
Is Trump tariff deal really a win for Vietnam – or a way of punishing China?
Just hours later though, they declined sharply, as it became clear that the devil would be in the detail, and the most striking part of the deal might in fact be aimed at Vietnam's powerful neighbour China.
Dodging the severe levy of 46% that was threatened in April, Vietnam is instead facing a tariff of 20% for many goods, and in return US products coming into the country will have zero tariffs placed on them.
However, a 40% tariff will remain for so-called transshipments – a provision that is aimed at Chinese companies accused of passing their products through Vietnam, or elsewhere, to avoid US tariffs.
Businesses worry that 'transshipment' is a politicised term, and that if the US defines it too broadly, many goods could be unfairly targeted.
'Vietnam is a manufacturing hub – and as a hub you take inputs from other countries and make value-added stuff in Vietnam, and then export it to other countries,' says Dr Nguyen Khac Giang, visiting fellow at the ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute.
It is unrealistic, he adds, to expect most Vietnamese goods, other than agricultural products, would be made entirely in Vietnam. What remains to be decided is: what proportion of a product should be?
How transshipments will be defined under the agreement – and how this policy will be enforced – remains to be seen, but it could have significant implications for global trade and tensions with China.
'One lesson for other countries is that the US intends to use these deals to apply pressure on China,' said Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator.
Vietnam, a booming manufacturing hub, benefited during the last Trump administration when punishing tariffs placed on China prompted many Chinese companies to shift their supply chains.
However, this caused the Vietnamese trade surplus with the US to surge, attracting US ire and allegations that Vietnam was wrongly acting as a conduit for Chinese companies wanting access to the US market.
China's commerce ministry spokesperson He Yongqian responded to the US-Vietname deal on Thursday stating: 'We firmly oppose any party reaching a deal at the expense of China's interests. If such a situation occurs, China will resolutely counter it to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.'
Vietnam's manufacturing industry is closely intertwined with both the US and China. US exports account for 30% of Vietnam's GDP, while China is Vietnam's top import source, relied on for raw materials used to make anything from footwear to furniture and electronics.
Vietnam is not alone in relying on China for such components, especially across electronic sectors. '[China] is completely interwoven into global supply chains,' says Dan Martin, international business adviser at Dezan Shira and Associates, based in Hanoi.
If companies are expected to prove the origin of all goods, this could place an unwelcome burden on those in sectors such as textiles where margins are low, says Martin.
However, he cautions that it remains to be seen whether the higher 40% tariff on transshipments will be actively enforced. It is also possible that Vietnam could benefit if US policy encourages suppliers to set up shop in Vietnam, Martin adds.
Businesses are largely pausing decisions until a clearer picture emerges, say analysts.
Policymakers in Hanoi remain on a diplomatic tightrope. Vietnam has long sought to balance relations with Washington and Beijing. It considers the US not only a key export market but a security partner that serves as a counterbalance to China's assertiveness.
However, if Beijing considers that Hanoi is helping Washington constrain it, this risks antagonising Vietnam's northern neighbour. It could lead to economic measures from China, or pressure over the disputed South China Sea, a major flashpoint in the region, says Peter Mumford, head of practice for south-east Asia at Eurasia Group.
As things stand, 'aggressive retaliation' by Beijing against Hanoi is unlikely, he says: 'Hanoi may even have given Beijing a rough indication of the steps it would have to take to secure a US trade deal.'
Vietnam has made efforts to show goodwill towards China over recent months, while also courting Trump.
In exchange for the 20% tariff rate, Trump said Vietnam would open up its market to US goods. US-made SUVs, 'which do so well in the United States, will be a wonderful addition to the various product lines within Vietnam', said Trump.
However the market for cars remains small in Vietnam, where city streets are famously crammed with millions of motorbikes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
34 minutes ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: Chagrin as Trump plays three-card trick on trade
July 7 (Reuters) - A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Wayne Cole. Well, that's as clear as mud. Apparently August 1 is now the U.S. deadline for when higher tariffs will be imposed on some countries if no trade deals are done, or under way. It's not really certain which countries that covers, or which deals. "President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that, if you don't move things along, then on August 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level," Treasury Secretary Bessent told CNN. The "letters" are going out to 10 or 12 countries today, presumably the same letters that were supposed to go last Friday. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters that the higher tariffs would take effect on August 1, but Trump was "setting the rates and the deals right now". Announcing trade policy changes in TV interviews does not make for clarity, and now it's uncertain if the original July 9 deadline matters, and for whom. India and the U.S., for instance, reportedly could make a mini-deal today or tomorrow, but then continue talks after July 9. According to Bessent, it also seems many countries didn't bother to contact the U.S. for talks - and will likely be getting stiff letters in return. Trump added to the confusion by mentioning that some tariffs could reach 60% or 70%, higher even than the 50% set on China. He also threatened an extra 10% tariff on countries aligning themselves with the "anti-American policies" of the BRICS, a group the U.S. itself is in tariff talks with. Investors have reacted with bemusement and nudged Wall St futures down 0.4% or so. Asian share indices are mostly lower on Monday, though not by much, while Treasury yields are down a basis point and the dollar stuck near four-year lows. Oil has been the big mover, losing around 1% after OPEC+ surprised by increasing production by much more than first expected, and flagging a similar increase for September. Analysts largely see this as Saudi Arabia putting the squeeze on higher-cost producers to capture market share, with low-margin U.S. shale output under particular pressure. It's OPEC's answer to "Drill, baby, drill". Key developments that could influence markets on Monday:


Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump promises fresh tariff announcement within hours
Donald Trump said countries across the globe would find out within hours what tariff rates they face under his latest trade onslaught. The US president said letters 'and/or deals with various countries from around the world' would be delivered at 5pm UK time today. He said an extra 10pc levy would be added to any country 'aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of Brics', an 11-member alliance including Brazil, Russia, India and China. The FTSE 100 was lower and Asian stock markets mostly fell as most US trading partners prepared to face higher rates. Despite promises to work on 90 deals in 90 days, President Trump and his team have been able to complete only a limited trade deal with Britain and an agreement with Vietnam. A long-promised deal with India has remained elusive, while a trade truce with China has appeared on shaky ground.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
France says China used embassies to undermine sales of French fighter jet
China deployed its embassies to spread doubts about the performance of French-made Rafale jets after they saw combat in India and Pakistan 's clashes in May, French military and intelligence officials have concluded, implicating Beijing in an effort to hammer the reputation and sales of France 's flagship fighter. Findings from a French intelligence service seen by The Associated Press say defence attaches in China's foreign embassies led a charge to undermine Rafale sales, seeking to persuade countries that have already ordered the French-made fighter — notably Indonesia — not to buy more and to encourage other potential buyers to choose Chinese-made planes. The findings were shared with AP by a French military official on condition that the official and the intelligence service not be named. Four days of India-Pakistan clashes in May were the most serious confrontation in years between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, and included air combat that involved dozens of aircraft from both sides. Military officials and researchers have since been digging for details of how Pakistan's Chinese-made military hardware — particularly warplanes and air-combat missiles — fared against weaponry that India used in airstrikes on Pakistani targets, notably French-made Rafale fighters. Sales of Rafales and other armaments are big business for France's defence industry and help efforts by the government in Paris to strengthen ties with other nations, including in Asia where China is becoming the dominant regional power. France is fighting what it calls a disinformation campaign against the Rafale Pakistan claimed its air force downed five Indian planes during the fighting, including three Rafales. French officials say that prompted questions about their performance from countries that have bought the fighter from French manufacturer Dassault Aviation. India acknowledged aircraft losses but didn't say how many. French air force chief Gen. Jérôme Bellanger said that he's seen evidence pointing to just 3 Indian losses — a Rafale, a Russian-made Sukhoi and a Mirage 2000, which is an earlier generation French-made jet. It was the first known combat loss of a Rafale, which France has sold to eight countries. 'Of course, all those, the nations that bought Rafales, asked themselves questions,' Bellanger said. French officials have been battling to protect the plane from reputational damage, pushing back against what they allege was a concerted campaign of Rafale-bashing and disinformation online from Pakistan and its ally China. They say the campaign included viral posts on social media, manipulated imagery showing supposed Rafale debris, AI-generated content and video-game depictions to simulate supposed combat. More than 1,000 social media accounts newly created as the India-Pakistan clashes erupted also spread a narrative of Chinese technological superiority, according to French researchers who specialize in online disinformation. French military officials say they haven't been able to link the online Rafale-bashing directly to the Chinese government. Intelligence assessment says Chinese officials lobbied potential clients to ditch French planes But the French intelligence service said Chinese embassy defence attaches echoed the same narrative in meetings they held with security and defence officials from other countries, arguing that Indian Air Force Rafales performed poorly and promoting Chinese-made weaponry. The defence attaches focused their lobbying on countries that have ordered Rafales and other potential customer-nations that are considering purchases, the intelligence service said. It said French officials learned of the meetings from nations that were approached. Asked by AP to comment on the alleged effort to dent the Rafale's appeal, the Ministry of National Defence in Beijing said: 'The relevant claims are pure groundless rumors and slander. China has consistently maintained a prudent and responsible approach to military exports, playing a constructive role in regional and global peace and stability.' In recent years, China has stepped up disinformation campaigns on global social media platforms like X, Instagram or Facebook, using networks of state-sponsored influencers, sites that pose as news organizations, and fake social media accounts to spread narratives from Beijing. France's Defence Ministry said the Rafale was targeted by 'a vast campaign of disinformation" that 'sought to promote the superiority of alternative equipment, notably of Chinese design.' France considers the jet a 'strategic French offering' "The Rafale was not randomly targeted. It is a highly capable fighter jet, exported abroad and deployed in a high-visibility theater," the Defence Ministry wrote on its website. 'The Rafale was also targeted because it represents a strategic French offering. By attacking the aircraft, certain actors sought to undermine the credibility of France and its defence industrial and technological base. The disinformation campaign therefore did not merely target an aircraft, but more broadly a national image of strategic autonomy, industrial reliability, and solid partnerships.' Dassault Aviation has sold 533 Rafales, including 323 for export to Egypt, India, Qatar, Greece, Croatia, the United Arab Emirates, Serbia and Indonesia. Indonesia has ordered 42 planes and is considering buying more. China may be hoping to weaken the security relationships that France is building with Asian nations by spreading worries about the equipment it supplies, said Justin Bronk, an airpower specialist at the Royal United Services Institute, a defence and security think tank in London. 'From a point of view of limiting Western countries' influence in the Indo-Pacific, it would make sense for China to be using the performance of Pakistani weapon systems — or at least purported performance — in downing at least one Rafale as a tool to undermine its attractiveness as an export,' he said. 'They certainly saw an opportunity to damage French sales prospects in the region."