There's no excuse for SNP supporters voting for Reform UK
READ MORE: Labour MSP Davy Russell sworn in to Scottish Parliament
Certainly it is anger-inducing, but there are two things you never do: 1) vote for an anti-independence party and 2) (never ever ever) vote for fascists!
It is not as if there are not pro-independence parties to vote for if you want to protest; there are the Scottish Socialist Party or the Greens, for example! Or is it the case that some supposed independence supporters found it easy to make their mark for Reform without holding their noses!
Drew Macleod
Wick
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Onshore wind is cheapest form of energy by far. Here's why bills are still high
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland's clean-energy transition is at risk of losing hearts and minds. The latest Scottish Climate Survey , published in April, highlighted an interesting contradiction that strikes at the heart of the issues facing governments and renewables developers when it comes to decarbonising energy generation. Almost three-quarters of Scots believe that climate change is an immediate and urgent problem; yet, less than half think the net-zero transition will improve their quality of life by 2045, the Scottish Government's target. In short, people have yet to be convinced of the benefits that a move to cleaner energy will bring to them and their families. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Cheaper household energy bills would go a long way towards persuading them that the net-zero transition is more than an arbitrary concept imposed upon them. Far from what many believe, it is already cheaper to generate energy from renewable sources than from fossil fuels and nuclear. Nonetheless, the growth in renewables has not yet translated into lower household bills. Wind turbine technology has come a long way since the opening of the Whitelee Windfarm near Eaglesham in 2009 (Picture: Danny Lawson) | PA Farcical A significant factor behind this is the – quite frankly – farcical reality that UK electricity prices are based on more expensive fossil fuel prices. That is why electricity market reform is vital if we are ever to unlock the potential of renewables to lower bills. The UK cannot afford to lose sight of the fact that the most effective way to achieve a long-term transition to clean and affordable energy is to build more renewable generation into the UK's energy mix. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Onshore wind might not immediately come to mind when considering the cheapest form of energy generation. Yet advances in technology, driven by a burgeoning global market, have significantly reduced the costs of onshore wind and it is now by far the cheapest form of energy generation. Guaranteeing a healthy supply of these projects over the long term is essential to ensure competitive tension and provide the UK Government with flexibility should other forms of generation prove more expensive or slower to develop than anticipated, such as floating offshore wind. Renewable energy firms are working diligently to develop this pipeline of high-quality onshore wind projects in a manner that directly engages communities and respects the surrounding environment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Planning problems, slow grid connections Developing wind farm projects does not come without its challenges; an unnecessarily strict planning regime and slow National Grid connections for projects increase costs and uncertainty for developers. These issues must be addressed if we are to reap the benefits of the renewables transition – maintaining the status quo would be an act of self-sabotage. The industry faces considerable uncertainty following a proposal in the UK Government's Clean Power Plan to cap the supply of onshore wind projects at the level of the 2030 target, plus 700 MW. Many in the business – including myself – believe constraining the number of projects could have the unintended consequence of reducing competition, which would drive up prices in Contract for Difference auctions and increase energy bills. For an industry where long-term certainty is vital, we need to understand whether there is sufficient flexibility for onshore wind to connect from 2030 to 2035. That Scotland is at the forefront of the UK's clean energy revolution is not enough. Government – and developers – must work to ensure that Scots see and feel the benefits.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Dear Mr Swinney, please fix the ferries (for Scotland's sake, and your own)
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Guess how many ferry sailings were cancelled because of a technical problem over the last couple of years or so. What do you reckon: 100, 1,000... 5,000!? Not even close. A freedom of information request has revealed that a fault of some kind resulted in the cancellation of a grand total of 10,809 sailings between January 2023 and April this year. The situation is so bad that maintenance issues and the like caused almost as many problems as the weather for which the Atlantic Ocean is notorious. