New sentencing dates set for 5 former Memphis, Tennessee, officers in Tyre Nichols case
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Norris later recused himself from a $550 million lawsuit filed by Nichols' mother against the city of Memphis, the police chief and the officers. Lipman also took over that case.
Advertisement
Norris had overseen the case since federal indictments were issued in September 2023. He accepted guilty pleas from two of the officers and presided over the trial for the others in October.
A flurry of motions were filed under seal after the recusal, including a request by defense attorneys seeking a new trial. It was not clear if any of those filings asked for Norris to step away from the case. It is unusual for a judge to recuse themself from a case between the trial and sentencing.
Advertisement
The city of Memphis and its police chief, and the Daily Memphian news outlet, have filed motions to unseal the documents.
On Jan. 7, 2023, the officers yanked Nichols from his car, then pepper-sprayed and hit the 29-year-old Black man with a Taser. Nichols fled, and when the five officers, who also are Black, caught up with him, they punched, kicked and hit him with a police baton. Nichols called out for his mother during the beating, which took place just steps from his home.
Nichols died Jan. 10, 2023.
Footage of the beating captured by a police pole camera also showed the officers milling about, talking and laughing as Nichols struggled with his injuries — video that prompted intense scrutiny of police in Memphis.
The beating also sparked nationwide protests and prompted renewed calls for police reform. The five officers — Tadarrius Bean, Demetrius Haley, Emmitt Martin, Desmond Mills Jr., and Justin Smith — were fired from the police force and indicted in state and federal court.
Bean, Haley and Smith were found guilty in federal court in October of obstruction of justice through witness tampering related to an attempt to cover up the beating.
The officers failed to say that they or their colleagues punched and kicked Nichols and broke Memphis Police Department rules when they did not include complete and accurate statements about what type of force they used.
Bean and Smith were acquitted of more serious civil rights charges by the federal jury. Haley was found guilty of violating Nichols' civil rights by causing bodily injury and showing deliberate indifference to medical needs. He was also convicted of conspiracy to tamper with witnesses.
Advertisement
Bean, Haley and Smith were acquitted in May of all state charges, including second-degree murder.
Martin and Mills pleaded guilty in federal court last year to violating Nichols' civil rights by causing death and conspiracy to witness tamper. They did not stand trial in federal court with their former colleagues. Martin and Mills also avoided the trial in state court after reaching agreements to plead guilty there. Both Martin and Mills testified in the federal trial, and Mills also took the stand in the state trial.
The officers were part of a special unit
The officers were part of a crime suppression team called the Scorpion Unit that was disbanded weeks after Nichols died. The team targeted illegal drugs and guns and violent offenders, and sometimes used force against unarmed people.
In December, the U.S. Justice Department said a 17-month investigation showed the Memphis Police Department uses excessive force and discriminates against Black people. The investigation also found that the police department conducts unlawful stops, searches, and arrests.
In May, the Trump administration announced it was retracting the findings of Justice Department civil rights investigations of police departments, including Memphis, that were issued under the Biden administration.
The city has created a task force to address police department reforms. The task force has not announced any recommendations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
40 minutes ago
- Washington Post
He traveled to Italy to master this dying art. Now he's brought it back to Brooklyn.
Opinion | This is why the media should not replay viral videos of black men being killed June 10, 2020
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
This woman claims Air Canada discriminated against her in a case of ‘flying while Black.' Now her human rights complaint could set a precedent
Months after a knee surgery, June Francis booked a business-class flight from Vancouver for a conference in Toronto, the first leg of a work trip that would also include the U.S. and Peru. Having waited in the 'exceptionally long line' at check-in for business passengers, the 62-year-old Jamaican Canadian said she approached the economy area and attempted to ask an Air Canada staffer for help, out of concern about standing too long on her replaced knees. But what happened next would lead to a complaint that is believed to be the first case of 'flying while Black' that reaches a full hearing before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. According to the claim by Francis, an international business professor at Simon Fraser University, the following verbal exchange ensued between her and the Air Canada check-in agent on March 1, 2018, at Vancouver International Airport. 'I have a question. I am a business class passenger and the lineup is really long,' Francis said, as she quotes in her complaint. 'What is your advice to me …' 'Don't ask me,' the ticket agent cut her off and yelled. 'Just get in the line,' added the agent before tending to other passengers in what Francis described as 'a kind and caring manner.' Embarrassed and humiliated, Francis said she believed the Air Canada employee treated her differently because she was Black, and asked the agent to give her name or identifying number so she could report her 'outrageous' behaviour to management. When the agent refused, Francis took out her cellphone to photograph her. She said in her claim that was the only way of identifying the agent to a superior. For that, Francis later had her boarding pass taken away and was told by a customer service manager — accompanied by an airport security guard — that she would not be allowed on the flight unless she deleted the agent's photos. Feeling threatened, Francis complied. On Monday, more than seven years after the encounter — which the airline said was due to Francis's unruly behaviour — July 28 the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal will hear her discrimination case against Air Canada. At issue is whether Canada's Human Rights Act trumps the Montreal Convention, an international treaty that governs airline liability for international flights but does not provide for damages of any kind for discrimination. Francis and her counsel, Sujit Choudhry and Mani Kakkar, declined the Star's interview request, but issued a statement. 'This is a test case about Flying While Black in international air travel,' the statement said. 