Motion would have aligned SNP foreign policy with Keri Starmer's
In Perth, on the auditorium screen was a topical motion on the issue in the name of Stephen Gethins MP. Had it passed unamended, it would have upended SNP policy in several areas – not only on the party's position on international nuclear disarmament treaty architecture, but broader issues of national security and indeed adjacent economic policy.
READ MORE: Protesters stage demonstration inside Reform UK's headquarters
Unamended, it would have positioned the SNP group at Westminster behind Keir Starmer and David Lammy's position on the Israel-Iran crisis. It would have also represented a softening of the tone, possibly even the substance, of the critical statements made by other SNP parliamentarians at Westminster and in Holyrood.
The unamended motion read: 'MIDDLE EAST SITUATION – National Council abhors the ongoing violence in the Middle East and recognises that destabilisation in the region is a threat to us all; calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and full access for humanitarian relief; further agrees that Iran should not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons but that the best means of stopping that and finding a sustainable solution is through diplomatic means.'
The motion only mentioned Iran and not Israel and was presented in the name of a former professor of international relations. Stephen was not in attendance, so his motion was subsequently moved by another delegate. I proposed that three words – 'be allowed to' – be excised. In the end, my suggestion was acceded to and political embarrassment averted. Other amendments pertaining to the, frankly, barely condemnatory tone on what is going on in Gaza, would have been appropriate but timescales and procedures precluded that.
(Image: Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)
At first, I wanted to accept the cock-up theory but after a few days of reflection and being faced with some irrefutable facts, the record needs to be put straight. This must be reflected upon by SNP spokespersons, particularly on matters of war and peace.
It's interesting how in the repertoire of those who used to promote a 'rules-based order that's not the United Nations', they and the mainstream media are very quick to gaslight anyone who says historical context is important. However, when the historical airbrush is applied to the signature diplomatic achievement of Barack Obama, I must speak out.
The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the deal that ensured Iran gave up any notion of developing nuclear weapons, was ditched by Donald Trump. My 'textual amendment' reaffirmed SNP adherence to the spirit of the Obama plan. During his first term as president, Trump of course trashed the JCPOA. Now, bizarrely, he appears to want to bomb Iran into a JCPOA-without-the-safeguards.
The SNP seek to achieve the restitution of a sovereign Scottish state. It will be a small state and, as such, on the journey to independence, the recognition of the UN will be indispensable.
However, I am no naive idealist. The world is a dangerous and uncertain place, particularly when you share a border with the Russian Federation or Israel.
Only politicians with links to the arms trade would want to use fear as a key electoral driver. Arguing that man-made global dangers and instability are uniform throughout the world is an understandable though rather unethical marketing tool for arms companies. The truth is, in the bigger scheme of things, some places are a bit safer than others, and Scotland is one of those – a fortunate reality that the independence movement should unapologetically make more of.
Bill Ramsay
SNP CND
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Steve Coogan accuses Labour of paving way for Reform UK
Steve Coogan has accused Keir Starmer's Labour government of a 'derogation of all the principles they were supposed to represent' and said they were paving the way for the 'racist clowns' of Reform UK. The actor, comedian and producer said the party he had long supported was now for people 'inside the M25' and described the prime minister's first year in power as underwhelming. 'I knew before the election he was going to be disappointing. He hasn't disappointed me in how disappointing he's been,' he said. Coogan spoke to the Guardian ahead of an address to the annual Co-op Congress in Rochdale, Greater Manchester, where he called for locally led grassroots movements to assemble across Britain and take back control from 'multinational institutions and billionaires'. The Bafta-winning actor, best known for his Alan Partridge persona, has backed Labour in several recent general elections but switched his support last year to the Green party. Coogan, 59, said he 'agreed wholeheartedly' with the statement released by former Labour MP Zarah Sultana on Thursday night, when she announced she was quitting the party to co-lead a left-wing alternative with Jeremy Corbyn. Sultana said Britain's two-party system 'offers nothing but managed decline and broken promises' and that Labour had 'completely failed to improve people's lives'. Coogan said: 'Everything she said in her statement I agree wholeheartedly. I wish I'd said it myself.' However, he added that he was 'reserving judgment' as to whether to support the new party at future elections if they field candidates. The Philomena star said he did not blame working people for voting for Nigel Farage's Reform UK. 