Explainer-Will the EU delay enforcing its AI Act?
Groups representing big U.S. tech companies such as Google owner Alphabet and Facebook owner Meta, and European companies such as Mistral and ASML have urged the European Commission to delay the AI Act by years.
WHAT IS THE AUGUST 2 DEADLINE?
Under the landmark act that was passed a year earlier after intense debate between EU countries, its provisions would come into effect in a staggered manner over several years.
Some important provisions, including rules for general purpose AI (GPAI) models, are due to apply on August 2.
GPAI, which includes foundation models like those made by Google, Mistral and OpenAI, will be subject to transparency requirements such as drawing up technical documentation, complying with EU copyright law and providing detailed summaries about the content used for algorithm training.
The companies will also need to test for bias, toxicity, and robustness before launching.
AI models classed as posing a systemic risk and high-impact GPAI will have to conduct model evaluations, assess and mitigate risks, conduct adversarial testing, report to the European Commission on serious incidents and provide information on their energy efficiency.
WHY DO COMPANIES WANT A PAUSE?
For AI companies, the enforcement of the act means additional costs for compliance. And for ones that make AI models, the requirements are tougher.
But companies are also unsure how to comply with the rules as there are no guidelines yet. The AI Code of Practice, a guidance document to help AI developers to comply with the act, missed its publication date of May 2.
"To address the uncertainty this situation is creating, we urge the Commission to propose a two-year 'clock-stop' on the AI Act before key obligations enter into force," said an open letter published on Thursday by a group of 45 European companies.
It also called for simplification of the new rules.
Another concern is that the act may stifle innovation, particularly in Europe where companies have smaller compliance teams than their U.S. counterparts.
WILL IT BE POSTPONED?
The European Commission has not yet commented on whether it will postpone the enforcement of the new rules in August.
However, EU tech chief Henna Virkkunen promised on Wednesday to publish the AI Code of Practice before next month.
Some political leaders, such as Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, have also called the AI rules "confusing" and asked the EU to pause the act.
"A bold 'stop-the-clock' intervention is urgently needed to give AI developers and deployers legal certainty, as long as necessary standards remain unavailable or delayed," tech lobbying group CCIA Europe said.
The European Commission did not respond immediatelyt to requests for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
42 minutes ago
- CNA
Code of practice to help firms comply with AI rules may apply end 2025, EU says
BRUSSELS :A code of practice designed to help thousands of companies comply with the European Union's landmark artificial intelligence rules may only apply at the end of 2025, the European Commission said on Thursday. Alphabet's Google, Meta Platforms, European companies such as Mistral and ASML as well as several EU governments have called for a delay in implementing the Artificial Intelligence Act, partly due to the lack of a code of practice. Publication of the Code of Practice for large language models (GPAI), such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and similar models launched by Google and Mistral, had originally been planned for May 2. The Commission plans to present the code in the coming days and expects companies to sign up next month and the guidance likely to kick in at the end of the year, a Commission spokesperson said. "On the AI Act's GPAI rules, the European AI Board is discussing the timing to implement the Code of Practice, with the end of 2025 being considered," he said. Signing up to the code is voluntary, but companies who decline to do so, as some Big Tech firms have indicated, will not benefit from the legal certainty provided to a signatory. The Commission pushed back against calls for a delay in rolling out the AI rules. "Our commitment to the goals of the AI Act, such as establishing harmonised risk-based rules across the EU and ensuring the safety of AI systems in the European market, remains unchanged," the spokesperson said. Campaign group Corporate Europe Observatory decried Big Tech's role. "Delay. Pause. Deregulate. That is Big Tech's lobby playbook to fatally weaken rules that should protect us from biased and unfair AI systems," said Bram Vranken, Corporate Europe Observatory researcher and campaigner. The AI rules for GPAI models will become legally binding on August 2 but only enforced a year later for new models placed on the market starting from next month. Existing models will have two years to August 2, 2027 to comply with the rules.
Independent Singapore
4 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Meta faces backlash over account suspensions amid mounting user frustration
After Meta's admission that it erroneously suspended many Facebook Groups last week, the social media platform is now under intense scrutiny, especially after it attributed the issue to a 'technical error.' A 'technical error' with real-world consequences According to the latest BBC report, for many users of the Meta platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, the problem goes beyond an anomaly in the system. For many, it means interrupted business transactions, severed social connections, and has led to emotional anguish. Despite Meta's assurances that the issue is being addressed, thousands of netizens have testified to being locked out of personal and professional accounts, without warning or clear-cut explanations. Additionally, many say their efforts to appeal against their account suspensions were met with mechanical replies, leaving them feeling helpless and ignored. From lost income to lost memories Among the most vocal detractors is Brittany Watson, a 32-year-old from Ontario, Canada, who initiated a petition when her Facebook account was abruptly deactivated for nine days. 'Facebook isn't just an app for me,' she told BBC News. 'It was years of memories, connections with family, mental health support groups.' See also Sophie the robot whips up oodles of Singapore noodles Brittany says the psychological impact and the draining experience were serious, and her story has reverberated extensively—over 25,000 people have signed her petition. She disputes Meta's description of the problem as isolated to Facebook Groups: 'There is a problem—it's personal accounts, business accounts, Facebook pages, and Groups.' In the meantime, in the UK, journalist John Dale also could not access his Facebook account, and lost control over a local news group with over 5,000 members. His posts were erased, and he can no longer moderate the group of which he is the sole admin. 'It's frozen in time,' he said, adding that his appeal has so far yielded little information from Meta. No human in sight: AI moderation under fire The absence of customer service and the platform's apparent dependence on AI to deal with content moderation and appeals have come under condemnation. Michelle DeMalo, a digital vendor from Niagara Falls, says she suffered a huge financial hit when her Facebook and Instagram accounts were shut off last month. Though her accounts were restored spontaneously the day after the BBC contacted Meta, she is still traumatised by the torment. 'There is no human being you can talk to,' she said. Sam Tall, a 21-year-old from Bournemouth, went through a similar shutdown of both his Facebook and Instagram accounts. His appeal was discarded within two minutes, which led him to think that no human eyes had read her appeal. 'There is absolutely no way that was seen by a person,' he said. 'All the memories, all my friends—gone.' Meta says it employs a blend of mechanical tools and human assessors to implement its community guidelines. But for many, the lack of transparency and real-time support has left them with more questions than answers, and a growing belief that the tech giant is not listening to them. With Reddit forums busy, social media protests swelling, and some users even contemplating a class action suit, Meta may find this problem won't be so easily fixed by attributing it to a 'technical error.'
CNA
4 hours ago
- CNA
Code of practice to help companies with AI rules may come end 2025, EU says
BRUSSELS :Key guidance to help thousands of companies comply with the European Union's landmark artificial intelligence rules may come at the end of the year, the European Commission said on Thursday, marking a six-month delay. "On the AI Act's GPAI rules, the European AI Board is discussing the timing to implement the Code of Practice, with the end of 2025 being considered," a Commission spokesperson said. GPAI refers to large language models such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and similar models launched by Google and Mistral. The Commission had originally set May 2 as the deadline for the introduction of the Code of Practice.
