
Q&A: What does the latest Trump tariff move mean for Ireland?
US President
Donald Trump
has announced
that he will extend the deadline for a trade deal with most other countries – including the
European Union
– from Wednesday July 9th to August 1st. Even this, as Trump himself said, is 'firm, but not 100 per cent firm.' (EU)
The EU goal will be to do some kind of outline agreement with the US in the weeks ahead, to avoid Trump imposing significantly higher
tariffs.
Remember that he had threatened to impose 50 per cent tariffs on many EU imports if no deal is done. Even if tariffs at this scale would have been unlikely to persist – given their massive damage on the US economy as well as Europe – the EU fears damaging action if no deal is done.
We saw late on Monday that Trump is now threatening 25 per cent tariffs on Japan and South Korea, and has also written to a further dozen countries with tariff threats. For now, at least, no letter has been sent to Brussels.
READ MORE
What happens next?
Talks between Washington and Brussels will continue, in a bid to map a way forward which avoids additional tariffs and chips away at those already in place.
[
EU gets three-week extension to negotiate US trade deal to avert escalating tariffs row
Opens in new window
]
But the mood in Brussels seems to be a bit downbeat and uncertain, despite the postponement of the Wednesday deadline and the fact that the EU did not receive a letter. It appears that the US will only accept a deal that keeps the wide 10 per cent additional tariffs imposed on imports in most sectors in place.
Progress seems slow on getting an agreement to reduce the 50 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminium and the 25 per cent on cars, which is a big issue for the German motor sector. And the US is also pushing for changes in rules and regulations to make it easier for US companies to sell into and operate in the EU.
Will this all be sorted by August 1st? That looks most unlikely. At best there might be some kind of outline agreement – but that would require further talks. And it is still possible that the talks reach a crunch point and break down, leading to the US increasing tariffs on EU imports and the EU responding with tariffs of its own. In other words a trade war.
How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax
Listen |
22:03
There are varying views in the EU on how to proceed. Germany wants a quick deal to protest its car exporters, but France is arguing for a more bullish approach, where the EU uses its own economic muscle. So far, the EU has held off retaliatory action for the tariffs Trump has imposed so far, though if there is no wider agreement this cannot continue for ever.
What about Ireland?
The additional 10 per cent tariffs in place are hitting some Irish exports, notably in the food and drink sector – in areas like butter and whiskey, as well as medical products.
Ireland would prefer they were negotiated away – hence Tánaiste Simon Harris talking about a " zero for zero' deal – but this looks unlikely. There are reports that spirits and aircraft could be excluded from tariffs, which would be positive for Ireland.
[
There is a strong logic for US firms to continue making drugs in Ireland for non-US markets
Opens in new window
]
For now, the wider pharma sector – a vital Irish national interest – has not been hit, but there is no clarity on what might happen here.
The Trump administration has undertaken a study of trade in this sector and this could pave the way for special tariffs, perhaps at the 25 per cent level applied to cars. It remains unclear what will happen here, or what other pressure Trump will put on the pharma companies to produce more in the US for the American market.
Ireland would be keen to get pharma closed off as part of any initial deal, removing the threat of a negative report to the US administration spurring further action. But this could be hard to achieve.
So far, the Irish economy has escaped any major hit, thought the uncertainty is affecting investment with many major projects on hold.
[
US threatens EU with 17% tariff on food exports
Opens in new window
]
The 10 per cent tariffs and the fall in the value of the US dollar have also hit exporters to the US. More uncertainty still lies ahead in the short term as trade talks rumble on, most likely amid more threats from Trump and the risk of some kind of trade war which could seriously affect growth. And in the longer term there are questions about whether Ireland will lose some US investment and tax revenues.
There is a more benign scenario, too, where the US and EU avoid all out trade conflict and some kind of agreement emerges without further major tariff hikes.
Why has Trump got so bullish on tariffs once more?
