Google to sign EU's AI code of practice despite concerns
The voluntary code of practice, drawn up by 13 independent experts, aims to provide legal certainty to signatories on how to meet requirements under the Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), such as issuing summaries of the content used to train their general-purpose AI models and complying with EU copyright law.
"We do so with the hope that this code, as applied, will promote European citizens' and businesses' access to secure, first-rate AI tools as they become available," Kent Walker, who is also Alphabet's chief legal officer, said in the blog post.
He added, however, that Google was concerned that the AI Act and code of practice risk slowing Europe's development and deployment of AI.
"In particular, departures from EU copyright law, steps that slow approvals, or requirements that expose trade secrets could chill European model development and deployment, harming Europe's competitiveness," Walker said.
Microsoft will likely sign the code, its president, Brad Smith, told Reuters earlier this month, while Meta Platforms declined to do so and cited the legal uncertainties for model developers.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Google Reverses Course: Most goo.gl Short Links to Stay Active
In a notable policy shift, Google has reversed its earlier decision to disable all shortened URLs by August 25, 2025. The company confirmed on Friday that most of these links will continue to function as usual, a significant change from its previous course of action announced in July 2024. Initially, Google had announced plans to phase out the service altogether, citing dwindling usage. "More than 99 percent of the URLs had no activity in the last month," the tech giant said at the time. This announcement sparked concern among users who relied on links embedded in countless blogs, documents, social media posts, and videos over the years. However, following extensive feedback, Google now says it will only deactivate a limited subset of links — specifically those that had already been flagged for deactivation. ' URLS that already show a message saying that they will be deactivated in August will still stop working,' the company clarified. These specific links were targeted because they "showed no activity in late 2024," and users were notified about the upcoming deactivation nearly nine months ago. In contrast, any URL not accompanied by such a deactivation notice will remain operational. 'All other links will be preserved and will continue to function as normal,' Google stated in its Friday update. The short link service was officially discontinued in 2019, preventing users from creating new links through the platform. But despite that, existing links remained widely in use, often as integral parts of marketing materials, online publications, academic papers, and legacy content. Google acknowledged this in its revised announcement: 'We understand these links are embedded in countless documents, videos, posts and more, and we appreciate the input received.' Jay Peters, the news editor at The Verge covering this update, noted the importance of Google's reversal for users who continue to depend on these legacy URLs. As platforms evolve, decisions that affect older infrastructure can have far-reaching implications — especially when those tools were once foundational to how content was shared online. This update provides a measure of relief to users and organizations that would have otherwise faced broken links and disrupted user experiences. Google's move reflects an effort to balance modernization with the realities of long-standing digital footprints.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Dominance of Amazon and Microsoft in cloud harming competition, UK says
The dominant position of Amazon and Microsoft in cloud computing is harming competition, with their impact exacerbated by technical and commercial barriers to switching, an inquiry group from Britain's antitrust regulator said. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) group said on Thursday the regulator should investigate whether to designate the two with strategic market status (SMS) in cloud services, which would give it new powers to intervene. It noted, however, that the CMA has said it will not consider new SMS investigations, which are conducted by its Digital Markets Unit (DMU), until early next year. Microsoft was singled out in its final report for licensing practices that the panel said adversely impacted Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google. The group said in January that Microsoft was using its dominance in enterprise software, such as Windows Server and Microsoft 365, to limit competition by charging licensing fees when its services were used on rival platforms. Microsoft and AWS have 30-40% market shares in cloud services such as processing, storage and networking, it said. Google is the third main provider, but it has a smaller share of 5-10%. "Measures aimed at Microsoft and AWS would address market-wide concerns," the CMA group said. The cloud computing industry has been scrutinised by regulators on both sides of the Atlantic. In Europe, Microsoft clinched a 20-million-euro deal last year to settle a complaint about its licensing practices, averting an antitrust investigation and potential hefty fine. The company said the CMA group's report "misses the mark again, ignoring that the cloud market has never been so dynamic and competitive, with record investment, and rapid, AI-driven changes". "Its recommendations fail to cover Google, one of the fastest-growing cloud market participants," a spokesperson said. Amazon said "clear evidence of robust competition" had been disregarded. "The action proposed by the Inquiry Group is unwarranted and undermines the substantial investment and innovation that have already benefited hundreds of thousands of UK businesses," a spokesperson said. But it noted the group had recognised that action needed to be taken over Microsoft's licensing practices. Google said the conclusive finding that restrictive licensing harmed customers and competition was a "watershed moment". "Swift action from the DMU is essential to ensure British businesses pay a fair price and to unleash choice, innovation and economic growth in the UK," said Chris Lindsay, Google Cloud's vice president for customer engineering EMEA. The Open Cloud Coalition and the Coalition for Fair Software Licensing said the CMA should take action quickly. "Given the alarming anticompetitive behaviour it has identified, the current plan to start this process in early 2026 is nowhere near sufficient," said Nicky Stewart, senior advisor to the Open Cloud Coalition.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Switzerland, the land of luxury brands, could see prices skyrocket from Trump's 39% tariffs