'The success of Reform, I lay squarely at the feet of the neoliberal consensus, which has let down working people for the last 40 years and they're fed up,' he said. 'It doesn't matter who they vote for, nothing changes for them. 'Keir Starmer and the Labour government have leant into supporting a broken system. Their modus operandi is to mitigate the worst excesses of a broken system and all that is is managed decline. What they're doing is putting Band-Aids on the gash in the side of the Titanic.' In his most strongly worded attack on Labour yet, Coogan described the party's priorities in the last year as 'a derogation of all the principles they were supposed to represent'. 'We have a Labour government and it's no different from a Conservative government in neglecting ordinary people,' he added. 'I think Labour governs for people inside the M25 – that's who they're preoccupied with, and gesture politics. Every decision that comes from central government these days to me looks political and strategic and nothing to do with sincerity or any kind of firmly held ideological belief.' Without meaningful action to improve the lives of ordinary people, Coogan said, both Labour and the Conservatives would face electoral oblivion. 'They'll pave the way for the only alternative, which is a racist clown. Reform couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery but if there's no alternative you understand why working people will make that choice,' he said. Coogan spoke in Rochdale's Grade I-listed town hall, which this weekend is hosting a congress of co-operative movements from across the world to mark this year's UN-designated International Year of Co-operatives. The actor is a supporter of Middleton Co-operating, a community-led initiative based in his home town, just outside Manchester, which aims to provide locally run energy, banking, social care, housing and other schemes. He said the government's focus on attracting investment to major cities had created a 'doughnut of neglect' with poorer communities 'ethnically cleansed'. 'You look at Manchester, you look at Liverpool, and you go: 'Wow, look at these shiny new buildings' and everything looks clean, there's no crisp bags flying about in the street,' he said. 'The disenfranchised people who lived there before are not there any more. They've been ethnically cleansed. They've been booted out to the next poor area. So who's benefiting?' Coogan urged Labour to breathe life back into towns by empowering grassroots groups to take over neglected buildings, using compulsory purchase orders for example. 'It's not just the fact that people are disempowered and feel like they have no autonomy. It's compounded by the fact that these people, these multinationals, are enabled and supported by the government to keep their foot on the neck of working people,' he said. It was 'perfectly understandable' for working people to vote for Farage's Reform in large parts of England, where many voters feel disenfranchised, Coogan said. 'But if any government wants to address that extremism, what they have to do is tackle the root cause,' he added. 'The root cause is poverty and economic decline in the post-industrial landscape, especially in the north. If Labour addressed that problem, Reform would go away – all their support would dissipate.'
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Chancellor Rachel Reeves says she is 'totally' up for the job of chancellor in first comments since tearful PMQs
The chancellor has said she was having a "tough day" yesterday in her first public comments since appearing tearful at Prime Minister's Questions - but insisted she is "totally" up for the job. Rachel Reeves told broadcasters: "Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that. "My job as chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government, and that's what I tried to do. "I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that." She declined to give a reason behind the tears, saying "it was a personal issue" and "it wouldn't be right" to divulge it. "People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job," she added. Ms Reeves also said she is "totally" up for the job of chancellor, saying: "This is the job that I've always wanted to do. I'm proud of what I've delivered as chancellor." Asked if she was surprised that Sir Keir Starmer did not back her more strongly during PMQs, she reiterated that she and the prime minister are a "team", saying: "We fought the election together, we changed the Labour Party together so that we could be in the position to return to power, and over the past year, we've worked in lockstep together." PM: 'I was last to appreciate' that Reeves was crying The chancellor's comments come after the prime minister told Sky News' political editor Beth Rigby that he "didn't appreciate" that she was crying behind him at Prime Minister's Questions yesterday because the weekly sessions are "pretty wild", which is why he did not offer her any support while in the chamber. He added: "It wasn't just yesterday - no prime minister ever has had side conversations during PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there's a bit more time, but in PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang. That's what it was yesterday. "And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that's just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation." 