logo
Money and Me: ‘I became a millionaire at the age of 35'

Money and Me: ‘I became a millionaire at the age of 35'

The National11-04-2025
Michael Belton, chief executive of property development company Mered, grows his wealth by spotting attractive opportunities in real estate and investing in them early on. The American, 55, who was born and raised in Alaska, worked in Russia for more than 20 years and has been in the UAE for six months now. He graduated from the University of Massachusetts in arts and political science and went to Russia on a foreign exchange programme and 'fell in love with everything there'. Mr Belton started working for Hines, America's largest property development company, in 1993, and was with them for eight years in Russia. He started as a leasing consultant and ended as the head of development after 10 years. He also had a short stint in Saudi Arabia, where he worked for the giga project Qiddiya as head of development for one of their business units. 'The parent company of Mered is headquartered in Russia and has been involved in real estate development for 25 years, predominantly in residential real estate, and built more than three million square metres of space,' he says. 'They saw the market in Dubai as one where they could add value with their expertise. They are a master developer like Aldar and Emaar and have the capabilities and cash flow to expand in a new market.' Mered is currently developing three properties, one in Dubai and two in Abu Dhabi, with a total sales value of $1.4 billion. 'Since my arrival in October as chief executive of Mered, we have sold $120 million worth of apartments in Dubai,' says Mr Belton, who lives in Dubai's Bluewaters Island with his wife and a daughter. I grew up in a middle-class American family with hard-working parents. We had enough for the essentials. I admired my wealthy New York relatives and learnt that dressing smartly could positively influence people's impression of me. I learnt the value of money and education by seeing them and going out with them. Like most Americans, my first job was when I was 12, delivering newspapers. My first professional job was with Hines in Moscow, earning $1,500 a month. No, I'm a very curious person, so the harder I worked, the more responsibilities I was given and the more I was able to earn. I've received consistent salary increases through promotions due to hard work. There are always cycles in the real estate market, but I've somehow been shielded from many of them. As we are in the business of residential real estate, we understand where the market is headed. So, I'm able to buy in early at a good price to get attractive investments that I take advantage of. I hire financial managers to reinvest those profits. Real estate development is a more high-risk profile, but that's why the returns are usually 30 per cent to 40 per cent on my investment. I also have a very wide investment portfolio, which is preserved more for growth and not for quick returns. My financial managers aim to offer me 6 per cent to 8 per cent returns, so it's a very different risk profile, and it's something that is more generational for me as an investment. I am neither, instead, I am an earner. I'm more focused and interested in finding ways to earn money. I reinvest earnings in short-term, mid-term and retirement vehicles. As far as saving, I try to save money every month and invest it. I'm not a shopper. I believe so. You make some mistakes, you make some good choices. But overall, when I see what I started with and where I am now, what I'm able to pass on to my children, I would say, it's been pretty good. Investing in myself and my business, specifically purchasing properties I develop. I founded my own business in 2007 called Storm Properties and sold it to one of the largest home builders in Europe in 2008. The majority of my wealth is created due to the sale of that company. No. I value people and experiences over physical possessions like cars or jewellery. I'm not attached to houses, apartments or cars. I have many of them, but when I sell them, I don't have much attachment to them. It's an important tool to provide comfort to my family and me, especially in later years. The more money you make is not equivalent to how happy you are as a person. Many people have lots of money and are miserable, and some people have no money and they're happy. Start investing in residential properties earlier. I wish I had bought my first property when I was 25 years old. Many of them cost $50,000 then and five years later, they were worth around $500,000 to $600,000. Also, maximise pension contributions to take advantage of tax-deferred retirement products. I always maximised my 401(k). By putting in maybe $300 to $400 a month when you are younger, you don't notice the money going out. But after doing it for 25 years, there's millions of dollars in my pension fund because of that. Flying business class, staying in five-star hotels and enjoying dinners with friends without budget limits. It's not necessarily to go out and buy a new Patek Philippe watch or a new Lamborghini, but I derive pleasure out of these comforts for me, my family and friends. Becoming a millionaire by age 35. I'm 55 years old and fairly wealthy. My goal is to continue to grow my family's income to pass on to the next generation. I don't have a goal to become a billionaire. It's not my thing. Financially, I've hit all the goals that I set for myself. Right now, I'm at the age where legacy is more important for me. I'm a real estate developer, so I want to build beautiful projects, which will stand for many years after I'll be gone. I enjoy taking my children around to see a project when the foundation is being poured, and then, when the building's up, they come back five years later and say: 'Wow, my dad built that.' That's my goal. It's not financial anymore. I also own three properties. I plan to maintain two to four properties, buying and selling as market conditions allow. I aim to own a property at a ski resort in Switzerland or Montana.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold falls on firmer US dollar and rising trade optimism
Gold falls on firmer US dollar and rising trade optimism

