logo
Bridget Jones or gorefests for Valentine's? The secret science of film release dates

Bridget Jones or gorefests for Valentine's? The secret science of film release dates

Telegraph14-02-2025
The milkshake hit the glass office door, erupting on impact. At least, that's how the story goes – a tale whispered around Hollywood about a well-known director, who, years ago, is said to have lost his temper in a meeting with the studio bankrolling his next blockbuster.
He'd just been told that the studio's plans had shifted – the film would now be hitting cinemas a few months later than originally agreed. Outraged by this change, the filmmaker flew into a rage, and the contents of his strawberry shake flew across the wall. Rumour has it he stormed out through a door streaked sugary pink, muttering something about sabotage.
Whether true or an industry myth, this story speaks to the sensitivity of feeling in the industry around one of the most crucial parts of the Hollywood machine.
The release date calendar – what films are released in cinemas when – is, in the words of movie distribution expert Hamish Moseley, 'frantic and fascinatingly complex… kind of like air traffic control,' he laughs.
A film's release date can dictate whether it sinks or soars. It can influence what sort of awards season recognition it receives. And with multiplex attendances continuing to decline and the future of the entire theatrical distribution model under threat as distractions like streaming and social media grow in popularity, more rests on this calendar than ever before.
'You need to get the date right. If you get the date wrong then you are really hobbled from the start,' says Moseley, who previously worked as Director of Distribution for Netflix in Europe, the Middle East and Africa (prior to that, he oversaw the UK releases of films like Moonlight, Minari, The Woman in Black and Lady Macbeth). There's 'definitely an art' to how films are scheduled, he says, but it's an art that passes most movie fans by unnoticed.
Look at the movie listings for the year ahead. It's easy to guess why Bridget Jones: Mad About the Boy, hitting cinemas this week, has been given a February 13 launch – the Renée Zellweger franchise has long grappled with the foibles of singledom and quest for true love, making it the perfect comfort watch for filmgoers going through their own romantic trials and tribulations this Valentine's Day.
Similarly, you don't need a PHD to work out why Jurassic World: Rebirth is roaring into cinemas on July 2, primed to take a meaty bite out of the box office during Independence Day weekend. The biggest studio blockbusters are historically always released in the summer because 'the summer represents the longest period of holidays and most simultaneous holidays globally, and therefore the largest possible audience for a movie during both opening and playout,' says Veronika Kwan Vandenberg, President of Distribution for Universal.
Less immediately apparent, though, is why January and February sees such an explosion in horror movie releases so far away from Halloween (Drew Hancock's Companion and Oz Perkins's upcoming Stephen King adaptation The Monkey are among this spring's batch of blood-splattered gorefests). Or why, after winning Best Picture at the Oscars with his last film, Parasite, Korean filmmaker Bong Joon-ho's Mickey 17 has been shifted around so many times, with a March 7 release now seemingly locked in.
A lot of it is to do with timing, reflecting back moviegoers' emotional states attached to particular times of the year and when the demographic of your film is primed and ready for a trip to the multiplex. Get the timing of a movie right and a smash hit potentially awaits. 'Dating a film in the right corridor to optimise theatrical success is the most important consideration,' Kwan Vandenberg explains, adding that it 'dictates how successful the film will be across its whole lifecycle'.
Time a release incorrectly, however, and you're in danger of losing millions. Solo: A Star Wars Story, for example, was given a May 10 2018 release date after a run of Star Wars movies released during the busy Christmas period, which generated billions.
'Solo failed for a lot of reasons, one of them absolutely being complacency when it came to the release window,' says one person familiar with the production, speaking anonymously to protect their relationship with Disney. 'Putting it out in May meant competing with Deadpool 2, released a week earlier. All while Avengers: Infinity War was still breaking box office records. That's a lot of competition for a film going after the same young comic book, fanboy audience, coming so soon after the last dose of Star Wars, which historically has always been event cinema – not something released every six months.'
This source suggests that moving the release date a few months further into the summer 'might have made all the difference' when it came to the movie's box office. (With directors often paid a percentage of their movie's total profits, an agreement known as 'back end,' no wonder the occasional milkshake goes flying.)
