Samsung needs to build a Galaxy Watch that looks as good as this mod
The 40mm Watch 4 was supposedly the only one small enough to fit in the case, which appears to be from a Panerai Luminor watch.
Even the crown button is reportedly functional.
What's the most customizable device you own? Plenty of us dress up our phones with a case intended to help it stand out, but we might argue that smartwatches place an even higher priority on customization. Alternate bands offer as much variety as cases on phones do, and are much more visible, always out on display. Add to that a nice custom watch face, and you're well on your way to a one-of-a-kind combo. But even our best strap-and-face combo is feeling a little inadequate, as we check out what one Redditor pulled off.
Over on Reddit's Galaxy Watch sub, user Signal-Impression-97 shares images of a modified Galaxy Watch 4 that's been tucked into the case of a high-end mechanical watch.
According to the poster, they contacted a watchmaker to help them transform their vision into a reality. Although they don't specifically reveal the donor watch in the post, Google Lens tells us this appears to be a Panerai Luminor, with that distinctive protected crown.
That crown is even functional, with Signal-Impression-97 confirming that it works for inputs. Apparently they went with this particular Galaxy Watch model due to size concerns, starting with a 40mm edition and dremeling down the body to begin with — not something we'd recommend anyone casually attempting. Confusingly, they repeatedly refer to this as the 'Classic' edition, even though that was only available in 42mm and 46mm sizes, and there doesn't seem to have been any attempt here to preserve the rotating bezel — that's presumably a misstatement where they meant to communicate that they chose the 'basic' model.
The big problem with which smartwatch to start with is reportedly size, and our poster claims that it's hard to find good mechanical watch donor bodies that are big enough to fit Samsung's larger Galaxy Watch entries. That sounds reasonable enough, and we imagine it was already quite tricky coming up with a combination that works as well as the pairing we see here.
Do you have a favorite traditional watch that you'd love to see Frankensteined up with the guts of a modern smartwatch? Share your idea down in the comments.
Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at
Email our staff at news@androidauthority.com . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cluely's ARR doubled in a week to $7M, founder Roy Lee says. But rivals are coming.
Cluely's revenue has skyrocketed to about $7 million in ARR since it launched its new enterprise product a week ago, founder Roy Lee told TechCrunch. 'Every single person who has a meeting or an interview is testing this out.' Cluely, one of Silicon Valley's most-talked-about startups, offers products that use AI to analyze online conversations, deliver real-time notes, provide context, and suggest questions to ask. This information appeared discreetly on the user's screen, invisible to others. For weeks leading up to the product reveal, Lee boasted that the company's annual recurring revenue (ARR) exceeded $3 million and that the startup was profitable. The increase in interest is coming from consumers and businesses alike, he said. Cluely is a startup born of controversy after Lee posted in a viral X thread saying he was suspended by Columbia University because he and a co-founder developed a tool to cheat on job interviews for software engineers. He turned around and created a product and startup out of the tech, originally using the marketing tagline that it helps you 'cheat on everything.' Now that it is backed by big-league VCs like Andreessen Horowitz, Abstract Ventures, and Susa Ventures, it has toned down its marketing to 'Everything You Need. Before You Ask. … This feels like cheating.' It has turned into a Silicon Valley sensation from its rage-bait marketing. But the startup's controversial history hasn't stopped businesses from showing interest in Cluely's product, Lee insists, telling us that it has signed a public company that just this week doubled its annual contract with Cluely to $2.5 million. Lee declined to name the company. The enterprise version of the product is similar to the consumer offering, but it comes with some extra features such as team management and additional security settings, Lee said. Business use cases include sales calls, customer support, and remote tutoring. Which Cluely features are the most interesting to customers? According to Lee, it's Cluely's ability to take real-time notes. 'Meeting notes have been a proven very sticky, very interesting AI use case. The only problem with them is they're all post-call,' Lee said of competitors' products. 'You want to look back at them in the middle of a meeting, and that is what we offer.' However, Cluely's real-time notetaker may be easy to replicate. On Thursday, Pickle, a company that describes itself as a digital clone factory, claimed on X that it built Glass, an open source, free product with very similar functionality to Cluely. By mid-day it had already garnered over 850 stars and been forked nearly 150 times — indicating that the open source developer community is giving this free version a try. Time will tell if Cluely's meteoric rise can withstand competition from free copycat products like Glass. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Slate Auto drops ‘under $20,000' pricing after Trump administration ends federal EV tax credit
Slate Auto, the electric vehicle startup backed by Jeff Bezos, has stopped promoting that its upcoming pickup truck will start 'under $20,000' following passage of President Trump's tax cut bill. The bill, which is expected to be signed into law by Trump on July 4, will cause the federal EV tax credit to end in September — a $7,500 incentive that Slate had counted on to help its all-electric pickup clear that mark. When Slate came out of stealth mode in April, the startup heavily promoted that its all-electric pickup would start at 'under $20,000' with the $7,500 federal EV tax credit. That language was still on Slate's website as recently as yesterday according to the Web Archive. The change is a potential blow to the young company's attempt to make a radically affordable electric vehicle. Slate didn't provide a precise price for the EV at its launch event; and it has yet to say what the actual starting price of its vehicle will be, sans-credit. A Slate spokesperson declined to comment on the change. The company won't start building the truck until the end of 2026 at the earliest. Slate's business is also built around making this vehicle highly customizable, which means it's possible that few people will buy the base model to begin with. The sub-$20,000 price had been a big attraction point for the brand new company's product, and it was a major focus following its April launch event. The auto industry has 'driven prices to a place that most Americans simply can't afford,' chief commercial officer Jeremy Snyder said during the event. 'But we're here to change that.' 'We are building the affordable vehicle that has long been promised but never been delivered,' CEO Chris Barman added at the time. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'I'm being paid to fix issues caused by AI'
