Godzilla will be back, promises Nissan as a new GT-R is on the card
The new Nissan GR-R is on the card and it claims to come reinventing the notion of a sportscar. Check Offers
Nissan GT-R may not be currently in business, but that doesn't diminish the consumer attention towards this car. And keeping that in mind, Nissan is working on a new GT-R. The Japanese car manufacturer that has been sailing through troubled waters has confirmed that a new GT-R is in development.
Nissan GT-R, which is popularly known as Godzilla as one of the insanely powerful sportscar is gearing up for a return. Auto Express has quoted Nissan's VP of Product Marketing Strategy, Arnaud Charpentier, saying that the GT-R will be back, without a doubt. This comment comes at a time when Nissan is undertaking a massive cost-cutting agenda after losing billions in recent years due to sales slumping short of investments.
Also Read : Upcoming cars in India
While the car manufacturer's new product strategy centres on the usual body styles like SUVs and crossovers, owing to the high demand for such models, the next-generation GT-R is also in development. 'There are people working on this. When, how, honestly, this we don't know. But today, we don't just need to make a sports car, but to do one with a powertrain that we foresee [working] in the coming years. If it is electric or electrified, it needs to remain a sports car. [But] if you end up with the same performance as an EV SUV, this is an issue," Charpentier said.
He also said that upon arrival, the new Nissa GT-R will reinvent the notion of a sports car. It's been about a year and a half since the company hinted that the next GT-R might come as a fully electric car. The Hyper Force concept, an ultra-angular supercar promising about 1,341 bhp peak power, was described as a tangible dream to achieve by the end of the decade. Also, it previewed what the new Nissan GT-R may look like.
While Nissan is still enthusiastic about a new GT-R, there are a host of challenges ahead of this project as well. The struggling Japanese carmaker has bigger priorities and is unlikely to favour a GT-R soon at the expense of a high-volume SUV. Surely, a new supercar would boost Nissan's image and draw more people into the showrooms, but in reality, the OEM may be more inclined to play it safe with volume-driven vehicles like SUVs and crossovers.
Check out Upcoming Cars in India 2024, Best SUVs in India.
First Published Date: 25 May 2025, 13:29 PM IST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India-US trade deal: India treads cautiously after Trump's trade agreements with Japan, others face challenges - here's what's happening
India-US trade deal: India would prioritise national interests over meeting deadlines in trade negotiations. (AI image) India-US trade deal: India is exercising caution in its trade negotiations with the US. This careful approach stems from complications in America's recent agreement with Japan, alongside ongoing difficulties in finalising deals announced by President Donald Trump with Indonesia and Vietnam. On Saturday, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal indicated that bilateral trade agreement discussions with the US and Oman have progressed significantly. He announced that US negotiators would visit India in the latter half of August to advance these discussions. Goyal also emphasised that India would prioritise national interests over meeting deadlines in trade negotiations, indicating the government's commitment to securing beneficial terms. Trump's self-imposed tariff deadline is August 1, after which countries that don't reach trade deals with the US will likely be hit with high tariff rates. Trump has over the last few weeks sent tariff letters to many countries, though notably India is absent from this list. Trump has also indicated that the US is nearing a trade deal with India. Also Read | Donald Trump tariffs: Will the August 1 deadline by extended by US President? What Commerce Secretary Lutnick said US-Japan Trade Deal Lesson for India According to an ET report, the Japanese-American trade agreement appears to have been hit by disagreements over its terms, with Japanese and US interpretations showing significant differences. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo This has caused extra caution from India's end in terms of trade negotiations, the report said. While US officials assert that Japan has pledged investments in America with local taxpayers receiving ninety per cent of profits, Japanese representatives maintain that no formal written agreement exists. A statement from a Japanese official last week clarified their position on the $550-billion investment package, indicating an expectation that profit distribution between both nations would be proportional to their respective contributions. This stance directly conflicts with Trump's assertion that Japan would independently shoulder the investment costs whilst the US receives 90% of the returns. Also Read | 'Confident India will get special treatment…': Piyush Goyal says trade deal talks with US making 'fantastic' progress; 'important to…' Trump made a unilateral announcement about a trade agreement with Indonesia after