logo
Bob Vylan claim they are being ‘targeted for speaking up'

Bob Vylan claim they are being ‘targeted for speaking up'

Telegraph6 hours ago
Bob Vylan have claimed they are being 'targeted for speaking up' after their 'death, death to the IDF' chant was branded anti-Semitic and prompted a police probe.
Rapper Pascal Robinson-Foster repeated the phrase during a Glastonbury performance over the weekend that was broadcast live by the BBC.
Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, said the issue should have been foreseeable and constituted 'a problem of leadership' for the BBC, while Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis described the incident as a 'time of national shame'.
Speaking for the first time since the incident, the punk group said: 'Today, a good many people would have you believe a punk band is the number one threat to world peace. Last week it was a Palestine pressure group, the week before that it was another band.
'We are not for the death of jews, arabs or any other race or group of people. We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine. A machine whose own soldiers were told to use 'unnecessary lethal force' against innocent civilians waiting for aid.
'A machine that has destroyed much of Gaza.
'We, like those in the spotlight before us, are not the story. We are a distraction from the story. And whatever sanctions we receive will be a distraction.'
In a statement published on Instagram, the group added: 'The government doesn't want us to ask why they remain silent in the face of this atrocity? To ask why they aren't doing more to stop the killing? To feed the starving?
'The more time they talk about Bob Vylan, the less time they spend answering for their criminal inaction.
'We are being targeted for speaking up. We are not the first. We will not be the last. And if you care for the sanctity of human life and freedom of speech, we urge you to speak up too. Free Palestine.'
Tim Davie, who was visiting staff at the festival on Saturday afternoon, was informed of the chant shortly after it had been made and ruled that the rap duo's set should not be made available to watch on demand. However, the chant remained on iPlayer for another five hours.
Sources stressed that pulling the livestream was not discussed, but a spokesman said that, in hindsight, the BBC regretted that this decision was not taken.
A BBC source said: 'Tim was there for a few hours to see the team. He was made aware during the time he was there of what had been said on stage. He intervened to make sure the performance was not made available on demand and he was very clear about that.
'Pulling the livestream brings certain technological challenges. With hindsight, we would have taken it down. He would have asked what the options were, but it isn't as straightforward as hitting a button and taking it down.'
'A problem of leadership'
Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, suggested that the incident called Mr Davie's position into question.
Speaking in the Commons, she said: 'When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped. When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership.'
During their appearance at Glastonbury, Bob Vylan chanted 'Free! Free!' and the crowd responded 'Palestine!', before they led fans in the chant of 'death, death to the IDF'.
Robinson-Foster, the group's frontman, who performs as Bobby Vylan, also ranted about a Jewish record company boss for whom he had worked.
The set was not made available on demand, where programmes can be accessed and watched on iPlayer after their live broadcast has finished.
However, it was possible to rewind and watch it back before the live broadcast from the stage where Bob Vylan were performing had finished.
The corporation said it regretted broadcasting the 'unacceptable' words, adding: 'The anti-Semitic sentiments expressed by Bob Vylan were utterly unacceptable and have no place on our airwaves. We welcome Glastonbury's condemnation of the performance.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palestine Action spraying paint is not terrorism. As ministers abuse their powers, I feel a duty to speak out
Palestine Action spraying paint is not terrorism. As ministers abuse their powers, I feel a duty to speak out

The Guardian

time34 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Palestine Action spraying paint is not terrorism. As ministers abuse their powers, I feel a duty to speak out

