logo
Canada needs an Arctic data strategy to achieve its northern ambitions

Canada needs an Arctic data strategy to achieve its northern ambitions

Mark Carney's Liberal government campaigned on an ambitious agenda for Canada's Arctic future. While Canada contains the second-largest swath of the Arctic in the world (40 per cent of our land mass, and 70 per cent of our coastline), our nation lags far behind others on almost every measure of built infrastructure, research investment, health outcomes and military readiness.
The prime minister is hoping to change this, and has already announced billions in spending on everything from housing to new and upgraded ports, roads and runways, as well as support for mineral extraction and climate change research. However, when it comes to the data strategy needed to tie all these investments together, Ottawa's silence has been deafening.
Critical knowledge about the Arctic continues to be siloed, disrupting what should be a functional and collaborative ecosystem model for sharing data and research. Despite decades of research on everything from ice conditions to wildlife genomics and archaeological sites, vital data remains scattered across hundreds of disconnected repositories. The need to unify this information and make it accessible is key to fully understanding and responding to the rapid pace of change in the Arctic.
On July 8, the Arctic Research Foundation (ARF), the Canadian Polar Data Consortium (CPDC), Red River College and Digital Governance Council released a Technical Report on Arctic Data Interoperability. It outlines simple steps, using a real-world case study, to increase the effectiveness of research data by making disparate databases interoperable. And while this is a significant step toward unifying this data, the road to full implementation is a long one that will require strategic and ongoing support from the federal government.
The data held in each individual database is useful, but none hosts enough cross-disciplinary information to provide a clear, holistic picture of the Arctic. Even narrowly targeted research, such as Beluga migration in the Husky Lakes or algae blooms in the Chukchi Sea, benefits from researchers having access to related information from different sources across both time and geographic regions.
But the current approach of keeping information in silos makes it difficult for researchers to make the crucial connections. What we need is a fulsome and dynamic data and research ecosystem.
Our report presents a method for directly addressing this problem and building a more holistic picture of the Arctic by using a central repository to search multiple databases simultaneously. The method is called Federated Metadata Search and unifies metadata — data that describes other data, providing information such as precise sample location or type of water analysis conducted — into a central platform.
More data is key to fully understanding and responding to the rapid pace of change in the Arctic, write Tom Henheffer, Keith Jansa and Shannon McAllister
The central resource utilized in the case study is the Polar Data Search (PDS) platform developed by the World Data System-International Technology Office and based on the Dutch 'polder model,' which emphasizes collaboration and consensus-building. The report details how students at Red River College and researchers at CPDC adapted ARF's Arctic Research Database — a free, pan-Arctic repository for primary research data — into PDS's new, more connected ecosystem.
The purpose of the report is to illustrate a real-world example of adaptation, providing a roadmap for other organizations to achieve metadata interoperability, with the goal of facilitating large-scale, cross-disciplinary research. While this may come across as incredibly technical to some, it represents an opportunity for Canada to become a global leader in a critical facet of Arctic research.
If Canada wants plans for large investments in Arctic infrastructure and research to be effective, it must do the work to ensure the data generated by these ventures is accessible and interoperable.
The release of this report is only one small step. Much more work is required to properly invest in Arctic science, to standardize and implement those standards in Arctic data, and to facilitate broad adoption of federated metadata practices.
This process is difficult, made more so by the same lack of investment in other fields of Arctic study. For example, the technical report was written on a volunteer basis in the spare time of the researchers and non-profit staff who authored it.
Even the Arctic Research Database used in the case study was built on a shoestring budget with private funds from ARF, a small grant from Mitacs, and the creativity of innovative and dedicated students at Red River College
The technological innovation detailed in the paper and the publication of the paper itself are a testament to what creativity and elbow grease can accomplish when a consortium of motivated researchers works toward a common purpose.
The pieces are in place. Now, for the initiative to achieve widespread adoption and for interoperability to grow sufficiently for Canada to truly harness the power of big data, the federal government will need to develop and fund a robust Arctic research data strategy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOLDSTEIN: Canada's huge federal government bureaucracy needs to be downsized
GOLDSTEIN: Canada's huge federal government bureaucracy needs to be downsized

