted after the negotiations due to start this month, would extend to all flights within the EU, as well as routes to and from the EU.
The airline industry is predictably opposed, stating that the cost of the bag will be folded into overall prices, pushing up fares.
'Europe's airline market is built on choice,' Georgoutsakou says. 'Forcing a mandatory trolley bag strips passengers of that choice and obliges passengers to pay for services they may not want or need. What's next? Mandatory popcorn and drinks as part of your cinema ticket?
'The European parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't,' she says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Irish economy expected to continue to grow this year despite tariff treat
Irish economy expected to continue to grow this year despite tariff treat

Irish Examiner

time2 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Irish economy expected to continue to grow this year despite tariff treat

The Irish economy is expected to continue to grow this year despite the potential fallout from US tariffs, a new report by KPMG has found, but housing and infrastructure continue to be major risks. In its latest economic outlook, advisory firm said while the economy grew — both in gross domestic product (GDP) and modified domestic demand (MDD) terms — during the first few months of the year, a large part of the increase was American businesses importing high volumes of products from Ireland, preempting a tariff announcement from US president Donald Trump. KPMG said it anticipates that GDP growth will be 3.3% or greater over the course of the year, excluding the one-off front-loading of exports between January and March. Growth may moderate to between 1.5% and 2.0% in 2026 as tariffs impact exports. MDD growth could be 2.5% or greater this year and will be similar in 2026, with this growth driven by domestic consumption and infrastructure spend. Dr Daragh McGreal, head economist at KPMG, said that indicators of the Irish economy point to a domestic economy that is ' holding up well' despite 'ambiguity around the prospects for global trade'. Mr McGreal said the prevailing view is that US tariffs of 10% will be 'most widely applied to EU exports to the US'. However, while the outlook for the domestic economy is positive, KPMG identities infrastructure and housing as major risks. It said that the country is 'continuing to see all-time high levels of demand for infrastructure and housing, goods, and services and one of the country's biggest challenges is meeting its own domestic demand'. Mr McGreal said that the pace at which the housing crisis is being addressed is 'too slow' and the longer it goes on the more elevated rents and sales prices drag down overall economic growth. Read More Trump's tariff threat to pharma in Ireland is leading to a push for trade unions

Dublin city councillors set to increase property tax for first time
Dublin city councillors set to increase property tax for first time

The Journal

time4 hours ago

  • The Journal

Dublin city councillors set to increase property tax for first time

DUBLIN CITY COUNCILLORS are set to vote next week to stop applying a 15% discount on property tax for the first time in more than 10 years. The change, for 2026, comes at the same time that the government is also applying increases to property tax to reflect the significant rise in house prices, although tax bands have been tweaked to moderate the impact. It's understood councillors' decision will cost less than €65 per year for homeowners whose houses are worth up to €525,000, with exact costs on a sliding scale based on the value of the property. For a €450,000 house, for example, the annual charge will be €428 in total. For the owners of the capital's most expensive houses, councillors' decision will cost more, with homes worth between €1m and €2m likely to pay €150-460 more than they would have with the discount. A house worth €1.2m must pay €1,094 in property tax in total each year from 2026 onwards. Property tax was introduced in 2013 at the behest of the Troika , with a view to broadening the tax base and funding local authorities without taxing employment. Dublin City Council management has long argued that the vast majority of Dublin homeowners would not be hit with substantial additional charges if councillors agreed to reduce the discount applied, while the city would benefit. The council's ruling group, comprising Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil, Labour and the Green Party, agreed after last year's local elections to apply the baseline rate with no discount this year for the first time. The decision, which will be taken at a meeting on 18 July, is expected to bring in more than €15m in extra funding for the city. It's understood councillors are considering targeting the additional revenue at improving the council's housing stock, as well as improvements to footpaths, although no final decisions have been taken yet. Advertisement Labour and the Green Party, which pushed for the discount to be scrapped, argue that property tax is progressive and will provide crucial funding for improving the city. Councillors Feljin Jose of the Green Party and Darragh Moriarty of Labour characterised property tax as the closest thing Ireland has to a wealth tax, given most of the country's wealth is held in property. 'A lot of our [council] housing stock is very bad, and we need to maintain and repair and urgently increase the energy efficiency of those buildings,' said Jose of the Green Party. Darragh Moriarty of Labour said: 'In the vast majority of instances, these are very modest property taxes, by European comparisons. The 15% will be modest as well.' He noted that the decision would mean an extra €60m could be invested in improving the city over the lifetime of the council. Councillor Deirdre Heney of Fianna Fáil said she hoped additional funding would be allocated to footpath repairs and tree maintenance, issues that are raised with her frequently by residents, as well as to building more playgrounds. Property tax for 2026 is owed on 1 November. The government changed property tax bands earlier this year to moderate the increase in the amount of tax payable as a result of increasing house prices. A possible left-leaning ruling coalition on Dublin City council last year including Sinn Féin fell apart over the question of property tax . Sinn Féin wanted to continue to apply the 15% property tax discount. Separately, the government said last week that this year it will allow Dublin city, which takes in by far the most property tax of any council, to keep an additional €19m of the revenue it raises this year. The government wants this extra funding spent on implementing the recommendations of its Dublin city taskforce. Each year, a proportion of council tax from larger local authorities is redistributed to those with a lower property tax base. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Trump to push Wednesday tariff deadline out to 1 August
Trump to push Wednesday tariff deadline out to 1 August

The Journal

time5 hours ago

  • The Journal

Trump to push Wednesday tariff deadline out to 1 August

US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump will push back the deadline for the imposition of higher tariffs to 1 August, the White House has said. The deadline for countries to make deals before steeper tariffs kick in had been set for this Wednesday, but White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters this evening that Trump would be signing an executive order to delay it. The delay is the latest last-minute shift in Trump's trade policy, which has seen the US impose sweeping tariffs with on imports from around the world. Trump originally announced sweeping tariffs on world economies on what he called 'Liberation Day' on 2 April, claiming the United States was being 'ripped off.' When his policies created market turmoil, Trump then suspended the initial tariffs for 90 days, a deadline that was due to expire on Wednesday. Negotiations with states around the world are ongoing. Earlier today, Trump had hinted at the deadline extension when he sent nearly identical letters to Japan and South Korea informing them that 25% tariffs would come into effect on 1 August, rather than this Wednesday. Trump said the tariffs would be imposed on the two countries because their trading relationships with Washington were 'unfortunately, far from Reciprocal.' The Trump administration had promised to make 90 trade deals in the space of 90 days. Advertisement So far though, Washington has unveiled deals with only the UK and Vietnam, while also agreeing with China to temporarily lower tariff levels on each other's products that had gone well over 100%. Today, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said he was 'hopeful' that the EU and US could reach a deal on trade following an update from European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade Simon Harris said that he had also been briefed on the EU-US negotiations. In a statement this evening that showed the uncertainty caused by the inconsistent position of the US, Harris said while he had been briefed ahead of the expected Wednesday deadline, 'My understanding is that we can now expect an extension of the current status quo until 1 August'. Harris stressed that tariffs at even low levels would be 'bad for consumers, jobs, economic growth and investment'. 'The uncertainty is also bad for economic confidence and Irish businesses seeking clarity on the trading environment in which they operate. 'We have consistently called for zero-for-zero tariffs in as many areas as possible and I know the EU has advocated this course of action. He said that 'uncertainty continues' around many areas of US-EU trade, including the pharmaceutical sector. 'This is obviously an area of significant concern to Ireland,' he said. With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store