
Hugh Grant blasts 'pathetic' schools for feeding children's screen addictions as he demands laptops and tablets are removed from classrooms
The Hollywood star and father-of-five made the call at a campaigning event at a school in west London, as he also criticised education chiefs for bars on children playing outside.
Notting Hill and Four Weddings And A Funeral star Grant, 64, accused schools of making 'pathetic' calls on what their students were allowed to do.
And he described himself as 'another angry parent fighting the eternal, exhausting and depressive battle with children who only want to be on a screen'.
He took part in the move organised by group Close Screens, Open Minds - appearing alongside US psychologist Dr Jonathan Haidt as well as actress Sophie Winkleman who is wed to King Charles 's second cousin Lord Frederick Windsor.
The event took place at Knightsbridge School in west London, a nearby district to Kensington where Grant has previously owned homes including a penthouse that was advertised for sale for almost £8million in 2021.
Some 98 per cent of teachers now use technology in classrooms across primary and secondary schools
Grant, who has been married since 2018 to Swedish TV producer Anna Eberstein, lambasted classroom Chromebooks for pupils as 'the last f***ing thing they need'.
Laptops and phones are available in primary and secondary school classrooms to nine out of ten pupils, according to a Department for Education report in 2023.
Grant appeared at the event alongside Dr Haidt, who wants schools to phone-free as well as a ban on mobiles for those aged under 14 and under-16s to be prevented from using social media.
Dr Haidt said there should be a role for technology in schools but 'not on children's desks', the Telegraph reported.
And Grant was quoted as expressing his frustration about the treatment of pupils, saying: 'The final straw was when the school started saying, with some smugness, we give every child a Chromebook.
'And they do a lot of lessons on their Chromebook, and they do all their homework on their Chromebook, and you just thought that is the last f***ing thing they need, and the last thing we need.'
Grant also criticised what he described as the 'kind of ridiculous posh private schools' attended by his children for allegedly restricting outdoor play.
He said: 'They're the ones saying they're not going to play outside today because it's raining, or they can't go on the climbing frame because it's windy.
'It's pathetic - it seems to me that there is space here for a hero school, a set of schools, to break the mould.'
Meanwhile, Peep Show sitcom actress Winkleman, said: 'We were sold a dream that technology would revolutionise education, personalise learning and prepare kids for a digital future. Billions of dollars and pounds later, where are we?
'Test scores are plummeting globally. The increased screen use is damaging children's health.
'Pupils are resorting to ChatGPT to write their essays, and teachers are employing AI to mark them, which begs the question, what's the point of school?'
And Dr Haidt told the event at Knightsbridge School: 'Test scores began going down after 2012 - I don't know if it's because of the phones, or because that's when we put iPads and Chromebooks on kids' desks.
'Whatever it is, as soon as we brought in the EdTech, scores plunged.'
MailOnline has contacted representatives for Hugh Grant for further comment.
His calls come after the Children's Commissioner earlier this month suggested that smartphone use should be restricted for children outside of school to keep them safe 'beyond the classroom'.
She spoke out as a new survey of 19,000 schools and colleges found that the vast majority already restricted mobile phone use during the school day.
Dame Rachel de Souza said stronger action was needed to protect children 'outside of the school gates', including restricting smartphone use and a possible social media ban for under-16s.
A poll of children aged between eight and 15 also found that almost one in four spent more than four hours each day using a computer, phone, tablet or games console.
Some 69 per cent of children devote more than two hours daily to electronic devices, while six per cent even said they used them more than six hours a day, the YouGov survey reported.
Dame Rachel said: 'These children are not spending these hours on their phones while sat in school. It goes much wider than that.
'If we want to protect children, we must broaden our focus beyond school gates and ensure they are safe online at all times.'
Schools in England were given non-statutory Government guidance in February last year intended to restrict the use of phones during the school day.
Meanwhile, Labour was last month accused of 'capitulating' to tech giants and 'betraying our children' by 'gutting' laws that would have included a ban on smartphones in schools.
Proposed legislation, known as the Safer Phones Bill, has been introduced to Parliament by Labour backbencher Josh McAlister.
The Bill aims to protect under-16s from addictive social media content on sites like TikTok and Snapchat and prevent them 'doom scrolling' on their phones.
