
Pretty, profane or pulled up? How socks became cool
Should it be a pair that matched the rest of my outfit, or with a pattern that stood out? Did a frill look fussy, or bring just the right amount of detail? Was the fact they didn't have a four-letter word on them going to expose me as woefully out of touch? The only thing I was certain of is that they should be on show.
Yes, the young and the fashionable have known this for a while, but for the rest of us it's taken time to notice the sock's shift to centre-stage. Maybe it took seeing Natalie Portman wearing black socks with high heels, or Lauren Laverne posting pictures of her 'Fucking Legend' socks on Instagram.
Almost 20 years since Sock Shop closed in the UK, hosiery has suddenly been returning to the high street – and online specialists have been popping up too. The independent retailer Socktopus has seven shops around the UK but has plans to add more – it sold 640,000 pairs last year and expects to sell 1m this year. Marks & Spencer says sales of women's socks are growing each year, and the accessory is increasingly on offer as a souvenir: at Glastonbury and Wimbledon they make up part of the merchandise collection.
My Guardian colleague Jess Cartner-Morley says socks are fashion's 'hottest topic of the decade', while Lynne Hugill, a senior lecturer for the BA in fashion at Teesside University, says 'people of both genders are embracing socks with all kinds of footwear – whether it's flat shoes, a sandal or now a heel'.
At M&S, where hosiery is a stock in trade (19m pairs of women's socks are sold there every year), the menswear director Mitch Hughes says there is a 'strong appetite for statement socks' among male shoppers. '[Socks have] had a 2025 glow-up, left behind their functional underdog status and are now attention-seeking and stylish – a key style contender within a man's wardrobe and definitely not an afterthought.'
Happy Socks, a sock maker that launched in Stockholm in 2008, has taken part in four international fashion weeks in the past year. 'We did Berlin as our own show, but for Copenhagen, Paris and New York we partnered with designers who came to us and said: 'Hey, we need socks on our runway. Can we work together?',' says the chief marketing and design officer Fiona Murchison. 'That shows the move into the fashion world – if they're on the runway, then, of course, it trickles down.'
While shrinkflation has been a big issue in consumer goods, the opposite has hit socks. No-show trainer socks are out, and fabric is slowly rising up the shin. 'We've extended that length higher than the average retailer,' says Murchison. 'Which only the most in-tune sock buyer would maybe notice, but it's an important shift for us because while ankle socks are staple, we see this growing enthusiasm for higher lengths.'
The look is highlighted with a word or detail near the cuff. This means 'people are more inclined to pull it up that little teeny bit more,' she says. 'It's a bit more important as a piece … a bit like wearing a giant necklace or something.' When we speak on Zoom, she takes off a sock to show me: it's from a collaboration with Awake NY and in a sports style with a little 'A' near the top.
This rising trend isn't just true on bare legs. Lois Woodcock, the head of design at the athleisure company Gymshark, says: 'One trend that stands out is the growing love for crew socks, which are halfway between ankle socks and knee-high socks, particularly with our gen Z community.'
Woodcock says these buyers are 'styling their socks very intentionally, often layering crisp white crew socks over leggings'.
But while gymgoers may go for plain white, elsewhere there is a move towards pattern and detail. At M&S, female shoppers are looking for sheer, ribbed, lace and embellished socks, and there's 'a huge demand for playful details like ruffles and bows'.
Happy Socks makes a huge choice of patterned socks, with this year's designs including tomatoes, hibiscus flowers and racing cars, although Murchison says fewer colours are being used across the range as it moves to be 'more fashion relevant'.
Socktopus has thousands of designs, from the whimsical to the artistic, via the F-word. Popular choices include a range of capybaras in cowboy hats – originally suggested by a customer. The firm also makes Henry VIII and his wives socks, which Josie Starsmore, the creative director, is wearing when we speak. Starsmore says people love to come into the shops and try to 'marry the exact sock with the exact person'. Her husband and co-founder Nick (wearing frog socks), says, 'If people think the pattern on a sock looks anything like their dog, they come in and they say, 'You've got Billy socks!' because we've got a sock with a border terrier and luckily it looks like Billy.'
In Socktopus branches, the sweary socks are concealed with cardboard. You can have a matching pair or, from an odd-socks pile, make up your own: you could have 'Cock' emblazoned in silver on black on your left leg and 'Twat' in gold on white on your right, or other family-unfriendly combinations.
Nick says profane socks 'are quite interesting because the lady who is wearing a floral dress and has two spaniels and comes to our stand at Badminton Horse Trials, and the kind of younger customer at Comic Con, both love socks that say 'fuck off' on them.'
