People are freaking out over the new $795 Chase Sapphire Reserve card. I never got one — and I'm finally vindicated
Some financial windfalls are all about the timing — and luck: A handful of California gold nuggets in 1848. A SoHo loft in 1984. Bitcoin in 2013. A home mortgage rate in 2020.
I've made peace with missing out on some of life's chances to accidentally inflate my financial standing in the world. But the one that has always made me slightly sick to my stomach is missing out on the late 2016 Chase Sapphire Reserve credit card points bonanza.
Now, my painful case of FOMO has been cured.
Last week, Chase said it was revamping the Sapphire Reserve — and upping its annual fee to $795, from the current $550. And it's making a bunch of changes to its rewards structure, which some people are downright furious about. They say they'll cancel. (Chase says its card will become even more valuable, with "over $2,700 in annual value.")
Well, as a world-class hater, sore loser, and jealous snake, I couldn't be more thrilled.
When the new yearly fee and rewards were announced last week, I watched in absolute glee as friends of mine and strangers on the internet lamented and wailed at the fact that the card that had once showered them with rewards points would not be worth the fee (again, only for some people).
The Chase Sapphire Reserve card had attained a millennial mythos akin only to avocado toast and entitled attitudes. It came during the peak of the ZIRP and " millennial lifestyle subsidy" eras: Ubers were cheap, and the credit card points flowed like The Fat Jewish's personal rosé brand. The card — especially if you signed up in the early days — gave you a massive points bonus that could be used for travel or other perks.
It seemed almost impossible not to have the credit card make you money (of course, assuming you paid off your balances and wisely used the points).
I never had the Chase Sapphire Reserve; when it launched, my friends were excited and extolling its virtues, but I thought I needed another credit card and was intimidated by the points gaming. At some point, I realized I had missed the boat. I didn't get in while the getting was good.
Now, I've been reading the r/SapphireReserve subreddit with glee, seeing some of the former evangelists of the card defeated by its new fee. The main post about the news: "Welp. It's bad and official."
I should note here that the card may indeed still be a good deal for some people — it matters how much you spend, and what kind of rewards/perks you're most interested in.
The perks, however, are not exactly what everyone wants, like Apple TV+ or Apple Music subscriptions (less appealing for a Spotify user). There are credits for certain hotels from Chase's selection of hand-picked hotels (which may not be the ones you want). If you spend $75,000 a year on the card, you will get status on Southwest Airlines.
But as one Redditor said: "Who is spending $75k per year on this card that also wants status on Southwest Airlines?"
As for Chase, it touts 8X points on all Chase Travel purchases, which is up from 5X on flights, but slightly down from 10X on hotels and car rentals. It also touts 4X points on flights and hotels purchased directly with the airline or hotel, up from 3X.
The points system for the card is somewhat complicated (part of why I have always avoided a points-based card), and people's individual situations will vary a lot about whether this card is better or worse or worth it. For some people, the higher yearly fee will net out with all the new rewards; for others, they're thinking of downgrading to a cheaper version or canceling altogether.
I wish all of the Chase Sapphire Reserve cardholders the best journey to the path that works best for them. Me, I'm just feeling a huge burden lifted off my shoulders. Ahhhh ….