Majority of young peole support stricter rules on social media - poll
The majority of young people support the idea of placing stricter rules on social media, with more than 60 per cent saying they believe it does more harm than good.
A study from new think tank The New Britain Project and polling firm More in Common found that three-quarters of those aged 16 to 24 said stronger rules were needed to protect young people from social media harms, and social media was named as the most negative influence on teens' mental health.
According to the research, which surveyed more than 1,600 16-to-24-year-olds, 55 per cent said social media had gotten worse in the last five years, with 62 per cent saying it has become less safe for young people.
Four out of five young people also said they would try to keep their own children off social media for as long as possible.
In general, young women were more negative about social media than young men, and half of all young people said they regretted time spent on their phones while growing up.
Luke Tryl, executive director at More in Common, said: 'Far from feeling empowered by smartphones and social media this research shows that many Gen Z Britons regret the time they spent on their devices and wish they'd waited longer to access social media - so much so they would try and keep their own children off social media for as long as possible - but they personally now feel they would struggle to quit.'
If passed into law, it would instruct UK chief medical officers to publish advice for parents on the use of smartphones and social media by children.
It would also compel ministers to say within a year whether they plan to raise the age at which children can consent for their data to be shared without parental permission.
But Mr MacAlister and the Government today faced anger over the watering-down of his initial proposals following talks with ministers.
The Whitehaven and Workington MP had originally planned for his private members' bill to call for a legal requirement to make all schools in England mobile-free zones.
Mr MacAlister also wanted to commit the Government to review further regulation of the design, supply, marketing and use of smartphones by under-16s.
As MPs debated the Bill's second reading, Tory MP Kit Malthouse claimed the officially-titled Protection of Children Bill was now a 'hollowed-out gesture'.
The former education secretary told the House of Commons he lamented 'the gutting of what could have been a landmark Bill'
Mr Malthouse claimed the Government had 'dithered, diluted and capitulated', adding: 'We should all be furious about this.
'We should all be furious about the delay and the prevarication that is being injected into what could have been a huge step forward for parents and children.
'I cannot then understand why the Government has pressured (Mr MacAlister) to produce what is, frankly, a cosmetic plug, betraying our children and capitulating to big tech.
'I'm afraid this Bill is a shell of what it could have been, and as a result, is yet another missed opportunity to improve the lives of our young people.'
Fellow Tory MP Sir Ashley Fox said he suspected a Government whip had told Mr MacAlister 'he had a very promising career ahead of him should he agree to do the right thing and water this legislation down to the point where it doesn't actually do very much at all'.
Intervening, Mr MacAlister said: 'Private members' Bills are often a shot in the dark, and my aim from the beginning of this process has been, yes, to have the national debate.
'But also to put all of my energy on landing this with some action and progress.'
Speaking in support of his Bill, Mr MacAlister - a former teacher - told MPs that the average 12-year-old spends 21 hours a week on their smartphone
'This is a fundamental rewiring of childhood itself and it's happened in little over a decade,' he added.
'We must act on excessive screen time today in the same way we acted on smoking back then, and like debates that were had on smoking and car seatbelts, it took a process of legislation rather than one 'big bang' event.
'That's why starting today with these initial steps and then following them through with major action soon will be so important.'
Data protection minister Sir Chris Bryant said he was 'not going to make any arguments today against action'.
'Everybody accepts that action is inevitable in this sphere,' he added.
Sir Chris said the Government was working to implement the already-passed Online Safety Act 'as fast as we possibly can'
A proposed bill aims to protect under-16s from addictive social media content on sites such as TikTok and Snapchat and prevent them 'doom scrolling' on their phones
He added that illegal content codes will come into force this month, with new duties on social media companies to detect and remove some content including child sexual abuse and terrorism material.
He said children's safety codes are 'nearly finalised', and told the Commons that the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology was running a feasibility study into the impact of smartphones and social media.
That is due to report in May, so ministers 'have all the information that we need to make a considered view', Sir Chris added.