Strongly worded emails are not doing it. Appeals to MPs are not doing it. Taking to the streets in our hundreds of thousands with banners and placards is not working. Elected representatives from every party in parliament have stood in the Commons and asked the government to act. Some government ministers themselves have condemned Israel's starvation of Palestinians in Gaza. Every poll of public opinion shows that the nation demands we stop arming Israel, and wants to see an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire. But none of these things are working. Keir Starmer and his cabinet remain impervious to all calls for humanitarian intervention, and Israel is still killing children in Gaza with the support of the British government. To proscribe as 'terrorist' a non-violent direct action group such as Palestine Action threatens the fundamental rights of freedom of expression, and of peaceful protest. Surely the government should only ever apply the Terrorism Act with the utmost restraint and precision. Otherwise it allows the state to repress civil liberties that have been dearly fought for and won, and which represent the bedrock of our democracy. Those civil liberties have already come under real and dangerous threat. The powers given to the police have incrementally increased to an alarming degree, owing in part to the Terrorism Act of 2000 and the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act of 2022. These have both led to the right of public protest being seriously eroded, and afforded the police much greater powers and significantly less accountability. We have for some time seen these powers being used to suppress lawful protest and to detain peaceful protesters. In addition, leaving aside its members, the proscription of Palestine Action will directly affect many other activists who are deeply concerned about the massacre of Palestinians in Gaza. Even to be seen to support PA's non-violent direct action will be to risk being criminalised. The government's response to embarrassing security breaches at RAF bases by Palestine Action seems disproportionate, and highlights, I think, the influence on them of vested interests. There has long been a campaign by senior rightwing politicians, arms company executives and pro-Israel lobby groups to shut down Palestine Action and have it proscribed. Lockheed Martin UK is a key manufacturer of parts for the F-35 fighter jets that have helped Israel flatten the Gaza Strip, kill more than 56,000 people and create more child amputees per capita than anywhere else in the world. The government ended direct sales to Israel of some weapons, but created an 'F-35 exemption' allowing sales of these parts to continue to reach Israel via the US, where the planes are assembled. The Israeli arms manufacturer Elbit Systems also operates on UK soil, and our government has lucrative bilateral deals with the company. As far back as 2022 the then home secretary, Priti Patel, held a meeting with Martin Fausset, the CEO of Elbit Systems in the UK, to discuss how to deal with Palestine Action. The definition of terrorism as laid out in the Terrorism Act of 2000 is clear, and includes 'serious damage to property'. Does spraying red paint on to metal constitute serious damage? The condemnation of this spraying of red paint on to planes as expressed by the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, does not appear to be matched by any equivalent condemnation by her of red blood sprayed on to the tented walls of Gaza. So yes, crimes concerning damage to property have been committed, but there are already laws in place to deal with them. Labelling these as terrorism only serves to deepen the UK government's complicity in the war crimes being committed in Palestine. In a further act of desperation, efforts have been made to try to undermine the motives of Palestine Action by making a tenuous link to Iran, with unnamed Home Office sources telling newspapers it is investigating the group's finances. Smear campaigns such as this are part of a wider policy by government to intimidate and clamp down on dissent. I have had a small taste of this myself. On 18 January, I attended a rally in Whitehall organised by Stop the War – and noticed immediately that the tactics of the police that day seemed to be markedly different. Present in their thousands, they were already kettling people at the start of the event, and behaving in a manner that seemed aggressive and provocative. The march to the BBC, which had been planned to protest against its coverage of the conflict, had been prohibited by the Met at short notice, and the gathering was confined to Whitehall. I was asked to join a group of about 12 people who would form a symbolic delegation, and request passage through police lines to reach the BBC. There we planned to lay flowers at the door. Reaching the police lines, after some hesitation and resistance, an officer allowed us through. Shortly after that, however, our progress was curtailed by another police line. It was here that I saw at close hand the disproportionate tactics used by police. I witnessed further vanloads of police arriving in the area, kettling peaceful protesters and making numerous arrests – 77 in total that day. Three weeks later I was sent a letter from the Met threatening me with charges under section 14 of the Public Order Act. I then faced a three-hour police interview, before being told after several weeks (and several thousand pounds of legal fees) that I would face no further action. Over the past 21 months, I have met many hundreds of people who come out – often travelling long distances – to protest against this genocide. Old people and young, people of every faith, race, generation and ethnic identity. They come in horror at the brutality being inflicted on the population of Gaza. And many of those in our midst are Jewish. But still we are accused by lobby groups of antisemitism. This I disregard; I am married to a Jewish man, whose mother was a refugee from Hitler's Vienna. She escaped just in time in 1938 as a refugee, and most of her family were subsequently wiped out in the Holocaust. My children define themselves as Jewish, and we have many beloved Jewish friends, all of whom are appalled by the activities of Benjamin Netanyahu, his government and the Israel Defense Forces. These Jewish friends are people driven by compassion, humanity and a sense of right and wrong that will not yield to intimidation. In Gaza, the world is watching the most heinous acts of violence that I have witnessed in my lifetime. It is as if the skin has been ripped off the face of humanity to reveal terrifying depths of sadism and depravity. I am intensely aware of this thought: I do not want to find myself at the end of my life looking back at this time regretting that I could have done something and didn't – that I was too frightened to speak out, or to act. Palestine Action and its supporters will have no such regrets. Our current British government, however, may well. Juliet Stevenson is an award-winning actor Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Two arrests after Palestine Action claims blocking Israeli defence firm UK site
Two arrests after Palestine Action claims blocking Israeli defence firm UK site