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad This is the extraordinary state into which Scotland's state-owned CalMac fleet has been allowed to deteriorate on the SNP's watch. The MV Glen Rosa at its launch in April last year. It will not be ready until sometime next year (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images 'Millions in repair bills' Jamie Greene MSP, transport spokesperson for the Scottish Liberal Democrats, which obtained the figures, said: 'The SNP's failure to deliver new lifeline ferries has anchored islanders with an ageing fleet that is in constant need of repair, at constant risk of cancellation and costing millions in repair bills.' He stressed that each sailing which did not go ahead meant islanders losing business, missing hospital appointments, and other real-world problems. Since becoming First Minister, John Swinney has rightly stressed the need for his government to focus on the effective delivery of public services, a tacit admission this hasn't always been the case. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Lengthy NHS waiting lists and violence in schools may occupy his mind more than most issues – and they should do – but the parlous state of our ferry services deserves Swinney's personal attention too. No fringe issue As Greene pointed out, islanders are effectively being treated as 'second-class citizens'. No one on the mainland would accept routine disruptions to road travel that effectively trapped people in their local area. This is far from a fringe issue. However, apart from being the right thing to do, there is another reason why Swinney should act: the ferry crisis is becoming increasingly emblematic of SNP incompetence. One of the biggest symbols, the long-delayed and over-budget Glen Rosa ferry, is currently expected to be ready just before or just after the Holyrood election – 11 years after it was commissioned.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Plan to scrap two-child benefit cap ‘dead in the water' after Labour's £5billion welfare U-turn
LABOUR will not scrap the two-child benefit cap despite pressure from left wing MPs, according to Downing Street sources. Plans to shelve the rule have reportedly been binned because of Labour's £5 billion welfare U-turn. 3 3 3 Earlier this year Starmer told his cabinet he wanted to scrap the cap and asked the Treasury to identify ways to fund the plan. However, a No 10 source has now told The Sunday Times: "My assessment is that is now dead in the water." And a No 11 source warned MPs there has to be 'trade offs' for not introducing major welfare reforms, reports the outlet. 'Whether that's tax rises or not scrapping the two child benefit cap,' they added. Parents have only been able to claim child tax credit and for their first two children since 2017. Imposed in April 2017, parents can not claim child tax credit or universal credit worth up to £3,455 per year for more than two children. An exception is made for children born as a result of rape. Lifting the cap would cost an estimated £3.5 billion and the Labour party has long been divided over the issue - with Sir Keir Starmer ruling out scrapping the cap in 2023. He then said Labour wanted to remove it, but only when fiscal conditions allowed. Following Labour's landslide victory last July, the prime minister refused to bow to pressure within his party, and suspended seven MPs for six months for voting with the SNP to scrap the cap. Ministers have toed the party line for months, but the narrative started to shift in May, with Sir Keir reported to have asked the Treasury to see how scrapping it could be funded. Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs Labour MPs who forced Sir Keir Starmer into a U-turn last week had set their sights on lifting the benefit cap. But it looks like that plan is now set to be scrapped once and for all with a decision on the cap set for the autumn. Speculation has been mounting that ending the two-child benefits cap will be the third welfare U-turn after those relating to winter fuel payments and disability benefits, which have already cost Rachel Reeves billions. Sir Keir recently suffered the biggest blow to his leadership since coming into power a year ago after he was forced to abandon a key plank of his controversial benefit cuts in order to get them through parliament. Just minutes before voting began, ministers announced that plans to restrict eligibility for personal independence payments were being dropped. Sir Keir had already been forced into a U-turn the week before when more than 130 Labour MPs turned rebels and signed an amendment that would have effectively killed the bill off. Among the concessions announced then was a plan to impose tougher eligibility rules only on future PIP claimants, leaving existing recipients unaffected. It comes after analysis of official figures previously revealed that ditching the child benefits cap would hand thousands of pounds a year in extra benefits to 180,000 large families in which no one goes out to work. But critics of the cap claim it has worsened child poverty. The hard-hitting rule, which slashes payments like Universal Credit and Child Tax Credit, is costing struggling households an average of £4,300 each, according to a recent report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Official figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show a staggering 450,000 families were stung by the cap last year. Most of those hit - around 280,000 families – have three kids, while 120,000 have four, and 56,000 are raising five or more little ones. The DWP doesn't reveal exactly how much the biggest families are missing out on.
