logo
Proposed new auto loan tax deduction could help buyers get break on interest

Proposed new auto loan tax deduction could help buyers get break on interest

Yahoo03-06-2025
If taxpayers actually end up seeing a new, proposed tax break on the interest borrowers pay on car loans, at least some can claim it all started in the Motor City.
President Donald Trump, who was running for his second term last year, dropped that car loan bombshell during his comments at the Detroit Economic Club on Oct. 10, 2024, less than a month before the presidential election. Trump said then that he planned to propose making interest on car loans fully deductible.
Now, we're getting more of the details for what such a deduction could look like based on what was tucked into the broad tax plan released by House Republicans on May 12.
The White House calls the proposed legislation "One, big, beautiful bill."
If you're looking to buy one, big, beautiful SUV or truck or car, pay attention to the haggling in Washington to see whether a new deduction on car loans will become a reality.
The good news: The GOP bill calls for an above-the-line deduction of up to $10,000 in car loan interest during a given taxable year. You'd pay no tax on that interest, if you qualified.
Creating an above-the-line deduction means that the proposed tax break on car loan interest would not just apply to the roughly 10% of taxpayers who itemize deductions. It also would apply to the vast majority of people who do not itemize and instead claim the standard deduction.
The standard deduction became far more prevalent after the major tax changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 — the Trump tax cut initiative that expires at the end of 2025. Trump is seeking to extend those tax cuts that are set to expire later this year.
The so-so news: All new car and truck buyers who take out a car loan won't qualify for the deduction. Much will depend on your income — and the car or truck that you buy.
Under the plan, House Republicans are calling for making the auto loan interest deduction limited to $10,000. But the deduction would phase out by $200 for every $1,000 of modified adjusted gross income above $100,000 for single filers and $200,000 for joint filers, according to an analysis by the Tax Foundation, a nonprofit research organization.
As a result, a single person with $149,001 in income or more would not receive any deduction, according to Mark Luscombe, principal analyst for Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting in Riverwoods, Illinois. The deduction phases out entirely, based on his calculations, for a married couple making $249,001 or more.
More personal finance: Restart of student debt collections expected to trigger more student loan scams
The auto loan interest deduction would be temporary under the GOP plan, and it would apply to auto loans that are taken out in 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028.
If you took out a five-year car loan in 2027, for example, you could only expect two years for a deduction on your car loan interest to apply at this point.
The wording of the bill indicates that you would only get the deduction for those specified four years, Luscombe said.
Again, the tax rule has yet to be approved, so don't bank on that tax deduction just yet.
We're talking about a tax break for buyers of qualified passenger vehicles that are "manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways," according to the House Ways and Means Committee section-by-section breakdown of the bill.
The vehicle could be a car, minivan, van, sport utility vehicle, pickup truck or even a motorcycle.
An applicable passenger vehicle for the tax break also would include all-terrain vehicles and recreational vehicles, if their final assembly took place in the United States.
The tax break would apply only to auto loans that were taken out to buy cars or trucks that have their final assembly in the United States.
It's debatable at this point whether the tax break would apply to both new car loans, as well as used car loans. The language in a Ways and Means Committee states: "No tax on car loan interest." It does not specify if that applies only to car loans taken out by a consumer to buy a new car. It also does not state whether a car loan for buying a used car would apply.
Luscombe said it's not clear what the odds are yet for Congress to pass a car loan deduction or even a deduction with the same rules outlined in the Ways and Means bill.
Bills were introduced in both the House and the Senate that focused on the auto loan interest deduction. Detroit Free Press Washington correspondent Todd Spangler reported about one bill by U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga, which is dubbed the "Made in America Motors Act." Huizenga, R-Holland Township, introduced that legislation May 7, which would allow a deduction of up to $2,500 in a given year for interest paid on a loan to buy a motor vehicle if it was built in the United States.
The differences in various bills are likely to emerge and be debated in the coming weeks.
"Any provision is likely to be weighed in terms of its impact on the overall budget numbers in trying to make the overall bill meet the budget requirements," Luscombe said.