speaking with President Prabowo Subianto, though the agreement had been unsigned. On July 22, Indonesia's lead negotiator and coordinating minister for economic affairs, Airlangga Hartarto, alongside US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, released a joint communiqué detailing the agreement's structure and specifying import duty rates. The declaration had details regarding non-tariff protocols and business arrangements, with both parties committing to ongoing discussions for finalising the agreement. "Yet, the risk of a policy setback remains high if the political agreement is not turned into a legal instrument," according to a commentary by Iis Gindarsah, a visiting senior fellow specialising in Indonesia at the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) in Singapore. In the interim, Vietnam has not formally validated the duty rates declared by Trump as a component of a two-sided agreement, sources indicate. Hanoi is concerned that its US-bound shipments could decrease by 33% if Trump's announced higher tariffs are implemented. According to official statistics, Vietnam's aggregate exports to the US reached $120 billion in the previous year. "Tariffs of 20% to 40% would slash export revenue by up to $37 billion, and hit the majority of Vietnam's key industries, including electronics, machinery, garments, footwear and furniture," a recent Bloomberg report said. Also Read | Donald Trump's aggressive trade moves: US President indicates he won't go below 15% tariff rate; 'we'll have a straight…' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Fibre2Fashion
an hour ago
- Fibre2Fashion
US department stores struggle, pressure mounts: NRF
US department stores remain under pressure, with most players in decline, according to the National Retail Federation's (NRF) 2025 Top 100 Retailers list compiled by Kantar. US department stores continue to struggle, with Macy's, Kohl's and Nordstrom posting sales declines, though TJX Companies leads apparel with 4 per cent growth and 3,660 stores. Ross and Burlington thrive in value apparel. Kantar's Marcotte highlights growing Gen Z interest in mall retail driven by Japanese trendsâ€'though its sustainability may hinge on tariff impacts. Dillard's (No. 68) stands as the category's strongest performer despite a soft year, while Nordstrom—now 49.9 per cent owned by Mexican retail giant El Puerto de Liverpool—remains a retailer to watch. Macy's (No. 24) saw a 3 per cent decline in US sales to $22.21 billion and a 2 per cent drop in comparable store sales. Kohl's (No. 31) posted an even steeper slide, with US sales down 7 per cent and comparable store sales off 6.5 per cent. In contrast, TJX Companies (No. 15) strengthened its lead in the apparel and jewellery segment, reporting 4 per cent growth in US sales to $43.56 billion and a 4 per cent gain in comp store sales. The retailer also grew its US store base by 3.1 per cent to 3,660 locations, NRF said in a release. Ross Stores (No. 25) and Burlington (No. 47) continue to thrive within the value apparel segment, both recognised as Power Players—retailers whose 2024 US sales were equal to or greater than 10 per cent of the category leader's. 'The broad variety of apparel options — either from source manufacturers or discontinued and clearance items — continues to support the growth of the discount trade. The additional sophistication of systems to manage a widely divergent procurement stream has led to the continued success of Ross and Burlington. The emergence of Shein and Temu has led to strong shopper engagement from the very different fast fashion shopper,' said David Marcotte, senior vice president of global retail and technology for Kantar. Walmart retained its No. 1 position overall, followed by Amazon, Costco, Kroger and The Home Depot. The NRF's annual ranking highlights category-specific power dynamics, spotlighting key players shaping retail's shifting landscape. Retail inside malls is attempting a comeback, fuelled by a real estate push to make these spaces more engaging and experiential—particularly for Gen Z shoppers. Japanese products are helping lure younger consumers back to malls, Marcotte noted. 'And that's something I'll be looking at next year, to see if it sticks. Because so much of that is impacted by tariffs,' he said. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (HU)
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
There is more scope for Indian investment in the UK than the other way around: Swaminathan Aiyar
