‘Son of Concorde' bosses reveal over 600 routes could see flight times HALVED including 3.5-hour trips from UK to US
And
Advertisement
2
2
The "Son of Concorde" reached supersonic speeds in January
Credit: Boom Technology
Boom Technology has been testing its XB-1 test jet which managed to fly faster than the speed of sound in January.
One of the hurdles they've overcome from supersonic flying is the sound.
The firm's jet, aptly dubbed the "Son of Concorde", has no audible sonic boom.
A number of orders from the likes of American Airlines, United Airlines, and Japan Airlines have already been made for Boom Technology's passenger jet model, Overture.
Advertisement
Read more about flights
President Trump recently
"While Boom is pleased to see the regulatory pathways to supersonic flight clearing, Boom's business case has never been predicated on regulatory change," a spokesperson for Boom told The Sun.
"There are over 600 global routes that are economically viable for supersonic flight—even without going supersonic over land.
"Now that rules are being updated to allow boomless supersonic flight over land in the US, additional routes will benefit from speedups.
Advertisement
Most read in Tech
Exclusive
Latest
"Boom's supersonic airliner, Overture, will fly transatlantic routes, such as New York to London, at its full cruising speed of Mach 1.7 over water – about twice as fast as today's conventional airliners."
"Boomless Cruise enables Overture to fly at speeds up to Mach 1.3 over land without an audible boom - up to 50% faster than subsonic jets - reducing US coast-to-coast flight times by up to 90 minutes.
I'm a Boom supersonic test pilot - my day job is testing a new generation of Concordes
"International routes with overland segments can also benefit from increased speeds."
The company also revealed that Overture "remains on target" to get certification from relevant bodies including the FAA by the end of the decade so it can carry passengers.
Advertisement
Bosses are aiming to roll out the first
To accomplish that, they expect production of the first aircraft in the "Superfactory" to start next year.
WHY DID CONCORDE FAIL?
CONCORDE was the supersonic passenger jet considered the ultimate luxury in air travel.
Air France and British Airways announced they would be
The plane had its first commercial flight on January 21, 1976, so was retired after 27 years of service and 50,000 flights.
Several reasons led to the decision to retire Concorde.
Air France and British Airways cited low passenger numbers and high maintenance costs.
By the early noughties, the planes were outdated and expensive to run, despite being incredibly advanced when they were first introduced almost three decades previously.
The 9/11 terrorist attack in 2001 majorly impacted passenger numbers, as people opted not to fly.
Passenger numbers also fell after an
The disaster
The plane ran over a small
It was also the only aircraft in the British Airways fleet that required a flight engineer.
Image credit: Alamy
By the end of this year, they expect to produce thrust during fully-operational engine core tests for Overture's bespoke engine, Symphony.
"Boom's current order book accounts for the first five years of production at the Overture Superfactory in North Carolina," the spokesperson added.
Advertisement
"Airlines have been very receptive to Overture and the competitive advantages of supersonic travel.
"In fact, the passenger research we have conducted indicates that 87% of passengers are willing to switch from their preferred airline in order to gain access to supersonic travel."
THE RISE OF SUPERSONIC AND HYPERSONIC
There are several types of hypersonic and supersonic jets. A breakdown of what's been happening in the industry and what's expected in the coming years.