Situations like Solo are why studios operate with a 'certain pragmatism,' as Moseley calls it, when it comes to scheduling their movies around other films that might attract similar demographics. 'There's an understanding that [film] is actually a relatively small industry and we need to help each other out for the greater good of the industry. Because if we have a lot of very large films failing, that's not good for the industry at large,' he explains.
'If a major contender targeted at a similar audience is already dated on a weekend, it [would be] a calculated risk for us to claim the same date,' adds Vandenberg – especially given the boom in popularity around seeing huge cinematic productions like Dune Part II in Imax format. 'There are only so many [Imax] screens,' says Moseley, leading to situations like the stand-off between 2023's Mission: Impossible: Dead Reckoning and Christopher Nolan's Oppenheimer, released 10 days apart, minimising the amount of 'premium format' showings the Tom Cruise action spectacle could offer audiences and harming its overall box office.
This process of 'slot jockeying' blockbuster releases begins to take shape years in advance. 'The larger the film, the earlier on the release date is confirmed,' says Moseley, explaining how this is in part down to the large financial overlay attached to blockbusters. 'If there's a big film like Oppenheimer that Universal have paid hundreds of millions for, and know that they're going to invest another few hundred million into for marketing and PR, that's an incredibly important part of their budget for the whole company for the next few years. And so they need to time that carefully.'
Among their considerations as these blockbusters are placed into the movie calendar are all sorts of cultural distractions that might see the film struggle to find an audience. 'The new Grand Theft Auto game coming out this year is a once-in-a-decade enormous event that will wipe out the young male demographic,' says Moseley. 'We know they're going to invest heavily in that game and play it for a period of time in which they'll probably stop going to see films.'
'We do take cultural events into consideration,' says Vandenberg, pointing to sport events like the World Cup as examples. 'We date around certain [football tournaments] depending on each market and how soccer-crazy it is, but we don't avoid those corridors [entirely] since they are still lucrative holiday periods.'
Some cultural events, though, have less obvious blueprints for how to navigate. In November 2024, America was due to vote in an election dubbed one of the most consequential of all-time by political commentators. 'Will people not go to the movies because they'll be distracted by the election?' asks Moseley, as an example of the sort of questions facing studio decision-makers. 'Or would it be a great time, because people want the escape? Is it not worth doing because you can't get the word of mouth out there? The media spend in the run-up to the election by Trump and Harris would have been in the billions – meaning there was probably little traditional media [TV ad slots] left to buy to promote your film.'
Ultimately, Hollywood steered clear entirely; no major releases hit cinemas the week that America went to the polls, a decision reflective of how 'everyone is scared to make a mistake,' Moseley says.
Once the huge tent pole films have their release dates slotted into the calendar, the rest of the movie industry begins a process of 'okay, you're there, so we'll go here,' as Moseley puts it. 'Counter programming is a big thing. January is a big time for awards season contenders like Anora and The Brutalist. But to a lot of people who just want to be entertained, those films feel like taking medicine. They don't want to see Bradley Cooper in black and white, they want to see Jason Statham kicking bad guys' heads in. So there's actually a tradition during the awards window of dumb action films doing very well.' He points to movies like current hits Den of Thieves 2 and Mel Gibson's Flight Risk as examples of this.
Problems are mounting for Hollywood, whose 2024 domestic gross totalled just $8.56 billion – a four per cent decline from 2023. With $1.3 billion of that amount courtesy of just one film (Deadpool & Wolverine), it's clearly harder than ever to convince audiences to fork out for cinema tickets, petrol and parking when they're already paying for streaming services at home. This leaves little room for margin when it comes to the movie release calendar, admits Moseley. Luckily, studios have a weapon to help them fight back: a more sophisticated understanding of audience demographics than ever before, and a willingness to try new things.
For example, the reason why so many horror movies are in cinemas right now, such as Universal's Wolfman, is because 2022's surprise smash M3GAN revealed that 'horror films are great date movies,' he chuckles. 'And so horror films can often do very well around Valentine's Day. That took a long time to figure out.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Critical: Between Life and Death reveals extent of Lambeth fairground crash
Critical: Between Life and Death reveals extent of Lambeth fairground crash