Swaminathan Aiyar, Consulting Editor, ET Now, says India stands as a prominent investor in the UK, with the Tata Group leading as the largest private sector employer. Enhanced by relaxed social security deductions for IT workers, increased Indian investment in the UK's IT sector appears promising. Opportunities also exist for Indian professionals in finance, media, and sports, potentially fostering a beneficial two-way exchange of skills and remittances. ADVERTISEMENT But the list is long when it comes to some labour intensive sectors, be it from auto ancillary to leather to processed food. Which can be the biggest beneficiary according to you? Swaminathan Aiyar: The government is anxious to emphasise that there will be job creation in artisanal, labour-intensive sectors like leather or textiles or auto ancillaries. I would just say that in the long run, we need to look away from the labour-intensive field. Our comparative advantage is in skills. We are very competitive in skills. We are not competitive on labour costs for there are a large number of issues on the labour side. It includes the very large number of holidays we have in India compared with anybody else, and relatively short hours of work. Because of all this, I do not think India has a great advantage in the labour-intensive sector which the government claims it wants to promote as our labour laws do not really promote that. So that is the real problem, our own labour laws, not the trade barriers in Europe, not the trade barriers in the UK. And we would have to do something about that. In auto ancillaries, we can certainly have a move up. The British car industry has disappeared in terms of British names, but the multinationals of the world are there, certainly the Japanese and Korean companies and we can export there and hopefully at some point of time, we will even be able to export to Jaguar which is very high-end in terms of the auto parts, but Tata owns it. We are not competitive in large cars, but we are definitely competitive in small cars. For countries in Europe, and in England, small cars are preferable, whereas in the USA, it is large cars. Small cars are preferable because of very high prices of petrol and because of a lack of parking spaces. Americans have huge parking spaces for their large cars. Britain and Europe are much more constrained by space. So, our small car exports should have a chance of rising significantly. It will also depend of course on what happens to the tariffs of various rivals. Malaysia, Thailand, China, all of these are competitors in small car areas. So, I am not sure what will happen out there, but if we have a good deal, if we have a very low tariff regime and they do not, that will clearly give us a benefit in the UK. Does the FTA lay groundwork for wider cooperation in technology, green energy, and mobility? Will it also help boost investments in a meaningful way according to you? Swaminathan Aiyar: There are a number of issues. As far as investment is concerned, will this help mutual investment? Will this help Indian investment in the UK? Will it help British investment in India? I am not sure to what extent it will boost British investment in India. The reason is that Britain hardly produces many goods anymore. It used to be a large exporter of goods, but it has substantially deindustrialised and become a services sector. So, it will want to do something more on the services sector which we should allow because we are competitive in services, we should allow them to come in. But again, if somebody comes into the services with a GCC, it will not involve very much investment. It will certainly generate revenue. It will help generate skills. It will be skilling of the Indian workforce. There will be exports involved, but do not expect very heavy investment. It does not take a lot of heavy investment to start an R&D centre into artificial intelligence. So that is the kind of thing the British may be investing in India. ADVERTISEMENT India is one of the biggest investors in the UK. The Tata Group is the largest single employer in the private sector in the entire United Kingdom. I mean, it has TCS, it has Jaguar, and it has its steel plant out there and those together are a massive amount of investment, a massive amount of jobs. Will that trend increase? Yes, it could increase. But as I said, that is now fundamentally a services economy. It is no longer a large-scale producer of merchandise. So, can Indian companies like TCS which are already well established increase their footprint? Yes, I should think so, especially now that there is this freedom in terms of social security deductions. Earlier, if an IT worker went there, a significant part of his salary was cut saying this is a social security contribution although he would never get it back as a pension in his old age. Now that that is being waived for three years, we will be able to send lots more people for up to three years and this should induce much more Indian investment in the IT sector there. I hope that happens. It looks promising. Of course, the other thing is that will there be more Indian writers for Financial Times and The Economist or more Indian footballers going into the Premier League, some of these areas and of course, there is the stock market. I mean, Britain is a highly financialised market with a huge stock market. It already has a significant number of Indian names that are already well known. I imagine that number could go up. How many of them would retain a close connection with India? I am not sure. But you could hope that a significant number of people go there and they improve their skills, send home remittances, and later on perhaps come back and open businesses here, so that is what we look forward to, something happening two-way and on this frankly I see more scope for Indian investment in the UK than the other way around. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