Talon-A
Built by Stratolaunch
Reported speeds of Mach 5
The first test flight conducted in 2024
Built by Nasa and Lockheed Martin
Predicted max speeds of Mach 1.4
The first test flight in 2024 - but subject to delays
Built by Venus Aerospace and Velontra
Predicted max speeds of Mach 6
First test flight in 2025
Built by Hermeus
Predicted max speeds of Mach 2.5
First test flight in 2026
Built by Hermeus
Predicted max speeds of Mach 5
First test flight by 2030
Built by China's hypersonic plane programme
Predicted max speeds of Mach 6
First test flight in 2025
Built by Hypersonix Launch Systems
Predicted max speeds of Mach 7
First test flight in 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Austerity budgets are a gift to populists
Time after time, austerity budgets have provided populist political parties with political openings. In the United Kingdom, France, Poland, and elsewhere, populists have used austerity budget cuts to browbeat 'fiscally responsible' governments. Because of this dynamic, it is hard to believe Elon Musk thought US president Donald Trump's interest in Musk's Department of Government Efficiency was motivated by a genuine commitment to saving public money. His sense of betrayal was nevertheless strong enough that he lambasted Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act — which is forecast to add trillions of dollars to the US federal budget deficit and national debt — as a 'disgusting abomination'. Even Steve Bannon, a key architect of Trump's populist 'Make America Great Again' (Maga) agenda and Musk's ideological adversary, has made similar criticisms of the bill, as have prominent Senate Republicans like Rand Paul and Ron Johnson. Such dissent from the right is unusual. Of course, Republicans have vigorously denounced the spending plans of past Democratic administrations. But when Republican presidents are in power, these affordability concerns instantly vanish. 'Deficits don't matter,' as former US vice-president Dick Cheney, the principal architect of the Iraq War, famously put it. While Republicans understand banging the drumbeat of fiscal austerity is a political instrument, Democrats have been more earnest — or naive — about its virtues. True, there is good political reason to join Republican dissenters in arguing the bill's tax cuts for the rich are 'unaffordable'. A protester burns a police car during a demonstration by soccer fans and retirees demanding higher pensions and opposing austerity measures implemented by Javier Milei's government in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in March Picture: AP/Rodrigo Abd But history suggests the Democratic Party may soon lose sight of the strategic character of such ideological alliances and end up playing an unfortunate role in a twisted morality play authored by the right. Since Ronald Reagan, every Republican president has dramatically increased the deficit through tax cuts and military spending. By contrast, Democratic administrations have done the work of reining in the country's growing debt, largely by slashing public investment and weakening the social safety net. Lawrence H Summers, who served as treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton, was convinced the economic revival of the 1990s was due to Clinton's commitment to balancing the budget. As director of President Barack Obama's National Economic Council, Summers successfully pushed the same approach. Following a decade of economic stagnation, President Joe Biden's administration broke from this pattern and tried to rouse the American economy from its pandemic-induced torpor with a massive fiscal stimulus. Summers led a media offensive against the policy, warning of an inflationary surge. But Biden stuck to his guns, and, although inflation did jump up briefly, no catastrophe unfolded, thanks to the United States' unique ability to run large budget deficits, owing to the dollar's centrality in the global financial system. Time and again over the past half-century, America has been able to sustain higher levels of debt than many anticipated. After Biden bowed out of the 2024 presidential election, the elevation of Kamala Harris, his vice president, to the top of the Democratic ticket signified a possible return to the economic-policy orientation of the Clinton and Obama eras. But Harris lost the race, leaving America — and the world — with Trump, the self-proclaimed 'king of debt.' Given this, it is not surprising many former Democratic officials have sounded the alarm about Trump's spending bill. In the New York Times, Peter Orszag, who served as director of the Office of Management and Budget under Obama, argued the national debt was now reaching a level that could undermine global investors' willingness to hold dollar assets. Summers has likewise warned Trump's bill implies 'debt on a massive scale that we can't afford'. Of course, any government's capacity to finance deficits is finite. Former British prime minister Liz Truss learned that the hard way in 2022, when her government's mini-budget triggered a sharp rise in borrowing costs, leading to the swift demise of her premiership. But Trump is not heading for a Truss-like incident. The dollar is far more critical to the world economy than the pound. And the US Federal Reserve's commitment to ensuring the liquidity of the Treasury market, in concert with foreign