Toronto Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

GOLDSTEIN: Canada's huge federal government bureaucracy needs to be downsized

During Justin Trudeau's Liberal government from 2015 to 2024, the federal bureaucracy grew in size by 43% Get the latest from Lorrie Goldstein straight to your inbox (L) Prime Minister Mark Carney and (R) former PM Justin Trudeau. Photo by File Photos / AFP via Getty Images While the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives warned last week that over 57,000 federal public service jobs could be cut between now and 2028 due to Prime Minister Mark Carney's restraint measures – assuming they occur – the reality is that a downsizing of the federal civil service is long overdue. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account During Justin Trudeau's Liberal government from 2015 to 2024, the federal bureaucracy grew in size by 43%, from 257,034 employees to 367,772, an increase of 110,738. That far outstrips the 15% increase in Canada's population between 2015 (35,606,734) and 2024 (41,012,563). The 43% growth rate of the federal public service also outpaced the 18.5% real growth rate of the economy, the 15.5% growth in total employment and the 25.5% growth of employment across the entire public sector, counting all orders of government. As Peter Nicholson, a former senior federal public servant and business executive who cited these figures in a policy paper last month for the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy at the University of Saskatchewan observed: Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'There is no reason to expect the growth of the civil service to match, much less exceed, population growth … By 2024, the number of federal public servants per 1,000 population had reached the highest ratio (9.0) in at least 40 years during which governments of various ideological stripes have held power.' He noted this rapid growth occurred during an era when 'so much specialized and urgent work is being outsourced to consultants.' RECOMMENDED VIDEO On that issue, parliamentary budget officer Yves Giroux reported in 2023 that despite the rapid increase in the size of the federal public service, the Trudeau government was also spending $21.4 billion annually hiring outside help – 106% more than the $10.4 billion spent when Trudeau took power in 2015. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Giroux reported the total cost of paying a full-time equivalent position in the federal public service – including salaries, pensions and benefits – increased by 7.7 % from $126,634 in 2022-23 to $136,345 in 2023-24, 'exceeding the growth realized in any year since 2006-07.' Meanwhile, 'total personnel spending increased by 15.7% to $65.3 billion in 2023-24, from $56.5 billion in 2022-23.' Some of these increases can be attributed to new federal programs such as dental care and pharmacare and increased hiring during the 2020 pandemic. But that was five years ago and the size of the federal bureaucracy continued to increase every year after that up to 2024 – from 300,450 positions in 2020 to 319,601 in 2021; 335,957 in 2022; 357,247 in 2023 and 367,772 in 2024. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. As of March 31, 2025, the public service was reduced by 9,807 positions to 357,965, compared to the same period in 2024, marking the first annual decrease in a decade. Even with that 2.65% cut in the growth rate of the federal bureaucracy over one year, the overall 39% increase from 2015 to 2025 is well over twice the 16.6% growth rate of Canada's population during the same period. RECOMMENDED VIDEO In a paper earlier this month, the Canadian Federation of Independent Business reported that from 2013 to 2023 (two years of the Stephen Harper Conservative government, eight years of the Trudeau government) the size of the federal bureaucracy increased by 36%, compared to just 13% job growth in the private sector. 'The rapid growth of the federal workforce and the accompanying surge in payroll expenditures risk crowding out private-sector activity,' authors Alchad Alegbeh and Christina Santini warned. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'This trend can reduce overall productivity, slow long-term economic growth, and limit the government's ability to respond to future economic or fiscal shocks … 'The continued expansion of the federal public service – both in headcount and compensation – has become a growing source of concern for Canada's small and medium-sized enterprises which represent the core of the private economy … 'While the federal public service has grown steadily, this has not been matched by improvements in economic performance or the business environment. In theory, a larger public sector could support business owners through streamlined regulations and efficient services. In practice, however, Canadian businesses face a costly and complex regulatory landscape – amounting to $51 billion annually.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More During the election, Carney promised to freeze rather than reduce the size of the public service, while increasing government productivity. But governments of all stripes have promised increased productivity for years, without accomplishing it, meaning that new programs almost inevitably result in hiring more staff, instead of fewer workers doing the job more efficiently. Critics say Carney's recent instructions to most federal departments to cut program spending by 15% by the 2028-29 fiscal year will result in job losses and reduce the quality of government services. But the reality, according to the numbers, is that downsizing the federal public service has become an economic necessity. lgoldstein@ Columnists Toronto & GTA Sunshine Girls Toronto & GTA Columnists