A key point to understand: Your entire monthly car payment would not be fully deductible. If you're paying $834 a month for your car loan, you're not looking at a $10,000 a year deduction.
Jonathan Smoke, chief economist for Cox Automotive, said consumers need to understand that car loans are amortized so that each payment covers interest and principal. You're not paying the same amount of interest each year on your car loan.
More of your payment goes to cover interest, Smoke said, in the first years of the loan. Therefore, the maximum tax deduction would be in year one and then it would get smaller in future years.
Let's assume an interest rate of 9.5% on a six-year car loan. On a $42,000 car loan in this example, the borrower would pay $768 a month. The first year of interest would add up to a bit more than $3,750 in this example.
For someone at a tax rate of 24%, that deduction would reduce taxes by roughly $900. But it's important to note that the deduction would decline in subsequent years of that car loan.
It's also key to note the dollar value of the deduction would be bigger for someone who makes more money and pays a higher tax rate. It would be smaller for someone who earns less money and pays a lower tax rate.
Ivan Drury, director of insights at Edmunds, said interest over the life of a loan is often overlooked as consumers become focused on monthly payment.
Interest rates have hovered around 7% for the last two years, he said, and the amount financed has been at or slightly above $40,000.
As a result, consumers are paying nearly double the amount of interest that they had in previous years.
"While a tax deduction won't wash away all of the increased costs associated with purchasing a new car in today's age, it will certainly dull the edge," Drury said.
If the legislation is approved by Congress, consumers would need to pay attention to the interest rate they're paying, Drury said, especially since this deduction wouldn't be available across the board or even on some models where different trim levels are assembled outside of the United States.
Another obvious but essential point: You'd need to qualify for a car loan to be able to take advantage of this tax break.
Increasingly, experts warn more consumers are experiencing financial fragility, struggling to manage their money and their debt.
Many consumers now expect that it will be far tougher to find an affordable car loan and many fear rejections in obtaining credit, according to a survey related to credit access by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
The survey takes into account what it calls "discouraged borrowers" or those respondents who stated they did not apply for any credit in the past 12 months because they did not think they would get approved, despite reporting a need to borrow. Those discouraged borrowers reached 8.5% in the February survey, the highest level since the start of the survey in October 2013.
For auto loan applications, the survey noted, the average perceived probability of a rejection reached 33.5%, the highest level since the start of the series.
Cox Automotive's research indicated that consumers saw credit access dip in April, particularly for those with lower credit scores. "Lenders were more cautious about extending credit to higher-risk borrowers," according to Cox Automotive.
A variety of issues could dampen someone's ability to buy a car this year or next — loss of a job, fear of losing a job, a credit score that was dinged in 2025 by nonpayment of student loans. Credit scores for student loan borrowers started getting hit again this year, as delinquencies resumed appearing on credit scores.
High car prices and high interest rates on car loans are another issue that can cause someone to put off buying a car or truck. Higher tariffs on many cars will drive up prices, too.
Ford Motor Co., for example, raised prices in May on the Mustang Mach-E electric SUV, Maverick pickup and Bronco Sport, which are built in Mexico. Prices increased by as much as $2,000 on some models, as first reported by Reuters.
In addition, many drivers owe more than their current car is worth, given the high prices they paid during the pandemic and used car values now, cutting into the potential trade-in value.
The expectation is that U.S. car and light truck sales will fall behind last year's red-hot run when it comes to sales in 2025, 2026 and 2027, according to a forecast issued in May by University of Michigan economists.
Right now, U-M economists expect U.S. passenger vehicle sales to drop sharply later this year, from an annual pace of 16.4 million in the first quarter of 2025 to 14.8 million in the third quarter once the tariffs on vehicle imports drive up prices for new cars and trucks.
So, a tax break on the interest you pay each year on your car loan certainly could rev up an industry facing plenty of challenges.
Free Press Washington correspondent Todd Spangler contributed to this report.
Contact personal finance columnist Susan Tompor: stompor@freepress.com. Follow her on X @tompor.
This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Proposed car loan interest tax deduction: Who would qualify
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP Split on Gaza Grows, as MTG Calls Crisis a 'Genocide'
GOP Split on Gaza Grows, as MTG Calls Crisis a 'Genocide'