MPs agreed to adjourn the debate, which was listed to resume on July 11.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Cat Deeley 'terrified' over shooter scare that prompted UK return before marriage split
Cat Deeley has spoken on occasion about her husband Patrick Kielty and one of their sons having been caught up in a shooter scare in a shopping mall when they lived in the US Presenter Cat Deeley said that her husband Patrick Kielty and one of their sons getting caught up in a shooter scare was a "catalyst" for them deciding to leave the US. They later moved back to the UK after the "terrifying" incident. Cat, 48, and Patrick, 54, who announced their separation this week, returned to London with their two children back in 2020. The former couple, who have been married since 2012, had previously lived in Los Angeles for years. The family's relocation is said to have been prompted by Patrick and their eldest son Milo, who was three at the time, ending up in a "really scary" situation, with Cat's comments about the experience resurfacing recently. It comes amid the news that Cat found moving back to London "really hard" despite her having concerns about her life in LA. Cat spoke about the mall incident in an interview published in 2019. Speaking to the Telegraph just "a month or so" after it happened, she said: "They had been in a Shake Shack in Century City Mall and there was a shooter scare." She said that people were told to lie behind the counter or "pushed" into toilets, adding that there was screaming and crying in the mall. Cat continued by telling the outlet: "Then as they were all hiding, the FBI turned up with guns." Cat added: "Paddy kept Milo calm – he didn't really know what was going on – and in the end it just turned out to be a suspect package but …" She's said to have shook her head before saying that her three-year-old had experienced that. She's since spoken on the incident on other occasions too, including in an interview with You magazine in 2020. She recalled: "They shut down the centre. I got a call from Paddy, saying, 'They're taking us out through the fire exits but nobody can get to their car. If we walk to a junction, can you come and get us?'" Cat said that she hadn't understood the "enormity" of the situation as her husband was trying to keep their son calm, adding that he distracted him with Peppa Pig on his phone. She said: "As I was driving I began to see helicopters, news vans, firemen and SWAT squads." She described the situation as "terrifying" but said her son "didn't properly understand". Speaking on ITV 's Lorraine later that year, Cat said that the incident contributed to them returning to the UK. She said: "It was kind of the catalyst." She said: "[Paddy] and Milo were stuck in a shopping centre [and] I had to go and pick them up." Cat then continued: "I didn't know quite where they were. There was helicopters and police vans and news crews. It was terrifying, for me. [...] Everybody was y'know safe and fine, it was completely okay but it was terrifying for me." She however shared that the couple had "always" planned to move their kids to the UK at some point, so that they could be closer to grandparents and other relatives. Cat said: "It's such a special moment in time and you don't get those times back again. So we had always thought we would bring them back here so they could know everybody in the family and friends." And speaking to the Sunday Times last year, Cat said that she found the experience to be "really scary". The outlet reported that there had been rumours of a shooter in the area but that it turned out to be over a suspect package. Cat commented: "I found that really scary." She added in the interview: "Then we'd go to look at schools and they say, 'This is the safe room and this is the drill if we have a live shooter on the premises.' It was very, very difficult."


Telegraph
16 hours ago
- Telegraph
Notting Hill residents ‘trapped in homes' by counter-terror concrete blocks
Notting Hill residents are taking legal action after being being 'imprisoned' in their houses by concrete barriers set up to prevent terror attacks. Kensington and Chelsea Borough Council put in place controversial ' hostile vehicle mitigation ' measures down Portobello Road as part of counter-terrorism guidance issued by the Metropolitan Police. The large concrete bollards and temporary barriers are dotted along the famed street in an effort to protect residents, traders and tourists from potential vehicle-based terror attacks. Residents of Portobello Road – which played a starring role in the Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts romantic comedy film Notting Hill – are now launching a legal challenge against the council. Law firm Broadfield, which represents the residents, claim the new security barriers were introduced without consultation and effectively stop residents accessing their homes by vehicle between 10am and 4pm every day of the week. They claim affected parties include elder and infirm individuals, young families, doctors and local shop and market traders. Patrick Somers, a resident involved in the legal action said: 'We feel trapped in our houses.' He described that in order to get access in or out of their street 'you have to drive to the barrier and just sort of wait for someone in a high-vis to turn up'. Philippe van den Abeele, who lives on the road, argued he should have the right to park in front of his own house. 'There are better ways of securing the road, like bollards that go up and down, much nicer. But the council just doesn't want to spend the money, and they haven't consulted residents,' he said. A security guard, standing by one of the 'H-stop' barriers defended the scheme, claiming its aim is 'to stop terrorism'. He argued that 'many attacks from all over the world have happened, using cars'. A number of residents have also complained that only emergency vehicles are exempt, with disabled blue badge holders not able to access the street. Kapu Lewis said he 'can no longer care for a relative with disability issues because it's almost impossible to get a vehicle to the property.' However, the council claim that the blue badge issue has been addressed, with new bays and drop-off areas created to support those with mobility issues. Mr Somers said traders and business owners on the market street are also struggling since the introduction of the road blocks, warning that 'it'll seriously impact their livelihoods'. He added that 'one local shop has already seen its takings drop by 50 per cent' because customers – who rely on their cars to take purchases home – can no longer park near the shops. Judy Fox, an antique dealer who's been trading in Notting Hill for over 50 years, said: 'The council has imprisoned us here. Customers cannot get in to collect large antiques. People just use [the blocks] to sit on and take photographs.' However, the council maintains that the barriers are a requirement to ensure public safety. A council spokesman said: 'Our top priority remains the safety and wellbeing of everyone in the community and we believe the current measures strike a reasonable balance between protecting the public and supporting the needs of individuals.' Despite these worries, the council insists that changes are necessary to combat the growing threat of vehicle-based terrorism. The spokesman added: 'The temporary Anti-Terrorism Traffic Regulation Order on Portobello Road was introduced to protect residents, traders, and visitors from the potential threat of vehicle attacks during busy trading periods.'


