SC promotes 'Rajmargyatra' app, directs NHAI to crack down on highway encroachments
National Highways Authority of India
to take effective steps to curb unauthorised occupation of highway lands and form surveillance teams of police officials to carry out patrolling. The top court also directed the Centre to give wide publicity to the availability of 'Rajmargyatra' mobile application on print, electronic, as well as social media.
The National Highways Authority of India (
NHAI
) has introduced the 'Rajmargyatra' mobile application which aims to provide comprehensive information and efficient complaint redressal for national highway users.
A bench of Justices Abhay S Oka and Augustine George Masih said information about the availability of the mobile application shall be displayed prominently at toll and food plazas on highways.
'We direct the Joint Secretary (Highways) to file on record the details of various categories of complaints lodged on the 'Rajmargyatra' mobile application, including complaints regarding unauthorised occupation of highway lands and action taken thereon.
'We further direct NHAI to report compliance regarding the creation of grievance redressal portal for reporting complaints relating to
unauthorised occupation of highways
. The compliance affidavits shall be filed within three months,' the bench said.
The top court also directed the highway administration to issue a detailed Standard Operating Procedure regarding the constitution of teams for inspection of the national highways, including collection of data regarding unauthorised occupation of highway lands.
'We direct the Union of India to constitute surveillance teams consisting of State police or other forces. The duty of the surveillance teams will be to do patrolling regularly and punctually. Even this compliance shall be reported within a period of three months.
'We direct the highway administration and the concerned respondents who are members of the same to take into consideration the suggestions submitted by the amicus curiae on October 5, 2024 and take steps to implement the said suggestions,' the bench said while posting the matter for compliance on September 15.
The top court was hearing a PIL filed by a person named Gyan Prakash whereby he sought various directions for implementation of provisions of the Control of National Highways (Land and Traffic) Act, 2002 and removal of encroachments from highways.
Advocate Swati Ghildiyal was appointed amicus curiae by the apex court for assisting in the matter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
34 minutes ago
- News18
NEET UG 2025: SC Declines To Consider Plea Alleging Errors In Question Paper
Last Updated: NEET-UG 2025: The petitioner's counsel argued that the three questions were incorrect, citing two expert opinions that supported this claim. On Friday, the Supreme Court declined to hear a plea asserting that there were 'serious errors" in three questions from the NEET-UG 2025 examination. A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar advised the petitioner's counsel to approach the relevant high court. The National Testing Agency conducts the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) for admissions to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH, and other related courses in both government and private institutions nationwide. The petitioner's counsel argued that the three questions were incorrect, citing two expert opinions that supported this claim. He stated that these questions affected the petitioner's score by 13 marks. 'These (three) questions were absolutely wrong. I have taken two expert opinions and those experts also concur with my views. They have certified my views," the counsel of the petitioner argued. The bench noted that the exam had already concluded. 'You withdraw this and go to the high court," the bench suggested, emphasising not wanting to deny the petitioner any remedy. The counsel requested that the Supreme Court appoint a panel of experts to review the questions within three days and consider their opinions. After the bench expressed unwillingness to entertain the plea, the petitioner's counsel decided to withdraw it. On July 4, the Supreme Court also declined to entertain a separate petition challenging the NEET-UG 2025 results due to an alleged error in one of the questions. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
United News of India
37 minutes ago
- United News of India
Delhi HC upholds conviction of three Delhi Police personnel in 2013 sexual harassment case
New Delhi, Aug 2 (UNI) The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction of three Delhi Police personnel in a 2013 sexual harassment case including a woman and her minor niece, directing the convicts to surrender before the trial court within five days. The Court ruled that no leniency will be granted given the nature of the offence and the fact that the convicts were law enforcement officers who violated the very law they were meant to uphold. The three convicts, Jaidev, Jagmal, and Suraj Bhan alias Monu were found guilty under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The Court noted that the incident occurred in May 2013 and involved repeated misconduct by the convicts, who were also neighbours of the complainant. The High Court observed that the convicts, despite being public servants, had persistently engaged in inappropriate behaviour, including making vulgar gestures, sexually explicit remarks, and, in one instance, indecent exposure in the presence of the complainant and her niece. The Court rejected claims for leniency based on the age, health conditions, or family responsibilities, citing the seriousness of the offences and their prolonged nature. The judgment showcased that the case did not merit a rehabilitative approach due to the aggravating circumstances, including the convicts' positions in the police force and the repeated nature of the acts. The Court further noted that other FIRs had been registered by the complainant in subsequent years, indicating ongoing harassment and misconduct. Citing Supreme Court precedents, the High Court highlighted that sentencing must be proportionate to the gravity of the crime and serve as a deterrent, especially when the perpetrators hold positions of authority. The Court concluded that a punitive approach was necessary to restore public confidence in the justice system. All sentences will run concurrently, and the High Court directed that its order be sent to the trial court to ensure compliance. UNI ATK PPP AAB
Indian Express
41 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Kerala nuns arrested in Chhattisgarh in ‘forceful conversion' case granted bail
An NIA court in Bilaspur Saturday granted bail to three people, including two nuns from Kerala, who were arrested recently in Chhattisgarh's Durg district in an alleged forced conversion and human trafficking case. A sessions court had earlier disposed of the bail application reasoning that the matter should be heard by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) court in Chhattisgarh's Bilaspur district. The nuns, Preeti Marry and Vandana Francis, and one more person, Sukaman Mandavi, were arrested last Friday at the Durg railway station in Chhattisgarh on allegations that they were involved in forceful conversion and human trafficking. The FIR, registered under sections of the Chhattisgarh Religious Freedom Act and the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, was based on a complaint by a local Bajrang Dal worker, who alleged that the accused forcibly converted three women from Narayanpur district and were attempting to traffic them.