KINSELLA: Canada once mattered on the international stage
KINSELLA: Canada once mattered on the international stage

Toronto Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

KINSELLA: Canada once mattered on the international stage

In recent years, we've been reduced to thumbing out sanctimonious tweets from the sidelines, far removed from the action Prime Minister Mark Carney listens to a journalist's question during a press conference on Parliament Hill following the Cabinet Policy Forum, in Ottawa on May 21, 2025. Photo by DAVE CHAN / AFP via Getty Images When a country doesn't matter militarily or diplomatically, when no one is sharing intelligence with it anymore, all that it has left are … empty words, basically. Piety and preaching. That's it. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account So, now, when it comes to world affairs, Canada is a season's ticket holder in the nosebleed seats. Holding up homemade signs, hollering, hoping to get on TV, while the real action is playing out elsewhere, far, far away. Ever since 2004, when Paul Martin and his brain trust thought it would be a good idea to meet the homicidal Libyan dictator Muammar Qaddafi in a tent in the desert, Canada has mattered less and less internationally. It all happened gradually. We became a bit of an afterthought, and then a punchline. Donald Trump, in particular, knows this. He's noticed that the rest of the world hasn't rallied to our side as he's openly coveted us as his 51st state. It was not always thus. Read More Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. At one time – say, when Mike Pearson won a Nobel Peace Prize in 1964 for resolving the Suez Crisis, or when Brian Mulroney fought to end apartheid in the Eighties, or when Jean Chretien refused to participate in George W. Bush's war against Saddam Hussein in 2003 – Canada truly mattered on the international stage. Not so much anymore. In recent years, we've been reduced to thumbing out sanctimonious tweets from the sidelines, far removed from the action. In both official languages, bien sur. So, Prime Minister Mark Carney issued a statement Thursday on X. Here's part of what it said: 'Canada condemns the Israeli government's failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza. Israel's control of aid distribution must be replaced by comprehensive provision of humanitarian assistance led by international organizations. Many of these are holding significant Canadian-funded aid which has been blocked from delivery to starving civilians. This denial of humanitarian aid is a violation of international law.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Canada condemns the Israeli government's failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza. Israel's control of aid distribution must be replaced by comprehensive provision of humanitarian assistance led by international organizations. Many of these are… — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) July 25, 2025 Carney's X post wasn't a serious statement by a head of a country. It was a selfie, basically, issued to get someone to notice us on a metaphorical global Jumbotron. (And: we won't duck, if they do.) When all you have left is words, words arguably matter. So, let's look at those five concluding words in Carney's declaration: 'A violation of international law.' Is it? Well, the first problem is international law itself. International law is a vague set of rules and principles, rarely if ever enforced. International law isn't written down anywhere, so you can make it into whatever you want, as Carney has done. The Canadian Prime Minister seems to be referring to 'the right to food,' which is mentioned in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The first, in its article 25, says that 'everyone has the right to … food.' The second says, in its article 11, that there exists 'the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A Palestinian carries a bag containing food and humanitarian aid delivered by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, a U.S.-backed organization, in Rafah, southern Gaza Strip, Wednesday, June 11, 2025. Photo by Abdel Kareem Hana / AP Photo Good. Yes. Agreed. But in the case of Gaza, the fact is this: the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) – an American organization, supported by Israel – was set up to prevent Hamas from stealing food, water, medicine and tents. On good days, the GHF has distributed as much as three million meals daily. American contractors and Israeli troops oversee all that, at four different distribution centres in Gaza. As of this week, however, more than 1,000 trucks containing GHF aid are sitting idle in Gaza – because the United Nations adamantly refuses to administer the desperately-needed food to Palestinians. The UN doesn't dispute that, either. It says that it can't distribute the GHF aid because, for the first time in its existence, it's concerned about bureaucracy. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'I don't think we need to add another layer of for-profit organizations,' UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric sniffed. To recap the facts, then: Food is going in to Gaza. Israel and the U.S. are sending it. The food is not being properly distributed, however. And the UN, which is actually paid to do these things, is adamantly refusing to help out. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Another pesky fact: Gaza is a war zone. Neither Hamas nor Israel permits non-combatants into that war zone. So where, exactly, did Prime Minister Carney get the evidence to back up his claim that Israel is, quote unquote, 'violating international law?' Not from Canadian diplomats or military observers – we don't have any in Gaza. And we designated Hamas, Gaza's government, as a terrorist entity way back in 2002. So how is the PMO and Global Affairs getting their information about Gaza? This writer contacted the PMO and and Global Affairs and asked: 'On what basis did the Prime Minister determine Israel has broken international law in the distribution of aid in Gaza? Does Canada presently have any official representatives on the ground in Gaza? Or have we instead relied upon hearsay accounts and/or the government there, which is run by a terrorist entity?' At press time, neither had provided an answer. Like we say, we're up in the nosebleeds, trying to get noticed. It isn't working. Toronto & GTA Sunshine Girls Columnists Toronto Blue Jays Toronto & GTA