central banks and treasuries, bolsters the greenback's too-big-to-fail status. The recent decision by Moody's to downgrade the US sovereign credit rating was significant. If unrestricted borrowing, coupled with endless tariff uncertainty, fuels inflation and slows growth, more downgrades will follow, making it more expensive for the US government to finance its debts. The fact so many prominent Republicans are objecting to Trump's spending bill reflects the hollow ideological core Maga shares with other right-wing populist movements. Picture: AP /Manuel Balce Ceneta Although this would have adverse consequences for America, it doesn't represent an existential threat, which means Democrats' calls for fiscal rectitude will not gain traction among Republicans. The party's resolve to rebalance the books will, however, influence intraparty debate. Leaders of the Democratic establishment such as Harris, Gavin Newsom, and Rahm Emanuel would fall over one another to reprise the Obama years. But that era's institutionalisation of the bailout state and prolonged fiscal austerity would push the country into another recession — providing fertile ground for popular discontent and further political polarisation. The US is not alone, of course. Across Europe and elsewhere, governments' embrace of socialism for the rich and austerity for everyone else has fuelled the rise of Maga-like populist movements. But the fact so many prominent Republicans are objecting to Trump's spending bill reflects the hollow ideological core Maga shares with other right-wing populist movements. A motley collection of intense grievances does not easily translate into a coherent economic strategy. Instead, the Democratic Party should focus on building a progressive economic policy platform that can mobilise electoral support. Bidenomics was a good but imperfect start, not a mistake to be regretted. The Democrats — and democrats worldwide — must offer a more appealing vision of the expansive use of the public purse. Otherwise, they may not get their hands back on the levers of fiscal policy for some time to come. Martijn Konings is professor of Political Economy and Social Theory at the University of Sydney and the author, most recently, of 'The Bailout State: Why Governments Rescue Banks, Not People' (Polity, 2025). Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2025.
Irish Examiner
10 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Donald Trump says he'll 'take a look' at deporting Elon Musk as feud reignites
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday threatened to cut off the billions of dollars in subsidies that Elon Musk's companies receive from the federal government, in an escalation of the war of words between the president and the world's richest man, one-time allies who have since fallen out. The feud reignited on Monday when Musk, who spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election, renewed his criticism of Trump's tax-cut and spending bill, which would eliminate subsidies for electric vehicle purchases that have benefited Tesla, the leading US EV maker. That bill passed the Senate by a narrow margin midday Tuesday. "He's upset that he's losing his EV mandate and … he's very upset about things but he can lose a lot more than that," Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday. Though Musk has often said government subsidies should be eliminated, Tesla has historically benefited from billions of dollars in tax credits and other policy benefits because of its business in clean transportation and renewable energy. The Tesla CEO renewed threats to start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who support Trump's tax bill, despite campaigning on limiting government spending. File Picture: (AP Photo/Alex Brandon The Trump administration has control over many of those programs, some of which are targeted in the tax bill, including a $7,500 consumer tax credit that has made buying or leasing EVs more attractive for consumers. Tesla shares dropped more than 5.5% Tuesday. The Tesla CEO renewed threats to start a new political party and spend money to unseat lawmakers who support the tax bill, despite campaigning on limiting government spending. Republicans have expressed concern that Musk's on-again, off-again feud with Trump could hurt their chances to protect their majority in the 2026 midterm congressional elections. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent pushed back on Musk's criticism that the bill would balloon the deficit, saying, "I'll take care of" the country's finances. Musk spearheaded the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), aimed at cutting government spending, before he pulled back his involvement in late May. Trump on Truth Social on Tuesday suggested Musk might receive more subsidies "than any human being in history, by far," adding: "No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE." Trump later doubled down, telling reporters with a smile, "DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon." In response to Trump's threats, Musk said on his own social media platform X, "I am literally saying CUT IT ALL. Now." He later added that he could escalate the exchange with Trump but said, "I will refrain for now." Challenges to Tesla The feud could create new challenges for Musk's business empire, particularly as the