Josie says her mum helped at a show and was originally disapproving of the sweary socks but, 'after the second day of asking, 'What is it about these socks that you like so much?', people were really opening up to her, saying it's almost like by wearing these socks to work or in a difficult situation or with my boss who I can't stand I'm having a minor rebellion.' She says: 'That really changed my mum's point of view because then she was like, my God, I actually think there's a real place for this, it's like a tiny little empowerment.'
Shorter trouser lengths mean that socks are generally more on display than they were, and are a factor in their rising popularity. But the main reason we all have more time for socks, say those in the know, is the pandemic. 'What really moved it on is Covid,' says Hugill. 'We were looking for comfort, and it changed the way people dress for work. People got used to being at home and wearing their Birkenstocks or their sliders with socks.'
The pandemic led to a decline in suit sales, and to the more general acceptance of trainers as office-wear, and so the traditional black or navy blue sock for men, and maybe tights for women, have been reassessed.
The financial climate may also have played a role. 'I think there's an element of the lipstick effect,' says Murchison, referring to the theory that in economic downturns consumers look to low-cost indulgences. 'It's a very affordable element to change your outfit. We would consider ourselves, I suppose, a little bit more on the premium end, pricing wise, but nevertheless, you can buy a single sock for 12 euros. So it doesn't break the bank to change up a look.'
Josie at Socktopus says rising costs elsewhere may be driving purchases among gift buyers. 'I think the £12 bottle of wine means we've benefited from an £8 pair of gift socks.'
She suggests the kidulthood trend, with grownups embracing cute things, and social media have both helped drive sales of patterned and fluffy socks. The thing about socks is they're very inclusive, she says. It doesn't matter what size you are, or what age.
That said, at a certain age, it's difficult to know how far to take it – both towards the knee and in terms of pattern.
Cartner-Morley says that, generally, she thinks black-and-white socks look better than patterned with shorts or skirts or over leggings, but adds: 'I love a colourful sock if you just get a flash of it, for instance with loafers and trousers.'
Of sweary socks, she says, 'I'm not a big fan of anything novelty-adjacent, but on the other hand, any sock that cheers you up or makes you smile is a good sock.'
If you want to go for something plain but a bit different from the socks you wore at school, Murchison says solid colours have sold well. Red was in, but now things have moved on and the hot colour is a 'really poppy vibrant blue'.
Or, to spruce up an outfit of a dress and trainers she suggests an 'extra fine … a kind of more dainty sock'.
She says no one's too old for knee-length socks: 'If you wear a longer length skirt, then you wear it like a tight, basically. It's like wearing a pair of tights, but you can wear it in the summer.'
Some will cleave to the no-show trainer sock which, after all, was for many years the agreed-on way to wear hosiery in the summer months and is a sock-drawer staple.
Cartner-Morley says that in a recent WhatsApp group chat between friends, someone asked if it was OK to wear trainer socks with a dress and trainers to a party or if she had to wear socks as decreed by fashion. 'After a heated debate we decided that, so long as there wasn't likely to be anyone under 35 at the party, she was safe to wear trainer socks,' she says.
Otherwise, I'm afraid there are no excuses. We all need to pull our socks up.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Jay-Z teams up with Caesars and SL Green to bid for huge Times Square Casino project
MEGASTAR JAY-Z joined forces with some of the biggest names in the casino business, looking to pitch a Caesars Palace Times Square casino project in New York. The rapper - real name Shawn Carter - was among several attendees to sit in front of the Community Advisory Committee (CAC) and bid for one of three $500 million downstate licenses. 1 The Roc Nation co-founder was representing a partnership alongside Caesars Palace and SL Green Properties and pledged $250million in benefits to the community as part of their pitch to convert an existing office on Broadway. They face stiff competition though with EIGHT applications in total having been submitted to the New York State Gaming Commission. Jay-Z, who grew up in Brooklyn, says the location was "perfect" for the partnership group and says the introduction of a casino resort would only "fulfil and enhance" the area, which he likened to huge landmarks around the world. The 150,000-square-foot gambling hall would boast 1000 casino rooms, a Caesars Sportsbook, four restaurants associated with high-profile chefs and a spa. Concerns over the venue becoming the main attraction to Broadway have been rebuffed by the entrepreneur, who insists they would only act as an 'additive' to a tourist spot which entices over 50 million tourists per year. During the presentation, Jay-Z said: "It's our chance to change the narrative and create something all around the world. "If we treat Times Square with the love and the attention that it requires, it can fulfill its promise. 'This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, I believe, to support something that's homegrown. 'As we hear a lot of talk about community, we are the community. We're from this community. 'We're not coming to compete with Broadway. We're coming to be additive. "Anything that we've done in the past, we've always included the community. We've never excluded the community.' The group's proposition also indicated a forecasted $7 billion in direct tax revenue and $26.7 billion in local economic activity in the first 10 years. Roc Nation also stated they'd supported more than five million people with social impacts worth more than $78 million. More than 3,000 construction jobs would be created as a result if they were awarded a license, and the 3,800 permanent jobs it would create would be 'mostly filled by New Yorkers'. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: For help with a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or go to to be excluded from all UK-regulated gambling websites.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