Zawya

time8 minutes ago

  • Zawya

Gold falls on firmer US dollar and rising trade optimism

Gold prices fell on Friday, pressured by a recovery in the U.S. dollar and optimism over progress in trade talks between the United States and the European Union. Spot gold was down 0.6% at $3,347.28 per ounce by 0949 GMT. U.S. gold futures fell 0.7% to $3,349.80. The U.S. dollar index rebounded from more than a two-week low, making bullion more expensive for overseas buyers, while benchmark 10-year U.S. Treasury yields rose. A resurgence in risk appetite driven by optimism over potential tariff negotiations, and lower-than-expected U.S. jobless claims reinforcing the view that the Federal Reserve is unlikely to cut rates, is pressuring gold, said Ricardo Evangelista, senior analyst at brokerage firm ActivTrades. "There is an element of uncertainty that still lingers... with a strong support around $3,300, I see the potential for gold prices to rise should new episodes of volatility be triggered," he said. The European Commission said on Thursday that a negotiated trade solution with the United States is within reach - while EU members voted to approve counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods in case the talks collapse. Data showed the number of Americans filing new applications for jobless benefits fell to a three-month low last week, pointing to stable labour market conditions. President Donald Trump pressed Fed Chair Jerome Powell to lower interest rates in a tense visit to the U.S. central bank on Thursday, less than a week before the next rate-setting meeting where policymakers are expected to hold interest rates steady. Markets are pricing in a potential rate cut in September. Gold typically performs well during periods of uncertainty and in low-interest-rate environments. Spot silver fell 0.6% to $38.85 per ounce, but was still on track for a weekly gain of about 1.6%. Platinum was 1.2% lower at $1,391.25, with palladium also down 1.2% at $1,213.76. (Reporting by Anmol Choubey in Bengaluru, additional reporting by Ishaan Arora; Editing by Rachna Uppal, Kirsten Donovan)

Psychology of a bargain: Why people spend more during sales – and how to stop
Psychology of a bargain: Why people spend more during sales – and how to stop