1:03 During PMQs, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded the chancellor the "human shield" for the prime minister's "incompetence" just hours after he was forced to perform a humiliating U-turn over his controversial welfare bill, leaving a "black hole" in the public finances. The prime minister's watered-down Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill was backed by a majority of 75 in a tense vote on Tuesday evening - but a total of 49 Labour MPs voted against the bill, which was the largest rebellion in a prime minister's first year in office since 47 MPs voted against Tony Blair's lone parent benefit in 1997, according to Professor Phil Cowley from Queen Mary University. Reeves looks transformed - but this has been a disastrous week for the PM It is a Rachel Reeves transformed that appears in front of the cameras today, nearly 24 hours since one of the most extraordinary PMQs. Was there a hint of nervousness as she started, aware of the world watching for any signs of human emotion? Was there a touch of feeling in her face as the crowds applauded her? People will speculate. But Ms Reeves has got through her first public appearance, and can now, she hopes, move on. The prime minister embraced her as he walked on stage, the health secretary talked her up: "Thanks to her leadership, we have seen wages rising faster than the cost of living." A show of solidarity at the top of government, a prime minister and chancellor trying to get on with business. But be in no doubt today's speech on a 10-year-plan for the NHS has been overshadowed. Not just by a chancellor in tears, but what that image represents. A PM who, however assured he appeared today, has marked his first year this week, as Sky News' political editor Beth Rigby put to him, with a "self-inflicted shambles". She asked: "How have you got this so wrong? How can you rebuild trust? Are you just in denial?" They are questions Starmer will be grappling with as he tries to move past a disastrous week. Ms Reeves has borne a lot of the criticism over the handling of the vote, with some MPs believing that her strict approach to fiscal rules has meant she has approached the ballooning welfare bill from the standpoint of trying to make savings, rather than getting people into work. Ms Badenoch also said the chancellor looked "absolutely miserable", and questioned whether she would remain in post until the next election. Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she will, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: "How awful for the chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place." Downing Street scrambled to make clear to journalists that Ms Reeves was "going nowhere", and the prime minister has since stated publicly that she will remain as chancellor "for many years to come".
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Rachel Reeves hints at tax rises in autumn budget after welfare bill U-turn
Why you can trust Sky News Rachel Reeves has hinted that taxes are likely to be raised this autumn after a major U-turn on the government's controversial welfare bill. Sir Keir Starmer's Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill passed through the House of Commons on Tuesday after multiple concessions and threats of a major rebellion. MPs ended up voting for only one part of the plan: a cut to universal credit (UC) sickness benefits for new claimants from £97 a week to £50 from 2026/7. Initially aimed at saving £5.5bn, it now leaves the government with an estimated £5.5bn black hole - close to breaching Ms Reeves's fiscal rules set out last year. 6:36 In an interview with The Guardian, the chancellor did not rule out tax rises later in the year, saying there were "costs" to watering down the welfare bill. "I'm not going to [rule out tax rises], because it would be irresponsible for a chancellor to do that," Ms Reeves told the outlet. "We took the decisions last year to draw a line under unfunded commitments and economic mismanagement. "So we'll never have to do something like that again. But there are costs to what happened." Meanwhile, The Times reported that, ahead of the Commons vote on the welfare bill, Ms Reeves told cabinet ministers the decision to offer concessions would mean taxes would have to be raised. The outlet reported that the chancellor said the tax rises would be smaller than those announced in the 2024 budget, but that she is expected to have to raise tens of billions more. It comes after Ms Reeves said she was "totally" up to continuing as chancellor after appearing tearful at Prime Minister's Questions. 1:16 Criticising Sir Keir for the U-turns on benefit reform during PMQs, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said the chancellor looked "absolutely miserable", and questioned whether she would remain in post until the next election. Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she would, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: "How awful for the chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place." In her first comments after the incident, Ms Reeves said she was having a "tough day" before adding: "People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. "Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job." 4:21 Sir Keir also told Sky News' political editor Beth Rigby on Thursday that he "didn't appreciate" that Ms Reeves was crying in the Commons. "In PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang," he said. "That's what it was yesterday. "And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that's just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation."