American living in the UK visits Poundland for the first time - but has one major criticism
An American who is living in the UK visited Poundland for the first time but he had one major criticism. Kobie Jordan, who is from the US but now living in London, took to his TikTok @kjordyyy to share a video of himself touring the popular British discount chain. However as he browsed the aisles, he was confused by the range of prices on items, despite the store's name suggesting a flat £1 cost. In the clip, which racked up 44,000 views, he said: 'It's automatically giving me Dollar General vibes. But the things aren't a pound, which is kind of crazy. I'm seeing £3.' UK-based social media users were quick to point out that while the store originally sold everything for £1, its pricing model has changed over the years due to inflation. One person said: 'When it first opened, everything was a pound. Then lockdown happened!' Another added: 'It used to literally be everything £1 now it's just a pointless shop full of stuff that's not £1.' But it wasn't just the pricing that raised questions. Kobie also had a cheeky take on the name itself, hinting that Poundland carries a very different, and much more risqué, connotation back in the US. 'They couldn't choose a different name besides Poundland? Poundland, really? UK... at least it's not called Pound Town,' he joked in the video. He even captioned the clip: 'Not a bad store... but the name is a bit sus.' Despite the eyebrow-raising branding, Kobie was surprisingly impressed by the store itself. He said: 'It's giving like a low key mini Walmart,' before adding, 'I'll be honest, most dollar stores back in the States are kind of like dirty, dingy... but there's something so clean and sterile about this one. Like, it's so pristine.' As he explored more of the shop, the American stumbled on a beloved British snack that he was eager to try. He added: 'Also, party rings. Never had them, but apparently all my British friends said they're a staple when you're growing up. Gotta try them one day. 'I'm genuinely shook with the variety of everything, cause it's not a big store from the outside, but they have a little bit of everything, which I kind of like. 'Imagine like a clean, sterile small Walmart mixed with Dollar General- that's what you have. Poundland. Many rushed to the comments to leave their own thoughts on his fair review of the discount chain 'I think I've explored every square inch of the store. I don't know what I was expecting from a Poundland, but it's pretty legit, innit? 'Living the dream, man. Living the dream in Poundland of all places.' Many rushed to the comments to leave their own thoughts on his review of the discount chain. One person said: 'My husband's American and wants a 'Poundland' T-shirt as he thinks the name is so funny.' Another suggested: 'Please try Greggs, Wetherspoons, Sports Direct and Primark.' Someone else added: 'Back in the day everything was a pound!!! There's 99p stores as well' A fourth added: 'Poundland needs to rename itself at this point. Bring back the days when everything was actually a pound'. It comes after Kobie revealed the British cultural habit of being 'over-polite' is sometimes confusing for visitors. The TikToker admitted he's still adapting to the famously apologetic and overly polite nature of British culture. In the clip, which racked up more than 45,000 views, he revealed one train journey in particular left him completely stumped. He said: 'As much as I love living in the UK, there's just one thing I have to talk about. 'Their over politeness almost to a fault. It's no secret they have a huge apologising culture. Always saying sorry, sorry all the time. But boy, do I have a story for y'all.' Kobie explained he was on a 'super packed train' from Birmingham to London when an older gentleman boarded the train and began eyeing the seat beside him, but wouldn't take it. He said: 'Every single seat was taken except for one. Right next to me, there's an older gentleman that just got on the train. 'He kept looking at me. Cause it's not my job to tell you to come sit if he wants to sit. He's a grown man, he can come sit. 'He would even look, look at me and look away. His wife had found a seat, but he was kind of looking at me like I was doing something wrong.' The American admitted he was tempted to offer the free seat to the man but he hesitated as he claimed the man could just grab the seat if he wanted it. He said: 'Part of me wanted me to offer my seat next to me to him, but I was like, wait a minute, it's an open seat, he can just come grab it if he wants to sit there. 'And me being from the US, it's hard for me to judge these type of situations here because, one, I don't know if he's actually just being too polite, maybe he's not too fond of me, or it just doesn't make sense.' He concluded: 'If y'all know me, y'all know I love the UK. And this is just my opinion and I Gotta see how it is. 'As much as I love it, that's one thing that I just can't really get my head around.' Many British commenters quickly weighed in, offering their own interpretations of what the elderly gentleman may have been thinking. One person said: 'I think he wanted you to give up your seat so him and his wife could sit together.' To which Kobie responded: 'Very true, why didn't he ask?' Another added: 'It polite to offer the seat… especially to pregnant or older people. He may not have wanted to have assumed he should squeeze past you.' Kobie added: 'Again that's so British. If you want to sit. Sit.' Someone else added: 'We're just polite to a fault. There's an unwritten rule about sitting next to people, although in PACKED situations usually doesn't apply. 'The 'look' would typically be inferred as a request to sit there and then the other party obliges.' A fourth added: 'I'm English. if he wanted the seat he would have either taken it or asked' Another added: 'As a old English lady who loves good manners, you acted in the correct manner. the choice was his to stand.'


