SNP must give up pretence weapons firms aren't arming Israel
We see the devastation every day on social media – the flattened homes, the murdered children, the hospitals turned to rubble.
While Scotland is thousands of miles away from this daily death and destruction, we have important questions to ask our own Governments about their complicity in this escalating conflict.
Labour's UK Government has armed Israel. It has even trained its military forces. It has refused to challenge Israel's genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie and Angus Robertson face-off as tensions rise over Israel divestment
Its response has done nothing but encourage the escalation of violence in the Middle East, from its ongoing material support for Israel's daily atrocities in Gaza and the West Bank, to the political cover it is now providing Israel and the US as they intensify the conflict in Iran.
The SNP have been right to call out Westminster's disgraceful complicity in Israel's war crimes. But, despite this, the Scottish Government has continued to give public money to companies which are arming Israel.
This paper exposed that since 2019, Scottish Enterprise has awarded at least £8 million in public grants to arms manufacturers.
And more recent research from Amnesty International found that between January 2022 and April 2025, Scottish Enterprise gave almost £2.75m to firms which have been arming Israel.
That includes Leonardo, which produces the laser targeting systems for Israeli fighter jets, and Raytheon, whose smart bombs have helped level whole city blocks in Gaza.
Entire cities in Gaza have been levelled by Israeli bombsThese aren't just abstract names on an export list, they are companies producing tools of death, and our money is helping them do it.
The companies profiting from this assault on Gaza – one which leading human rights experts, including Amnesty International, have described as a genocide – are embedded in our economy.
This should not be happening.
In 2019, the Scottish Government – after pressure from the Scottish Greens – committed that all Scottish public bodies would conduct human rights checks on companies, including arms manufacturers, prior to funding them.
These due diligence checks look at a number of things – including whether a company has been associated with human rights abuses anywhere in the world.
READ MORE: 'Isn't it telling?': John Swinney rips into Anas Sarwar on benefit cuts
But no company has ever failed the checks undertaken by Scottish Enterprise, despite clear evidence that companies like Raytheon and Leonardo are arming Israel's war.
These human rights checks are clearly not fit for purposes.
In February, we forced the Government to review these human rights checks. For months, we pushed for a progress update.
We demanded answers before the summer.
Earlier this week, Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes finally updated Parliament on the review. She claimed that Scottish Enterprise's internal assessment of past practice found no evidence that grant money has gone towards the manufacturing of munitions.
The SNP are right not to use public money to pay for the production of munitions in Scotland.
Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes (Image: Jane Barlow/PA Wire) But exactly how many degrees of separation does the Scottish Government want before it finally acknowledges complicity?
If you contribute towards building a bigger bomb factory, you don't get to say that you haven't funded the production of the bombs.
The truth is that Scottish Government funds are still going to the manufacturers of weapons and military technology used by Israel to inflict unimaginable harms on Palestinians.
The Scottish Greens have always been clear.
Companies that are arming Israel's assault on Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank should never receive public funding.
Our money should never be used to boost the profits and profiles of arms companies that are happy to fuel genocide and war crimes.
READ MORE: Which protests will the UK state declare unacceptable next?
Let's stop pretending we don't know where our money ends up and who's enjoying the spoils. The evidence is there.
We may not have the power to halt the UK's arms sales or change its foreign policy.
But we do have the power to decide where our own public funds go. And we must use that power responsibly.
The Scottish Government can't have it both ways. Ministers can't call on the UK Government to halt arms exports to Israel while simultaneously handing money to the very firms that make those weapons. The people of Scotland deserve better.
The Scottish public has a proud tradition of opposing war, standing for peace, and defending human rights. Let's not tarnish that legacy by turning a blind eye when it matters most.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Few thought airstrikes could end Iran's nuke program. Did they?