The National

time37 minutes ago

  • The National

Psychology of a bargain: Why people spend more during sales – and how to stop

Black Friday, Prime Day, Cyber Monday – it feels as though there's always a 'can't-miss' sale and it's never been easier to buy with just one click. But while snagging a bargain delivers an instant rush, is it doing more harm than good? Amazon recently reported its biggest ever sales during its four-day Prime Day event in the US, where Americans spent an estimated $24.1 billion online, according to Adobe Analytics. But while buying the latest tech or new clothing can feel good in the moment, what does deal-chasing really do to our wallets – and our well-being? Shopping can make you feel good – but only briefly Shopping does make people feel good, at least temporarily. The activity – especially when finding a good offer – can boost the brain's release of dopamine, the same 'feel good' chemical involved in eating chocolate or receiving a compliment. 'It creates excitement and anticipation, making the purchase feel more rewarding than it actually is,' says Dr Salman Kareem, specialist in psychiatry at Aster Clinic, Discovery Gardens JLT and Aster Royal Clinic, Downtown. 'The thrill of finding a 'good deal' provides immediate satisfaction.' But while the psychological thrill drives many purchases, it doesn't always have to end in regret. With the right mindset, sales can also be approached strategically, says Carol Glynn, founder of Conscious Finance Coaching. 'Major sales events like Prime Day or Black Friday can financially benefit consumers if they are mindful, planned for and used intentionally,' she adds. 'If you've already budgeted for a big-ticket purchase, done your research, and waited for a sale to make the purchase, then yes, it can be a smart financial move.' When a bargain isn't really a bargain However, that same feel-good rush can also lead to buying things that aren't needed, meaning people splurge on offers that aren't truly useful or wanted. 'These tactics trigger our brain's fear of missing out. We tend to grab on to things if we believe they're rare, so 'limited time' offers make us act quickly without fully thinking,' says Dr Kareem. 'Certain phrases like 'one day sale' or '90 per cent sale' activate our emotional brain centres while bypassing the logical thinking areas. This makes it harder to pause and consider whether we actually need the item.' Glynn puts it simply: 'If you're buying something just because it's discounted, you're still spending, not saving.' Like any unchecked behaviour, uncontrolled shopping habits can quickly spiral, especially thanks to the ease of shopping online. 'One-click checkout and constant online sales have fundamentally changed how people manage, or often lose track of, their spending by making purchases extremely quick and seamless, which encourages more frequent and impulse buying,' says Glynn. She notes that Cornell University research shows that one‑click checkout users spend nearly 30 per cent more on average, placing 43 per cent more orders and buying 36 per cent more items than before. 'This speed and convenience reduce the mental effort that usually makes us pause before buying, leading to more impulsive purchases,' she explains. But this instant gratification can also be addictive. 'It can create a vicious cycle where you need more 'shopping therapy' to feel good,' says Dr Kareem. 'This can lead to financial stress, cluttered living spaces and the realisation that material purchases don't create lasting happiness.' When sales backfire Alison Soltani, founder of UAE savings website Leap Savvy Savers, agrees that people tend to spend more when they believe they're getting a good deal. But she warns against mistaking discounts for savings. 'Most of the time, I think sales encourage people to overspend and perhaps spend money they hadn't planned to because something is 'a good deal' or 'on sale'. But if you don't want or need the item, you haven't saved any money – you've added another item burdening your life,' she says. 'It's great if you find an item you really need, or have been searching for a while, that comes up on sale – then you've secured a bargain. But otherwise, you haven't.' Soltani also notes that excessive shopping can take a toll beyond finances. 'Depending on what we are buying, our purchases may have a negative effect on the environment and make our homes and minds cluttered. This can lead to overwhelm and a resistance to taking action to make changes,' she says. Although a purchase here and there may seem harmless, Glynn warns that these small expenses can quickly add up, often leading to overspending or debt without much to show for it. 'Constant deal-hunting can cause stress and decision fatigue, which might influence poorer financial choices and overall well-being. The fleeting satisfaction from bargains can perpetuate a cycle of compulsive buying,' Glynn adds. Dr Kareem adds that for many, the consequences go beyond finances. 'Overspending often leads to financial anxiety, shame and relationship conflicts. It can also prevent people from developing healthier coping strategies for stress or difficult emotions,' he says. Practical ways to shop smarter For those who struggle to decide whether to make a purchase, there are some practical steps that can help. Dr Kareem recommends making shopping lists and sticking to them, giving yourself time before making an initial purchase, and finding alternative ways to relieve stress or stay entertained. Glynn advises creating a sales-specific budget, using only cash or a debit card to pay and unsubscribing from marketing emails to reduce temptation. Meanwhile, Soltani suggests pausing checking out – whether in-store or online – and waiting 24 hours to see if an item is still wanted. She also recommends asking a few simple questions, such as: 'How many hours have I had to work to make this purchase?' 'How often will I use it?' 'If I lost the item in a fire, would I quickly replace it?' 'Could I buy it cheaper second-hand or at a different retailer?' For many, shopping is a source of enjoyment and instant gratification. But for those who overspend as a way of coping, Dr Kareem says it may be time to seek help: 'If someone uses shopping as their primary way to cope with emotions, it's time to seek professional support.'

Starmer's 'all guns, no butter' policy will cost him dearly
Starmer's 'all guns, no butter' policy will cost him dearly

Middle East Eye

time4 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Starmer's 'all guns, no butter' policy will cost him dearly