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why your Social Security check could shrink by nearly 20% — and more if jobs are scarce
Social Security is hugely important to a large share of Americans. Almost 69 million Americans will receive monthly Social Security benefits in 2025, totaling about $1.6 trillion in benefits paid during the year. But Social Security will need some kind of reform within the next decade in order for America's retirees to keep counting on it. Given its funding structure, if Social Security continues to roll forward in its current trajectory, the program will be able to cover just 81% of promised benefits starting in 2034, according to the latest estimates of the Social Security Trust Fund report. My brother stole $100K from my mom to buy bitcoin. Do I convince her to sue him? Most American weddings are a lot more extravagant than the nuptials of Amazon's Jeff Bezos I'm a stay-at-home. Do I take a part-time job to spend more time with my kids — or get a job for six figures? JPMorgan has a new way of forecasting the stock market — and there's a surprising finding 'He doesn't seem to care': My secretive father, 81, added my name to a bank account. What about my mom? Congress will need to take action. But both Republicans and Democrats have long been reluctant to reduce Social Security benefits and averse to raising payroll taxes to close the funding gap. Yet the economic reality can't be ignored. The way in which Social Security is funded exposes the program to challenges. Unlike other forms of saving for retirement, where workers put away savings into an account that is dedicated to them, this pay-as-you-go system acts more like a checking account: Current workers are paying into the system and the current beneficiaries are receiving those funds out of the program. This structure did not present a challenge while the baby-boom generation was entering the workforce in the early 1960s, with the share of workers paying into the system rising much faster than the share of the population able to claim benefits. Since the early 2000s the tables have turned: The share of the U.S. population that is 18-64 has been declining while the share that is 65 and older grew at the fastest rate in over a century, going from 13.0% of the total population in 2010 to 16.8% in 2020. As a result of these opposing trends, while there were about 18 people aged 65 and older for every 100 working-age Americans in 1980, this dependency ratio grew to 30 retirement-age Americans per 100 workers in 2025 (see the chart above). The ratio of retirees to workers is likely to continue increasing beyond the retirement of the baby boomers because of the lower fertility rates that the U.S. has experienced over the past 15 years or so. For several years, the trustees of the Social Security Trust Fund have been projecting that the program has promised more benefits than it is able to pay out. According to the latest trustees report, released on June 18, the combined Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance Trust Fund is expected to be depleted in 2034. At that time, benefits will be paid only from the income that is coming in, as there won't be anything in the reserves to supplement that income. Legally, the trust fund cannot borrow money. At that point, the trust funds would only be sufficient to pay about 81 cents on every dollar scheduled to be paid. Unless policymakers make deliberate efforts to clarify how to handle shortfalls, it is likely that the program will face similar uncertainties in the future. Right now, we face uncertainty in how the gap between the funds coming in and the benefits promised will be closed. It is not clear if beneficiaries will face those benefit cuts, if taxpayers will be liable for those tax increases, or something else. Both the benefits paid and the contributions into Social Security are prescribed by law. This means it's likely that demographic or economic assumptions will change again at some point in the future, resulting in an imbalance between the benefits that are scheduled to be paid and the revenue that is expected to come in. For example, when there's an economic downturn, fewer people are working and contributing into the trust fund. There are other ways in which the retirement security system is lacking that could be addressed. While the existence of Social Security and Medicare have contributed to a dramatic reduction in elderly poverty, some groups face persistent challenges. Although survivor benefits provide helpful protection to surviving spouses, there is some evidence that the existing level of survivor insurance may not be adequate to cover the costs that a surviving spouse incurs. In 2019, among those 60 and over, 16% of new widows lived in poverty, compared to 10% overall. There remain significant expenditure risks that the elderly face that are not fully addressed by Social Security and Medicare. While Social Security does not provide any kind of medical payments, Medicare provides a source of health insurance for most people over the age of 65. However, Medicare doesn't cover everything, and there are significant copayments and deductibles that a person may be responsible for. Read: Trump pledged not to cut Medicare — but his budget bill does just that For example, annual out-of-pocket spending on healthcare was on average $6,663 for all beneficiaries enrolled in traditional Medicare in 2019, according to a study by AARP. This average out-of-pocket spending for healthcare was equivalent to about 38% of the average annual Social Security retirement benefit ($17,460) in 2019. Moreover, there is a significant coverage gap regarding long-term care services for chronic conditions. This type of care is costly and largely paid for either out of pocket, through state Medicaid programs for those who qualify, or provided by unpaid