Prices for the eponymous Swiss watches , Swiss chocolate and Swiss cheese could skyrocket in a week as a result of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Switzerland, home to some the world's most recognizable luxury brands, now faces an upcoming 39% tariff from the U.S. Industry groups on Friday warned that both Swiss companies and American consumers could pay the price. Trump signed an executive order Thursday placing tariffs on many U.S. trade partners - the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and alliances - that's set to take effect next Thursday. The order applies to 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands. In Switzerland, officials failed to reach a final agreement with the U.S. after Trump initially threatened a 31% tariff in April. Swiss companies will now have one of the steepest export duties - only Laos, Myanmar and Syria had higher figures, at 40-41%. The 27-member EU bloc and Britain, meanwhile, negotiated 15% and 10% tariffs, respectively. Figure came as a surprise The Swiss government spent Friday - the country's National Day - reeling from the news. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter said that the 39% figure was a surprise, because negotiators had hashed out a deal last month with the Trump administration that apparently wasn't approved by the American leader himself. "We will now analyze the situation and try to find a solution," Keller-Sutter told reporters. "I can't say what the outcome will be, but it will certainly damage the economy." The U.S. goods trade deficit with Switzerland was $38.5 billion last year, a 56.9% increase over 2023, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. Keller-Sutter said that she believes Trump ultimately chose the 39% tariff, because the figure rounded up from the $38.5 billion goods trade deficit. "It was clear that the president was focused on the trade deficit and only this issue," she said. Time is ticking for watch companies For Swiss watch companies, whose products already come with price tags in the tens of thousands - if not the hundreds of thousands - of euros, a timepiece for an arm could cost a leg, too, come next week. The 39% figure was especially galling to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, because Switzerland in 2024 got rid of import tariffs on all industrial goods. "As Switzerland has eliminated all custom duties on imported industrial products, there is no problem with reciprocity between Switzerland and the U.S.," the federation said in a statement. "The tariffs constitute a severe problem for our bilateral relations." Swiss watch exports were already facing a prolonged slowdown, with significant declines in the United States, Japan and Hong Kong, according to the federation's June figures, the most recent available. Swatch and Rolex declined to comment Friday. Representatives for Patek Philippe, IWC and Breitling didn't respond to requests for comment. Sour taste for Swiss chocolatiers Multinational chocolatiers Nestle and Lindt & Sprungli said they have production lines in the U.S. for American customers. But small- and medium-sized Swiss companies are predicted to suffer under the tariffs. Roger Wehrli, chief executive of the Association of Swiss Chocolate Manufacturers. also known as Chocosuisse, said Switzerland exports 7% of its chocolate production to the U.S. It's not just the 39% tariff that's the issue. Once the manufacturers factor in the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Swiss francs ($1 to 1.23 francs on Friday), Wehrli said, it's close to a 50% increase in costs for the Swiss companies. And that's a big number to pass on to American consumers, if the already-slim margins aren't further reduced. "I expect that our industry will lose customers in the United States, and that sales volumes will decrease heavily," he told The Associated Press. Wehrli said that he wants Swiss chocolatiers to sell to other markets around the globe to make up the difference. Still, he hopes American customers remember that Swiss quality beats cheaper quantity. "I think even if prices for Swiss chocolate increase due to the very high tariffs, I think it's worth (it) to buy Swiss chocolate," he said. "It's worth (it) to really eat it consciously and to really enjoy it instead of eating a lot." Tough pill for Swiss pharmaceuticals Swiss pharmaceuticals powerhouse Roche says that it's working to ensure its patients and customers worldwide have access to their medications and diagnostics amid the Trump tariff war. "While we believe pharmaceuticals and diagnostics should be exempt from tariffs to protect patient access, supply chains and ultimately future innovation, we are prepared for potential tariffs being implemented and confident in managing any impacts," the statement said. The company in April announced that it plans to invest $50 billion in the United States over the next five years, creating 12,000 jobs. The company already employs more than 25,000 people in the U.S. Meanwhile, Novartis, another major Swiss pharmaceutical firm, said in a statement that it was reviewing Trump's executive order. "We remain committed to finding ways to improve access and affordability for patients," it said. Pietro De Cristofaro in Berlin, and David McHugh in Frankfurt, Germany, contributed to this report.