A serious wobble in the financial markets forced him to draw back in April from his initial tariff threats. The recovery in the markets since then, steady US economic indicators and political 'wins' at home and abroad, including the new budget bill, seem to have emboldened him again.
Markets now seem to reckon that the worse will not happen
in terms of a trade war – but serious further tensions could lead to more upheaval and stay Trump's hand.
He is also facing legal challenges in relation to his powers to impose widespread tariffs and we will have to see where these end up, too. As has been the case for months now, much remains up in the air.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
When it comes to climate action, politicians can't see the wolves from the trees
What have experts ever done for us? 'I think the people of this country have had enough of experts,' British Conservative MP Michael Gove famously said during the Brexit debate, as he dismissed concerns about the potential downside impacts of leaving the EU. But Gove and a lot of people thought they knew better. Well, it seems many may have buyer's remorse or 'Bregret' over the decision. Since late July 2022, the share of people who regret Brexit in surveys has consistently been above 50%. As of May 2025, 56% of people in Great Britain believed it was wrong to leave the European Union, compared with 32% who thought it was the right decision. Just when we thought things could not get any worse, the American electorate and Donald Trump said 'Hold my beer'. Even the most pessimistic person could not have been ready for the vengeful gutting of scientific and educational standards, contempt for the law and disdain for facts and the truth during the second Trump term. But like most right-wingers, Trump seems to hold a special contempt for the environment and any person or body protecting the environment. He has launched more attacks on the environment in 100 days than his entire first term — hitting protections for land, oceans, forests, wildlife and climate. But lest we get complacent and superior over on this side of the water, it looks like those in charge in Europe and Ireland are just as willing to ignore experts and academics when it suits them, and particularly when it comes to the environment. Recently, the European Parliament voted to lower the protection status of wolves under the Habitats Directive — with no sound scientific basis. This proposal was a politically motivated U-turn away from science-based conservation. Ireland's own experts in the National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) advised against supporting it, as the wolf remains in an unfavourable conservation status in six out of seven biogeographical regions in Europe. A data-driven reassessment of the species conservation status is due later this year, and the NPWS concluded any change to the species protected status before then was premature. Fine Gael MEP Regina Doherty was quoted as saying: 'A high wolf population can be a threat to biodiversity conservation, farmers, rural communities and tourism.' In fact, wolves play a crucial role in maintaining healthy ecosystems and biodiversity by regulating prey populations, which can lead to a more balanced and diverse ecosystem, the reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park in 1995 being just one example. As for the threat to farmers and rural communities, it seems MEPs could have appraised themselves of some studies before they made their decision. Wolf predation represents a very small fraction of total livestock losses, according to nature strategist Kriton Arsenis. In a LinkedIn post, he referenced a peer-reviewed study from Poland which found grey wolves avoid eating farm animals — even when thousands roam unprotected. In an area where more than 4,000 cattle and 700 horses graze freely each year, scientists found over a two-year period: Only three cattle calves were consumed by wolves; No horse attacks were recorded; Livestock made up just 3% of the wolf diet — and even that was likely scavenged — meaning wolves fed on animals that were already dead; Instead, wolves fed mainly on wild prey — roe deer and wild boar made up over 80% of their diet. And then there's the effect on tourism — but not in the way that Ms Doherty thinks. Nature and wildlife tourism is a growing market. Wildlife tourism centred around wolves is growing across Europe, with organisers highlighting its value for both conservation and rural revitalisation. And it's more profitable than killing wolves. There are already areas with wolves that make 10 times more money organising sightseeing tours than for shooting them, according to the Wilderness Society. Forestry minister Michael Healy-Rae's suggestion to allow forestry on peatlands 'about the dumbest thing we can do'. Many people may not care about wolves. But if we allow these laws to unravel without any evidence or expertise taken into account, what's next. And we in Ireland are not immune from ignoring or threatening to ignore expert and scientific advice, particularly in relation to the environment. 