Trudeau radically overhauled the Senate — will Carney keep his reforms?
Trudeau radically overhauled the Senate — will Carney keep his reforms?

CBC

time10 hours ago

  • CBC

Trudeau radically overhauled the Senate — will Carney keep his reforms?

Former prime minister Justin Trudeau upended 150 years of Canadian parliamentary tradition when he dumped Liberal senators, named Independents to the upper house and generally stripped the place of partisan elements. The experiment produced mixed reviews, with some old-guard senators — those who were there well before Trudeau — arguing the Senate is now irrelevant, slower, less organized and more expensive. Some of Trudeau's appointees say the reforms have helped the Red Chamber turn the page on the near-death experience of the expenses scandal, which they maintain was fuelled by the worst partisan impulses. Defenders of the new regime say partisans are pining for a model that's best left in the dustbin of history. The Senate has been more active in amending government bills and those changes are not motivated by party politics or electoral fortunes — they're about the country's best interest, reformers say. As the debate rages internally over whether the last 10 years of change have been worth it, Prime Minister Mark Carney has said almost nothing about his vision for the upper house. Under the current model, would-be senators are recommended by an outside panel but the decision is still up to the prime minister. Most of Trudeau's early picks were strictly non-partisan but, as polls showed his party was headed for an almost certain defeat, he increasingly named Liberals to the chamber. Carney has already scrapped Trudeau's carbon tax, introduced legislation to bypass Trudeau-era regulations, repaired once-frosty relations with the provinces and taken a different approach to the trade war. All that has some senators wondering whether the non-partisan push in the Red Chamber will be the next domino to fall. In an interview with CBC Radio's The House, House leader Steve MacKinnon signalled there may indeed be more changes coming. "I think the Senate is very much a work in progress," he said. "We continue to work constructively with the Senate in its current configuration and as it may evolve. I know many senators, the various groups in the Senate and others continue to offer some constructive thoughts on that." Asked if Carney will appoint Liberals, MacKinnon said the prime minister will name senators who are "attuned to the vagaries of public opinion, attuned to the wishes of Canadians and attuned to the agenda of the government as is reflected in the election results." Carney is interested in senators who "are broadly understanding of what the government's trying to achieve," MacKinnon said. As to whether he's heard about efforts to revive a Senate Liberal caucus, MacKinnon said: "I haven't been part of any of those discussions." Alberta Sen. Paula Simons is a member of the Independent Senators Group, the largest in the chamber and one mostly composed of Trudeau appointees (she is one of them, appointed in 2018). Simons said she knows the Conservatives would scrap Trudeau's reforms at the first opportunity. What concerns her more are those Liberals who are also against the changes. "There's a fair bit of rumbling about standing up a Liberal caucus again. And I am unalterably opposed to that," she said. When the last Liberal caucus was disbanded, some of its members regrouped as the Progressive Senate Group, which now includes senators who were never Liberals. "To unscramble that omelette, whether you're a Liberal or a Conservative, I think would be a betrayal of everything that we've accomplished over the last decade," Simons said. "I think the Senate's reputation has improved greatly as a result of these changes. I think the way we are able to improve legislation has also increased tenfold. It would be foolish and wasteful to reverse that." Still, she said there's been pushback from some Trudeau appointees. Senate debates are now longer, committee hearings feature more witnesses and there's more amendments to legislation than ever before, she said. Not to mention Independent senators can't be whipped to vote a certain way. All of