Daily Mirror

time8 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Critical: Between Life and Death reveals extent of Lambeth fairground crash

Critical: Between Life and Death follows the trauma teams at various London hospitals as they tend to injured patients - including those involved in the Lambeth Country Fair crash Netflix' s latest docuseries Critical: Between Life and Death arrives on the streamer tonight, taking viewers behind the scenes at Royal London Hospital as NHS trauma teams attempt to save patients with life-threatening injuries. ‌ The hard-working unit is thrown into a dire situation from the first few minutes, with several patients fighting for their lives after being injured at a fairground in Brockwell Park. Four people were left with serious injuries in June last year when a fairground ride at the Lambeth Country Show malfunctioned. ‌ "I saw heads and bodies crash into the railings, like crash test dummies," Claire Collins - who witnessed her sister Alison and Alison's boyfriend Nick sustain injuries from the incident - tells the Netflix documentary. ‌ "I immediately jumped up onto the ride, and my sister and Nick were still in their seats. The whole of the side of Nick's face was basically open. Just this big hole. It looked so, so serious. I was really concerned he wasn't going to make it." With Critical: Between Life and Death looking into the aftermath of the horrific incident, here's everything you need to know about what happened at the Lambeth Country Show. What happened at the Lambeth Country Show fairground? ‌ The Lambeth Country Show hit the headlines last year, when a fairground ride failed and people were thrown through the air. Four people were rushed to hospital as a result of the incident, with emergency services being alerted at 6:20pm on Saturday 8 June 2024. One eyewitness told the MailOnline at the time: "People were running towards us and crying and screaming ... Saw a lady with blood streaming down her face. She had paramedics carrying her off the ride." While another said: "I am told a ride collapsed and all hell broke loose. It was horrific. The screams were terrible. Four people flew off and went through the air. It was like a horror movie." A spokesperson for Lambeth Council said at the time that a "thorough" investigation was being carried out into the cause of the malfunction. "The situation is being closely monitored. The area around the ride is secure and the funfair has been closed ... Additional safety inspections are being carried out on all rides and attractions at the show," a spokesperson said. ‌ Those who attended the fair soon took to social media to warn others, with one writing on X: "They need to shut the whole thing down. Do not take your kids, do not go on any of the rides. I am scarred for life. I really hope they are OK. My wife was physically sick. Saw the air ambulance coming over about 15 minutes after it happened." The Metropolitan Police later said in a statement: "Emergency services responded at around 6.20pm on Saturday to a fairground ride having failed at the Lambeth Country Show in Brockwell Park. Four people have been taken to hospital. We await an assessment of their conditions. Nobody is trapped on the ride. ‌ "Enquiries are under way to establish the circumstances. Cordons are in place at the location. The Health & Safety Executive will be informed." Among those injured was Alison Collins, who was left fighting for her life in the hospital after suffering horrific injuries. Meanwhile, her boyfriend Nick was also admitted to the hospital after suffering injuries to his face and head. Silvana, 11, was also admitted to the hospital with injuries to her legs, pelvis and lower back, while her grandfather, Sebastiano, sustained a broken nose. During the incident, Sebastiano threw himself between Silvana and a flying speaker, which smashed into his face. 'I was given a bag with my dad's things, like his ring,' Sebastiano's daughter Marcia told The Mirror. "It was covered in blood." ‌ Just weeks after the incident, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) launched an investigation into the ride failure. They said that the ride was being "forensically examined by specialists". HSE inspector Stacey Gamwell said in July last year: "We will continue to thoroughly investigate what happened and determine whether there were any breaches of health and safety law at the time of this incident. "Once we have finished our investigation, a decision will then be made on whether formal enforcement is required in line with our enforcement policy. We remain in contact with those affected by the ride's malfunction and will keep them updated throughout our investigation." What happened to the victims? ‌ While Critical: Between Life and Death viewers will see that Alison's skull fracture and chest injuries were a cause of concern, both she and her boyfriend Nick made a full recovery. Speaking in the documentary, Alison said: "Everybody tells me that when I started to come around, I was sort of talking a load of rubbish and generally, I'm sort of quite good with memory and words. "Initially, I was told that I would probably be in hospital for five or six weeks. I was stuck in a bed, and didn't even know if I could walk. When can I get out of here? In reality, I managed to get better a lot quicker. So I came out of hospital, I think, after two and a half weeks." ‌ Nick's recovery took slightly longer. "It's the last thing you think is going to happen when you go to a country fair, that you'll be in hospital for a few months. It brings it home to you, how lucky we are to have the NHS and critical care when something goes wrong. The skill involved in the surgeon who repaired my face - which to me is absolutely astounding." Alison added: "It's been challenging but we cheated death so we look forward." Sebastiano suffered multiple fractures to his nose but was discharged from hospital, while Silvana's injuries were also not life-threatening. "Well, end of the day, I feel lucky," he told the documentary. "Very lucky." Sebastiano's daughter Marcia said that her family worked with the fun fair and it has now left their business in limbo. 'In a way, we're out of work but we go to different locations.' And her family have made a huge decision: 'My brother said, 'I'm never taking the kids to a fun fair ride again.'