caregivers, often spouses and adult children, who indirectly bear the costs through reduced labor force participation and adverse impacts on their own health. A person turning 65 between 2021 and 2025 is estimated to incur, on average, $120,900 in paid long-term care costs, of which 37% is estimated to be paid out of pocket, and the remainder covered by a combination of Medicaid (and other sources of public insurance) and private insurance (see here). Read: $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid would have a devastating impact on people receiving long-term care. Here's why. Also read: Medicare may actually be in more trouble than Social Security What will Social Security reform ultimately look like? The answer is unclear at this stage. Would it be an across-the-board cut or a cut that applies more to certain people than others? Will the burden fall on all U.S. taxpayers or only on current workers? Delaying real discussion about the solutions makes the problems harder to solve. The timeline that the U.S. has to fix it is shorter and the change that is needed is more drastic than it would be otherwise. While addressing the imminent financial challenges of the program will be unavoidable, Americans shouldn't just be thinking about the issue of solvency. What is the role of government and markets in providing this protection? How can Americans ensure that their major entitlement programs are solvent and sustainable for the long term? Social Security reform offers an opportunity to take comprehensive look at how policy can best help people manage the risks they face in retirement. Gopi Shah Goda is director of the Retirement Security Project, the Alice M. Rivlin chair in economic policy and senior fellow in economic studies at the Brookings Institution. This commentary was originally published by Econofact — 'Facing the Social Security Shortfall.' Also read: As Social Security starts operating under controversial new rules, here's how they could affect you and your benefits More: Social Security will stop sending paper checks soon. How to make sure you still get your benefits on time. S&P 500 scores record high for first time in 4 months. What could push stocks higher from here? There's an important market indicator that suggests investors remain wary. It's good news for stocks. My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum or $355 a month for life? What drove stock market's record-breaking week? Don't overlook growing rate-cut expectations. Coinbase's stock is up over 40% this month as Wall Street projects amazing profit growth Sign in to access your portfolio
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Crypto Miner IREN Surges 102% as AI Pivot Delivers Profit Haul
IREN Limited (IREN) is undergoing a transformation, and investors have taken notice. The cryptocurrency mining firm is turning into a profitable digital infrastructure play by combining Bitcoin mining with high-demand AI cloud services. So far, so good, as its recent numbers tell a compelling story: record quarterly revenue of $148.1 million, a return to profitability with $24.2 million in net income, and a rock-solid balance sheet. Confident Investing Starts Here: I am optimistic about the stock and believe it deserves serious consideration for those seeking exposure to a crypto miner with an AI infrastructure technology play. The stock has outstanding growth potential, with analyst price targets suggesting potential gains of more than 50%. The stock price has doubled over the past three months alone. Evolution into an AI Infrastructure Provider IREN has reinvented itself as a next-generation infrastructure provider serving both Bitcoin mining and AI computing needs. It operates cutting-edge data centers across North America, with facilities strategically located in Canada and Texas, all powered by renewable energy. The company has grown from holding a modest 2.8% share of Bitcoin production to capturing 4.5% of the market, placing it among the top 10 publicly traded miners globally. But the real game-changer has been the addition of AI cloud services, powered by nearly 1,900 NVIDIA H100 and H200 graphics processing units (the gold standard for AI computing). What sets IREN apart from competitors like Marathon Digital (MARA) and Riot Platforms (RIOT) is its commitment to renewable energy and operational efficiency. The company has achieved industry-leading performance with an all-in Bitcoin mining hash cost of just $23, resulting in gross profit margins exceeding 87%. However, in March, management made the strategic decision to pause Bitcoin mining expansion at 52 exahash per second and to redirect resources toward AI infrastructure development. It is a bold move into a rapidly growing market that McKinsey projects will require $6.7 trillion in infrastructure investment by 2030. Transformation Drives Financial Results The results from the last quarter suggest a successful transition. Q3 FY2025 revenue reached $148.1 million, 23.8% growth over the previous quarter. More to the point, the company achieved its second consecutive profitable quarter, reporting a net income of $24.2 million. Bitcoin mining contributed $141.2 million, with the company successfully mining 1,514 Bitcoins at a cost of $41,000 per coin while earning $93,000 per coin in revenue. Meanwhile, AI cloud services generated $3.6 million with a remarkable 97% hardware profit margin and 33% quarter-over-quarter growth, demonstrating that the business model transformation is working. Profitability metrics have been solid, with EBITDA of $83.3 million translating to a healthy 56% margin, while earnings per share of $0.11 were roughly in line with analyst expectations. The balance sheet is also quite strong, with zero debt and $184.3 million in cash, before a recent round of fundraising. IREN added $534.9 million from an