Singaporeans say SG has gotten dirtier in recent years
'I notice a lot more litter at bus stops, along sheltered walkways, and in void decks. Usually, tissue paper, drink containers, and plastic trash. Of course, not saying our streets were once totally spotless, but I think it's time we reinforced the anti-littering campaign and stepped up education in schools and neighbourhoods. No point being a cleaned city rather than a clean one by habit,' wrote u/Davemel50 in a post on r/askSingapore on Jun 1 (Monday).
The top comment belonged to a Reddit user who lamented the state of many public bathrooms.
'It's indeed getting dirtier… especially toilets. I don't understand why coffee shops and hawker centre toilets can be so filthy. Like… why? And not to forget MRT toilets too,' they wrote.
Another chimed in to say that they've observed that there are fewer cleaners and trash bins.
'Usually, when I use the toilet in malls, there's a 50/50 chance I will see a cleaner, but not recently. Like, where did all the cleaners go? There are also fewer bins around. Foreigners are an easy scapegoat, and may in fact contribute, but (I don't think) they're the root of the issue. With public transport and places getting so crowded nowadays, Singaporeans and foreigners alike might be losing their patience. Cleanliness will be the last thing on their minds.'
In response to this, some have written that cleaners should be given better salaries to make the job more attractive to potential candidates.
'I hate to say this, but shopping mall toilets are reaching coffee shop and hawker toilet standards too… Anyhow throw their used tissues and empty packets on the floor too. The stench of urine is also terrible. I don't blame the cleaners for not wanting to wash up such dirty cubicles,' another added, writing that people who don't care about personal hygiene are to blame.
'100%. I lived in Singapore (from) 2013 to 2014 and was mesmerised at how clean the toilets everywhere were, not just those in the atas malls. Now, the majority are poorly made, dirty, and unclean. Big difference in just over 10 years,' wrote a commenter.
'Even little India and Chinatown were cleaner just a decade ago,' one pointed out.
A commenter from Vietnam wrote, '15 years ago, I heard SG was the cleanest city all around the world and went to SG for travel two times. I lived and worked here 1 year ago (basically newbie) but imo, SG got dirtier for real.'
When another expressed the concern that not only has it gotten dirtier, but they also believe that there are 'a lot more' rats, many agreed.
One pointed out, 'On the point of rats, I think that as cities age, they get dirtier. In the 2000s, our sewers were at most 10 to 20 years old for most HDB estates. Liken it to a human, Singapore was a teenager then. Now they're 40 to 50 years old. Our sewers become older, they will have more rats. New estates also do not really have rats.' /TISG
Read also: Jack Sim asks why millionaire coffee shop owner would be given a grant to clean toilets
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Number of atomic bomb survivors falls below 100,000 for first time
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Visitors stopping to look at the Atomic Bomb Dome in the centre of Hiroshima in June 28. TOKYO - The total number of officially recognised Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivors has fallen below 100,000 for the first time since the certification system began in fiscal 1957, government data showed July 1. The number of survivors holding a health book, which entitles the holder to free lifetime medical care, stood at 99,130 as at the end of March, down 7,695 from the previous year, according to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Their average age rose 0.55 years to 86.13. As the 80th anniversary of 1945 US atomic bombings and the end of World War II approach, questions are being raised about how best to support aging survivors and pass on their stories. According to the ministry, Hiroshima Prefecture had the highest number of health book holders at 48,310, followed by Nagasaki at 23,543 and Fukuoka at 3,957. There were around 200,000 health book holders in fiscal 1957, with the number peaking at over 372,000 in fiscal 1980 before beginning a steady decline. The number of holders fell below 300,000 in fiscal 1999, and 200,000 in fiscal 2013. Individuals are recognised as 'hibakusha,' or survivors of the atomic bombings, if they were within designated areas or in utero at the time of the attacks, entered either of the two cities within two weeks of the attacks, or were exposed to radiation under conditions likely to affect their health. While hibakusha are entitled to receive medical care and may receive allowances depending on their illnesses, there are some individuals who decide not to apply for the health book despite qualifying for fear of discrimination. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US Senate approves divisive Trump spending Bill World Trump escalates feud with Musk, threatens Tesla and SpaceX support Business Cathay Cineplexes gets demand for $3.4 million in arrears from Jem landlord Singapore 3,800 private candidates in Singapore to take O- and A-level exams in 2025 Business Binance to keep hundreds of staff in Singapore despite crackdown, sources say Sport FAS introduces 'enhancements' to SPL, with increase in prize money and foreign player quota Multimedia Right on track: Meet the new JB-Singapore RTS Link train World Trump urges Hamas to accept 'final proposal' for 60-day Gaza ceasefire In 2021, the Hiroshima High Court ruled that people exposed to radioactive 'black rain' outside the government-recognised area were eligible to receive health care benefits. The government updated their recognition criteria in 2022 as a result. KYODO NEWS
Independent Singapore
16 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Social worker, lab officer, speech therapist, librarian: Singaporeans who love their jobs share what they do for a living