that makes the legislative process more difficult to navigate. "Partisan Liberals don't like the new independent Senate because they can't control it as easily," she said. Marc Gold, Trudeau's last government representative in the Senate who briefly served under Carney before retiring, said his advice to the new prime minister is to keep the Senate the way it is. "The evolution of the Senate to a less partisan, complementary institution is a good thing. I think it's a success, and I certainly hope that it continues," Gold said. On the other side of the divide, Quebec Sen. Leo Housakos, the leader of the Conservative Senate caucus, welcomes the idea of injecting some partisanship. He said, under the current model, the chamber is less influential. "The place has become, unfortunately, an echo chamber," he said. Housakos said the old Senate was more honest, when members were more transparent about their political leanings. Many of Trudeau's Independent appointees are Liberal-minded and their voting record suggests they often align with the government, Housakos said. "Look at how often they've held the government to account," he said. "Look how often they've asked the difficult questions in the moments when the government needed … their feet held to the fire." Simons sees things differently. "It's really difficult for people who've been brought up in a partisan milieu, whether they're Conservative or Liberal or New Democrat, to understand that it is actually possible to be a political actor without a team flag," she said. "It's not my job to stand for a political party." Saskatchewan Sen. Pamela Wallin is a member of the Canadian Senators Group, which is made up of non-partisan senators including some who, like her, formerly sat as Conservatives. She said the current process has produced some senators who are political neophytes, unfamiliar with the Senate's traditional role. "I don't care if somebody belongs to a political party.… I think people need to be better educated about what they're signing up for," she said. "Our job is to be an arbiter of legislation and laws put forward by the House of Commons. It's not a place where we can all ride our individual hobby horses." That's a reference to the proliferation of Senate public bills — legislation introduced by senators themselves. These bills often have no hope of passing through both chambers, while still taking time and resources to sort through. There is data to support Wallin's contention that there are more of these bills than there were before the Trudeau reforms. During Stephen Harper's last term, there were 56 Senate public bills introduced and nine of them were passed into law, according to a CBC News review of parliamentary data. By comparison, Trudeau's final session saw 92 bills introduced over a shorter time period. Only 12 of them passed — a worse success rate. In the first few weeks of this new Parliament, more than 32 such bills have already been introduced, some of them a revival of those that died on the order paper. Wallin said those bills often reflect senators' "personal interests or the interests that they've shared over a lifetime." She wants the Senate to take a "back to basics" approach. "Our job is sober second thought," she said. Wallin is also calling for better regional representation in the Senate, which may be a tricky proposition given the constitutional realities. A change in seat allocation would require cracking open that foundational document, a politically unpalatable idea. Still, Alberta separatists are agitating for change, calling the current breakdown grossly unfair. Housakos said depriving some parts of the country of meaningful representation needs to be addressed. In B.C., for example, the province's nearly six million people are represented by just six senators. P.E.I., by comparison, has four senators for about 180,000 people — an allocation formula that dates back to Confederation. "Western Canada has a legitimate beef. They are not fairly represented in the upper chamber," Housakos said. "It's probably the biggest problem that needs to be addressed." But the government isn't interested in that sort of change, MacKinnon said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store