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GOP Split on Gaza Grows, as MTG Calls Crisis a 'Genocide'

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, accompanied by U.S. President Donald Trump (L), speaks during a dinner at the White House on July 07, 2025. Credit - Andrew Harnik—Getty Images Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a right-wing lawmaker closely identified with President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, this week became the first Republican in Congress to describe the situation in Gaza as a 'genocide.' 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct. 7 in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene, who represents Georgia, said in a social media post Monday evening. The post was in response to fellow Republican Rep. Randy Fine, who had posted last week on X: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away.' Greene's declaration represented a sharp turn for her on the fraught issue of Gaza. Since Hamas' terror attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which over 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostage, virtually all prominent Republicans have been in lockstep in support of Israel's military campaign. Weeks after Hamas' attack, Greene filed a resolution to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, over her criticism of Israel. Read More: The Malnutrition Crisis in Gaza Will Outlive the War, Experts Warn The shift from Greene was the latest sign of a broader debate within the Republican Party over Gaza. Greene's words came the same day as Trump seemed to break with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Netanyahu's claims that there is no starvation in Gaza. Trump made clear to reporters at an event in Scotland with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he believed the starvation there was 'real.' 'We're going to set up food centers, and we're going to do it in conjunction with some very good people,' Trump said. 'We're going to supply funds… and we're going to spend a little money on some food. Other nations are joining us.' Starmer later said on Tuesday that the U.K. would recognize Palestine as a state if Israel did not make 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza' and make moves towards 'sustainable, long-term peace.' Though Trump did not explicitly condemn Netanyahu, he did acknowledge he 'told Bibi [Netanyahu] that you have to maybe do it a different way.' Republicans are more divided on the issue than they have been since the Oct. 7 attack. While a few fellow Republicans have joined Greene's condemnation—'More need to speak out,' she said in response to a post from Rep. Lance Gooden of Texas about Gaza's 'humanitarian crisis'—others are insisting the fault over the situation still lies with Hamas. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he 'shares the President's view,' but also accused Hamas of intercepting and diverting much of the food aid going to Gaza. 'The humanitarian thing obviously when you see people hurting in a need like that, is to want to help meet that need and alleviate that pain,' Thune said at his weekly press conference. 'I think all of us want to see, obviously, a peaceful solution there that gets the hostages freed and ends the reign and rule of Hamas in the region. But in the meantime, do everything we can to ease the pain and the hunger that's afflicting so many of the people in that region.' North Carolina's Republican Sen. Thom Thillis simultaneously told The Hill that Hamas deserves blame and that Trump was 'right to hold elected [officials] accountable,' saying he would 'encourage Mr. Netanyahu to just be sensitive to that.' Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Chris Hollen of Maryland said Sunday on CBS's Face The Nation that claims that Hamas was stealing U.N.-delivered food were a "big lie." Many others in the Republican Party remain staunch in their support for Netanyahu's government. 'I want to be crystal clear on my thoughts regarding the catastrophe in Gaza: I blame Hamas 100%,' South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham said on X on Tuesday. 'If you want this suffering to end, call on Hamas to lay down their weapons and their leaders to take safe passage out of Gaza. The criticism of Israel is beyond the pale as they are fighting for their very existence.' The split within the GOP comes amid mounting pressure from Democrats and the international community for both Israel and the U.S. to better address starvation in Gaza. On Tuesday, 40 Senators sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, imploring them and Trump to address starvation in Gaza with the resumption of ceasefire talks. The Senators also expressed opposition to 'permanent forced displacement of the Palestinian people.' 'To prevent the situation from getting even worse, we urge you to advocate for a large-scale expansion of humanitarian assistance and services throughout the Gaza Strip, including through the use of experienced multilateral bodies and NGOs that can get life-saving aid directly to those in need and prevent diversion,' the letter reads. Contact us at letters@