oversubscribed convertible notes offering in June 2025, giving management significant resources to execute on growth plans. Looking ahead, management is targeting 50 exahash per second of mining capacity by June 2025, followed by the launch of Horizon 1, a 50-megawatt AI project in Q4. Furthermore, the company aims to bring online a massive 2-gigawatt facility in Texas by April 2026, which would significantly expand its AI hosting capabilities. A Deep Dive Into IREN's Valuation IREN appears undervalued when compared to peers in the cryptocurrency mining space. It trades at a relative discount, despite more robust forward-looking expectations, such as the forecast for positive EPS. Furthermore, the price-to-future-cash-flow ratio of 13.64x appears attractive when compared to the IT sector average of 19.15x, especially for a company executing a successful growth strategy in a high-demand market. The asset value story is equally compelling. With potential annual revenue exceeding $714 million at full mining capacity, plus growing AI services revenue, the enterprise value-to-forward EBITDA multiple of 12.16x appears modest relative to the sector average of 14.43x, suggesting the company's power infrastructure and renewable energy advantage may not be fully reflected in the current stock price. Is IREN a Good Stock to Buy? Wall Street has shown strong support for IREN's transformation story, with analysts issuing seven Buy ratings, one Hold, and no Sell recommendations over the past three months. IREN's average stock price target of $17.96 implies approximately 36% upside potential over the next twelve months. JPMorgan recently upgraded IREN to an 'Overweight' rating, naming it their top pick in the sector due to the company's operational efficiency and compelling growth outlook. Meanwhile, Nick Giles from B. Riley raised his price target to $15, and Roth MKM boosted its target to $20, both highlighting IREN's accelerated growth initiatives and strategic investments. The recently oversubscribed $550 million convertible notes offering also provides additional validation of institutional investor confidence. Initially announced at $450 million, the offering was increased twice due to strong demand, demonstrating that the smart money wants exposure to the company's growth story. Final Thoughts on IREN The company is currently undergoing a successful evolution from a Bitcoin miner into a diversified digital infrastructure provider with multiple revenue streams in a market with exceptional growth prospects. Its financial picture looks promising — the balance sheet is solid, revenue is trending up, and it's profitable again. The strategic pivot to AI infrastructure positions IREN to capitalize on a significant investment opportunity, while maintaining profitable Bitcoin mining operations. The combination of exposure to growth in the evolving digital economy, solid financials, and relative undervaluation makes this a stock I remain bullish on.
Business Insider
5 hours ago
- Business Insider
Analysts See CoreWeave-Core Scientific Deal Topping $30 Per Share Mark
Analysts are closely evaluating the renewed interest from CoreWeave (CRWV) in acquiring Core Scientific (CORZ). Although neither party has revealed a potential deal price, analysts are already offering their own projections. Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Brett Knoblauch believes that the Core Scientific deal could be priced at over $30 per share. At the same time, Roth MKM analyst Darren Aftahi noted that CoreWeave could pay up to $38 per share in an all-stock deal for CORZ. Shares of both companies are trending higher in pre-market trading at the time of writing. Confident Investing Starts Here: CoreWeave is a cloud-computing and artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure company. CRWV also leases access to Nvidia's (NVDA) graphic processing units (GPUs) to big tech clients. On the other hand, Core Scientific provides Bitcoin mining and hosting facilities in North America. The two companies do share a long-term partnership, in which Core Scientific supplies large amounts of data center space and power to support CoreWeave's high-performance computing (HPC) needs and AI workloads. Aftahi Says the Acquisition 'Makes a Lot of Sense' Analyst Aftahi says that CoreWeave acquiring Core Scientific 'makes a lot of sense' because it would prove highly beneficial to the company. Primarily, it would add more capacity to CoreWeave and eliminate the hefty annual lease payment of $850 million from its expenses. It would also mean that CoreWeave would own its data centers outright. Notably, Aftahi's 'rudimentary accretion/dilution analysis' suggests that CoreWeave could end up paying up to $38 per share for the deal. Aftahi kept his Buy rating and $20 price target on CORZ stock, which implies 22.3% upside potential from current levels. Knoblauch Says CoreWeave Could 'Save Several Billion Dollars' According to Knoblauch, CoreWeave is set to pay roughly $15 billion to $16 billion to Core Scientific over their 12-year partnership. These payments will go toward capex and lease expenses for utilizing Core Scientific's data centers and power. The analyst noted that even after making these massive payments, CoreWeave will not retain ownership of the data center infrastructure. Thus, Knoblauch believes that the acquisition makes sense and that CoreWeave would not mind paying a significant premium for buying Core Scientific and still 'save billions of dollars.' Knoblauch has a Buy rating on CORZ stock and $18 price target, which implies 10% upside potential from current levels. Is Core Scientific a Good Stock to Buy? On TipRanks, all 12 analysts who currently rank CORZ stock have given it a Strong Buy consensus rating. Also, the average Core Scientific price target of $17.83 implies nearly 9% upside potential from current levels.