The trouble with Gillian Anderson
The trouble with Gillian Anderson

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

The trouble with Gillian Anderson

Imagine, for a moment, that a respected middle-aged British male character actor – Jason Isaacs, let's say – had been cast in the lead role of a sex therapist in a popular, Gen Z-focused Netflix series, called something like Love Lessons. Then imagine that Isaacs had become seemingly so obsessed with blurring the lines between himself and his character that he had not only edited a book about men's sexual fantasies, anonymously including one of his own in there, too, but had begun a secondary career appearing on podcasts in which he encouraged men to freely discuss their peccadilloes and penchants, however taboo they might seem. It would, of course, never happen – not even for a man as likeable as Isaacs. Yet something very similar has taken place with his Salt Path and Sex Education co-star Gillian Anderson, a woman who seems to have turned into her Sex Education character Jean Milburn, only with added froideur and grandeur. (Her Instagram profile, where she boasts 3.5 million followers, describes her as 'Actor. Author. Activist. Dog Mum.') When Anderson recently appeared on Davina McCall's podcast Begin Again, the blurb gushed that 'this episode is about giving yourself permission to explore your wildest fantasies, the power of desire and the importance of asking what you truly WANT – not only in the bedroom but in LIFE!' The territory of mum-fluencer of a certain age is hardly unknown, and Anderson cannot be blamed for embracing extra-curricular activities. Her most recent book, 2024's Want, was a bestseller on both sides of the Atlantic, and she has segued smoothly into a career that has encompassed television, film and theatre, as well, now, as that of author. (We will draw a tactful veil over the trio of fantasy novels, The Earthend Saga, that she co-authored, or at least put her lucrative name to, between 2014 and 2016.) She is one of the best-known actresses in Britain, thanks to her star-making role in The X Files and her subsequent high profile, and remains a sought-after A-list guest at any party or soirée. So why, then, is Gillian Anderson so difficult to warm to? Most actors try and give an impression of warmth and likeability in press interviews and in public appearances on things like The Graham Norton Show. Even if, privately, they detest everyone around them and consider themselves part of a rarified species, they have been given extensive media training to make themselves seem down-to-earth and accessible. Anderson, however, has gone entirely the other way. If ever she is compelled to appear on a chat show, she wears an air of regal hauteur that suggests that she regards the whole affair as deeply beneath her, and carries this sense of superiority into interviews. Journalists use the words 'frosty' or 'steely' in profiles about her; a polite way of describing someone who clearly has little interest in ingratiating herself with those who she finds beneath her. If Anderson's work was consistently extraordinary, she might be forgiven much of this aloofness. Many of the greatest actors in history could not be described as 'nice', from Marlene Dietrich to Tommy Lee Jones. Anderson would also probably argue that it is a misogynistic canard that she should have to be seen as warm and fuzzy because she is a woman. She might, of course, be right, but the difficulty is that she is a variable screen talent, to say the least. Anderson was indeed magnificent in Terence Davies's little-seen Edith Wharton adaptation The House of Mirth, and gave very fine performances indeed in both the BBC's adaptation of Bleak House and the serial killer drama The Fall, which both made use of her icy beauty and cool intelligence. But she was devastatingly bad as Margaret Thatcher in the fourth series of The Crown, pitching her performance just this side of pantomime in an apparent attempt to convince viewers that she, herself, was nothing like this dreadful woman that she was playing, and that she didn't share an iota of her politics or thoroughly reprehensible views. By the time that Anderson popped up in Sex Education, an enjoyable if silly show that overstayed its welcome, it was clear that she had come to regard herself as a Great British Institution; ironic, really, for a woman born in Chicago and who rose to prominence playing American characters. So it is amusing that her most recent performance may yet turn out to be one of her most controversial. Anderson and Isaacs played Raynor and Moth Winn, the beleaguered protagonists of The Salt Path, in the successful film adaptation of the book, which has since run into trouble after the revelations that Winn had been more than a little economical with the actualité. Ironically, Anderson had already inadvertently conveyed her own misgivings about Winn, saying in an interview that: 'I was surprised at how guarded she was…it was interesting to encounter a certain steeliness.' Or, indeed, a fear that being lifted to another level of recognition altogether would lead to her subsequent exposure by the Observer. Anderson has not commented publicly on the scandal, and it is unlikely that she will be prepared to do so until it is settled one way or the other. Yet were she to break her silence, and admit that she felt annoyed, even betrayed, by the undeniably embarrassing situation, it would be a rare chink in the armour of this ice queen, sex therapist and, it would appear, all-round Renaissance woman. Just a tinge of vulnerability, you cannot help thinking, would make the Magnificent Anderson that bit more human, and therefore likeable. Whether it will ever happen, however, is a mystery worthy of Agent Scully's investigative powers.