electric automaker — his primary source of wealth — bets heavily on the success of its robotaxi program currently being tested in Austin, Texas. The speed of Tesla's robotaxi expansion depends heavily on state and federal regulation of self-driving vehicles. "The substance of Tesla's valuation right now is based on progress towards autonomy. I don't think anything is going to happen on that front, but that is the risk," said Gene Munster, managing partner at Tesla investor Deepwater Asset Management. Analysts expect another rough quarter when the EV maker reports second-quarter delivery figures on Wednesday. Sales in major European markets were mixed, data showed Tuesday, as Musk's embrace of hard-right politics has alienated potential buyers in several markets worldwide. The elimination of the EV credit could hit Tesla's earnings by as much as $1.2bn, about 17% of its 2024 operating income, J.P. Morgan analysts estimated earlier this year. Gary Black, a longtime Tesla investor who manages money for the Future Fund LLC, sold his shares recently as car sales declined. He told Reuters he is considering when to reinvest and that eliminating electric vehicle credits would harm Tesla. In a separate post on X, Black said: 'Not sure why @elonmusk didn't see this coming as a result of him speaking out against passage of President Trump's big beautiful bill.' The US Transportation Department regulates vehicle design and will play a key role in deciding if Tesla can mass-produce robotaxis without pedals and steering wheels, while Musk's rocket firm SpaceX has about $22bn in federal contracts. Tesla also gets regulatory credits for selling electric vehicles, and has reaped nearly $11bn by selling those credits to other automakers who are unable to comply with increasingly strict vehicle emissions rules. Without those sales, the company would have posted a first-quarter loss in April. Trump had in early June threatened to cut Musk's government contracts when their relationship erupted into an all-out social media brawl over the tax-cut bill, which non-partisan analysts estimate would add about $3tn to the US debt. Asked if he was going to deport Musk, a naturalized US citizen, Trump told reporters as he left the White House on Tuesday: "I don't know. We'll have to take a look." - Reuters
The Irish Sun
11 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
‘Squeezed middle will not be forgotten' insists Harris in Budget vow amid Govt parties row on €1k college fee increase
THE GOVERNMENT will have enough cash to cut college fees, slash childcare costs and provide a boost for businesses in the upcoming budget despite 'sobering' warnings about the economic impacts of Trump tariffs, Simon Harris has claimed. It comes as Advertisement The last government introduced temporary cuts of €1,000 to student fees as part of This brought fees from €3,000 down to €2,000. However, Higher Ed Minister James Lawless revealed this week that This sparked a furious reaction from Fine Gael, with party leader Advertisement Read more in News The coalition partners are at odds on how to best ease the financial burden on students as Fianna Fail favour targeted measures for those who most need support while Fine Gael want universal cuts for everyone. Taoiseach The Taoiseach told reporters in The money ministers warned about the economic impact from Advertisement Most read in Irish News Latest The Fianna Fail leader said the Government has made commitments on widening access to college grants and for third level students with disabilities. However, Simon Harris today claimed the 'squeezed middle' in Ireland will not be forgotten in the upcoming budget as he doubled down on commitments to abolish college fees. Martin vows to do 'everything we can' to reduce pressure on families ahead of Budget 2026 The Fine Gael leader said: 'There is still space to do things and yes, governments are about choices. 'I think if you reduce college fees by €1,000, it is roughly the equivalent of putting about €1.20 on each social welfare payment. Advertisement 'I'm not making judgement calls on these things, but I'm just saying that there are lots of things government does in budgets. 'What you do on a pension, what you do for carers, what you do for students, what you do for tax – all of these things need to be considered in the round. 'THEY WON'T BE FORGOTTEN' 'But one thing is for sure, hard working people who are getting up for work everyday, the squeezed middle, call them what you want – they won't be forgotten about. They can't be.' Opposition parties today claimed the coalition were flip-flopping on student fees as they called for clarity for families. Advertisement And they are organising a protest outside Leinster House next week with students to demand that the €1,000 cut to fees be made permanent. Labour leader Ivana Bacik said: 'It seems we are hurtling towards yet another U-turn from this chaotic Coalition. 'After flip-flops on Rent Pressure Zones and tax policy, the latest retreat involves a planned hike in college fees – revealed by Minister Lawless on national radio. 'The increase in student fees will hit families already struggling under the weight of rising costs, during a cost of living crisis." Advertisement 1 Harris messaged his party saying the Government will still abolish fees Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire
