Chhattisgarh HC orders Holy Cross School to share student records with biological father in 15 days
Chhattisgarh High Court
has directed
Holy Cross Convent Senior Secondary School
, Ambikapur, to provide information to the
biological father
of a student within 15 days.
The order of the Single Bench of Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad came in response to a petition filed by the father, Rahul Gupta, who sought copies of his son's Dakhil-Kharij (
transfer certificate
) and admission form.
The petitioner stated that he applied to the CBSE-affiliated school on April 27, 2024, for the documents but received no response. Subsequently, he filed an application under Section 6(1) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005, with the district education office, Surguja, on April 29, 2024. However, this request was denied on the grounds that private schools are not covered under the RTI Act.
Aggrieved by this, the petitioner filed a first appeal to the District Education Officer and First Appellate Authority, citing a previous letter from the office and decisions of the Central Information Commission indicating that private schools are indeed covered under Sections 2(g) and 2(h) of the RTI Act. The First Appellate Authority upheld the denial.
The petitioner then filed complaints with the District Collector of Surguja, the Chief Minister, the Secretary of School Education, and the District Collector.
The District Education Officer, acting on the Chief Minister's Office's response, directed the petitioner to communicate with the school. On October 25, 2024, the petitioner reapplied to Holy Cross Convent Senior Secondary School, with an intimation to the District Education Officer, but the school again denied the request on October 29, 2024.
The school's counsel argued in court that the application was denied due to a dispute between the child's mother and father.
However, the High Court, considering the petitioner's right to information as the biological father, directed the school to provide the requested information within 15 days of receiving a certified copy of the order. The court also instructed the school to provide the information to the petitioner's address, email, and mobile number as listed in the petition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
2 hours ago
- The Wire
'ED Not a Super Cop or a Loitering Munition to Attack at Will On Any Criminal Activity': Madras HC
The court added that there must be criminal activity coming within the schedule of the Act along with the presence of proceeds of crime based on which the ED will have jurisdiction to start a probe. The Madras high court. Photo: roadconnoisseur/Flickr CC BY-SA 2.0 New Delhi: The Madras high court has said that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) can take action only upon the existence of a predicate offence and the agency cannot conduct investigations on its own. A bench of Justices MS Ramesh and V Lakshminarayanan reiterated the fact that ED is not a super cop for investigating anything and everything that came to its notice. 'The ED is not a super cop to investigate anything and everything which comes to its notice. There should be a 'criminal activity' which attracts the schedule to PMLA, and on account of such criminal activity, there should have been 'proceeds of crime'. It is only then the jurisdiction of ED commences,' said the court, reported LiveLaw. The court added that there must be criminal activity coming within the schedule of the Act along with the presence of proceeds of crime based on which the ED will have jurisdiction to start a probe. 'The terminus a quo for the ED to commence its duties and exercise its powers is the existence of a predicate offence. Once there exists a predicate offence, and the ED starts investigation under the PMLA, and file a complaint, then it becomes a stand alone offence,' said the court. The court said that if the agency was allowed to conduct an investigation merely on coming to know about any activity, the ED would be conducting roving enquiry. 'The essential ingredient for the ED to seize jurisdiction is the presence of a predicate offence. It is like a limpet mine attached to a ship. If there is no ship, the limpet cannot work. The ship is the predicate offence and 'proceeds of crime'. The ED is not a loitering munition or drone to attack at will on any criminal activity,' said the court. The observations were made by the court while hearing a plea filed by RKM Powergen Private Limited, which has challenged the ED's action of freezing its fixed deposits. The court added that as per Section 66(2) of the PMLA, if the ED comes across a violation of law during the course of the investigation, it cannot assume the role of an investigating agency and investigate those offences also. In June this year, Justice Ramesh had remarked that while courts often term the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2002 as an 'evolving legislation' which throws up new legal questions, but it is actually the 'officials of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) who are evolving day by day by expanding their powers.' Justice Ramesh's remarks came as he wondered which provision of the PMLA empowers the ED officials to seal a residential/business premises if it was found to be locked when the officials go over there for a search and seizure operation. Following the remarks, the ED had told the high court that it did not have the power to seal premises if the same was locked at the time of making a search as per Section 17 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
HRF and HRW demands criminal prosecution of police for killing Maoists
VISAKHAPATNAM : The Human Rights Forum (HRF) and the Human Rights Watch (HRW) demand criminal prosecution of police personnel responsible for the killing of three Maoist armed squad members on the morning of June 18, 2025 in the forest area of Rampachodavaram mandal in Alluri Sitharama Raju district, Andhra Pradesh. Those involved must be booked under relevant provisions of the law, including murder and the SC, ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is imperative that an independent, impartial investigation – either by the CBI or under Supreme Court monitoring – be done. It cannot be entrusted to the local police, regular or special, since they are implicated in the crime. A three-member HRF and HRW team (Y Rajesh – HRF AP State general secretary, VS Krishna – HRF AP&TG Coordination Committee member and Balu Akkisa – HRW AP State president) on July 18, 2025 visited the Rampachodavaram Agency area on a fact-finding into the 'encounter'. We spoke with Adivasis of several villages in the Vemulakonda and Akuru panchayats as well as residents of Kintukuru, a remote habitation. The version of the police that a combing party of Greyhounds personnel were fired upon by the Maoists and the retaliatory fire in self-defence resulted in the death of three Maoists is a patent falsehood. The three Maoists were ambushed and executed in a burst of one-sided firing by the Greyhounds in the early morning of June 18. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Villas For Sale in Dubai Might Surprise You Dubai villas | search ads Get Deals Undo The Maoists had been encamped deep in the forest area at a location about 3.5 km to the West of Kintukuru village. The camp is at a place referred locally as 'Oota mamidi' a perennial spring abutting a mango tree. Just behind it is a rivulet that flows East to merge with the Pamuleru vaagu. The three Maoists were camped at that spot for over two weeks. A large contingent of Greyhounds went via Kintukuru (Akuru panchayat) past midnight of June 17. They evidently had precise detail of the camp location which they surrounded from two sides to the South. The Greyhounds opened fire at daybreak, killing all three Maoists. There was no exchange of fire – no crossfire - only a targeted execution. The Greyhounds could have easily apprehended the three alive but they chose to kill them instead. The three Maoists killed were Gajarla Ravi (of Velishala village in Chityala mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally district, Telangana), Venkata Ravivarma Chaitanya (of Karakavanipalem in Pendurthi mandal, Visakhapatnam district, AP) and Kovvasi Anju, an Adivasi from Bodagubal village, Konta block, Sukma district of Chattisgarh. The bodies were taken to the Rampachodavaram Area Hospital the same evening, but the post-mortem was deliberately delayed until the next day. Relatives were forced to wait, plead, and it was only after sustained media pressure that they ultimately received decomposed bodies late on the night of June 19. By the time they were brought home, the bodies were infested with worms. These killings by special forces are part of a chilling, systematic ongoing campaign. Since January 2024, over 440 Maoists and unarmed civilians – preponderantly Adivasis in Chattisgarh - have been killed in encounters, many of them allegedly staged. We call on the Central and State governments in Maoist-affected regions to immediately halt this vicious slaughter. No democracy that claims to uphold Constitutional values can legitimise such a brutal policy of State-sanctioned extra-judicial bloodletting. HRF and HRW are of the opinion that the Maoists' repeated offers to cease hostilities and pursue peace talks warrants the government's utmost seriousness and constructive engagement. There is now a rare political opening to mitigate suffering, particularly among Adivasis, and address long-standing and deep-rooted grievances. This protracted conflict has already exacted a significant human cost, the three-member team added.
News18
4 hours ago
- News18
Justice Ramaswami, A 1989 Report & An Impeachment Proceeding: Ex-CAG Boss' Book Reveals Rot
As the Modi government looks to impeach Allahabad HC judge Yashwant Varma, a book explains how a 1989 CAG report led to an impeachment motion against Justice V Ramaswami As the Monsoon Session of Parliament begins on Monday, the Narendra Modi government is expected to start proceedings to impeach Allahabad High Court judge Yashwant Varma, from whose Delhi bungalow wads of currency notes were found. The likely proceedings bring back memories of a 1989 CAG report that led to impeachment proceedings against Justice V Ramaswami — a first in Indian Parliament where a judge faced the heat on the basis of a CAG report. Amid the buzz over Varma's impeachment, former Director General of CAG P Sesh Kumar's book throws light on Justice Ramaswami's case in particular. 'The CAG report in 1989 played a pivotal role in the impeachment motion against Justice V Ramaswami, who was then serving at the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The report highlighted instances of financial misconduct and irregularities during Justice Ramaswami's tenure as the Chief Justice (CJ) of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Specifically, it highlighted extravagant expenditures, unauthorised purchases and violations of financial norms," Kumar wrote in his new book 'CAG: What It Ought to Be Auditing'. In his book, Kumar takes the reader to 1989, recalling the findings of the CAG: 'The CJ allegedly misused public funds on renovations and furnishings of his official residence and office. These included expensive items such as carpets, air conditioners and furniture without proper approvals. The audit revealed that approximately Rs 49 lakh was misused for unauthorised expenditures, including lavish renovations and purchases for his official residence and office. The report flagged the misuse of funds earmarked for judicial and administrative purposes, leading to significant financial impropriety." The former CAG boss stressed in the book that while the top auditor of India 'submits audit reports based on the administrative control of the audited entity", which should have been the Governors of Punjab and Haryana, the findings involved matters of national importance for the attention of the Parliament of India, as they involved matters of judicial accountability. In the case of Justice Ramaswami, the issue gained national attention and was examined at the parliamentary level, leading to the involvement of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the Lok Sabha. 'Following the CAG revelations, 108 Lok Sabha MPs submitted a motion for impeachment against Justice Ramaswami, accusing him of 'proved misbehaviour' under Article 124(4) of the Constitution. It was the first-ever impeachment process initiated against a judge of the higher judiciary in India based on a CAG report. A three-member judicial committee was constituted under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, to investigate the allegations," he recalls. The committee found Justice Ramaswami guilty of gross misconduct, corroborating the CAG report's findings, he added. 'In 1993, the impeachment motion was debated in the Lok Sabha. Despite the strong evidence presented, the motion failed because the ruling party abstained from voting. As a result, the impeachment motion fell short of the required two-thirds majority in the Lok Sabha," laments Kumar. Justice Ramaswami was not impeached but resigned shortly afterwards, marking a controversial end to the episode. 'The case remains a landmark in Indian judicial history, highlighting both the importance of the CAG in exposing financial irregularities in the higher judiciary and the limitations of the impeachment process, particularly the role of political considerations in what is supposed to be a quasi-judicial procedure," he added in the book. The Modi Sarkar has, over the last few weeks, reached out to key opposition leaders over the issue of impeaching Justice Varma and Kumar, without taking any names, made a scathing remark on the issue. 'Contrast this with the situation and sad spectacles of cash allegedly found to have been delivered to one judge at the residence (Haryana) and found burnt in the outhouse (New Delhi) of another judge of high courts—where nothing happened till recently when it appears to be heading towards an impeachment process or resignation." Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : corruption Narendra Modi Yashwant Varma view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