Daily Mirror
17 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Wayne Rooney is banned from watching son, 15, play football for sad reason
Wayne Rooney has been banned from watching his son Kai play football, with the Manchester United legend's fame meaning the 15-year-old has to tell his dad to stay away Wayne Rooney's celebrity status has emerged as the reason behind the Manchester United legend being barred from watching his son Kai play football. The 15-year-old is the eldest child of Rooney and wife Coleen, who are also parents to three younger boys - Klay, 11, Kit, eight, and Cass, six. Kai became part of the Red Devils academy in 2016, treading the same path as his iconic father who dedicated 13 years to Old Trafford and holds the club's scoring record with 253 goals. Despite being recognised as a promising talent, the young striker has informed his celebrated dad that his presence isn't welcome at matches, owing to the enormous crowds he attracts. The revelation came during Coleen's appearance on ITV's I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here last year. Prior to securing second place behind McFly vocalist Danny Jones, she shared details of her son's difficult choice with her fellow campmates, reports the Express. "That's the thing with kids I think, it's hard to go on days out," Coleen revealed to her jungle companions last December. "Kai told Wayne to stop coming to football games, when he played grassroots tournaments and stuff because he used to get swarmed and he couldn't even watch the game. "How do you say to all of these kids, 'Go away, I'm watching my son?' Adults, it's different you could speak to them, so he [Kai] just said, 'Oh, dad there's no point you coming because you don't even watch me play anyway.' Which is sad, but it can't be helped anyway. At the same time, the fans help you along the way and get you where you are." Despite his father's absence, Kai has continued to shine in the academy and even found the net in United's opening SuperCupNI fixture on Monday. The teenager converted from the penalty spot and mimicked the trademark celebration of Arsenal's latest acquisition, Viktor Gyokeres. Following his assist for Sam O'Brien's opener against West Cork Academy, Kai confidently dispatched the spot-kick before team-mate Abdoulaye Bassirou Nkoto sealed a third. The celebration, which sees Gyokeres mask his face by weaving his fingers together, was devised whilst the Swedish striker was on his holidays, with the forward admitting his mates pushed him to devise his own goal celebration. "Before I got it, my friends were always saying to me to find my own celebration because they were very tired of me doing all kinds of stuff when I was celebrating," he previously said. "I had some time off. We went on vacation together. During that time, we came up with it after a while. We thought it looked good, and I started doing it straightaway. It felt even better on the pitch." Despite the existence of his ban, Rooney, 39, attended the tournament in Northern Ireland alongside his wife to keep a keen eye on their son in action. The ex-Plymouth boss spoke to BBC News NI about his son's career in the academy and the role he plays in his progression. "He has great coaches at Manchester United, so I take a stand-off approach," Rooney said. "I speak to him, but for me it's all about his mentality and his mindset, to make sure he keeps enjoying it – that's the main thing for me. It's a long time since I was here, but it does bring back great memories. "The Super Cup, like many other tournaments, is a fantastic place to go away as a young person; you're away with your team-mates in a hotel together, and it's great for team building." Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.