SINGAPORE: A local Reddit user asked others on the platform who love their job what they do for a living — apparently in a bid to counter the usual negative talk about work, though that may be legitimate. In a post on r/askSingapore on Sunday (Jun 29), u/ piopiolink wrote, 'I love hearing people talk about why they enjoy doing what they do… makes me feel like being cynical or jaded is not the only way to be.' In 2022, when the National University of Singapore's (NUS) Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) conducted a survey on which careers are the most meaningful or fulfilling, it found more professionals, managers, executives, and technicians (PMET) tended to find purpose and meaning in their work than clerical or service workers and cleaners and labourers, Channel NewsAsia reported at the time. Most of those who commented on u/ piopiolink's post, however, did not necessarily fall into the PMET category. The most upvoted comment came from a laboratory officer, who wrote, 'Essentially, one of my duties includes preparing baby-sized blood bag for a newborn!! I enjoy doing it knowing it's gonna save a baby!!!!' Another came from a funeral director, who wrote that 'the thank yous and appreciation from families are always a feeling I hold close to my heart.' A social worker who admitted that their job comes with 'ups and downs' wrote, however, that they are 'still loving it,' complete with a heart emoji. In response, another social worker who works in the mosque sector added, 'I love what I'm doing too.' One chimed in to say they are a speech language therapist and that they 'absolutely love' what they do. A third agreed, writing, 'Social worker, I love my clients, and there's really no other job I'd rather do. The only thing I'd change about my job would be that we had more manpower to serve our clients; the need is much greater than what we have.' A Reddit user who also helps others weighed in to say, 'I help persons with disabilities to find jobs/internships, and I also conduct training workshops for companies that are keen to hire inclusively. I am a PWD (person with disability) myself, so I feel it's my calling to help build and contribute to a more inclusive Singapore :).' Another commenter who loves their job is a librarian, who wrote, 'I wake up each day and can't wait to get to work and be with my books muahaha.' Unlike in other parts of the world, some Singapore teachers say they love what they do. 'Taking pride to mould the next generation of SG!' wrote one, while another agreed and added, 'Hi-five! Honestly, one of the very best things is to really see and hear kids' perspectives on things. So refreshing! Love seeing the 'eureka!' moment light up their face when they understand a concept.' Another teacher, albeit one who works at a tuition centre, wrote, 'All the fun of teaching without too much admin work. Watching students actually improve and learn things that their schoolteachers neglect is very rewarding.' There was at least one commenter who works in a corporate setting who said they enjoy what they do. 'Business Analytics and Intelligence for a bank. More on the discovering insights side. It's like solving puzzles and finding answers that no one else can. I'm on the spectrum, so it fits me perfectly. I gladly work late and on weekends, cos it rejuvenates me.' /TISG Read also: Burnt-out S'porean looks for recommendations for jobs that are 'low-stress, not demanding or exploitative'
CNA
21 hours ago
- CNA
Certis says sick leave policy designed to address system misuse, not to penalise employees
SINGAPORE: Security firm Certis said on Tuesday (Jul 1) that its medical leave policy was designed to address instances of system misuse, and not to penalise employees. 'The aim is to ensure fairness and maintain operational readiness, especially amid ongoing challenges in recruiting and retaining officers in a tight labour market. The policy helps us address rostering challenges and mitigate manpower shortages, as we ensure the safety and well-being of our stakeholders,' said a spokesperson. Details of the company's sick leave policy made headlines recently, with requirements for staff to remain at home or to share their "live" location via digital devices. 'We wish to clarify that the policy applies only to our frontline officers. We conduct care visits only under compelling circumstances, such as when officers are on frequent or extended medical leave,' Certis said on Tuesday. 'These visits can be to the officers' homes, or to the hospitals if they are hospitalised. Furthermore, supervisors will remain available if our officers require any assistance.' The spokesperson added that the intent of such follow-ups was not punitive. It was instead to understand if its officers require further support and also to help manage manpower planning. 'In vast majority of the cases where medical leave is genuinely taken, such visits are often well-received by our officers,' said Certis. 'We have encountered a very small number of cases where individuals have misused medical leave. For instance, there have been situations where officers took MCs to travel overseas. These irresponsible behaviours affect overall team resourcing and are unfair to colleagues who need to cover additional shifts.' Certis also said that it understands that there have been rumours of employees being terminated solely as a result of non-compliance to these policies. 'We firmly reject these rumours. Termination of employment is decided upon the severity of an officer's misconduct, such as proven malingering, and only taken as a last resort after an extensive and fair process. 'Since recent media reports, Certis has been actively engaging with our union partner, the Union of Security Employee. We are working with USE to review the current processes around the care visits, and will partner them to strengthen our engagement with employees to ensure greater clarity around our policies and to reinforce our commitment to fair and respectful treatment of all staff.' The spokesperson added that Certis acknowledges its frontline roles can be physically demanding and challenging. 'We deeply value the efforts of our officers on the ground and recognise the importance of supporting their health and well-being.'