The Independent

time40 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Two arrests after Palestine Action claims blocking Israeli defence firm UK site

Two arrests have been made after soon-to-be banned direct action group Palestine Action claimed to have blockaded the entrance of an Israeli defence company's UK headquarters. It comes ahead of proposed legislation that will ban the group under anti-terror law. Avon and Somerset Police said a 30-year-old woman and a 36-year-old man, both from London, have been arrested on suspicion of criminal damage, unauthorised entry to a prohibited place and locking onto a person, object or land to cause serious disruption. Earlier on Tuesday, a Palestine Action spokesperson said activists had blocked the entrance to Elbit Systems in Bristol, and covered it in red paint 'to symbolise Palestinian bloodshed'. Avon and Somerset Police said officers were called to the site at around 6.30am. A spokeswoman said: 'Two people have been arrested following a small protest outside a premises at the Aztec West Business Park, in Almondsbury. 'They remain in police custody and inquiries are ongoing. 'We're committed to facilitating people's right to peaceful protest, but will not tolerate any criminal behaviour.' The incident comes as a draft order was laid before Parliament on Monday to amend the Terrorism Act 2000 to include Palestine Action as a proscribed organisation. If approved, it would become a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it. MPs and peers are expected to debate the legislation on Wednesday and Thursday and, if approved, the ban could come into force by Friday. A Palestine Action spokesperson said: 'While the Government is rushing through Parliament absurd legislation to proscribe Palestine Action, the real terrorism is being committed in Gaza. 'Palestine Action affirms that direct action is necessary in the face of Israel's ongoing crimes against humanity of genocide, apartheid, and occupation, and to end British facilitation of those crimes.' The group also occupied the rooftop of UK subcontractor Guardtech Group, the spokesperson added. Officers are also at the scene at the site in Brandon, Suffolk. A Suffolk Police spokesman said: 'Officers and specialist negotiators are currently at the location and our immediate priority is to bring this to a conclusion and to ensure the safety of everyone at the scene.' Palestine Action is seeking a legal challenge against the Government's bid to proscribe it, with a hearing expected on Friday to decide whether the ban can be temporarily blocked, pending further proceedings to decide whether a legal challenge can be brought. Commenting on the proscription on Monday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'The right to protest and the right to free speech are the cornerstone of our democracy and there are countless campaign groups that freely exercise those rights. 'Violence and serious criminal damage has no place in legitimate protests.'

British companies named and shamed by UN for profiting from Israeli ‘genocide'
British companies named and shamed by UN for profiting from Israeli ‘genocide'

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

British companies named and shamed by UN for profiting from Israeli ‘genocide'