Iran itself has acknowledged the impact of the U.S. and Israeli attacks. But in the years since Washington's withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran, experts and analysts have emphasized that airstrikes alone would merely delay Iran's nuclear ambitions rather than permanently derail them. Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Illinois, reiterated that long-held understanding in a June 26 interview. "The targets are hard targets, deep targets, mobile targets. So it was never meant to eliminate the program," Quigley told USA TODAY. "It was never meant to do anything but slow the program." The congressman, who is on the House's intelligence committee and has regularly received briefings on Iran, added, "We've always been told . . . the only way to end this (nuclear) program is with a lot of troops on the ground for a long time. A war." The former head of the National Nuclear Security Agency's nonproliferation programs, Corey Hinderstein, struck a similar tone. "The conventional wisdom that you can't destroy the Iranian (nuclear) program through air attack alone has actually held," said Hinderstein, now a vice president at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "While some are saying that the airstrikes were tactically and strategically successful, I think that the jury is still out on that, and we don't actually have the information that we need to believe that this program is gone." Third nuclear site, hidden centrifuges, missing uranium Iran may have another nuclear site that, if equipped with enrichment centrifuges and conversion equipment, could continue the process of preparing uranium for use in a nuclear bomb, if the regime wishes to pursue one. Shortly before Israel began its air campaign against Iran, the regime told the International Atomic Energy Agency that it had a third nuclear enrichment site but did not reveal details. Analysts believe an undisclosed underground facility at Pickaxe Mountain near the Natanz nuclear plant may be even deeper under the surface than the Fordow enrichment plant that was severely damaged in the U.S. strikes. The Pickaxe Mountain facility was first publicly revealed in 2023 by experts who spoke with the Associated Press. And it's unclear how much of Tehran's approximately 880 pounds of highly enriched uranium was destroyed or buried during the strikes -- satellite images show cargo trucks parked outside the Fordow enrichment plant in the days before the U.S. attack. U.S. lawmakers briefed June 26 and June 27 on intelligence assessments of the strikes acknowledged the missing uranium and called for a full accounting of the material, according to CNN. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told the news agency that the question of the uranium's whereabouts underscores the importance of Iran negotiating "directly with us, so the (IAEA) can account for every ounce of enriched uranium that's there." More: Where is Iran's enriched uranium? Questions loom after Trump claims victory. But whether Iran wants to negotiate is another question. Despite the country's obligations as a member of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Iran's Guardian Council approved a law June 25 halting the country's cooperation with the IAEA and its inspections of Tehran's nuclear sites "until the safety and security of our nuclear activities can be guaranteed," the country's foreign minister said on social media. Contributing: Tom Vanden Brook and Cybele Mayes-Osterman, USA TODAY Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
When it comes to Iran, failure isn't an option for Trump, US
Iran's long-standing quest for nuclear weapons was at least set back for many months, and probably several years. Many parties had much to gain from the ceasefire: For Israel, a relief from the imminent threat of Iran, and from the punishment of the Iranian missiles. For Iran, an end to Israeli efforts at regime change; for the neighbors in the region, a relief from the fear of a widening conflict. For Russia, the preservation of its strategic partner, Iran. For China, an end to the imminent threat to its fuel and gas transiting the Strait of Hormuz. For President Trump, a validation of his judgment that overwhelming American power could be effective in ending a conflict without embroiling us in a "forever war," an end to the split of his MAGA supporters, and wide acknowledgement of his personal role in creating the ceasefire. Crown prince of Iran: Israel weakened Iran regime. World must help finish the job | Opinion What happens now for Iran and the rest of the world? But now what? Israel has been highly successful in the use of military force over many decades in the region - from the 1948 war of independence, through the 1956 war in Sinai, the 1967 preemptive war against Egypt, Jordan and Syria, the 1973 war, the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, strikes against the PLO in Tunisia in 1985, and later operations in Lebanon and Gaza. U.S. military action in the Gulf War in 1991 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003 were also highly successful. At this time, Israel, with U.S. help, has stripped Iran of its protective shields of Hezbollah and Hamas, and Iran, without effective air defenses, is laid bare. But outstanding military operations are not sufficient - they must be followed by successful work to end the roots of the conflict. Not once has this happened in the Middle East. Hatred, resentment, anger, terrorism and war have become endemic to the region. This is the moment to end the pattern of continuing conflict. But that requires new appreciation among the leaders in the region of the realities underscored by this latest bout of conflict. Iran, you're not going to have a nuclear bomb, no matter what. And if you continue to seek it, your regime will be defeated along with the destruction of your country. Israel, you cannot continue to use force with impunity - even with the best technology, your own people are vulnerable. To others in the region: Israel and the Palestinians are both permanently in the region; and with all due respect to the different religion, sects, and ethnicities at play, and the pain of history, both must be accommodated, accepted, and, ultimately, embraced as part of a thriving and prosperous Middle East. If there was ever a moment for fundamental change within the region, this is it. The world has come face to face with the potential of a spiraling conflict. Many of the Gulf States have achieved unprecedented wealth and are on the path to world-leading economic, social and technical advances. The region is still and will likely remain the center of global energy production, distribution and investment. There is everything to gain from seizing this moment. Gen. Wesley Clark: Trump needs to push Putin hard to end war in Ukraine - now | Opinion This is the moment for American leadership But how to proceed? Based on the model followed by President Clinton in dealing with the Balkans in the 1990's, it is best to start with a set of principles agreed upon objectively, by those outside the conflict but with the influence and will to deal with the respective parties. The principles must be fair and practicable. It required many weeks of shuttle diplomacy for the much simpler issues in the Balkans, and then, ultimately a 78-day air campaign by NATO in parallel with Presidential-level mediation by outside parties. In all, it entailed more than five years of continuous effort by the United States. In this region, the issues are deeper and more complex, but certainly among the principles, Iran must renounce its efforts, overt and covert, to destroy the state of Israel, and Israel must respect the rights of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza to govern and develop their own self-governing state. Terrorism against Israel must be halted. Countries in the region must participate in rebuilding the Palestinian homeland in the West Bank and Gaza. Sanctions against Iran will be lifted, and Iran will be provided the materials it needs for peaceful nuclear energy. Progress must be phased and accompanied by confidence-building measures. Perhaps the Abraham Accords will be fully implemented, and the U.S. will provide a security umbrella for all in the region. International organizations will no doubt remain part of the solution. Perhaps Russia and China, and other interested parties will be invited as observers. Iran today is a wounded tiger. Maybe 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium is still available, maybe some other country will provide nuclear weapons or materials. Revenge will be sought. We cannot permit the next conflict - it could well go "nuclear." So neglect or failure are not options. This is the moment for American leadership. It is the moment for President Trump to exercise his broader vision for strategic realignment of the region, and in so doing, to end the Middle East as a cockpit for continuing conflict. Wesley K. Clark is a retired four-star general who served as commander of U.S. Southern Command and then as commander of U.S. European Command/Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Performances by Bob Vylan and Kneecap branded ‘hateful' and ‘grotesque'
Reacting on social media, the Israeli Embassy said it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival" Police continue to examine videos of comments made by acts Bob Vylan and Kneecap at Glastonbury as the festival enters its third day. Rapper Bobby Vylan, of rap punk duo Bob Vylan, on Saturday led crowds on the festival's West Holts Stage in chants of: "Free, free Palestine" and: "Death, death to the IDF", before a member of Irish rap trio Kneecap suggested fans "start a riot" outside his bandmate's upcoming court appearance. In a post on social media, Avon and Somerset Police said: "We are aware of the comments made by acts on the West Holts Stage at Glastonbury Festival this afternoon. Video evidence will be assessed by officers to determine whether any offences may have been committed that would require a criminal investigation." Reacting on social media, the Israeli Embassy said it was "deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival". A statement on X said: "Freedom of expression is a cornerstone of democracy. But when speech crosses into incitement, hatred, and advocacy of ethnic cleansing, it must be called out-especially when amplified by public figures on prominent platforms. "Chants such as 'Death to the IDF,' and 'From the river to the sea' are slogans that advocate for the dismantling of the State of Israel and implicitly call for the elimination of Jewish self-determination. When such messages are delivered before tens of thousands of festivalgoers and met with applause, it raises serious concerns about the normalisation of extremist language and the glorification of violence. We call on Glastonbury Festival organisers, artists, and public leaders in the UK to denounce this rhetoric and reject of all forms of hatred." Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch called the scenes "grotesque", writing on X: "Glorifying violence against Jews isn't edgy. The West is playing with fire if we allow this sort of behaviour to go unchecked. The cultural establishment needs to wake up to the fact this isn't protest, it's incitement. "Less than 2 years ago, hundreds were raped and murdered at a music festival. It's not just the act but the gormless people clapping along and cheering. People with no idea what real terror don't understand the evil ideology they're amplifying – and they don't care." A BBC spokesperson said: "Some of the comments made during Bob Vylan's set were deeply offensive. During this live stream on iPlayer, which reflected what was happening on stage, a warning was issued on screen about the very strong and discriminatory language. We have no plans to make the performance available on demand." Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has spoken to the BBC director general about Bob Vylan's performance, a Government spokesperson said. They added: "We strongly condemn the threatening comments made by Bob Vylan at Glastonbury. The Culture Secretary has spoken to the BBC director general to seek an urgent explanation about what due diligence it carried out ahead of the Bob Vylan performance, and welcomes the decision not to re-broadcast it on BBC iPlayer." Kneecap, who hail from Belfast, have been in the headlines after member Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the name Mo Chara, was charged with a terror offence. In reference to his bandmate's upcoming court date, Naoise O Caireallain, who performs under the name Moglai Bap, said they would "start a riot outside the courts", before clarifying: "No riots just love and support, and support for Palestine." In the run-up to the festival at Worthy Farm in Somerset, several politicians called for the group to be removed from the line-up and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said their performance would not be "appropriate". During the performance, Caireallain said: "The Prime Minister of your country, not mine, said he didn't want us to play, so f*** Keir Starmer." He also said a "big thank you to the Eavis family" and said "they stood strong" amid calls for the organisers to drop them from the line-up. O hAnnaidh, 27, wore a keffiyeh during the set, while member JJ O Dochartaigh, who performs under the name DJ Provai, wore his signature tri-coloured balaclava as well as a T-shirt that said: "We are all Palestine Action", in reference to the soon-to-be banned campaign group. News broadcasts criticising the hip hop trio played from the sound system before they walked onto the stage were booed by the Glastonbury Festival audience. The trio opened with the song Better Way To Live from their 2024 album Fine Art and also performed tracks including Get Your Brits Out and Hood. Access to the area around the West Holts Stage was closed around 45 minutes before their performance after groups of fans arrived to form a sea of Irish and Palestinian flags. O hAnnaidh was charged with allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah, while saying "up Hamas, up Hezbollah" at a gig in November last year. On June 18, the rapper was cheered by hundreds of supporters as he arrived with bandmates O Caireallain and O Dochartaigh at Westminster Magistrates' Court in Free Mo Chara T-shirts. He was released on unconditional bail until the next hearing at the same court on August 20.