'It is also a crucial test case for the effectiveness of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It will decide if airlines can ever be liable to pay damages for discrimination for international flights.' Air Canada told the Star it is contesting Francis's allegations of discrimination and declined further comment. However, in its submissions to the tribunal, Air Canada said Francis ignored and refused instructions by its staff, and acted in 'an unruly manner,' escalating the situation 'unnecessarily.' 'A primary role and paramount objective of Air Canada's employees working a flight, including its check-in agents, is to ensure safety and security with respect to the ultimate boarding of passengers and the atmosphere in the cabin of the aircraft,' the airline said in a response to the tribunal. In her complaint, Francis said both the Air Canada supervisor and the security guard ignored her complaint of mistreatment and the reason for photographing the check-in agent. 'It became clear that both of these people were not interested in taking Dr. Francis's complaint seriously and had made their decision that Dr. Francis was at fault,' the claim said. 'The supervisor went so far as to say she could see the problem was because clearly Dr. Francis did not take direction.' According to the claim, Francis then asked which law was being broken by taking a picture in a public space, and the supervisor said she had a right to have it deleted because of the possibility of social media getting a hold of the image. Francis subsequently wrote to Air Canada and received a response that she said did not address the issues or indicate an investigation was undertaken. She said the airline did not contact her for her account of the event, nor did it contact a Caucasian passenger, who witnessed the interaction, tried to intervene and left his business card for reference. ('The supervisor changed her demeanour and behaved with a respectful manner toward this white male which she had not demonstrated in her behaviour toward Dr. Francis,' the complainant alleged.) In seeking damages in the amount of $40,000, Francis also requests Air Canada institute sensitivity training and training in unconscious bias, anti-racism and anti-sexism, as well conducting an audit of its services to ensure it treats racialized passengers with respect and sensitivity. In its defence, Air Canada said the check-in line agent requested the assistance of the manager because she was faced with a passenger who was 'demanding and unwilling and refusing to follow instructions' in an unusually busy check-in area. It said both the agent and the manager were of Asian descent. In its submission, the airline flagged the complainant's resumé, which included being the special adviser to Simon Fraser University's president on anti-racism, director of the university's Institute for Diaspora Research & Engagement, co-founder of its Black Caucus, and board chair of the Hogan's Alley Society, a group with the mandate to advance the economic and cultural well-being of people of African descent. 'There will be no evidence to support let alone prove 'anti-Black racism,' 'conscious and unconscious bias,' and 'systemic and institutional and structural racial discrimination,' ' Air Canada said in its defence. 'These allegations of the Complaint are disproportionate and untethered to the factual circumstances and serve to fit the agenda of the Complainant, whose career is focused on promoting these issues.' Air Canada also argued that the tribunal cannot award damages because a claim against an air carrier is governed by the Montreal Convention, which is a standard liability regime for death and injury, damage or loss of baggage and flight delay in international travel. Given Francis's itinerary, her journey was deemed international, said the airline. However, Choudhry, lawyer for Francis, argued in her submissions that Canada's Human Rights Act is a quasi-constitutional statute and must trump the Montreal Convention, which should be deemed unconstitutional if it denies the tribunal the power to award damages to victims of discrimination. 'Every person has a right to be free from discrimination in international travel,' said Francis's statement to the Star. 'For Canada's diasporas, international air travel is not a luxury. They must travel for family, economic and cultural reasons. They should be secure in the knowledge that if airlines discriminate against them, they have the right to damages.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Axios
4 hours ago
- Axios
Ex-Columbus officer faces murder sentencing
Former Columbus police officer Adam Coy — the city's first officer convicted of murder while on duty — is scheduled to be sentenced Monday. Why it matters: Coy is also the first officer convicted of murder while on duty in all of Ohio, according to a Bowling Green State University police violence database tracking crimes since 2005. The case marks an historic step in holding law enforcement accountable for deadly use of force. Catch up quick: A jury found Coy guilty on Nov. 4 in the 2020 death of 47-year-old Andre Hill, an unarmed Black man. Hill was holding a cell phone and keys inside a garage, which Coy told jurors he mistook for a gun. A Franklin County judge delayed Coy's sentencing after his attorneys unsuccessfully asked for a new trial. Coy, 48, faces a life sentence without the possibility of parole for at least 15 years. The big picture: A total of 209 officers nationwide have been arrested for on-duty murder or manslaughter since 2005, per BGSU's database. When officers are convicted, it's typically for a lesser crime, says professor Philip Stinson, who maintains the data. Of 72 convictions, just 10 were murder. Often, prosecutors struggle to get convictions because jurors hesitate to second-guess officers' split-second decisions, Stinson tells Axios. Despite more attention on police violence in recent years, he says there hasn't been a "statistically significant" difference in convictions. Between the lines: A key factor in Coy's case is not giving Hill first aid, which body cameras recorded, says Timothy Dimoff, a law enforcement procedures expert from Northeast Ohio. Coy's conviction will undoubtedly show law enforcement to "err in the area of caution instead of blowing it off" regarding medical assistance, Dimhoff says. Flashback: Columbus City Council passed " Andre's Law" in 2020, requiring officers to render immediate first aid if they injure someone. Hill's family also got a $10 million settlement. What's next: Today's sentencing could serve as a police violence deterrent, and it could raise prosecutors' confidence in bringing charges forward in the future, California civil rights attorney Adanté Pointer tells Axios. The bottom line:"This also sends a message to the officers doing it, right? The police department and the judicial system will not tolerate those officers who abuse the badge," Pointer says. Other Central Ohio police violence cases Nov. 3: Blendon Township deputy Connor Grubb, who faces charges in the fatal shooting of Ta'Kiya Young in 2023. Dec. 8: Former Franklin County deputy Jason Meade, who is charged in the 2020 killing of Casey Goodson Jr.