British companies have been named and shamed by the United Nations, which has accused them of supporting a genocide carried out by Israel. Barclays, BP and a string of universities were listed by the UN in a report on Tuesday as entities benefitting from 'the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid and now genocide'. The document was written Francesca Albanese, an Italian human rights lawyer and the UN Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Commenting, she said 'Genocide, it would seem, is profitable.' The move marks the first time the UN has focused in on private businesses for links to Israel's attacks on Gaza and its activities in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Israel's relationship with the UN continues to deteriorate due to its criticism of the Jewish state's conduct of its war and its blocking of humanitarian aid to Palestinian refugees. The Israeli embassy in Geneva said the report was driven by the author's 'obsessive hate-driven agenda to delegitimize the existence of the State of Israel'. In the document, Ms Albanese wrote that BP was providing crude oil to the Jewish state and was granted a licence in March to explore gas resources in 'Palestinian maritime expanses illegally exploited by Israel'. Financial enterprises including Barclays were called out for investing in and underwriting Israeli government bonds, which the UN said was Israel's main source of revenue for its ballooning military spending. The University of Edinburgh was highlighted as one of many British higher education centres with ties to Israel. It said the Scottish Russell Group university had invested £25.5 million of its endowment in tech giants 'central to the Israeli surveillance apparatus and the ongoing Gaza destruction'. 'The university ranks among the most financially entangled institutions in the United Kingdom' as it also has partnerships with firms involved with the Israeli military, such as Italian aerospace and defence firm Leonardo SpA, the report read. The document focused on companies that have strengthened ties with Israel since October 2023, when it began attacks on Gaza. It identifies a range of companies, including arms manufacturers such as Israeli firms Elbit Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries, as well as the US's Lockheed Martin, the world's largest defence contractor, for providing military hardware from drones to fighter jets. Major tech firms were also called out, including Amazon, Alphabet, Microsoft and Palantir, for providing a range of services and software such as digital and biometric surveillance, artificial intelligence for military operations and predictive policing technology. ' Repression of Palestinians has become progressively automated, with tech companies providing dual-use infrastructure to integrate mass data collection and surveillance, while profiting from the unique testing ground for military technology offered by the occupied Palestinian territory,' the report read. 'While life in Gaza is being obliterated and the West Bank is under escalating assault, the present report shows why the genocide carried out by Israel continues: because it is lucrative for many,' Ms Albanese wrote. 'The complicity exposed by the report is just the tip of the iceberg; ending it will not happen without holding the private sector accountable, including its executives.' Companies providing equipment such as bulldozers used to demolish Palestinian homes and infrastructure, such as Caterpillar, Hyundai and Volvo, were also named, as well as Keller Williams, a real estate firm, for developing and marketing properties in Israeli settlements on Palestinian territory. Agriculture firms including Tnuva, owned by Chinese state-owned China Bright Food, were listed for sourcing products from Israeli settlements and for providing farming technology to support crop expansion in Palestinian areas. A number of global pension funds were also named for investing in firms alleged to be complicit in Israel's activities, as well as tourism companies, such as AirBnB and for listing accommodation in Occupied Palestinian Territories. Other energy firms mentioned include Chevron and Drummond from the US, and Switzerland's Glencore, which is used for electricity generation. BNP Paribas, Blackrock and Allianz were also attacked for, like Barclays, investing in Israeli government bonds. Sanction Israel? The document will be presented to the UN Human Rights Council on Thursday and is likely to anger Israel, which dropped out of the Council in February citing 'ongoing and relenting institutional bias against Israel'. It makes several recommendations such as sanctions and a full arms embargo on Israel, as well as freezing the assets of 'individuals involved in activities that may endanger the Palestinians,'. Companies, it says, should cease business activities linked to human rights violations and international crimes against Palestinians and pay reparations to them, 'including in the form of an apartheid wealth tax along the lines of post-apartheid South Africa'. The report came after the UN issued a call for submissions last November to investigate businesses and entities involved in Israel's war crimes in Palestinian territory. Some companies identified have earlier been highlighted by human rights groups and research organisations for alleged complicity in Israel's war crimes. Glencore, Chevron and Volvo rejected the allegations. Blackrock declined to comment. A university spokesperson said an investment advisory group had been established to 'inform the University's approach to responsible investment, carefully considering the diverse perspectives and concerns of our community.' 'We unequivocally condemn the violence and suffering resulting from events in Israel and Gaza in recent years. While our commitment as a global institution to act in accordance with our values is unwavering, it is essential that any actions taken are measured, responsible and fully consultive.' The death toll in Gaza since October 2023 stands at more than 56,000 people, with an additional 132,200 injured, according to the local health ministry.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store