'About the dumbest thing we can do' from the point of view of climate action were the words of Peter Thorne, a professor of climate change at Maynooth University in response to forestry minister Michael Healy-Rae's suggestion to allow forestry on peatlands, which would be a reversal of Government policy, which prohibits afforestation on deep peat. The Irish Peatland Conservation Council warned such actions would have severe environmental consequences and undermine Ireland's commitments to biodiversity and climate action. Peatlands are one of Ireland's most valuable ecosystems, serving as critical carbon sinks, supporting unique biodiversity, and regulating water quality. Scientific research has repeatedly shown afforestation on peatlands disrupts their natural hydrology, accelerates carbon release, and damages habitats essential for rare and endangered species. Of course, the minister's suggestion is cloaked in a faux argument that if you don't plant forestry in bogs, the only other option is to import them: a Sophie's Choice of tree planting. You should always be wary when you're offered a binary choice to a complex problem. More recently, concerns have been raised over Government plans which will lower protections for rivers and lakes by labelling them 'heavily modified water bodies'. Sustainable Water Network chief executive Sinéad O'Brien said the Government's plan to lower protections for one in 10 of our rivers, lakes, and coastal waters, without evidence or proper explanation, shows disregard for the public. This is all starting to sound familiar. We need experts, academics and scientists to help us make decisions based on the best knowledge, information, evidence and science available. The laws of science and nature do not really care about your political affiliations, party policy or whether you think the world is flat — they just carry on regardless. They can't just be discarded on a whim or because the political wind has changed direction. And you ignore them at your peril, as we're finding out with our changing climate.


Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Vacant property in central Dublin
Sir, – What is it about the Irish tax code (or the broader set of incentives faced by property owners in Ireland, Dublin especially) that makes it more lucrative to leave properties derelict, often for many years, rather than develop them for retail or, better yet, housing? On a recent visit to Dublin, I was struck by the number of derelict buildings on almost every street in the city centre. On the same trip I visited Madrid, and in an evening ramble around central Madrid I failed to see a single derelict site. Is there not some low hanging fruit here that could be picked to quickly address the housing problem in Dublin? – Yours, etc. READ MORE MARK A WYNNE, Dallas, Texas.

The Journal
5 hours ago
- The Journal
Hamas agrees to release 10 hostages as part of Gaza truce talks
LAST UPDATE | 25 mins ago HAMAS HAS SAID it has agreed to release 10 hostages held in Gaza as part of ongoing ceasefire talks with Israel, adding it was working to overcome hurdles despite the 'difficulty of negotiations'. The statement came after four days of indirect talks brokered by Qatar and as the United States signalled its belief that agreement for a 60-day truce would be struck before the end of the week. 'In the framework of [Hamas's] commitment to ensuring the success of ongoing efforts, the movement displayed the required flexibility and agreed to release 10 prisoners,' the group said in a statement. It said that the 'core points remain under negotiations', notably the flow of aid, Israel's withdrawal and guarantees for a permanent ceasefire. 'Despite the difficulty of negotiations over these issues until now due to the intransigence of the occupation, we continue to work seriously and with a positive spirit with the mediators to overcome the hurdles,' it said. Advertisement Of 251 hostages taken by Hamas on 7 October 2023, 49 are still held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military believes to have died. Israel earlier appeared to fall in behind US President Donald Trump and his optimism for an end to the conflict. Israeli army chief Eyal Zamir said in a televised address that military action had prepared the ground for a deal that would bring home the Israeli hostages. Netanyahu, who after talks with Trump in Washington last night was still uncompromising in his determination to crush Hamas, said he believed an agreement was on the horizon. Hamas has vowed that 'Gaza will not surrender'. One Palestinian source familiar with the negotiations in Qatar said the Israeli delegation was 'mostly listening rather than negotiating, which reflects Netanyahu's ongoing policy of obstruction and sabotaging any potential agreement'.