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australian actor Rebel Wilson sued by production company behind her own film
The legal drama surrounding The Deb, Rebel Wilson's directorial debut, has made landfall in Australia, with one of the production companies behind the venture filing a lawsuit against Wilson in the New South Wales supreme court this week. UK-based AI Film, represented by Australian legal firm Giles George and high-profile barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC, accused the Pitch Perfect Australian actor of deliberately sabotaging the film's release, alleging threats and defamatory claims had caused the production company financial and reputational damage. The suit also claims the motive behind Wilson's actions was to devalue the production's worth and pressure AI Film and Australian company Dunburn Debutantes Commissioning Company (DDCC – the entity managing the film's rights and named as the second plaintiff in the lawsuit) into selling their stake to Wilson's company Camp Sugar. Originally conceived as a quirky musical comedy celebrating Australian culture, The Deb was co-produced by AI Film and Camp Sugar, with Wilson directing and starring. But the partnership fractured in mid-2024 when Wilson took to Instagram to accuse fellow producers Amanda Ghost, Gregor Cameron and Vince Holden of alleged embezzlement, sexual misconduct and obstructing the film's release. The allegations, broadcast to Wilson's 11 million followers, were swiftly denied by the producers who began defamation proceedings against Wilson in the Los Angeles superior court last July. In November, the film's lead actor, Charlotte MacInnes, who Wilson claimed was the victim of the alleged sexual misconduct, filed a declaration in the US court stating that Wilson fabricated the claims, describing them as 'completely false and absurd'. The court subsequently threw out Wilson's bid to strike out the defamation suit, not accepting her lawyer's argument that under California's anti-Slapp laws, the accusations she had made against the producers of her The Deb constituted 'protected activity' and were a matter of public interest. That defamation case remains ongoing. After filing its lawsuit in the supreme court's equities division on Thursday, AI Film issued the following statement: 'These proceedings are regrettable but essential to ensure The Deb's timely release. It's a joyous, fun film, and we are sure that audiences are going to love it.' And MacInnes issued a second statement, saying: 'I love this film and I can't wait for it to be released … it would be wonderful if these proceedings can help make that happen.' Wilson's Californian legal team, Freedman Taitelman + Cooley, which is handling the defamation case, did not respond to the Guardian's request for comment. In its lawsuit filed this week, Giles George claims that on 5 January, Wilson's lawyer Bryan Freedman responded to correspondence by AI Film's legal team, saying that 'Wilson is currently in active discussions to outright purchase The Deb (the 'Film') and all associated rights and title'. The Freedman letter also threatened to 'pursue all claims and damages should Al Film or any agents acting on its behalf interfere with that business opportunity'. AI Film is alleging that Wilson's motivation behind her alleged undermining of distribution efforts, including making threats to seek an injunction against the film's release, was personal financial gain. AI Film's lawyers claim that on 6 June 2025, Wilson had a discussion with film distributor Kismet, who was bidding to secure the rights for the theatrical release of The Deb in Australia, during which she said words to the effect that she was supportive of Kismet as the Australian distributor of the film but while there was a legal case involving the film in the US she could not support the film's distribution and would seek an injunction if any attempts to distribute the film were made. Giles George alleges Wilson knew the legal proceedings in the US were not impeding the film's release, and knew the threat of injunction was against her and her company, Camp Sugar's, contractual obligations. But as evidence in Byran Freedman's correspondent to them in January, Wilson was delaying the film's release so that she could pursue the 'business opportunity' of buying all rights to the film outright. AI Film is seeking damages, a formal apology, corrective advertising and a permanent restraint on Wilson and her company making any further disparaging and incorrect claims relating to other companies and individuals involved in the making of The Deb, which have come to been know in legal circles as 'The Wilson Statements'.