The recent Nato summit demanded that member states agree to reach a target of five percent of GDP on defence spending over the next decade. Nato secretary general Mark Rutte was beside himself with joy. This will make Nato 'more lethal', he vowed. Rutte was in no doubt as to why Nato had successfully agreed on this historic high in arms spending: US President Donald Trump, or 'daddy', as Rutte called him. In embarrassingly fulsome messages to Trump, made public by the US president, Rutte put to shame the most obsequious courtier in an 18th-century absolute monarchy, as he verbally prostrated himself at the feet of the ruler of the empire. In all fairness to Rutte, he was correctly summarising the view of European governments. Much as some claim to dislike Trump, they have fallen in line with his demands for increased arms expenditures in double-quick time. All but Spain endorsed the five-percent defence spending target, despite the fact that the US spends only 3.5 percent of GDP on arms. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Trump was triumphant, using the Nato news conference to rub the noses of European leaders in the latest proof that the US is the organisation's top dog. Never has founding secretary general Lord Ismay's aphorism - that Nato exists to keep 'the Soviet Union [read Russians] out, the Americans in, and the Germans [read Europeans] down' - been more true. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer is an unqualified enthusiast for rearmament. The most clearly defining policy of his prime ministership so far, where so much else is shrouded in serial U-turns, is a commitment to US-led rearmament. The picture of Starmer at the recent G7 summit bowing at Trump's knee to pick up papers that the president had dropped went viral, because it accurately captured the political relationship between the two governments. Credibility gap Starmer, of course, signed up to the five percent of GDP rearmament target and coupled it with a commitment to buy a dozen American F35A fighters capable of carrying a nuclear payload, marking the first time the UK will have the capacity to deliver airborne nukes since the Cold War. The cost of this programme alone will be £15bn. More broadly, the newly publicised Strategic Defence Review underpins Starmer's over-inflated rhetoric about the UK needing to prepare to fight on the 'home front' in the case of a full land invasion of the UK. Such a project, unsuccessfully contemplated by Napoleon and Hitler, was last accomplished in 1066. There is no plausible modern candidate for this project. Russia, with an economy the size of Spain's and a military depleted by three years of unsuccessful war in Ukraine, is certainly not the 21st-century equivalent of either Napoleon or Hitler when their empires spanned the continent. Indeed, having failed to reach Kyiv, it is improbable to the point of absurdity to think that Russian troops might soon be on the Normandy beaches. The period of high Starmerism is past. Now the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, back towards traditional centrist Labourism The UK defence establishment and government are well aware that this huge credibility gap exists in the minds of British voters. The Strategic Defence Review spends an unusual amount of time worrying about how rearmament can be sold to the population. It calls for a 'national endeavour', first mooted by the previous Tory government, in which a wide variety of propaganda and 'educational' weapons will be fired at hapless citizens in order to reduce them to compliance with the warmongers' project. And there is no Starmer speech that does not echo the Strategic Defence Review's insistence that there will be a 'defence dividend', in the Orwellian language now common in government circles, that will result in more jobs. So far, the 'national endeavour' project is failing spectacularly. The purchase of F35A jets is a case in point. It's a slap in the face for Unite the Union general secretary Sharon Graham, who campaigned relentlessly for a renewal of the Eurofighter Typhoon fleet in the name of British jobs. In a sharp lesson in the UK's defence subservience to the US arms industry, Starmer ignored her and opted instead to flatter Trump with a purchase of American planes manufactured by Lockheed Martin, with only 15 percent of UK-made components. Leadership in danger But even when money spent by the UK government isn't pouring directly into the bank accounts of US defence contractors, it will never produce the same number of jobs as the same amount of money spent on civilian industry. Defence spending is simply a massively inefficient way of generating jobs. Beyond these specific arguments is the gigantic fact that Starmer is advocating huge increases in arms expenditures, while hacking away at the already emaciated welfare budget. The assault on welfare, the defining project of the first year of the Labour administration, has already produced a record-breaking back bench rebellion. This in turn produced yet another screeching U-turn from Starmer. Accompanying the U-turn is the blame game. At the moment, No. 10 guru Morgan McSweeney and 'iron chancellor' Rachel Reeves are the ones catching it in the neck. Starmer is running out of road Read More » As tens of thousands of people at the recent Glastonbury Festival cursed Starmer's name, Starmer himself has been busy apologising for his own mistakes to any journalist who will listen. A sure sign that Starmer's leadership is endangered was Health Secretary Wes Streeting's recent TV interview, in which he refuted criticism of the Glastonbury crowd by saying that Israel should get its 'own house in order'. Starmer is now a couple of by-election losses away from a leadership challenge. Perhaps he can make it to the May 2026 council elections if the fates spare sitting MPs and no by-election takes place. But whatever the timing proves to be, the period of high Starmerism is past. Now the pendulum is swinging in the other direction, back towards traditional centrist Labourism. A number of important consequences follow. Firstly, the time for Jeremy Corbyn to launch a new leftist party is now. Secondly, no new party can afford to be merely an electoral project: it must have the closest possible relations with Palestine and antiwar movements whose activists will be its core constituency. Thirdly, the antiwar movement will be central to ongoing opposition to the government. Reeves or her successor will return to the task of extracting the money for rearmament from working people, one way or another. The defence of working-class living standards at home will be intimately bound to opposition to the preparation for war abroad. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store