AI is making me extra money, says Sarah Skidd, a product marketing manager who writes for tech and start-up companies. In May Ms Skidd was approached by a content agency to urgently rework website copy that had been produced via generative AI for a hospitality client. What was supposed to save money had, instead, caused a host of problems. "It was the kind of copy that you typically see in AI copy – just very basic; it wasn't interesting," says Ms Skidd. "It was supposed to sell and intrigue but instead it was very vanilla." Ms Skidd spent about 20 hours rewriting the copy, charging $100 (£74) an hour. Rather than making small changes, she "had to redo the whole thing". Ms Skidd, who lives in Arizona, is not worried that businesses are switching to AI, like ChatGPT, rather than using copywriters like herself. "Maybe I'm being naive, but I think if you are very good, you won't have trouble." For now, she's hearing of writers whose main role now is to fix copy churned-out by AI. "Someone connected with me and said that was 90% of their work right now. So, it's not only me making money off such missteps, there's other writers out there." Ms Skidd is certainly not anti-AI and believes it can be an excellent resource. "My husband and son are dyslexic and writing for them is very difficult - anything to help somebody to write; it can be lifechanging." In the last few years, generative AI has taken off and businesses are turning to systems like ChatGPT developed by OpenAI, and Google Gemini to transform business practices, and cut time and money. More than a third (35%) of small businesses plan to expand AI use within two years, rising to 60% among those aiming for rapid sales growth, according to research by the Federation of Small Businesses. However, some businesses are rushing in, and as Ms Skidd shows, it can often create more work and costs than originally intended. Certainly, that's the experience of Sophie Warner, co-owner of Create Designs, a digital marketing agency in Hampshire in the UK. In the last six to eight months, she seen a surge in requests for help from clients who have turned to AI for a quick fix, but have run into problems. "Before clients would message us if they were having issues with their site or wanted to introduce new functionality," says Ms Warner. "Now they are going to ChatGPT first." Ms Warner says this has led to clients adding code to their website that has been suggested by ChatGPT. This, she says, has resulted in websites crashing and clients becoming vulnerable to hackers. She points to one client who, instead of manually updating their event page, which she says would have taken 15 minutes, instead turned to ChatGPT for easier instructions. The error ultimately "cost them about £360 and their business was down for three days". Ms Warner says it also happens to larger clients too. "We are spending more time educating clients on the consequences [of using AI]. "We often have to charge an investigation fee to find out what has gone wrong, as they don't want to admit it, and the process of correcting these mistakes takes much longer than if professionals had been consulted from the beginning." Prof Feng Li, associate dean for research and innovation at Bayes Business School, says some businesses are too optimistic about what current AI tools can do. He points out that AI is known to hallucinate - to generate content that is irrelevant, made-up, or inconsistent. "Human oversight is essential," he says. "We've seen companies generate low-quality website content or implement faulty code that breaks critical systems. "Poor implementation can lead to reputational damage and unexpected costs – and even significant liabilities, often requiring rework by professionals." In Gujarat in northwesten India, copywriter Kashish Barot says she has been editing content written by AI for US-based clients to make it appear more human and remove sentence patterns that make it sound like AI. Despite the often-poor quality of the content, she says clients are becoming used to the speed of AI and that is creating unrealistic expectations. "AI really makes everyone think it's a few minutes work," says Ms Barot, who says clients are using Open AI's ChatGPT. "However good copyediting, like writing, takes time because you need to think and not curate like AI, which also doesn't understand nuance well because it's curating the data." The hype around AI has prompted many companies to experiment without clear goals, adequate infrastructure, or a realistic understanding of what the technology can deliver, says Prof Li. "For example, companies must assess whether they have the right data infrastructure, governance processes, and in-house capabilities to support AI use. Relying on off-the-shelf tools without understanding their limitations can lead to poor outcomes," he says. OpenAI says that ChatGPT can help with a wide range of tasks, "but results vary depending on the model used, the user's experience working with AI, and how the prompt is written". It also points out that there are several versions of ChatGPT. "Each of our models has different capabilities for completing different tasks." Is Warner worried about the impact of AI, if – as expected – it rapidly improves? "Yes and no," she says. "While it seems like a quick and inexpensive option, AI rarely takes into account unique brand identity, target demographics, or conversion-focused design. As a result, much of the output looks generic and can actually damage the brand's reputation or effectiveness." She adds: "While AI can be a helpful tool, it simply cannot replace the value of human expertise and context in our industry." Who will win the race to develop a humanoid robot? Why we need 'revolutionary' cooling tech The camera tech propelling shows like Adolescence Sign in to access your portfolio