Trump says US and Pakistan have concluded a trade deal
Trump says US and Pakistan have concluded a trade deal

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says US and Pakistan have concluded a trade deal

By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday his administration struck a deal with Pakistan in which Washington will work with Islamabad in developing the South Asian nation's oil reserves. "We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves," Trump wrote on social media. "We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership." Trump's social media post did not provide further details on the deal between the U.S. and Pakistan. The Pakistani embassy in Washington had no immediate comment. Last week, Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar said the United States and Pakistan were "very close" to a trade deal that could come within days, after he met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Friday. Under Trump, Washington has attempted to renegotiate trade agreements with many countries that he threatened with tariffs over what he calls unfair trade relations. Many economists dispute Trump's characterization. The U.S. State Department and Pakistan's foreign ministry, in separate statements after Rubio's meeting with Dar, said last week the two top diplomats stressed in their discussion the importance of expanding trade and ties in critical minerals and mining. "Our teams have been here in Washington discussing, having virtual meetings and a committee has been tasked by the prime minister to fine tune now," Dar said last week about U.S.-Pakistan talks.

Could Trump Accounts Turn American Babies Into Tomorrow's Millionaires? Here's What Experts Say
Could Trump Accounts Turn American Babies Into Tomorrow's Millionaires? Here's What Experts Say

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Could Trump Accounts Turn American Babies Into Tomorrow's Millionaires? Here's What Experts Say

A new federal savings initiative, known as 'Trump accounts,' signed into law by President Donald Trump, could significantly alter the financial future of millions of American children. What Happened: The Trump Accounts initiative, part of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, will provide a $1,000 head start to every baby born in the U.S. The accounts will allow for additional contributions from families and employers, potentially leading to the creation of retirement millionaires from today's youth, reported Newsweek. These accounts, much like traditional retirement accounts, provide tax-advantaged growth and allow penalty-free withdrawals after age 59 and a half. Early withdrawals may also be permitted for certain purposes, such as education costs, purchasing a first home, or starting a business. Trending: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics—now it's your turn to Scott Hefty, senior wealth manager and founding partner at Serae Wealth told the publication, 'This account reflects a broader shift in how Americans build wealth across generations. We are moving toward a model where families, employers, and the federal government each play a part.' Matt Hylland, a financial planner at Arnold and Mote Wealth Management explained, with a 7% annual return, investing $5,000 yearly could grow to about $6.95 million by age 65. A more modest $1,000 yearly investment would yield around $1.46 million. On a more conservative note, Hylland stated that $1,000 government-seeded account left untouched could grow to about $93,380 by age 65. 'If the seed contribution continues beyond potential for long-term impact grows even further,' he It Matters: The 'Trump accounts' align with the 'Start Young' philosophy of billionaire investor Warren Buffett. The tax-deferred investment account will be for each child born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028. The government would seed each account with $1,000, and guardians could contribute up to $5,000 annually. Notably, consistently contributing the $5,000 maximum requires parents to be financially well-off, as they likely have other savings commitments like 401(k)s. The IRS is expected to clarify tax rules before the accounts launch, which will affect savings outcomes. However, not everyone agrees that this is the best approach. Some critics argue that the plan may not be the smartest idea, as it would give parents a new, stock-indexed nest egg they could add to, but not touch, until the child turns 18. Furthermore, a Benzinga reader poll suggests that parents could use the $1,000 investment accounts to invest in mutual funds, ETFs, and individual stocks, including fast-growing Magnificent Seven stocks like NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL) being top preferences. Read Next: $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends Image via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Could Trump Accounts Turn American Babies Into Tomorrow's Millionaires? Here's What Experts Say originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store