Sick of And Just Like That? Try Sex and the City: The Movie instead
Sick of And Just Like That? Try Sex and the City: The Movie instead

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Sick of And Just Like That? Try Sex and the City: The Movie instead

It's a rite of passage. Some stole late-night glimpses when they snuck into the lounge room while their mother watched it. Others gobbled it up on a laptop in bed. For gen Z, many first encountered Sex and the City via meme pages dedicated to digitally archiving the best outfits, best quotes or most problematic storylines from the HBO series that followed the misadventures of Carrie (Sarah Jessica Parker), Samantha (Kim Cattrall), Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) and Charlotte (Kristin Davis). Then, when the series landed internationally on Netflix last year, gen Z got properly acquainted – and much to the surprise of their millennial elders, they didn't hate it. The original show remains timeless. And rather than suffer through the increasingly deranged overtures of its revival And Just Like That, newer fans may do well to revisit an earlier sequel – Sex and the City: The Movie. Released in 2008, it aligned perfectly with a cinema boom for millennial women, where moviegoing was done in groups, usually supplemented by themed drinks and food. It was also panned viciously by critics, who called it shallow and bloated – though this Sex and the City diehard thinks it deserves a reappraisal. It picks up where the series finale left off, providing a very neat synopsis of the intervening years. Carrie is still dating her on-again, off-again beau, Big. Charlotte and her husband Harry have adopted their daughter Lily. Samantha has moved to LA to manage her movie star boyfriend Smith's career. And Miranda has moved to – quelle horreur – Brooklyn. Granted, there are a lot of things wrong with this film. Like its 142-minute run time, which is at least 90 minutes too long. Or its farcical series of events: a near-wedding, a breakup, a pregnancy, a tragically horny dog, some questionable product placement, a trip to Mexico that leads to a faecal incident, and then an actual wedding. Or that every character's life seems to revolve around Carrie in a far more egregious way than the series. Or that they fat-shame Samantha for putting on a couple of kilos. If the series was barely concealed lifestyle porn for millennial women, the movie makes no attempt at justifying the absurdity of these people's lives. The clothes are even flashier, the real estate is more lavish, and their personal problems are always solved by money. But beneath the excess, Sex and the City: The Movie works when it zeroes in on the ways that its central quartet continually show up for each other. Samantha feeds Carrie yoghurt after she hasn't left her bed for two days. Miranda opens her door on New Year's Eve to a breathless Carrie, who's run across the city to get there before midnight to tell her, 'You're not alone.' When Charlotte runs into the man who's betrayed her friend, her face cracks open in feral rage. 'I curse the day you were born!' she screams. The movie, like the show, only makes sense when it's exploring the inexplicable bonds among these four women and what it means to be a true friend. One of the most emotionally brutal scenes in the movie is when Miranda and Carrie go out for dinner on Valentine's Day – sans suitors. Carrie is heartbroken; Miranda has a guilty secret to confess. When it all spills over into a fight in the middle of the restaurant, it feels genuinely tragic: a failure of communication so familiar it stings. It's one of the most believable moments in the movie; Parker and Nixon capture the agony of friendship so naturally it almost feels improvised. Crucially, the film can stand on its own. You don't need to have an encyclopaedic knowledge of Carrie's past boyfriends. You don't need to know that Samantha once dated a lesbian artist, or that Charlotte and Harry met because of her divorce, or that Miranda once yelled at a man, 'I'm no Mena Suvari but I'm great in bed!' You can get through Sex and the City: The Movie without knowing what any of those things mean and still understand what this movie is about: four women who help each other as they constantly renegotiate their relationships with men. It's a perfect paean to imperfect friendships. Sex and the City: The Movie is available to stream on Binge and Prime Video in Australia, Netflix in the UK and HBO Max in the US. For more recommendations of what to stream in Australia, click here

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store